Two decades of generalizable evidence on U.S. instruction from national surveys

Teachers College Record

Volumn 113, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 561-610

  Camburn, Eric M ^a   Won Han, Seong ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 78650387639     PISSN: 01614681     EISSN: 14679620     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (228)

1. Ball, D. L., & Rowan, B. (2004). Introduction: Measuring instruction. Elementary School Journal, 105(1), 3-10. (Pubitemid 39427415)
2. Barr, R., & Dreeben, R. (1983). How schools work. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
3. Becker, H.J. (1999). Internet use by teachers: Conditions of professional use and teacher-directed student use. Teaching Learning, and Computing: 1998 National survey. Report #1. Irvine, CA: Center for Research on Information Technology and Organizations the University of California Irvine and the University of Minnesota.
4. Betts, J. R., & Shkolnik, J. L. (1999). The behavioral effects of variations in class size: The case of math teachers. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 21(2), 193-213.
5. Brookhart, S. M. (1997). Effects of the classroom assessment environment on mathematics and science achievement. Journal of Educational Research, 90(6), 323-330.
6. Burkam, D. T., Lee, V. E., & Smerdon, B. A. (1997). Gender and science learning early in high school: Subject matter and laboratory experiences. American Educational Research Journal, 34(2), 297-331. (Pubitemid 127353575)
7. Butty, J.-A. L. M. (2001). Teacher instruction, student attitudes, and mathematics performance among 10th and 12th grade black and Hispanic students. Journal of Negro Education, 70(1/2), 19-37.
8. Byrnes, J. P. (2003). Factors predictive of mathematics achievement in white, black, and Hispanic 12th graders, Journal of Educational Psychology, 95(2), 316-326.
9. Condron, D. J. (2003). An early start: Effects of ability grouping on reading achievement. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Atlanta, GA.
10. Camburn, E. and Han, S.W. (2005). Validating measures of instruction based on annual surveys. Paper presented at the 2005 annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association.
11. Carbonaro, W. J., & Gamoran, A. (2002). The production of achievement inequality in high school English. American Educational Research Journal, 39(4), 801-827. (Pubitemid 36263739)
12. Cohen, D. K, & Ball, D. L. (1999). Instruction, capacity and improvement (CPRE Research Report Series RR43). Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania, Consortium for Policy Research in Education.
13. Cuban, L. (1993). How teachers taught: Constancy and change in American classrooms, 1890-1990. New York: Teachers College Press.
14. D'Agostino, J. (2000). Instructional and school effects on students' longitudinal reading and mathematics achievements. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 11(2), 197-235.
15. Dewey, J. (1990). The school and society and the child and the curriculum. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
16. Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Building theories from case study research. The Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 532-550.
17. Firestone, W. A. (1993). Alternative arguments for generalizing from data as applied to qualitative research. Educational Researcher, 22(4), 16-23.
18. Franks, M. E., DeVaney, T. A., Weerakkody, G. J., & Katayama, A. D. (1996). An analysis of NAEP trial state assessment data concerning the effects of computers on mathematics achievement. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New York.
19. Gales, M. J., & Yan, W. (2001, April). Relationship between constructivist teacher beliefs and instructional practices to students ' mathematical achievement: Evidence from TIMMS. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Seattle, WA.
20. Gallagher, S. A. (1994). Middle school classroom predictors of science persistence. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 31(7), 721-734.
21. Gau, S.J. (1997, April). The distribution and the effects of opportunity to learn on mathematics achievement. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, IL.
22. Goertz, M. E. (1994). Opportunity to learn: Instructional practices in eighth-grade mathematics: Data from the 1990 NAEP trial state assessment (CPRE Research Report Series Report #32). Brunswick, NJ: Consortium for Policy Research in Education.
23. Guthrie, J. T., Schafer, W. D., & Huang, C.-W. (2001). Benefits of opportunity to read and balanced instruction on the NAEP. Journal of Educational Research, 94(3), 145-162. (Pubitemid 33578009)
24. House, J. D. (2000). Relationship between instructional activities and science achievement of adolescent students in Hong Kong: Findings from the Third International Mathematics and Science Study (TIMSS). International Journal of Instructional Media, 27(3), 275-288.
25. House, J. D. (2001). Relationship between instructional activities and mathematics achievement of adolescent students in Japan: Findings from the Third International Mathematics and Science Study (TIMSS). International Journal of Instructional Media, 28(1), 93-105.
26. House, J. D. (2002a). Instructional practice and mathematics achievement of adolescent students in Chinese Taipei: Results from the TIMSS 1999 assessment. Child Study Journal, 32(3), 157-178.
27. House, J. D. (2002b). The motivational effects of specific teaching activities and computer use for science learning: Findings from the Third International Mathematics and Science Study (TIMSS). International Journal of Instructional Media, 29(4), 423-439.
28. House, J. D. (2003). Instructional activities and interest in science learning for adolescent students in Japan and United States: Findings from the Third International Mathematics and Science Study (TIMSS). International Journal of Instructional Media, 30(4), 429-442.
29. House, J. D. (2004). The effects of homework activities and teaching strategies for new mathematics of adolescent students in Japan: Results from the TIMSS 1999 assessment. International Journal of Instructional Media, 31(2), 199-210.
30. Labaree, D. F. (2004). The trouble with ed schools. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
31. Lee, A.S. & Baskerville, R. L. (2003). Generalizing generalizability in information systems research. Information Systems Research, 14(3), 221-243.
32. Lee, V. E., Smith, J. B., & Croninger, R. G. (1997). How high school organization influences the equitable distribution of learning in mathematics and science. Sociology of Education, 70(2), 128-150.
33. Leigh, B., Gillmore, M., & Morrison, D. (1998). Comparison of diary and retrospective measures for recording alcohol consumption and sexual activity. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 51(2), 119-127. (Pubitemid 28066138)
34. Lemmens, P., Knibbe, R., & Tan, F. (1988). Weekly recall and diary estimates of alcohol consumption in a general population survey. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 49(2), 131-135. (Pubitemid 18066838)
35. Lubienski, S. T. (2004, April). Instruction, achievement and equity: Intersections of race/ethnicity and SES in NAEP data. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Diego, CA.
36. Lundberg, I. (1994). The teaching of reading. In W. B. Elley (Ed.), The IEA study of reading literacy: Achievement and instruction in thirty-two school systems, (1st ed., pp. 149-192). Oxford, England: Pergamon Press.
37. Milesi, C., & Gamoran, A. (2003). Effect of class size and instruction on kindergarten achievement. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Atlanta, GA.
38. Munck, I., & Lundberg, I. (1994). Multivariate analyses of data from population A. In W. B. Elley (Ed.), The IEA study of reading literacy: Achievement and instruction in thirty-two school systems (1st ed., pp. 193-222). Oxford, England: Pergamon Press.
39. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development. (2000). Report of the National Reading Panel Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction: Reports of the subgroups (NIH Publication No. 004754). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
40. National Mathematics Advisory Panel. (2008). Foundations for Success: The Final Report of the National Mathematics Advisory Panel, U.S. Department of Education: Washington, DC, 2008.
41. National Research Council. (1998). Preventing reading difficulties in young children. Washington DC: National Academy Press.
42. National Research Council. (2001). Adding it up: Helping children learn mathematics. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
43. Newmann, F., & Wehlage, G. (1993). Five standards of authentic instruction. Educational Leadership, 50(7), 8-12.
44. Perkins, D. (1992). Smart schools: From training memories to educating minds. New York: Free Press.
45. Pong, S.-I., & Pallas, A. (2001). Class size and eighth-grade math achievement in the United States and abroad. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 23(3), 251-273.
46. Rathbun, A. H., & Hausken, E. G. (2003). Reading and writing instruction in kindergarten: How often and who receives it? Chicago: American Educational Research Association.
47. Reynolds, A. J., & Walberg, H.J. (1991). A structural model of science achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 83(1), 97-107.
48. Reynolds, A. J., & Walberg, H.J. (1992a). A process model of mathematics achievement and attitude. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 23(4), 306-328.
49. Reynolds, A. J., & Walberg, H.J. (1992b). A structural model of science achievement and attitude: An extension to high school. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84(3), 371-382.
50. Reigeluth, C. M., & Moore, J. (1999). Cognitive education and the cognitive domain. In C. Reigeluth (Ed.), Instructional-design theories and models: Vol II. A new paradigm of instructional theory (pp. 51-68). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
51. Roderick, M., and Camburn, E. (1999). Risk and recovery from course failure in the early years of high school. American Educational Research Journal 36(2), 303-343.
52. Rowan, B., Camburn, E., and Correnti, R. (2004). Using teacher logs to measure the enacted curriculum: A study of literacy teaching in third-grade classrooms. Elementary School Journal 105(1), 75-102.
53. Rowan, B., Chiang, F. S., & Miller, R. J. (1997). Using research on employees' performance to study the effects of teachers on students' achievement. Sociology of Education, 70(4), 256-284.
54. Rowan, B., Correnti, R., & Miller, R. J. (2002). What large-scale, survey research tells us about teacher effects on student achievement: Insights from the "Prospects" study of elementary schools. Teachers College Record, 104(8), 1525-1567.
55. Shadish, W. R., Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (2002). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for generalized causal inference. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
56. Slavin, R. (1980). Cooperative learning. Review of Educational Research, 50(2), 315-342.
57. Smith, J.B., Smith, B., & Bryk, A.S. (1998). Setting the pace: Opportunities to learn in Chicago's elementary schools. Chicago: Consortium on Chicago School Research.
58. Snow-Renner, R. (2001, April). What is the promise of large-scale classroom practice measures for informing us about equity in student opportunities-to-learn? An example using the Colorado TIMSS. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Seattle, WA.
59. Tarr, J. E., Mittag, K C., Uekawa, Kazuaki, & Lennex, L. (2000). A comparison of calculator use in eighth-grade mathematics classrooms in the United States, Japan, and Portugal: Results from the Third International Mathematics and Science Study. School Science and Mathematics, 100(3), 139-150.
60. Tomoff, J., Thompson, M., & Behrens, J. (2000). Measuring NCTM-recommended practices and student achievement with TIMSS Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA.
61. Walston, J., & West, J. (2004). Full-day and half-day kindergarten in the United States: Findings from the Early Childhood Longitudinal Study, kindergarten class of 1998-99 (NCES 2004-078). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics.
62. Wang, J. (1999). A structural model of student career aspiration and science education. Research in the Schools, 6(1), 53-63.
63. Wang, J. J., & Ma, X. (2001). Effects of educational productivity on career aspiration among United States high school students. Alberta Journal of Educational Research, 47(1), 75-86.
64. Walker, C. M. (1999, April). The effect of different pedagogical approaches on mathematics students' achievement. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
65. Wang, J. J., & Staver, J. R. (2001). Examining relationships between factors of science education and student career aspiration. Journal of Educational Research, 94(5), 312-319.
66. Wenglinsky, H. (2002). The link between teacher classroom practices and student academic performance. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 10(2). Retrieved January 23, 2008, from http://epaa.asu.edu/epaa/v10n12/
67. Wenglinsky, H. (2003). Using large-scale research to gauge the impact of instructional practices on student reading comprehension: An exploratory study. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 11(9). Retrieved January 23, 2008, from http://epaa.asu.edu/epaa/v11n19/
68. Wenglinsky, H. (2004). The link between instructional practice and the racial gap in middle schools. Research in Middle Level Education, 28(1). Retrieved January 23, 2008, from http://www.nmsa.org/portals/0/pdf/publications/ RMLE/rmle-vol28-no1-article1.p df
69. Wilkins, J. L. M., & Ma, X. (2002). Predicting student growth in mathematical content knowledge. Journal of Educational Research, 95(5), 288-298. (Pubitemid 41399599)
70. Wilkins, J. L. M., & Ma, X. (2003). Modeling change in student attitude toward and beliefs about mathematics. Journal of Educational Research, 97(1), 52-63.
71. Wong, K K., Hedges, L. V., Borman, G. D., & D'Agostino, J. (1996). Prospects: Special analyses. Final report. Washington, DC: U.S. Dept. of Education Office of Educational Research and Improvement Educational Resources Information Center. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 402 656).
72. Xue, Y., & Meisels, S.J. (2004). Early literacy instruction and learning in kindergarten: Evidence from the Early Childhood Longitudinal Study- Kindergarten class of 1998-1999. American Educational Research Journal, 41(1), 191-229. (Pubitemid 38920213)
73. Zeng, G., & Zeng, L. (2005). Developmentally and culturally inappropriate practice in U.S. kindergarten programs: Prevalence, severity, and its relationship with teacher and administrator qualification. Education, 125(4), 706-724.
74. Condron, D.J. (2003). An early start: Effects of ability grouping on reading achievement. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Atlanta, GA.
75. Denton, K., West, J., & Walston, J. (2003). Reading-Young children's achievement and classroom experiences: Findings from the Condition of Education 2003 (NCES 2003-070). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics.
76. Judge, S., Puckett, K, & Cabuk, B. (2004). Digital equity: New findings from the Early Childhood Longitudinal Study. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 36(4), 383-396.
77. Milesi, C., & Gamoran, A. (2003, April). Effect of class size and instruction on kindergarten achievement. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Atlanta, GA.
78. Rathbun, A. H., & Hausken, E. G. (2003). Reading and writing instruction in kindergarten: How often and who receives it? Chicago: American Educational Research Association.
79. Rathbun, A. H., Walston, J. T., & Hausken, E. G. (2000, April). Kindergarten teachers' use of developmental appropriate practices: Results from the Early Childhood Longitudinal Study, kindergarten class of 1998-1999. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA.
80. Rathbun, A. H., West, J., & Germino-Hausken, E. (2003). Young children's access to computers in the home and at school in 1999 and 2000 (NCES 2003-36). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics.
81. Walston, J., & West, J. (2004). Full-day and half-day kindergarten in the United States: Findings from the Early Childhood Longitudinal Study, kindergarten class of 1998-99 (NCES 2004-078). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics.
82. Xue, Y., & Meiseis, S.J. (2004). Early literacy instruction and learning in kindergarten: Evidence from the Early Childhood Longitudinal Study- Kindergarten class of 1998-1999. American Educational Research Journal, 41(1), 191-229. (Pubitemid 38920213)
83. Zeng, G., & Zeng, L. (2005). Developmentally and culturally inappropriate practice in U.S. kindergarten programs: Prevalence, severity, and its relationship with teacher and administrator qualification. Education, 125(4), 706-724.
84. Longitudinal Study of American Youth
85. Betts, J. R., & Shkolnik.J. L. (1999). The behavioral effects of variations in class size: The case of math teachers. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 21(2), 193-213.
86. Brookhart, S. M. (1997). Effects of the classroom assessment environment on mathematics and science achievement. Journal of Educational Research, 90(6), 323-330.
87. Gallagher, S. A. (1994). Middle school classroom predictors of science persistence. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 31(7), 721-734.
88. Reynolds, A. J., & Walberg, H.J. (1991). A structural model of science achievement Journal of Educational Psychology, 83(1), 97-107.
89. Reynolds, A. J., & Walberg, H.J. (1992a). A process model of mathematics achievement and attitude. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 23(4), 306-328.
90. Reynolds, A. J., & Walberg, H.J. (1992b). A structural model of science achievement and attitude: An extension to high school. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84(3), 371-382.
91. Shimizu, K. (1997, March). Teachers' emphasis on inquiry science and prevailing instructional method. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, Oak Brook, IL.
92. Wang, J. (1999). A structural model of student career aspiration and science education. Research in the Schools, 6(1), 53-63.
93. Wang, J. J., & Ma, X. (2001). Effects of educational productivity on career aspiration among United States high school students. Alberta Journal of Educational Research, 47(1), 75-86.
94. Wang, J. J., & Staver, J. R. (2001). Examining relationships between factors of science education and student career aspiration. Journal of Educational Research, 94(5), 312-319.
95. Wilkins, J. L. M., & Ma, X. (2002). Predicting student growth in mathematical content knowledge. Journal of Educational Research, 95(5), 288-298. (Pubitemid 41399599)
96. Wilkins, J. L. M., & Ma, X. (2003). Modeling change in student attitude toward and beliefs about mathematics. Journal of Educational Research, 97(1), 52-63.
97. Allen, R., Bettis, N., Kurfman, D., MacDonald, W., Mullis, I. V. S., & Salter, C. (1990). The geography learning of high-school seniors. Washington, DC: Office of Educational Research and Improvement
98. Anderson, L., Jenkins, L. B., Leming, J., MacDonald, W. B., Mullis, I. V. S., Turner, M.J., et al. (1990). The civics report card: Trends in achievement from 1976 to 1988 at ages 13 and 17; Achievement in 1988 at grades 4, 8, and 12. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
99. Applebee, A. N., Langer, J. A., Jerkins, L. B., Mullis, I. V. S. & Foertsch, M. A. (1990). Learning to write in our nation's schools: Instruction and achievement in 1988 at grades 4, 8, and 12. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
100. Applebee, A. N., Langer, J. A., & Mullis, I. V. S. (1988). Who reads best? Factors related to reading achievement in grades 3, 7, and 11 (Report No. 17-R-01). Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
101. Barton, P. E., & Coley, R. J. (1994). Testing in America's schools. Policy information report Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
102. Beatty, A. S., Reese, C. M., Persky, H. R., & Carr, P. (1996). NAEP 1994 U.S. history report card: Findings from the National Assessment of Educational Progress. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
103. Blank, R. K., & Gruebel, D. (1995). State indicators of science and mathematics education 1995: State-by-state trends and new indicators from the 1993-94 school year. Washington, DC: Council of Chief State School Officers.
104. Blank, R. K., & Langesen, D. (1999). State indicators of science and mathematics education, 1999: State-by-state trends and new indicators from the 1997-98 school year. Washington, DC: Council of Chief State School Officers.
105. Braswell, J. S., Lutkus, A. D., Grigg, W. S., Santapau, S. L., Tay-Lim, B., & Johnson, M. (2001). The nation's report card: Mathematics, 2000. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics.
106. Byrnes, J. P. (2003). Factors predictive of mathematics achievement in white, black, and Hispanic 12th graders. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95(2), 316-326.
107. Coley, R. J., & Coleman, A. B. (2004). The fourth-grade reading classroom. Policy information report Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
108. Dossey, J. A., Mullis, I.V. S., Gorman, S., & Latham, A. S. (1994). How school mathematics functions: Perspectives from the NAEP 1990 and 1992 assessments. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
109. Educational Testing Service. (1994). Data compendium for the NAEP 1992 reading assessment of the nation and the states. Washington, DC: Author.
110. Foertsch, M. A. (1992). Reading in and out of school: Factors influencing the literacy achievement of American students in grades 4, 8, and 12, in 1988 and 1990. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
111. Franks, M. E., DeVaney, T. A., Weerakkody, G. J., & Katayama, A. D. (1996). An analysis of NAEP trial state assessment data concerning the effects of computers on mathematics achievement Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. New York.
112. Goertz, M. E. (1994). Opportunity to learn: Instructional practices in eighth-grade mathematics: Data from the 1990 NAEP trial state assessment (CPRE Research Report Series Report #32). Brunswick, NJ: Consortium for Policy Research in Education.
113. Greenberg, E. (1995). More metro than nonmetro students have access to computers, but their rates of usage are similar. Rural Development Perspectives, 10(3), 61-64.
114. Grouws, D. A., Smith, M. S., & Sztajn, P. (2004). The preparation and teaching practices of United States mathematics teachers: Grades 4 and 8. In P. Kloosterman & F. K. Lester (Eds.), Results and interpretations of the 1990 through 2000 mathematics assessments of the National Assessment of Educational Progress (pp. 221-267). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
115. Guthrie, J. T., Schafer, W. D., & Huang, C.-W. (2001). Benefits of opportunity to read and balanced instruction on the NAEP. Journal of Educational Research, 94(3), 145-162. (Pubitemid 33578009)
116. Hammack, D. C., Hartoonian, M., Howe, J., Jenkins, L. B., Levstik, L. S., MacDonald, W. B., et al. (1990). The U.S. history report card: The achievement of fourth-, eighth-, and twelfth-grade students in 1988 and trends from 1986 to 1988 in the factual knowledge of high-school juniors. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
117. Hawkins, E. F., Stancavage, F. B., & Dossey, J. A. (1998). School policies and practices affecting instruction in mathematics: Findings from the National Assessment of Educational Progress. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
118. Kloosterman, P., Warfield, J., Wearne, D., Koc, Y., Martin, W. G., & Strutchens, M. (2004). Fourth-grade students' knowledge of mathematics and perceptions of learning mathematics. In P. Kloosterman & F. K. Lester (Eds.), Results and interpretations of the 1990 through 2000 mathematics assessments of the National Assessment of Educational Progress (pp. 71-103). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
119. Langer, J. A., Applebee, A. N., Mullis, I. V. S., & Foertsch, M. A. (1990). Learning to read in our nation's schools: Instruction and achievement in 1988 at grades 4, 8, and 12. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
120. Lindquist, M. M. (1997). NAEP Findings regarding the preparation and classroom practices of mathematics teachers. In P. A. Kenney Sc E. A. Silver (Eds.), Results from the sixth mathematics assessment of the National Assessment of Educational Progress (pp. 61-86 296). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
121. Lubienski, S. T. (2002). A closer look at black-white mathematics gaps: Intersections of race and SES in NAEP achievement and instructional practices data. Journal of Negro Education, 71 (4), 269-287.
122. Lubienski, S. T. (2004). Instruction, achievement and equity: Intersections of race/ethnicity and SES in NAEP data. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Diego, CA.
123. Lubienski, S. T., & Shelley, M. C., II. (2003). A closer look at U.S. mathematics instruction and achievement: Examinations of race and SES in a decade of NAEP data. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago.
124. Mangels, K. (1993, April). A study of mathematics education in the Lutheran Church-Missouri Synod schools using background questions from the 1990 National Assessment of Educational Progress. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Atlanta, GA.
125. Mitchell, J. H., Hawkins, E. F., Jakwerth, P. M., Stancavage, F. B, & Dossey, J. A. (1999). Student work and teacher practices in mathematics. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics.
126. Mullis, I. V. S., Campbell, J. R., & Farstrup, A. E. (1993). Executive summary of the NAEP 1992 reading report card for the nation and the states: Data from the national and trial state assessments. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
127. Mullis, I. V. S. (Ed.) (1994). America's mathematics problem: Raising student achievement. A Synthesis of Findings from NAEP's 1992 Mathematics Assessment. (NAEP-23-FR-03; NCES-94-703). Princeton, NJ: National Assessment of Educational Progress.
128. Mullis, I.V. S., Jenkins, F., & Johnson, E. G. (1994). Effective schools in mathematics: Perspectives from the NAEP 1992 assessment. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics.
129. National Center for Education Statistics. (1992). NAEP Facts: Calculators and computers. Washington, DC: Author.
130. National Center for Education Statistics. (1993). NAEP1992: Reading state report for Colorado: The trial state assessment at grade 4. Washington, DC: Author.
131. National Center for Education Statistics. (2002). The nation's report card: Geography highlights, 2001. Washington, DC: Author.
132. O'Sullivan, C. Y., & Weiss, A. R. (1999). Student work and teacher practices in science: A report on what students know and can do. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
133. O'Sullivan, C. Y., Weiss, A. R., & Askew, J. M. (1998). Students learning science: A report on policies and practices in U.S. schools. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
134. Shaughnessy, J. M., & Zawojewski, J. S. (1999). Secondary students' performance on data and chance in the 1996 NAEP. Mathematics Teacher, 92(8), 713-718.
135. Sowder, J. T., Wearne, D., Martin, W. G., & Strutchens, M. (2004). What do 8th-grade students know about mathematics? Changes over a decade. In P. Kloosterman & F. K. Lester (Eds.), Results and interpretations of the 1990 through 2000 mathematics assessments of the National Assessment of Educational Progress (pp. 105-143). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
136. Swanson, C. B., Plank, S. B., & Hewes, G. M. (2003). From national movement to local action: The status of standards-based science instruction in middle school classrooms (CRESPAR-RN-64). Baltimore, MD: Center for Research on the Education of Students Placed at Risk.
137. Unger, J., & Fleischman, S. (2004). Is process writing the 'write stuff? Educational Leadership, 62(2), 90-91.
138. U.S. Department of Education, Office of Educational Research and Improvement (1993). What's wrong with writing and what can we do right now? Washington, DC: Author.
139. Weiss, A. R., Lutkus, A. D., Grigg, W. S., & Niemi, R. G. (2001). The next generation of citizens: NAEP civics assessments: 1988 and 1998. Education Statistics Quarterly, 3(3), 21-24.
140. Weiss, A. R., Lutkus, A. D., Hildebrant, B. S., & Johnson, M. S. (2002). The nation's report card: Geography 2001 (NCES 2002-484). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics.
141. Wenglinsky, H. (2000). How teaching matters: Bringing the classroom back into discussions of teacher quality. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service, Policy Information Center.
142. Wenglinsky, H. (2002). The link between teacher classroom practices and student academic performance. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 10(2). Retrieved January 23, 2008, from http://epaa.asu.edu/epaa/v10n12/
143. Wenglinsky, H. (2003). Using large-scale research to gauge the impact of instructional practices on student reading comprehension: An exploratory study. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 11(9). Retrieved January 23, 2008, from http://epaa.asu.edu/epaa/v11n19/
144. Wenglinsky, H. (2004). The link between instructional practice and the racial gap in middle schools. Research in Middle Level Education, 28(1). Retrieved January 23, 2008, from http://www.nmsa.org/portals/0/pdf/publications/ RMLE/rmle-vol28-no1-article1.p df /
145. Burkam, D. T., Lee, V. E., & Smerdon, B. A. (1997). Gender and science learning early in high school: Subject matter and laboratory experiences. American Educational Research Journal, 34(2), 297-331. (Pubitemid 127353575)
146. Butty, J.-A. L. M. (2001). Teacher instruction, student attitudes, and mathematics performance among 10th and 12th grade black and Hispanic students. Journal of Negro Education, 70(1/2), 19-37.
147. Carbonaro, W. J., & Gamoran, A. (2002). The production of achievement inequality in high school English. American Educational Research Journal, 39(4), 801-827. (Pubitemid 36263739)
148. Chaney, B. (1994). Teachers'academic backgrounds and student outcomes in science and mathematics: NSF/NELS:88 teacher transcript analysis. Rockville, MD: Westat.
149. Chaney, B. (1995). Student outcomes and the professional preparation of eighth-grade teachers in science and mathematics: NSF/NELS:88 teacher transcript analysis. Rockville, MD: Westat.
150. Gamoran, A., & Carbonaro, W.J. (2002/2003). High school English: A national portrait. High School Journal, 86(2), 1-13.
151. Gau, S.-J. (1997, April). The distribution and the effects of opportunity to learn on mathematics achievement. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, IL.
152. Hoffer, T. B., & Moore, W. M. (1996). High school seniors' instructional experiences in science and mathematics: National Education Longitudinal Study of 1988. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics.
153. Horn, L., Hafner, A. L., & Owings, . A. (1992). National Education Longitudinal Study of 1988: A profile of American eighth-grade mathematics and science instruction. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
154. Johnson, R. M. (2000, April). Gender differences in mathematics performance: Walberg's educational productivity model and the NELS:88 database. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA.
155. Lee, V. E., Smith.J. B., & Croninger, R. G. (1997). How high school organization influences the equitable distribution of learning in mathematics and science. Sociology of Education, 70(2), 128-150.
156. Rowan, B., Chiang, F. S., & Miller, R. J. (1997). Using research on employees' performance to study the effects of teachers on students' achievement. Sociology of Education, 70(4), 256-284.
157. Scott, L. A., & Ingels, S.J. (1992, April). Transitions to high
158. Smerdon, B. A., Burkam, D. T., & Lee, V. E. (1999). Access to constructivist and didactic teaching: Who gets it? Where is it practiced? Teachers College Record, 101(1), 5-34.
159. National Survey of Science and Mathematics Education
160. Banilower, E. R. (2002). The status of high school physics teaching. Chapel Hill, NC: Horizon Research, Inc.
161. Fulp, S. L. (2002a). The status of elementary science teaching. Chapel Hill, NC: Horizon Research, Inc.
162. FuIp, S. L. (2002b). The status of middle school science teaching. Chapel Hill, NC: Horizon Research, Inc.
163. Malzahn, K A. (2002). The status of elementary mathematics teaching. Chapel Hill, NC: Horizon Research, Inc.
164. Smith, P. S. (2002). The status of high school chemistry teaching. Chapel Hill, NC: Horizon Research, Inc.
165. Smith, P. S., Banilower, E. R., McMahon, K. C., & Weiss, I. R. (2002). The National Survey of Science and Mathematics Education: Trends from 1977 to 2000. Chapel Hill, NC: Horizon Research, Inc.
166. Weiss, I. R. (1987). Report of the 1985-86 National Survey of Science and Mathematics Education. Durham, NC: Research Triangle Inst.
167. Weiss, I. R. (1994). A profile of science and mathematics education in the United States, 1993. Chapel Hill, NC: Horizon Research, Inc.
168. Weiss, I. R. (1997). The status of science and mathematics teaching in the United States: Comparing teacher views and classroom practice to national standards. ERS Spetrum, 15(3), 34-39.
169. Weiss, I. R. (2002). The status of secondary earth science teaching. Chapel Hill, NC: Horizon Research, Inc.
170. Weiss, I. R., Banilower, E. R., McMahon, K C., & Smith, P. S. (2001). Report of the 2000 National Survey of Science and Mathematics Education. Chapel Hill, NC: Horizon Research, Inc.
171. Whittington, D. (2002a). The status of high school mathematics teaching. Chapel Hill, NC: Horizon Research, Inc.
172. Whittington, D. (2002b). The status of middle school mathematics teaching. Chapel Hill, NC: Horizon Research, Inc.
173. Wood, K. D. (2002). The status of high school biology teaching. Chapel Hill, NC: Horizon Research, Inc.
174. PIRLS.
175. Martin, M. O., Mullis, I. V. S., Gonzalez, E. J., & Kennedy, A. M. (2003). Trends in children's reading literacy achievement 1991-2001: IEA's repeat in nine countries of the 1991 reading literacy study. Chestnut Hill, MA: Boston College.
176. Mullis, I. V. S., Martin, M. O., Gonzalez, E. J., & Kennedy, A. M. (2003). PIRLS 2001 international report : IEA's study of reading literacy achievement in primary school in 35 countries. Chestnut Hill, MA: Boston College.
177. Ogle, L. T., Sen, A., Pahlke, E., Jocelyn, L., Kastberg, D., & Williams, T. (2003). International comparisons in fourth-grade reading literacy: Findings from the Progress in International Reading Literacy Study (PIRLS) of 2001. Washington, DC: U.S. Dept. of Education Institute of Education Sciences National Center for Education Statistics.
178. Prospects
179. D'Agostino, J. (2000). Instructional and school effects on students' longitudinal reading and mathematics achievements. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 11(2), 197-235.
180. Karweit, N., & Ricciuti, A. (1994). Prospects: Chapterl Service Delivery Report. Cambridge, MA: Abt Associates, Inc.
181. Puma, M. J., Jones, C. C., Rock, D., & Fernandez, R. (1993). Prospects: The Congressionally Mandated Study of Educational Growth and Opportunity. The interim report Bethesda, MD: Abt Associates, Inc.
182. Rowan, B., Correnti, R., & Miller, R. J. (2002). What large-scale, survey research tells us about teacher effects on student achievement: Insights from the prospects study of elementary schools. Teachers College Record, 104(8), 1525-1567.
183. Wong, K. K., Hedges, L. V., Borman, G. D., & D'Agostino, J. (1996). Prospects: Special analyses. Final report. Washington, DC: U.S. Dept of Education Office of Educational Research and Improvement Educational Resources Information Center. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 402 656).
184. Replication of the "First R" study
185. Baumann, J. F., Hoffman, J. V., Duffy-Hester, A. M., & Ro, J. M. (2000). The First R yesterday and today: US elementary reading instruction practices reported by teachers and administrators. Reading Research Quarterly, 35(3), 338-377.
186. Reading Literacy Study
187. Binkley, M. R., & Williams, T. (1996). Reading literacy in the United States: Findings from the IEA Reading Literacy Study (NCES 96258). Washington, D.C.: National Center for Education Statistics.
188. Elley, W. B. (Ed.). (1992). How in the world do students read? : IEA study of reading literacy. Hamburg: The International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement.
189. Lundberg, I., & Linnakylèa, P. (1993). Teaching reading around the world: IEA study of reading literacy. Hamburg, Netherlands: The International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement.
190. Lundberg, I. (1994). The teaching of reading. In W. B. Elley (Ed.), The IEA study of reading literacy: Achievement and instruction in thirty-two school systems (1st ed., pp. 149-192). Oxford, England: Pergamon Press.
191. Munck, I., & Lundberg, I. (1994). Multivariate analyses of data from population A. In W. B. Elley (Ed.), The IEA study of reading literacy: Achievement and instruction in thirty-two school systems (1st ed., pp. 193-222). Oxford, England: Pergamon Press.
192. Owen, P., & Pumfrey, P. D. (Eds.). (1995). Children learning to read: International concerns. London; Washington: Falmer Press.
193. Postlethwaite, T. N., & Ross, K. N. (Eds.). (1992). Effective schools in reading: Implications for educational planners: An exploratory study. The Hague, Netherlands: International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement
194. Schools and Staffing Survey (SASS) Teacher Follow-up Survey
195. Henke, R. R., Chen, X., & Goldman, G. (1999). What happens in classrooms? Instructional practices in elementary and secondary schools, 1994-95 (NCES 1999348). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics.
196. TIMSS.
197. Beaton, A. E., Mullis, I., V. S., Martin, M. O., Gonzalez, E. J., Kelly, D. L., & Smidi, T. A. (1996a). Mathematics achievement in the middle school years: IEA's Third International Mathematics and Science Study. Chestnut Hill, MA: Boston College, TIMSS International Study Center.
198. Beaton, A. E., Mullis, I., V. S., Martin, M. O., Gonzalez, E. J., Kelly, D. L., & Smith, T. A. (1996b). Science achievement in the middle school years: IEA's Third International Mathematics and Science Study. Chestnut Hill, MA: Boston College, TIMSS International Study Center.
199. Cwikla, J. (2001). TIMSS-R 1999: An analysis of the Delaware science coalition data (TIMSS-R report). Newark: University of Delaware, Delaware Education Research and Development Center.
200. Cwikla, J. (2002). Top TIMSS-R mathematics performers: What are they doing differently? (TIMSSR Report 2002). Delaware: Delaware Foundation for Science and Math Education.
201. Gales, M. J., & Yan, W. (2001, April). Relationship between constructivist teacher beliefs and instructional practices to students'mathematical achievement: Evidence from TIMMS. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Seattle, WA.
202. House, J. D. (2002b). The motivational effects of specific teaching activities and computer use for science learning: Findings from the Third International Mathematics and Science Study (TIMSS). International Journal of Instructional Media, 29(4), 423-439.
203. House, J. D. (2003). Instructional activities and interest in science learning for adolescent students in Japan and United States: Findings from the Third International Mathematics and Science Study (TIMSS). International Journal of Instructional Media, 30(4), 429-442.
204. Kimmelman, P., Kroeze, D., Schmidt, W., van der Ploeg, A., McNeely, M., & Tan, A. (1999). A first look at what we can learn from high performing school districts: An analysis of TIMSS data from the first in the world consortium. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, National Institute on Student Achievement, Curriculum, and Assessment
205. Leung, F. K. S. (2002). Behind the high achievement of East Asian students. Educational Research and Evaluation: An International Journal on Theory and Practice, 8(1), 87-108.
206. Martin, M. O., Mullis, I., V. S., Beaton, A. E., Gonzalez, E. J., Smith, T. A., & Kelly, D. L. (1997). Science achievement in the primary school years: IEA's third international Mathematics and science study. Chestnut Hill, MA: Boston College, TIMSS International Study Center.
207. Martin, M. O., Mullis, I., V. S., Beaton, A. E., Gonzalez, E. J., Smith, T. A., & Kelly, D. L. (1998). Science achievement in Missouri and Oregon in an international context: 1997 TIMSS benchmarking. Chestnut Hill, MA: Boston College, Center for the Study of Testing, Evaluation, and Educational Policy.
208. Martin, M. O., Mullis, I., V. S., Gonzalez, E.J., & Chrostowski, S.J. (2004). TIMSS 2003 international science report: Findings from IEA's trends in International Mathematics and Science Study at the fourth and eighth grades. Chestnut Hill, MA: Boston College, TIMSS International Study Center.
209. Martin, M. O., Mullis, I., V. S., Gonzalez, E. J., Gregory, K. D., Smith, T., A., Chrostowski, S. J., Garden, R. A., & O'Connor, K M. (2000). TIMSS 1999 International science report: Findings from IEA's repeat of the Third International Mathematics and Science Study at the eighth grade. Chestnut Hill, MA: Boston College, TIMSS and PIRLS International Study Center.
210. Martin, M. O., Mullis, I., V.S., Gonzalez, E. J., O'Connor, K M., Chrostowski, S. J., Gregory, K. D., Smith, T., A., & Garden, R. A. (2001). TIMSS 1999 Science benchmarking report, eighth grade achievement results for US States and districts in an international context. Chestnut Hill, MA: Boston College, TIMSS and PIRLS International Study Center.
211. Masini, B. E. (2001, April). Race differences in exposure to algebra and geometry among U.S. eighthgrade students. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Seattle, WA.
212. Mullis, I., V. S., Martin, M. O., Beaton, A. E., Gonzalez, E. J., Kelly, D. L., & Smith, T. A. (1997). Mathematics achievement in the primary school years: IEA's Third International Mathematics and Science Study. Chestnut Hill, MA: Boston College, TIMSS International Study Center.
213. Mullis, I., V. S., Martin, M. O., Beaton, A. E., Gonzalez, E. J., Kelly, D. L., & Smith, T., A. (1998). Mathematics achievement in Missouri and Oregon in an international context: 1997 TIMSS benchmarking. Chestnut Hill, MA: Boston College, TIMSS International Study Center.
214. Mullis, I., V. S., Martin, M. O., Gonzalez, E.J., & Chrostowski, S.J. (2004). TIMSS 2003 International mathematics report: Findings from IEA's trends in International Mathematics and Science Study at the fourth and eighth grades. Chestnut Hill, MA: Boston College, TIMSS and PIRLS International Study Center.
215. Mullis, I. V. S., Martin, M. O., Gonzalez, E. J., Gregory, K D., Garden, R. A., O'Connor, K. M., et al. (2000). TIMSS 1999 International mathematics report: Findings from IEA's repeat of the Third International Mathematics and Science Study at the eighth grade. Chestnut Hill, MA: Boston College, International Study Center.
216. Mullis, I., V. S., Martin, M. O., Gonzalez, E. J., O'Connor, K. M., Chrostowski, S. J., Gregory, K. D., et al. (2001). Mathematics benchmarking report: TIMSS 1999-eighth grade: Achievement results for U.S. states and districts in an international context. Chestnut Hill, MA: Boston College, International Study Center.
217. National Education Goals Panel. (2000). Minnesota and TIMSS: Exploring high achievement in eighth grade science: Lessons from the states. Washington, DC: Author.
218. Pong, S.-I., & Pallas, A. (2001). Class size and eighth-grade math achievement in the United States and abroad. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 23(3), 251-273.
219. Rowan, B., Chiang, F. S., & Miller, R. J. (1997). Using research on employees' performance to study the effects of teachers on students' achievement. Sociology of Education, 70(4), 256-284.
220. Schmidt, W. H., McKnight, C. C., Raizen, S. A., & Third International Mathematics and Science Study. (1997). A splintered vision: An investigation of U.S. science and mathematics education. Dordrecht, Holland: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
221. Snow-Renner, R. (2001, April). What is the promise of large-scale classroom practice measures for informing us about equity in student opportunities-to-learn? An example using the Colorado TIMSS. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Seattle, WA.
222. Tananis, C. A., Chrostowski, S. J., Bunt, N. R., Seeley, M. M., & Tamler, L. (2002). TIMSS 1999 southwest Pennsylvania: Third International Mathematics and Science Study, eighth grade: Regional benchmarking report, achievement for a workforce region in a national and international context Chestnut Hill, MA: Boston College, International Study Center.
223. Tarr, J. E., Mittag, K. C., Uekawa, Kazuaki, & Lennex, L. (2000). A comparison of calculator use in eighth-grade mathematics classrooms in the United States, Japan, and Portugal: Results from the Third International Mathematics and Science Study. School Science and Mathematics, 100(3), 139-150.
224. Tomoff, J., Thompson, M., & Behrens.J. (2000). MeasuringNCTM- recommendedpractices and student achievement with TIMSS. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, L.A.
225. Walker, C. M. (1999, April). The effect of different pedagogical approaches on mathematics students' achievement. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
226. Williams, T., Levine, D., Jocelyn, L., Butler, P., Heid, C., & Haynes, J. (2000). Mathematics and science in the eight grade: Findings from the Third International Mathematics and Science Study. Washington DC: National Center for Education Statistics.
227. Teaching Learning and Computing Survey (TLC)
228. Becker, H. J. (1999). Internet use by teachers: Conditions of professional use and teacher-directed student use. Teaching, Learning, and Computing: 1998 National survey. Report #1. Irvine, CA: Center for Research on Information Technology and Organizations the University of California Irvine and the University of Minnesota.