Mapping nanosciences by citation flows: A preliminary analysis

Scientometrics

Volumn 70, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 859-880

  Bassecoulard, Elise ^a   Lelu, Alain ^b,c   Zitt, Michel ^a,d  

^a LERECO   (France)

^b CEMAGREF   (France)

^c LASELDI   (France)

^d Observ des Sci et des Techniques   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33847389866     PISSN: 01389130     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11192-007-0315-1     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. BACHMANN G. (1998), Innovationsschub aus dem Nanokosmos. Technologieanalyse, Bericht desVDI Technologiezentrum, Abteilung Zukünftige Technologie des Vereins Deutscher Ingenieure (VDI).
2. BENZECRI J.-P. (Coll.) (1981), Pratique de l'analyse des données: Linguistique et lexicologie, Dunod, Paris.
3. BONACCORSI A., THOMA G. (2005), Scientific and Technological Regimes in Nanotechnology: Combinatorial Inventors and Performance, LEM Papers Series, 2005-13.
4. BRAUN T., SCHUBERT A., ZSINDELY S. (1997), Nanoscience and nanotechnology on the balance, Scientometrics, 38 (2): 321-325.
5. CRONIN B. (2004), Normative shaping of scientific practice: The magic of Merton, Scientometrics, 60 (1): 41-46.
6. DARBY M. R., ZUCKER L. G. (2003), Grilichesian Breakthroughs: Inventions of Methods of Inventing and Firm Entry in Nanotechnology, NBER, 9825.
7. DOMENGES D., VOLLE M. (1979), Analyse factorielle sphérique: une exploration, Annales de l'INSEE, 35 (Juillet - Septembre): 3-84.
8. ESCOFIER B. (1978), Analyses factorielles et distances répondant au principe d'équivalence. distributionnelle, Revue de Statistique Appliquée, 26 (4): 29-37.
9. FOGELBERG H. (2003), The grand politics of technoscience: Contextualizing nanotechnology, In: H. FOGELBERG H. GLIMELL (Eds), Bringing Visibility To the Invisible Towards A Social Understanding of Nanotechnology, Goeteborg University STS Research Reports 6, pp. 29-47.
10. FRANKS A. (1987), Nanotechnology, Journal of Physics E: Scientific instruments, 20: 1442-1451.
11. FREITAG D., BLUME M., BYRNES J., CHOW J. E., KAPADIA S., ROHWER R., WANG Z. (2005), New experiments in distributional representations of synonymy, Proceedings of the 9th Conference on Computational Natural Language Learning (CoNLL), Ann Arbor, June 2005.
12. GARFIELD E. (1967), Primordial concepts, citation indexing and historio-bibliography, Journal Library History, 2: 235-249.
13. GLÄNZEL W., CZERWON H. J. (1996), A new methodological approach to bibliographic coupling and its application to the national, regional and institutional level, Scientometrics, 37 (2): 195-221.
14. GLÄNZEL W., MEYER M., DU PLESSIS, M., THIJS B., MAGERMAN T., SCHLEMMER B., DEBACKERE K., VEUGELERS R. (2003), Nanotechnology. Analysis of an Emerging Domain of Scientific and Technological Endeavour, Steunpunt O&O Statistieken, K.U. Leuven, Steunpuntoos.
15. HEINZE T. (2004), Nanoscience and Nanotechnology in Europe: Analysis of Publications and Patent Applications including Comparisons with the United States, Nanotechnology, Law & Business, 1 (4): 427-445.
16. HEINZE T., KUHLMANN S. (2006), Analysis of heterogeneous collaboration in the German research system with a focus on nanotechnology, In: D. JANSEN (Ed.), New Forms of Governance in Research Organizations. From Disciplinary Theories towards Interfaces and Integration, Springer, Heidelberg.
17. KAHANE B., THEORET C., MOGOUTOV A., LARÉDO P. (2006) Dynamics of "Nano" Science: A Remake of the IT or Bio "Waves"? Prime, NanoDistrict Workshop, March 2006, Grenoble.
18. KESSLER M. M. (1963), Bibliographic coupling between scientific papers, American Documentation, 14: 10-25.
19. KOSTOFF R. N., STUMP J. A., JOHNSON D., MURDAY J. S., LAU C. G. Y., TOLLES W. M. (2006), The structure and infrastructure of the global nanotechnology literature, Journal of Nanoparticle Research, 8 (3-4): 301-321.
20. LAREDO P. (2002), Six major challenges facing public intervention in higher education, science, technology and innovation, 4th Triple Helix Conference, Copenhagen.
21. LEGENDRE P., GALLAGHER E. D. (2001), Ecologically meaningful transformations for ordination of species data, Oecologia, 129 (2): 271-280.
22. LELU A. (1994), Clusters and factors: neural algorithms for a novel representation of huge and highly multidimensional data sets, In: E. DIDAY Y. LECHEVALLIER (Eds), New Approaches in Classification and Data Analysis, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, pp. 241-248.
23. LELU A. (2003), Evaluation of three measures of similarity used in information science, Information Sciences for Decision Making 6: 14-25.
24. LEONTIEF W. (1996), Proposal for the Use of the Input-Output Approach in the Analysis of the Structure of Interdisciplinary Relationships, Economic Systems Research, 8 (1): 81-86.
25. LEYDESDORFF L. (1998), Theories of citation? Scientometrics, 43 (1): 5-25.
26. LEYDESDORFF L., WAGNER C. (2007), Is the United States Losing Ground in Science? A Global Perspective on the World Science System in 2005, in preparation.
27. MALSCH I. (1997), Nanotechnology in Europe: Experts Perceptions and Scientific Relations between Subareas, European Commission - JRC Institute for Prospective Technological Studies, EUR 17710EN.
28. MARCOTORCHINO J.-F. (1986), Maximal associations as a tool for classification, North Holland, In: W. GAUL M. SCHADER (Eds), Classification as a Tool for Research, North- Holland, Amsterdam, pp. 275-288.
29. MARSHAKOVA I. V. (1973), Document coupling system based on references taken from Science Citation Index (in Russian), Nauchno- Teknicheskaya Informatsiya, Seriya 2 (6): 3-8.
30. MATUSITA K. (1955), Decision rules based on distance, for problems of fit, two samples and applications, Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 26: 631-640.
31. MEYER M., PERSSON O. (1998), Nanotechnology - Interdisciplinarity, patterns of collaboration and differences in application, Scientometrics, 42 (2): 195-205.
32. MEYER M., PERSSON O., POWER Y. (2001), Nanotechnology Expert Group and Eurotech Data.Mapping Excellence in Nanotechnologies, EC, DG-Research, Preparatory study.
33. MEYER M. (2007), What do we know about innovation in nanotechnology? Some propositions about an emerging field between hype and path-dependency, Scientometrics, 70 (3): 779-810.
34. MORILLO F., BORDONS M., GOMEZ I. (2001), An approach to interdisciplinarity bibliometric indicators, Scientometrics, 51 (1): 203-222.
35. NOYONS E. C., BUTER R. K., HINZE S., VAN RAAN A. F. J., SCHMOCH U., HEINZE T., RANGNOW R. (2003), Mapping Excellence in Science and Technology across Europe: Nanoscience and Nanotechnology, EC, EC-PPN CT 2002-0001.
36. PORTER A., YOUTIE Y., SHAPIRA P. (2006), Refining Search Terms for Nanotechnology, working paper NSF/CNS-ASU.
37. ROCO M. C., BAINBRIDGE W. S. (2002) Converging Technologies for Improving Human Performance. Nanotechnology, Biotechnology, Information Technology and Cognitive Science, NSF.
38. SCHMID G., DECKER M., ERNST H., FUCHS H., GRUENWALD W., GRUNWALD A., HOFMANN H., MAYOR M., RATHGEBER W., SIMON U., WYRNA D. (2003), Small dimensions and material properties. A definition of nanotechnology, Europaeische Akademie, Graue Reihe, 35: 1-134.
39. SCHUMMER J. (2004), Multidisciplinarity, interdisciplinarity, and patterns of research collaboration in nanoscience and nanotechnology, Scientometrics, 59 (3): 425-465.
40. SMALL H. (1973), Co-citation in the scientific literature: A new measure of the relationship between two documents, Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 24 (4): 265-269.
41. TOMOV D. T., MUTAFOV H. G. (1996), Comparative indicators of interdisciplinarity in modern science, Scientometrics, 37 (2): 267-278.
42. VAN LEEUWEN, T., TIJSSEN R. (2000), Interdisciplinary dynamics of modern science: analysis of crossdisciplinary citation flows, Research Evaluation, 9 (3): 183-187.
43. ZITT M., BASSECOULARD E. (1994), Development of a method for detection and trend analysis of research fronts built by lexical or cocitation analysis, Scientometrics, 30 (1): 333-351.
44. ZITT M., RAMANANA-RAHARY S., BASSECOULARD E. (2003), Bridging citation and reference distributions: Part I - The referencing-structure function and its application to co-citation and co-item studies, Scientometrics, 57 (1): 93-118.
45. ZITT M. (2005), Facing diversity of science: a challenge for bibliometric indicators - comments on A. Van Raan's focus article, Measurement: Interdisciplinary Research and Perspectives, 3 (1): 38-49.
46. ZITT M., BASSECOULARD E. (2006), Delineating complex scientific fields by an hybrid lexical-citation method: An application to nanosciences, Information Processing & Management, 42 (6): 1513-1531.