Delineation of the genomics field by hybrid citation-lexical methods: Interaction with experts and validation process

Scientometrics

Volumn 82, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 647-662

  Laurens, Patricia ^a   Zitt, Michel ^a,b   Bassecoulard, Elise ^b  

^a Observatoire des Sciences et des Techniques OST   (France)

^b LERECO   (France)

Author keywords

Bibliographic coupling; Bibliometrics; Citation methods; Field delineation; Genomics; Information retrieval; Science mapping

Indexed keywords

EID: 77952031985     PISSN: 01389130     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11192-010-0177-9     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Aksnes, D. W., Olsen, T. B., & Seglen, P. O. (2000). Validation of bibliometric indicators in the field of microbiology: A Norwegian case study. Scientometrics, 49(1), 7-22.
2. Archambault, É., Gingras, Y., Godin, B. & Vallières F. (1999). Characterization of genomics in Canada-a bibliometric study of scientific articles and research grants 1995-1997. Prepared for Genome Canada by OST. 19 pp.
3. Bassecoulard, E., Lelu, A., & Zitt, M. (2007). Mapping nanosciences by citation flows: a preliminary analysis. Scientometrics, 70(3), 859-880.
4. Basu, A., & Lewison, G. (2006). Visualization of a scientific community of Indian origin in the US: A case study of bioinformatics and genomics. International Workshop on Webometrics, Informetrics and Scientometrics & seventh COLLNET meeting, 10-12 May 2006, Nancy.
5. Brin, S., & Page, L. (1998). The anatomy of a large-scale hypertextual Web search engine. Computer Networks and Isdn Systems, 30(1-7), 107-117.
6. Debruin, R. E., & Moed, H. F. (1993). Delimitation of scientific subfields using cognitive words from corporate addresses in scientific publications. Scientometrics, 26(1), 65-80.
7. Garfield, E. (1967). Primordial concepts, citation indexing and historio-bibliography. Journal Library History, 2, 235-249.
8. International Human Genome Sequencing Consortium (IHGSC). (2004). Finishing the euchromatic sequence of the human genome. Nature, 431(7011), 931-945.
9. Lelu, A. (1994). Clusters and factors: neural algorithms for a novel representation of huge and highly multidimensional data sets. In E. Diday & Y. Lechevallier (Eds.), New approaches in classification and data analysis (pp. 241-248). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
10. Lelu, A., & François, C. (1992). Automatic generation of hypertext links in information retrieval systems. In D. L. al (Ed.), Proceedings of ECHT'92 (Milano) (pp. 112-121). New York: ACM Press.
11. McKusick, V. A., & Ruddle, F. H. (1987). A new discipline, a new name, a new journal. Genomics, 1(1), 1-2.
12. Rinia, E. J., Delange, C., & Moed, H. F. (1993). Measuring national output in physics-delimitation problems. Scientometrics, 28(1), 89-110.
13. van Leeuwen, T. N., van der Wurff, L. J., & van Raan, A. F. J. (2001). The use of combined bibliometric methods in research funding policy. Research Evaluation, 10, 195-201.
14. Zitt, M., & Bassecoulard, E. (2006). Delineating complex scientific fields by an hybrid lexical-citation method: An application to nanosciences. Information Processing & Management, 42(6), 1513-1531.
15. Zitt M., Lelu A., & Bassecoulard E. (2008). Hybrid maps of scientific fields (terms and citations): an application to nanosciences. In J. Gorraiz & Schiebel, E. (Eds.), Excellence and emergence. A new challenge for the combination of quantitative and qualitative approaches. 10th International conference on science & technology indicators. Book of abstracts. Vienna, Austria, 17-20 September, 2008 (pp. 53-56). Vienna (AUT): Austrian Research Centers GmbH.