Erratum to "Delineating complex scientific fields by an hybrid lexical-citation method: An application to nanosciences" [Information Processing and Management 42 (2006) 1513-1531] (DOI:10.1016/j.ipm.2006.03.016);Delineating complex scientific fields by an hybrid lexical-citation method: An application to nanosciences

Information Processing and Management

Volumn 42, Issue 6, 2006, Pages 1513-1531

  Zitt, Michel ^a,b   Bassecoulard, Elise ^a  

^a LERECO   (France)

^b Observatoire des Sciences et des Techniques OST   (France)

Author keywords

Bibliometrics; Citation network; Information retrieval; Lexical query; Nanosciences; Scientific area delineation

Indexed keywords

BIBLIOGRAPHIC RETRIEVAL SYSTEMS; FUZZY SETS; NANOTECHNOLOGY; PARAMETER ESTIMATION; QUERY LANGUAGES; TECHNICAL WRITING;

BIBLIOMETRICS; CITATION NETWORK; DELINEATION; LEXICAL QUERY; NANOSCIENCES; SCIENTIFIC AREA DELINEATION;

INFORMATION MANAGEMENT;

EID: 33744756689     PISSN: 03064573     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ipm.2006.10.005     Document Type: Erratum

References (50)

1. Bachmann, G. (1998). Innovationsschub aus dem Nanokosmos. Technologieanalyse. Düsseldorf: Bericht desVDI Technologiezentrum, Abteilung Zukünftige Technologie des Vereins Deutscher Ingenieure (VDI).
2. Bassecoulard E., and Zitt M. Patents and publications: the lexical connection. In: Glaenzel W., Moed H., and Schmoch U. (Eds). Handbook of quantitative science and technology research (2004), Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht 665-694
3. Bonaccorsi, A. (2002, January 25-26). Matching properties. Research regimes and institutional systems in science. Paper presented at the science as an institution, the institution of science conference, Siena, Italy.
4. Bookstein A. Informetric distributions, part i: unified overview. Journal of the American Society for Information Science 41 5 (1990) 368-375
5. Bookstein A. Informetric distributions, part ii: resilience to ambiguity. Journal of the American Society for Information Science 41 5 (1990) 376-386
6. Braam R.R., Moed H.F., and van Raan A.F.J. Mapping of science by combined cocitation and word analysis. I. Structural aspects. Journal of the American Society of Information Science 42 4 (1991) 233-251
7. Braun T., Schubert A., and Zsindely S. Nanoscience and nanotechnology on the balance. Scientometrics 38 2 (1997) 321-325
8. Brin S., and Page L. The anatomy of a large-scale hypertextual Web search engine. Computer Networks and Isdn Systems 30 1-7 (1998) 107-117
9. Callon M., Courtial J.P., Turner W.A., and Bauin S. From translations to problematic networks: an introduction to co-word analysis. Social Science Information 22 2 (1983) 191-235
10. Darby, M. R., & Zucker, L. G. (2003). Grilichesian breakthroughs: inventions of methods of inventing and firm entry in nanotechnology (Working Paper No. 9825). Cambridge, MA 02138: NBER.
11. Egghe L. The duality of informetric systems with applications to the empirical laws. Journal of Information Science 16 (1990) 17-27
12. Egghe L. New informetric aspects of the Internet: some reflections - many problems. Journal of Information Science 26 5 (2000) 329-335
13. Egghe L. The power of power laws and an interpretation of lotkaian informetric systems as self-similar fractals. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 56 7 (2005) 669-675
14. Egghe L., and Rousseau R. Introduction to informetrics. Quantitative methods in library, documentation and information science (1990), Elsevier, Amsterdam
15. Fogelberg, H. (2003). The grand politics of technoscience: contextualizing nanotechnology. In H. Fogelberg & H. Glimell (Eds.), Bringing visibility to the invisible towards a social understanding of nanotechnology (pp. 29-47): Goeteborg University STS Research Reports 6.
16. Franks A. Nanotechnology. Journal of Physics E: Scientific instruments 20 (1987) 1442-1451
17. Garfield E. Primordial concepts, citation indexing and historio-bibliography. Journal Library History 2 (1967) 235-249
18. Glaenzel W., Meyer M., du Plessis M., Thijs B., Magerman T., Schlemmer B., et al. Nanotechnology. Analysis of an emerging domain of scientific and technological endeavour (Intermediary results) (2003), Steunpunt O&O Statistieken, K.U Leuven, B-3000 Leuven
19. Katz S.J. The self-similar science system. Research Policy 28 5 (1999) 501-517
20. Kessler M.M. Bibliographic coupling between scientific papers. American Documentation 14 (1963) 10-25
21. Kostoff R.N., delRio J.A., Humenik J.A., Garcia E.O., and Ramirez A.M. Citation mining: integrating text mining and bibliometrics for research user profiling. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 52 13 (2001) 1148-1156
22. Laredo, P. (2002, November 6-9). Six major challenges facing public intervention in higher education, science, technology and innovation. Paper presented at the 4th triple helix conference, Copenhagen.
23. Leydesdorff L. The university-industry knowledge relationship: analyzing patents and the science base of technologies. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 55 11 (2004) 991-1001
24. Malsch, I. (1997). Nanotechnology in Europe: experts perceptions and scientific relations between sub-areas (No. EUR 17710EN). Seville: European Commission - JRC, Institute for Prospective Technological Studies.
25. Marshakova I.V. Document coupling system based on references taken from Science Citation Index. Nauchno-TeknicheskayaInformatsiya 2 6.3 (1973) (in Russian)
26. Meyer M. Does science push technology? Patents citing scientific literature. Research Policy 29 3 (2000) 409-434
27. Meyer M., Persson O., and Power Y. Nanotechnology expert group and eurotech data mapping excellence in nanotechnologies (No. Preparatory study) (2001), EC, DG-Research, Brussels
28. Moed H.F., and Vriens M. Possible inaccuracies occurring in citation analysis. Journal of Information Science 15 (1989) 95-107
29. Murugesan P., and Moravcsik M.J. Variation of the nature of citation measures with journal and scientific specialties. Journal of the American Society for Information Science 29 (1978) 141-155
30. Naranan S. Bradford's law of bibliography of science: an interpretation. Nature 227 (1970) 631-632
31. Noyons E.C.M. Bibliometric mapping as a science policy and research management tool (1999), University DSWO Press, Leiden
32. Noyons, E. C., Buter, R. K., Hinze, S., van Raan, A. F. J., Schmoch, U., & Heinze, T., et al. (2003). Mapping excellence in science and technology across Europe: nanoscience and nanotechnology (Draft Report No. EC-PPN CT 2002-0001): EC.
33. NSF, Roco, M. C., & Bainbridge, W. S. (Eds.). (2002). Converging technologies for improving human performance. Nanotechnology, biotechnology, information technology and cognitive science. Arlington, Virginia: NSF/DOC-sponsored report.
34. Pao M.L. Term and citation retrieval - a field-study. Information Processing & Management 29 1 (1993) 95-112
35. Pinski G., and Narin F. Citation influence for journal aggregates of scientific publications: theory, with application to the literature of physics. Information Processing & Management 12 (1976) 297-312
36. Rip A. Mapping of science: possibilities and limitations. In: Raam A.F.J.v. (Ed). Handbook of quantitative studies of science and technology (1988), Elsevier, Amsterdam 253-273
37. Rousseau R. Relations between continuous versions of bibliometric laws. Journal of the American Society for Information Science 41 (1990) 197-203
38. Rousseau R. Sitations: an explanatory study. Cybermetrics 1 1 (1997) 7
39. Salton G., and McGill M.J. Introduction to modern information retrieval (1983), McGraw-Hill, New-York
40. Schmid G., Decker M., Ernst H., Fuchs H., Gruenwald W., Grunwald A., et al. Small dimensions and material properties. A definition of nanotechnology. Europaeische Akademie Graue Reihe 35 (2003) 1-134
41. Schummer J. Multidisciplinarity, interdisciplinarity, and patterns of research collaboration in nanoscience and nanotechnology. Scientometrics 59 3 (2004) 425-465
42. Small H. Co-citation in the scientific literature: a new measure of the relationship between two documents. Journal of the American Society for Information Science 24 4 (1973) 265-269
43. Small H., and Griffith B.C. The structure of scientific literatures i: identifying and graphing specialties. Science Studies 4 (1974) 17-40
44. Small H., and Sweeney E. Clustering the Science Citation Index using co-citations I - a comparison of methods. Scientometrics 7 3-6 (1985) 391-409
45. van Raan A.F.J. On growth, ageing, and fractal differentiation of science. Scientometrics 47 2 (2000) 347-362
46. van Raan A.F.J. Competition amongst scientists for publication status: toward a model of scientific publication and citation distributions. Scientometrics 51 1 (2001) 347-357
47. Zitt M. Facing diversity of science: a challenge for bibliometric indicators - comments on a Van Raan's focus article. Measurement: Interdisciplinary Research and Perspectives 3 1 (2005) 38-49
48. Zitt M., and Bassecoulard E. Reassessment of co-citation methods for science indicators: effect of methods improving recall rates. Scientometrics 37 2 (1996) 223-244
49. Zitt M., Ramanana-Rahary S., and Bassecoulard E. Bridging citation and reference distributions: part I. The referencing-structure function and its application to co-citation and co-item studies. Scientometrics 57 1 (2003) 93-118
50. Zitt M., Ramanana-Rahary S., and Bassecoulard E. Relativity of citation performance and excellence measures: from cross-field to cross-scale effects of field-normalisation. Scientometrics 63 2 (2005) 373-401