Hybrid citation-word representations in science mapping: Portolan charts of research fields?

Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology

Volumn 62, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 19-39

  Zitt, Michel ^a   Lelu, Alain ^b,c   Bassecoulard, Elise ^a  

^a LERECO   (France)

^b UNIVERSITÉ DE FRANCHE COMTÉ   (France)

^c LORIA   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIBLIOMETRIC; BROKEN DOWN; CLUSTERING TECHNIQUES; COMPUTING EFFICIENCY; CONTINGENCY TABLE; CORRESPONDENCE ANALYSIS; RESEARCH FIELDS; SCIENTIFIC FIELDS; THEMATIC MAPPING; WORD REPRESENTATIONS;

MAPPING;

EID: 78650165883     PISSN: 15322882     EISSN: 15322890     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/asi.21440     Document Type: Article

References (73)

1. Aksnes, D.W., &, Rip, A., (2009). Researchers' perceptions of citations. Research Policy, 38 (6), 895-905.
2. Bassecoulard, E., Lelu, A., &, Zitt, M., (2007). Mapping nanosciences by citation flows: A preliminary analysis Scientometrics, 70 (3), 859-880.
3. Benzecri, J.-P., ed. (1973). L'Analyse des données 1-L'analyse des correspondances (Vol. 1) [Data analysis 1: Correspondence analysis]. Paris: Dunod.
4. Bertin, J., (1967). Sémiologie graphique; Les diagrammes, les réseaux, les cartes [Semiology of graphics: Diagrams, networks, maps]. Paris: Mouton Gauthier-Villars.
5. Bertin, J., (1977). La graphique et le traitement graphique de l'information. [Graphics and graphical treatment of information]. Paris: Flammarion.
6. Börner, K., Chen, C.M., &, Boyack, K.W., (2003). Visualizing knowledge domains. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 37 (1), 179-255. (Pubitemid 36121885)
7. Boyack, K.W., (2004). Mapping knowledge domains: Characterizing PNAS. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 101, 5192-5199. (Pubitemid 38469126)
8. Boyack, K.W., Klavans, R., &, Börner, K., (2005). Mapping the backbone of science. Scientometrics, 64 (3), 351-374. (Pubitemid 41152144)
9. Braam, R.R., Moed, H.F., &, Van Raan, A.F.J., (1991). Mapping of science by combined cocitation and word analysis. I. Structural aspects. Journal of the American Society of Information Science, 42 (4), 233-251.
10. Callahan, A., Hockema, S., &, Eysenbach, G., (2010). Contextual cocitation: Augmenting cocitation analysis and its applications. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 61 (6), 1130-1143.
11. Callon, M., Courtial, J.P., Turner, W.A., &, Bauin, S., (1983). From translations to problematic networks: An introduction to co-word analysis. Social Science Information, 22 (2), 191-235.
12. Callon, M., &, Law, J., (1982). On Interests and their transformation: Enrolment and counter-enrolment. Social Studies of Science, 12 (4), 615-625.
13. Chen, C.M., (1999). Visualising semantic spaces and author co-citation networks in digital libraries. Information Processing & Management, 35 (3), 401-420.
14. Chen, C.M., (2003). Mapping scientific frontiers: The quest for knowledge visualization. London: Springer-Verlag.
15. Cozzens, S.E., (1989). What do citations countâThe rhetoric-1st model. Scientometrics, 15 (5-6), 437-447.
16. Cronin, B., (1984). The citation process: The role and significance of citations in scientific communication. London: Taylor Graham.
17. Diday, E., (1971). Une nouvelle méthode en classification automatique et reconnaissance des formes la méthode des nuées dynamiques [A new method in automatic clustering and pattern recognition: The moving clouds method]. Revue de Statistique Appliquée, 19 (2), 19-33.
18. DomengÃs, D., &, Volle, M., (1979). Analyse factorielle sphérique: Une exploration. [Spherical factor analysis: An exploration]. Annales de l'INSEE, 35, 3-84.
19. Egghe, L., (2000). New informetric aspects of the Internet: some reflectionsâmany problems. Journal of Information Science, 26 (5), 329-335.
20. Eisen, M.B., Spellman, P.T., Brown, P.O., &, Botstein, D., (1998). Cluster analysis and display of genome-wide expression patterns. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 95 (25), 14863-14868. (Pubitemid 29003722)
21. Garfield, E., (1967). Primordial concepts, citation indexing and historio-bibliography. Journal Library History, 2, 235-249.
22. Garfield, E., (1998). Random thoughts on citationology. Its theory and practiceâComments on theories of citation ? Scientometrics, 43 (1), 69-76. (Pubitemid 128456840)
23. Garfield, E., &, Sher, I.H., (1993). Keywords- PlusTmâAlgorithmic derivative indexing. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 44 (5), 298-299.
24. Glänzel, W., &, Czerwon, H.J., (1996). A new methodological approach to bibliographic coupling and its application to the national, regional and institutional level. Scientometrics, 37 (2), 195-221. (Pubitemid 126722450)
25. Granovetter, M., (1983). The strength of weak ties: A network theory revisited. Sociological Theory, 1, 201-233.
26. Guénoche, A., &, Garreta, H., (2002). Representation and evaluation of partitions. In, A.S.K. Jajuga, &, H.-H. Bock, (Eds.), Classification, clustering, and data analysis (IFCS 2002) (pp. 131-138). Cracow, Poland: Springer.
27. Hartigan, J.A., (1972). Direct clustering of a data matrix. Journal of the American. Statistical Association, 67 (337), 123-129.
28. Janssens, F., Glanzel, W., &, De Moor, B., (2008). A hybrid mapping of information science. Scientometrics, 75 (3), 607-631.
29. Kessler, M.M., (1963). Bibliographic coupling between scientific papers. American Documentation, 14, 10-25.
30. Latour, B., (1987). Science in action: How to follow scientists and engineers through society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
31. Laurens, P., Zitt, M., &, Bassecoulard, E., (2010). Delineation of the genomics field by hybrid citation-lexical methods: Interaction with experts and validation process. Scientometrics, 82 (3), 647-662.
32. Law, J., &, Williams, R.J., (1982). Putting facts together: A study of Scientific persuasion. Social Studies of Science, 12 (4), 535-558.
33. Legendre, P., &, Gallagher, E.D., (2001). Ecologically meaningful transformations for ordination of species data. Oecologia, 129 (2), 271-280. (Pubitemid 32996572)
34. Lelu, A., (1994). Clusters and factors: Neural algorithms for a novel representation of huge and highly multidimensional data sets. In, E. Diday, &, Y. Lechevallier, (Eds.), New approaches in classification and data analysis (pp. 241-248). Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag.
35. Lelu, A., (2008). La méthode de classification non-supervisée K-means axiales. Document LORIA (Vol. 6, pp. 14-25): INRIA.
36. Leydesdorff, L., (1997). Why words and co-words cannot map the development of the sciences. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 48 (5), 418-427. (Pubitemid 127612345)
37. Leydesdorff, L., (1998). Theories of citation ? Scientometrics, 43 (1), 5-25.
38. Leydesdorff, L., (2004). The university-industry knowledge relationship: Analyzing patents and the science base of technologies. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 55 (11), 991-1001.
39. Liu, X., Yu, S., Janssens, F., Glänzel, W., Moreau, Y., &, De Moor, B., (2010). Weighted hybrid clustering by combining text mining and bibliometrics on a large-scale journal database. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 61 (6), 1105-1119.
40. Lloyd, S.P., (1957). Least squares quantization in PCM (No. Published in S.P.). Bell Telephone Laboratories Internal Technical Report.
41. Lloyd, S.P., (1982). Least squares quantization in PCM. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 28 (2), 129-137.
42. Luukkonen, T., (1997). Why has Latour's theory of citations been ignored by the bibliometric community? Discussion of sociological interpretations of citation analysis. Scientometrics, 38 (1), 27-37. (Pubitemid 127457568)
43. Marcotorchino, J.-F., (1987). Block seriation problems: A unified approach. Reply to the problem of H. Garcia and J.M. Proth from Applied Stochastic Models and Data Analysis, 1(1), 25-34, 1985. Applied Stochastic Models and Data Analysis, 3 (2), 73-91.
44. Marshakova, I.V., (1973). Document coupling system based on references taken from ScienceCitation Index (in Russian). Nauchno- TeknicheskayaInformatsiya, 2 (6.3).
45. McCain, K.W., (1983). The author cocitation structure of macroeconomics. Scientometrics, 5 (5), 277-289.
46. McCain, K.W., (1991). Mapping economics through the journal literature: An experiment in journal cocitation analysis. Journal of the American Society for Information science, 42 (4), 290-296.
47. McQueen, J., (1967). Some methods for classification and analysis of multivariate observations. In, L.M. LeCam, &, J. Neyman, (Eds.), Proceedings of Fifth Berkeley Symposium on Mathematical Statistics and Probability (Vol. 1, pp. 281-297). Berkeley: University of California Press.
48. Mirkin, B., (1996). Mathematical Classification and Clustering. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
49. Morris, S.A., &, Yen, G.G., (2004). Crossmaps: Visualization of overlapping relationships in collections of journal papers. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 101 (suppl. 1), 5291-5296. (Pubitemid 38469141)
50. Morris, S.A., Yen, G.G., Wu, Z., &, Asnake, B., (2003). Time line visualization of research fronts. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 54 (5), 413-422.
51. Mullins, N.C., Hargens, L.L., Hecht, P.K., &, Kick, E.L., (1977). The group structure of cocitation clusters: A comparative study. American Sociological Review, 42, 552-562.
52. Narin, F., Pinski, G., &, Gee, H.H., (1976). Structure of biomedical literature. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 27 (1), 25-45.
53. Noyons, E.C., Buter, R.K., Hinze, S., van Raan, A.F.J., Schmoch, U., Heinze, T., et al. (2003). Mapping excellence in science and technology across Europe: Nanoscience and nanotechnology (Draft Report No. EC-PPN CT 2002-0001), European Commission.
54. Noyons, E.C., &, van Raan, A., (1998). Monitoring scientific developments from a dynamic perspective: Self-organized structuring to map neural network research. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 49 (1), 68-81. (Pubitemid 128612342)
55. Pinski, G., &, Narin, F., (1976). Citation influence for journal aggregates of scientific publications: Theory, with application to the literature of physics. Information Processing & Management, 12 (5), 297-312.
56. Polanco, X., Grivel, L., &, Royauté, J., (1995). How to do things with terms in informetrics: Terminological variation and stabilization as science watch indicators. In, M. Koenig, (Ed.), Proceedings of the Fifth Biennial International Conference of the International Society for Scientometrics and Infometrics (River Forest IL, June 7-10) (pp. 435-444). Medford NJ: Learned Information.
57. Prime, C., Bassecoulard, E., &, Zitt, M., (2002). Co-citations and co-sitations: A cautionary view on an analogy. Scientometrics, 54 (2), 291-308.
58. Rao, C.R., (1995). A review of canonical coordinates and an alternative to correspondence analysis using Hellinger distance. Questiio, 19 (1-3), 23-63.
59. Rip, A., (1988). Mapping of science: Possibilities and limitations. In, A.F.J. v. Raam, (Ed.), Handbook of quantitative studies of science and technology (pp. 253-273). Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Publishers.
60. Small, H., (1973). Co-citation in the scientific literature: A new measure of the relationship between two documents. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 24 (4), 265-269.
61. Small, H., (1986). The synthesis of specialty narratives from co-citation-clusters. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 37 (3), 97-110.
62. Small, H., &, Greenlee, E., (1980). Citation context analysis of a co-citation clusterâRecombinant-DNA. Scientometrics, 2 (4), 277-301.
63. Small, H., &, Griffith, B.C., (1974). The structure of scientific literatures I: Identifying and graphing specialties. Science Studies, 4, 17-40.
64. van den Besselaar, P., &, Heimeriks, G., (2006). Mapping research topics using word-reference co-occurrences: A method and an exploratory case study. Scientometrics, 68 (3), 377-393. (Pubitemid 44127030)
65. White, H.D., (2001). Authors as citers over time. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 52 (2), 87-108. (Pubitemid 32134183)
66. White, H.D., &, Griffith, B.C., (1981). Author co-citation: A literature measure of intellectual structure. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 32 (3), 163-172.
67. Wilkinson, L., (1979). Permuting a matrix to a simple pattern. In Proceedings of the Statistical and Computing Section of the American Statistical Association (pp. 409-412). Alexandria, VA: American Statistical Association.
68. Wouters, P., (1997). Citation cycles and peer review cycles. Scientometrics, 38 (1), 39-55. (Pubitemid 127457569)
69. Zitt, M., (1991). A simple method for dynamic scientometrics using lexical analysis. Scientometrics, 22 (1), 229-252.
70. Zitt, M., &, Bassecoulard, E., (1994). Development of a method for detection and trend analysis of research fronts built by lexical or cocitation analysis. Scientometrics, 30 (1), 333-351.
71. Zitt, M., &, Bassecoulard, E., (1996). Reassessment of co-citation methods for science indicators: Effect of methods improving recall rates. Scientometrics, 37 (2), 223-244. (Pubitemid 126722451)
72. Zitt, M., &, Bassecoulard, E., (2006). Delineating complex scientific fields by an hybrid lexical-citation method: An application to nanosciences. Information Processing & Management, 42 (6), 1513-1531. (Pubitemid 43825590)
73. Zitt, M., Lelu, A., &, Bassecoulard, E., (2008, September). Hybrid maps of scientific fields (terms and citations): An application to nanosciences. Paper presented at the Tenth International Conference on Science & Technology Indicators: Excellence and EmergenceâA New Challenge for the Combination of Quantitative and Qualitative Approaches, Vienna, Austria.