Progress and challenges to the recognition and reward of the scholarship of teaching in higher education

Higher Education Research and Development

Volumn 30, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 25-38

  Chalmers, Denise ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA   (Australia)

Author keywords

Reward and recognition; Scholarship of teaching; Status of teaching; Tenure and promotion

Indexed keywords

EID: 78650466716     PISSN: 07294360     EISSN: 14698366     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/07294360.2011.536970     Document Type: Review

References (62)

1. Anderson, V. (2007). Contingent and marginalized: Academic development and part-time teachers. International Journal for Academic Development, 12(2), 111-121.
2. Andresson, P., & Roxa, T. (2004). The pedagogical academy: A way to encourage and reward scholarly teaching. European Journal of Engineering Education, 29(4), 559-569.
3. Asmar, C. (2002). Strategies to enhance learning and teaching in a research-extensive university. Journal for Academic Development, 7(1), 18-30.
4. Badley, B. (2003). Improving the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 40(3), 303-309.
5. Badri, M.A., & Abdulla, M.H. (2004). Awards of excellence in institutions of higher education: An AHP approach. International Journal of Educational Management, 18(4/5), 224-242.
6. Benjamin, J. (2000). The Scholarship of Teaching in teams: What does it look like in practice? Higher Education Research and Development, 19(2), 191-204.
7. Boshier, R. (2009). Why is the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning such a hard sell? Higher Education Research and Development, 28(1), 1-15.
8. Boyer, E. (1990). Scholarship reconsidered: Priorities of the professoriate. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
9. Braxton, J.M., & Del Favero, M. (2002). Evaluating scholarship performance: Traditional and emergent assessment templates. New Direction in Institutional Research, 114(Summer), 19-31.
10. Braxton, J.M., Luckey, T.M., & Helland, P.A. (2006). Ideal and actual value patterns towards domains of scholarship in three types of colleges and universities. New Direction in Institutional Research, 129(Spring), 67-76.
11. Chalmers, D. (2007). A review of Australian and international quality systems and indicators of learning and teaching. V1.2. Retrieved August 3, 2009, http://www.catl.uwa.edu.au/projects/tqi
12. Chalmers, D., & Thomson, K. (2008). Snapshot of teaching and learning practice in Australian universities. Retrieved August 3, 2009, http://www.catl.uwa.edu.au/projects/tqi
13. Chalmers, D., Lee, K., & Walker, B. (2008). International and national quality teaching and learning performance models currently in use. Retrieved August 3, 2009, http://www.catl.uwa.edu.au/projects/tqi
14. Cruz, L., Ellern, J., Ford, G., Moss, H., & White, B. (2009). Recognition and reward: SOTL and the tenure process at a regional comprehensive university. MountainRise: The International Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning,Summer, 1-27.
15. Department for Education and Skills (DfES). (2003). The future of higher education. London: Department for Education and Skills.
16. Diamond, R.M. (1993). Changing priorities and the faculty reward system. New Directions in Higher Education, 81. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.
17. Diamond, R.M. (2002). Defining scholarship for the twenty-first century. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 90(Summer), 73-79.
18. Dooris, M.J. (2002). Institutional research to enhance faculty performance. New Directions for Institutional Research, 114(Summer), 85-95.
19. El-Khawas, E. (1996). Campus trends: Adjusting to new realities. Higher Education Panel Report, 86. Washington, DC: American Council on Education.
20. Elton, L. (2009). Continuing professional development in higher education: The role of Scholarship and Teaching and Learning. International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 3(1), 1-10.
21. Fairweather, J. (2002). The ultimate faculty evaluation: Promotion and tenure decisions. New Directions for Institutional Research, 114(Summer), 97-108.
22. Fairweather, J. (2005). Beyond the rhetoric: Trends in the relative value of teaching and research in faculty salaries. Journal of Higher Education, 76(4), 401-422.
23. Frame, P., Johnson, M., & Rosie, A. (2006). Reward or award? Reflections on the initial experiences of winners of a National Teaching Fellowship. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 43(4), 409-419.
24. Gibbs, G. (2001). Analysis of strategies for learning and teaching: Research report. HEFCE 01/37a.
25. Glassick, C.E., Huber, M.T., & Maeroff, G.I. (1997). Scholarship and the purpose of the university. San Francisco: Jossey- Bass.
26. Gordon, G., D'Andrea, V., Gosling, D., & Stefani, L. (2003). Building capacity for change: Research on the Scholarship of Teaching. Report to HEFCE.
27. Gosling, D. (2004). The impact of a national policy to enhance teaching quality and the status, England, the United Kingdom. Quality Assurance in Education, 12(3), 136-149.
28. Hardre, P., & Cox, M. (2008). Evaluating faculty work: Expectations and standards of faculty performance in research universities. Research Papers in Education, 24(4), 383-419.
29. Healy, M., & Jenkins, A. (2003). Educational development through the disciplines. In R. Macdonald and H. Eggins (Eds.), The scholarship of academic development. Buckingham: Open University Press and SRHE.
30. Henkel, M. (1997). Academic values and the university as a corporate enterprise. Higher Education Quarterly, 51(2), 134-143.
31. Henkel, M. (2005). Academic identity and autonomy in a changing policy environment. Higher Education, 49, 155-176.
32. Higher Education Academy (HEA). (2009). Reward and recognition of teaching in higher education. Interim Report. Leicester, UK: Higher Education Academy and GENIE Centre for Excellence in Teaching and Learning, University of Leicester.
33. Higher Education Funding Council for England (HEFCE). (2009). Enhancement, learning and teaching. Retrieved August 3, 2009, http://www.hefce.ac.uk/learning/
34. Huber, M.T. (2004). Balancing acts: The Scholarship of Teaching and Learning in academic careers. Washington, DC: American Association for Higher Education and the Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching.
35. Hutchings, P., & Shulman, L.S. (1999). The Scholarship of Teaching: New elaborations, new developments. Change, 31(5), 11-15.
36. Hutchings, P. (2000). Approaching the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning. Menlo Park, CA: The Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching.
37. Jackson, M. (2006). Great classroom teaching and more: Awards for outstanding teaching evaluated. International Journal of Educational Management, 20(4), 261-278.
38. Kreber, C. (2002). Controversy and consensus on the scholarship of university teaching movement. Studies in Higher Education, 27(2), 151-167.
39. Kreber, C. (2005). Charting a critical course on the scholarship of university teaching movement. Studies in Higher Education, 30(4), 389-405.
40. Kreber, C. (2006). Promoting inquiry-based learning through educational development units. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 107(Fall), 79-88.
41. McKinney, K., Jarvis, P., Klass, T., & others (2007). The status of SoTL at Illinois State University. Retrieved October 1, 2009, from http://www.sotl.ilstu.edu/downloads/pdf/sotlQuant2007.pdf
42. Menges, R.J. (1996) Awards to individuals: In honoring exemplary teaching. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 65(Spring), 3-10.
43. Nicholls, G. (2004). Scholarship in teaching as a core professional value: What does this mean to the academic? Teaching in Higher Education, 9(1), 27-42.
44. O'Meara, K.A. (2005). Encouraging multiple forms of scholarship in faculty reward systems: Does it make a difference? Research in Higher Education, 46(5), 479-510.
45. O'Meara, K.A. (2006). Encouraging multiple forms of scholarship in faculty reward systems: Have academic cultures really changed? New Directions in Institutional Research, 129(Spring), 77-95.
46. Preparing Academics to Teach in Higher Education (PATHE). (2009). Retrieved November 1, 2009, from http://www.flinders.edu.au/teach/foundations/pathe.html
47. Palmer, A., & Collins, R. (2006). Perceptions of rewarding excellence: Motivation and the Scholarship of Teaching. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 30(2), 193-205.
48. Paulsen, M.B., & Feldman, K.A. (2006). Exploring the dimensions of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning: Analytics for an emerging literature. New Directions in Institutional Research, 129(Spring), 21-36.
49. Postereff, L., Lindblom-Ylanne, S., & Nevgi, A. (2007). The effect of pedagogical training on teacher education. Teacher and Teaching Education, 23(5), 557-571.
50. Powney, J., Hamilton, S., Wilson, V., Kirk, S., Edward, S., Proctor, J., et al. (2003). Appointment, retention and promotion of academic staff in higher education institutions. Report to HEFCE by the Scottish Council for reaching in Education, University of Glasgow and Nottingham Trent University.
51. Prosser, M., Ramsden, P., Trigwell, K., & Martin, E. (2003). Dissonance in experience of teaching and its relation to the quality of student learning. Studies in Higher Education, 28(1), 37-48.
52. Ramsden, P. (2008). The future of higher education teaching and the student experience. Retrieved August 3, 2009, from, http://www.dius.gov.uk/higher_education/shape_and_structure/he_debate/~/media/publications/T/teaching_and_student_experience_131008
53. Ramsden, P., & Martin, E. (1996). Recognition of good university teaching: Policies from an Australian study. Studies in Higher Education, 21(3), 299-315.
54. Richlin, L. (2001). Scholarly teaching and the Scholarship of Teaching. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 86(Summer), 57-68.
55. Ryan, Y., Fraser, K., & Dearn, J. (2005). Towards a profession of tertiary teaching: Academic attitudes in Australia. In K. Fraser (Ed.), Educational development and leadership in higher education. London: RoutledgeFalmer.
56. Skelton, A. (2004). Understanding 'teaching excellence' in higher education: A critical evaluation of the National Teaching Fellowships Scheme. Studies in Higher Education, 29(4), 451-468.
57. Stromquist, N.P., Gil-Anton, M., Colatrella, C., Mabokela, R.O., Smolentseva, A., & Balbachevsky, E. (2007). The contemporary professoriate: Towards a diversified or segmented profession. Higher Education Quarterly, 61(2), 114-135.
58. Swedish National Agency for Higher Education. (2008). National quality assurance for the period 2007-2012. Report 2008:4.R. Retrieved October 1, 2009, from http://www.hsv.se/download/18.4103c723118f5a4ec8f8000350/0804R.pdf
59. Trigwell, K., & Shale, S. (2004). Student learning and the scholarship of university teaching. Studies in Higher Education, 29(4), 523-536.
60. Trowler, P., Fanghanel, J., & Wareham, T. (2005). Freeing the chi of change: The Higher Education Academy and enhancing teaching and learning in higher education. Studies in Higher Education, 30(4), 427-444.
61. Witman, P.D., & Richlin, L. (2007). The status of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning in the disciplines. International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 1(1), 1-16.
62. Young, P. (2006). Out of balance: Lecturers' perceptions of differential status and rewards in relation to teaching and research. Teaching in Higher Education, 11(2), 191-202.