Encouraging multiple forms of scholarship in faculty reward systems: Does it make a difference?

Research in Higher Education

Volumn 46, Issue 5, 2005, Pages 479-510

  O'Meara, Kerry Ann ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS   (United States)

Author keywords

Broader definition of scholarship; Reform in faculty evaluation

Indexed keywords

EID: 21444438490     PISSN: 03610365     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11162-005-3362-6     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Aldersley, S. F. (1995). Upward drift is alive and well: Research/doctoral model still attractive to institutions. Change 27(5): 50-56.
2. Austenson, R. A. (1997). Faculty relations and professional development: Best practices for the chief academic officer. In: Martin, J., Samels, J., and Associates (eds.), First Among Equals: The Role of the Chief Academic Officer. The Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore.
3. Baldwin, R. G. (1990). Faculty career stages and implications for professional development In: Schuster, J. H., and Wheeler, D. W. (eds.), Enhancing Faculty Careers: Strategies for Development and Renewal, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA, pp. 20-40.
4. Berberet, J. (1999). The professorate and institutional citizenship: Toward a scholarship of service. Liberal Education 85(4): 33-39.
5. Boice, R. (1992). The New Faculty Member. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco.
6. Boyer, E. (1990). Scholarship Reconsidered, Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching, Princeton.
7. Braskamp, L. (2003). Fostering Student Development Through Faculty Development: A National Survey of Chief Academic Officers at Church-related Colleges, Loyola University, Chicago, IL.
8. Braxton, J. M. and Hargens, L. L. (1996). Variation among academic disciplines: Analytical frameworks and research. In Smart, J. C. (ed.), Handbook of Theory and Research, Agathon Press, New York, Vol. II, pp. 1-46.
9. Braxton, J., Luckey, W., and Holland, P. (2002). Institutionalizing a Broader View of Scholarship Through Boyer's Four Domains, Jossey-Bass, New Jersey.
10. Chait, R. (2002). Why tenure? Why now?. In: Chait, R. (eds.), The Questions of Tenure, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, pp. 6-31.
11. Clark, B. R. (1987). The Academic life: Small Worlds, Different Worlds, The Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching, New York.
12. Creamer, E. (1998). Assessing faculty publication productivity: Issues of equity. ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report, 26 (2). Washington, DC: George Washington University.
13. Dey, E. L., Milem, J. F., and Berger, J. B. (1997). Changing patterns of publication productivity: Accumulative advantage or institutional isomorphism?. Sociology of Education 70(4): 308-323.
14. Diamond, R. M. (1993). Instituting change in faculty reward systems. In: Diamond R. M., and Adam B. E. (eds.), Recognizing Faculty Work: Reward Systems for the Year 2000. New Directions for Higher Education, No 81. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, pp. 13-22.
15. Diamond, R. M. (1999). Aligning Faculty Rewards with Institutional Mission: Statements, Policies, and Guidelines, Anker, Bolton, MA.
16. Diamond, R., and Adam, B. (1997). Changing Priorities at Research Universities: 1991-1996, Center for Instructional Development, Syracuse University, Syracuse, NY.
17. Driscoll, A., and Lynton, E. (1999). Making Outreach Visible: A Guide to Documenting Professional Service and Outreach, American Association for Higher Education, Washington, DC.
18. Finnegan, D. E., and Gamson, Z. F. (1996). Disciplinary adaptations to research culture in comprehensive institutions. Review of Higher Education 19(2): 141-177.
19. Fowler, F. (1993). Survey Research Methods (2nd ed.), Sage, California.
20. Glassick, C. E., Huber, M. T., and Maeroff, G. I. (1997). Scholarship Assessed: Evaluation of the Professorate, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco.
21. Huber, M. (1998). Community College Faculty: Attitudes and Trends, 1997, National center for postsecondary improvement, Stanford, CA.
22. Huber, M. (2002). Faculty evaluation and the development of academic careers. In: Carol Colbeck (eds.), Evaluating Faculty Performance, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco.
23. Hutchings, P., and Shulman, L. (1999). The scholarship of teaching: New elaborations, new developments. Change 31(5): 11-15.
24. Kezar, A. (2000). Higher education research at the millennium: Still trees without fruit?. The Review of Higher Education 23(4): 443-468.
25. Lynton, E. (1995). Making the Case for Professional Service, American Association for Higher Education, Washington, DC.
26. Martin J., Samels J., and Associates, (eds.) (1997). First Among Equals: The Role of the Chief Academic Officer. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
27. Morphew, C. C. (2002). A rose by any other name: Which colleges became universities. Review of Higher Education 25(2): 207-224.
28. O'Meara, K. (1997). Rewarding Faculty Professional Service, Working paper #19. Boston: New England Resource for Higher Education.
29. O'Meara, K. A. (2001). Scholarship unbound: Assessing service as scholar ship for Promotion and tenure. In: Altbach, P. (eds.), Studies in Higher Education Dissertation Series, Routledge Falmer, NY.
30. O'Meara, K. (2005a). Encouraging Multiple Forms of Scholarship in Faculty Work-Life. Amherst, MA: Unpublished manuscript.
31. O'Meara, K. (2005b). Effects of encouraging multiple forms of scholarship nationwide and across institutional types. In O'Meara, K. and Rice, R. E. (eds.), Faculty Priorities Reconsidered: Rewarding Multiple Forms of Scholarship. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco.
32. Park, S. (1996). Research, teaching, and service: Why shouldn't women's work count?. The Journal of Higher Education 67(1): 46-84.
33. Prince, G. S. Jr. (2000). A liberal arts college perspective. In: Ehrlich, T. (eds.), Civic Responsibility and Higher Education, Oryx Press, Phoenix, AZ, pp. 249-262.
34. Rice, R. E. (1996). Making a Place for the New American Scholar, American Association for Higher Education, Washington, DC.
35. Rice, R. E., and Sorcinelli, M. (2002). Can the tenure process be improved?. In: Chait, R. (eds.), The Questions of Tenure, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
36. Rice, E., Sorcinelli, M., and Austin, A. E. (2000). Heeding new voices Academic careers for a new generation. New Pathways Working Paper Series inquiry #7, Washington DC, American Association for Higher Education.
37. Ruscio, K. P. (1987). The distinctive scholarship of the selective liberal arts college. Journal of Higher Education 58(2): 205-222.
38. Tierney, W. G., and Bensimon, E. M. (1996). Promotion and Tenure: Community and Socialization in Academe, State University of New York Press, Albany.
39. Tierney, W. G., and Rhoads, R. A. (1993). Enhancing promotion, tenure and beyond: Faculty socialization as a cultural process. ASHE ERIC Higher Education Report No. 6.
40. Ward K., and Wolf-Wendel L. (2004). Academic life and motherhood: Variations by institutional type. Paper presented at the Annual Conference of the Association for the Study of Higher Education, Portland, Oregon.