Theories of citation?

Scientometrics

Volumn 43, Issue 1, 1998, Pages 5-25

  Leydesdorff, L ^a  

^a Science and Technology Dynamics   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0002943532     PISSN: 01389130     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/BF02458391     Document Type: Article

References (96)

1. ABERNATHY, WILLIAM J. and KIM B. CLARK, Innovation: Mapping the winds of creative destruction, Research Policy, 14 (1985) 3-22.
2. ADAIR, W. C., Citation indexes for scientific literature?, American Documentation, 6 (1955) 31-32.
3. AMSTERDAMSKA, OLGA and LOET LEYDESDORFF, Citations: Indicators of significance, Scientometrics, 15 (1989) 449-471.
4. BARNES, BARRY and DAVID EDGE, Science in Context. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1982.
5. BAZERMAN, CHARLES, Shaping Written Knowledge: The Genre and Activity of the Experimental Article in Science. University of Wisconsin Press, Madison, WI, 1988.
6. BURT, RONALD S., Toward a Structural Theory of Action. Academic Press, New York, etc., 1982.
7. BURT, RONALD S., Network data from archival records. In: R. S. BURT and M. J. MINOR (Eds). Applied Network Analysis, Sage, Beverly Hills, etc., 1983, pp. 158-174.
8. BUSH, VANNEVAR (1945), The Endless Frontier: A Report to the President. Reprinted: Arno Press, New York, 1980.
9. GALLON, MICHEL, JEAN-PIERRE COURTIAL, WILLIAM A. TURNER, and SERGE BAUIN, From translation to problematic networks: An introduction to co-word analysis, Social Science Information, 22 (1983) 191-235.
10. CALLON, MICHEL, JOHN LAW, and ARIE RIP (Eds), Mapping the Dynamics of Science and Technology. Macmillan, London, 1986.
11. CALLON, MICHEL, JEAN-PIERRE COURTIAL, and HERVÉ PENAN, La Scientométrie. Presses Universitaires de France, Paris, 1993.
12. Cambridge Modern History. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 1958.
13. CHUBIN, D. E., and S. MOITRA, Content analysis of references: Adjunct of alternative to citation counting, Social Studies of Science, 5 (1975) 423-441.
14. CHUBIN, DARYL and SAL RESTIVO, The 'mooting' of science studies: research programmes and science policy. In: KARIN D. KNORR-CETINA and MICHAEL J. MULKAY (Eds), Science Observed: Perspectives on the Social Studies of Science. Sage, London, 1983, pp. 53-83.
15. COLLINS, HARRY M., The possibilities of science policy, Social Studies of Science, 15 (1985) 554-558.
16. COZZENS, SUSAN E., Taking the measure of science: A review of citation theories, Newsletter of the International Society for the Sociology of Knowledge, 8 (1981) 16.
17. COZZENS, SUSAN E., Comparing between the sciences: Citation context analysis of papers from neuropharmacology and the sociology of science, Social Studies of Science, 15 (1985) 127-153.
18. COZZENS, SUSAN E., What do citations count? The rhetorical-first model, Scientometrics, 15 (1989) 437-447.
19. CRONIN, BLAISE, The need for a theory of citation, Journal of Documentation, 37 (1981) 16-24.
20. CRONIN, BLAISE, The Citation Process: The Role and Significance of Citations in Scientific Communication, Taylor Graham, London, 1984.
21. EDGE, DAVID, Quantitative measures of communication in science: A critical overview, History of Science, 17 (1979) 102-134.
22. ELKANA, YEHUDA, JOSHUA LEDERBERG, ROBERT K. MERTON, ARNOLD THACKRAY, and HARRIET ZUCKERMAN, Toward a Metric of Science: The Advent of Science Indicators. John Wiley, New York, etc., 1978.
23. FUJIGAKI, YUKO, Filling the gap between discussions on science and scientists' everyday activities: Applying the autopoiesis system theory to scientific knowledge, Social Science Information, 37 (1997) 5-22.
24. GARFIELD, EUGENE, Citation indexes for science, Science, 122 (1955) 108-111.
25. GARFIELD, EUGENE, The obliteration phenomenon, Current Contents, No. 51/52 (1975) 5-7.
26. GARFIELD, EUGENE, Citation Indexing: Its Theory and Application in Science, Technology, and Humanities. John Wiley, New York, 1979.
27. GARFIELD, EUGENE, When to cite?, Library Quarterly 66 (1996, nr. 4), 449-458.
28. GARVEY, W. D., Communication: The Essence of Science. Pergamon Press, Oxford, 1979.
29. GIDDENS, ANTHONY, The Constitution of Society. Polity Press, Cambridge, 1984.
30. GILBERT, G. NIGEL, Referencing as persuasion, Social Studies of Science, 7 (1977) 113-122.
31. GILBERT, G. NIGEL, A simulation of the structure of academic science, Sociological Research Online 2 (1997, no. 2) 〈http://www.socresonline.org.uk/socresonline/2/2/3.html〉
32. GILBERT, G. NIGEL and MICHAEL J. MULKAY, Opening Pandora's Box: A Sociological Analysis of Scientists' Discourse. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1984.
33. GILLMOR, C. STEWART, Federal funding and knowledge growth in ionospheric physics, 1945-81, Social Studies of Science, 16 (1986) 105-133.
34. GLÄNZEL, WOLFGANG (Ed.), Proceedings of the Workshop in 'Bibliometric Standards', Scientometrics, 35 (1996) 165-277.
35. GOULDNER, ALVIN, The Dialectic of Ideology and Technology, Macmillan, London, etc., 1976.
36. HABERMAS, JÜRGEN, Theorie des kommunikativen Handeln. Suhrkamp, Frankfurt a.M., 1981.
37. JENCKS, C. and D. RIESMAN, The Academic Revolution, Doubleday, Garden City NY, 1968.
38. KAPLAN, NORMAN, The norms of citation behaviour: Prolegomena to the footnote, American Documentation, 16 (1965) 179-184.
39. KRONICK, DAVID, Scientific and Technical Periodicals of the Seventeenth and Eighteenth Centuries: a Guide. Scarecrow Press, Metuchen, N.J., 1991.
40. KUHN, THOMAS S., The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1962/1970.
41. LANGTON, CHRISTOPHER G. (Ed.), Artificial Life. Addison Wesley, Redwood City, CA, 1989.
42. LATOUR, BRUNO, Science in Action. Open University, Milton Keynes, 1987.
43. LATOUR, BRUNO and STEVE WOOLGAR, Laboratory Life. Sage, Beverly Hills, etc., 1979.
44. LEYDESDORFF, LOET, Various methods for the mapping of science, Scientometrics, 11 (1987) 291-320.
45. LEYDESDORFF, LOET, Words and co-words as indicators of intellectual organization, Research Policy, 18 (1989) 209-223.
46. LEYDESDORFF, LOET, A validation study of 'LEXIMAPPE', Scientometrics, 25 (1992) 295-312.
47. LEYDESDORFF, LOET, 'Structure'/'Action' contingencies and the model of parallel processing, Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 23 (1993) 47-77.
48. LEYDESDORFF, LOET, The Challenge of Scientometrics: The development, measurement and self-organization of scientific communications. DSWO Press, Leiden University, Leiden, 1995.
49. LEYDESDORFF, LOET, The New Communication Regime of University-Industry-Government Relations, In: HENRY ETZKOWITZ and LOET LEYDESDORFF (Eds), Universities and the Global Knowledge Economy: A Triple Helix of University-Industry-Government Relations. Cassell Academic, London, 1997, pp. 106-117.
50. LEYDESDORFF, LOET, JOHN IRVINE, and ANTHONY F. VAN RAAN (Eds), The relations between qualitative theory and scientometric methods in STS, Scientometrics, (Theme Issue), 15 (1989) 333-631.
51. LEYDESDORFF, LOET and OLGA AMSTERDAMSKA, Dimensions of citation analysis, Science, Technology and Human Values, 15 (1990) 305-335.
52. LEYDESDORFF, LOET and PAUL WOUTERS, Quantitative measuring and qualitative understanding: Is it possible to bridge the divide in STS?, EASST Review, 15 (1996, Nr. 3) 20-24.
53. LEYDESDORFF, LOET and PETER VAN DEN BESSELAAR, Scientometrics and communication theory: Towards theoretically informed indicators, Scientometrics, 38 (1997) 155-174.
54. LUHMANN, NIKLAS, Die Wissenschaft der Gesellschaft. Suhrkamp, Frankfurt a.M., 1990.
55. LUUKKONEN, TERTTU, Citations in the Rhetorical, Reward, and Communication Systems of Science. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Tampere, Tampere, 1990.
56. LUUKKONEN, TERTTU, Why has Latour's theory of citation been ignored by the bibliometric community? Scientometrics, 38 (1997) 27-37.
57. MACROBERTS, M. H. and MACROBERTS, B. R., Another test of the normative theory of citing, Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 16 (1987) 151-172.
58. MARTIN, BEN and JOHN IRVINE, Assessing basic research: Some partial indicators of scientific progress in radio astronomy, Research Policy, 12 (1983) 61-90.
59. MATURANA, H. R., and F. VARELA, Autopoiesis and Cognition: The Realization of the Living, Reidel, Boston, 1980.
60. MEADOWS, A. J., Communication in Science. Butterworths, London, 1974.
61. MERTON, ROBERT K., Priorities in scientific discovery, American Sociological Review, 22 (1957, 6), 635-659.
62. MERTON, ROBERT K., On the Shoulders of Giants: A Shandean Postscript. The Free Press, New York, 1965.
63. MERTON, ROBERT K., The Matthew effect in science, Science, 159 (5 January 1968, No. 3810) 56-63.
64. MOED, HENK F., W. J. M. BURGER, J. G. FRANKFORT, and ANTHONY F. J. VAN RAAN, The use of bibliometric data for the measurement of university research performance, Research Policy, 14 (1985) 131-146.
65. MORAVCSIK, M. J. and P. MURUGESAN, Some results on the function and quality of citations, Social Studies of Science, 5 (1975) 86-92.
66. MULKAY, M., J. POTTER, and S. YEARLEY, Why an analysis of scientific discourse is needed. In: K. D. KNORR-CETINA and M. MULKAY (Eds), Science Observed, Sage, London, 1983, pp. 171-203.
67. NADEL, ERNEST, Commitment and co-citation: An indicator of incommensurability in patterns of formal communication, Social Studies of Science, 13 (1983) 255-282.
68. NARIN, FRANCES, Evaluative Bibliometrics. Computer Horizons Inc., Cherry Hill, NJ, 1976.
69. PRICE, DEREK DE SOLLA, Science Since Babylon. Yale University Press, New Haven, 1961.
70. PRICE, DEREK DE SOLLA, Networks of Scientific Papers, Science 149 (1965) 510-515.
71. PRICE, DEREK DE SOLLA, Little Science, Big Science. Columbia University Press, New York, 1965.
72. PRICE, DEREK DE SOLLA, Citation measures of hard science, soft science, technology, and nonscience. In: C. E. NELSON and D. K. POLLACK (Eds), Communication among Scientists and Engineers. Heath, Lexington, MA, 1970, pp. 3-22.
73. RIP, ARIE and MARJAN HENNEKAM, Acknowledging Funding in Biotechnology and Bioengineering, Science Dynamics, Report to the US National Science Foundation, Amsterdam, 1985.
74. RUMELHART, D. E., J. L. MCCLELLAND, and the PDP Research Group, Parallel Distributed Processing. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA/London, 1986.
75. SMALL, HENRY, Co-citation in the scientific literature: a new measure of the relationship between two documents, Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 24 (1973) 265-269.
76. SMALL, HENRY G. Characteristics of Frequently Cited Papers in Chemistry. Final Report on NSF Contract #C795, ISI, Philadelphia (1974).
77. SMALL, HENRY, Cited documents as concept symbols, Social Studies of Science, 7 (1978) 113-122.
78. SMALL, HENRY, Recapturing physics in the 1920s through citation analysis, Czechoslovak Journal of Physics, 36 (1986) 142-147.
79. SMALL, HENRY and BELVER GRIFFITH, The structure of the scientific literature I, Science Studies, 4 (1974) 17-40.
80. SNYDER, HERBERT, BLAISE CRONIN, and ELISABETH DAVENPORT, What's the use of citation? Citation analysis as a literature topic in selected disciplines of the social sciences, Journal of Information Science, 21 (1995) 75-85.
81. SPIEGEL-RÖSING, INA, Wissenschaftsentwicklung und Wissenschaftssteuerung. Suhrkamp, Frankfurt a.M., 1973.
82. SPIEGEL-RÖSING, INA and DEREK DE SOLLA PRICE, Science, Technology and Society: A Cross-Disciplinary Perspective. Sage, London/Beverly Hills, 1977.
83. STICHWEH, RUDOLF, Zur Entstehung des modernen Systems wissenschaftlicher Disziplinen. Physik in Deutschland, 1740-1890. Suhrkamp, Frankfurt a.M, 1984.
84. STICHWEH, RUDOLF, Self-organization and autopoiesis in the development of modern science. In: WOLFGANG KROHN, GÜNTER KÜPPERS, and HELGA NOWOTNY (Eds), Selforganization: Portrait of a scientific revolution. Kluwer, Dordrecht, etc., 1990, pp. 195-207.
85. VAN RAAN, ANTHONY F. J. (Ed.), Handbook of Quantitative Studies of Science and Technology. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 1988.
86. WEBER, MAX, Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft. Mohr, Tübingen, 1922.
87. WEINBERG, BELLA H., The earliest Hebrew citation indexes, Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 48 (1997) 318-330.
88. WHITE, HYWEL D., DANIEL SULLIVAN, and EDWARD J. BARBONI, The interdependence of theory and experiment in revolutionary science: The case of parity violation, Social Studies of Science, 9 (1979) 303-327.
89. WHITE, HOWARD D. and BELVER C. GRIFFITH, Author co-citation: a literature measure of intellectual structure, Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 12 (1981) 163-171.
90. WHITLEY, RICHARD D., The Intellectual and Social Organization of the Sciences. Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1984.
91. WOOLGAR, STEVE, Beyond the citation debate: towards a sociology of measurement technologies and their use in science policies, Science and Public Policy, 18 (1991) 319-326.
92. WOUTERS, PAUL, Citation cycles and peer review cycles, Scientometrics, 38 (1997) 39-55.
93. WOUTERS, PAUL, The Citation Culture. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam (1998, forthcoming).
94. WOUTERS, PAUL and LOET LEYDESDORFF, Has Price's dream come true: Is scientometrics a hard science? Scientometrics, 31 (1994) 193-222.
95. ZUCKERMAN, HARRIET, Citation analysis and the complex problem of intellectual influence, Scientometrics, 12 (1987) 329-338.
96. ZUCKERMAN, HARRIET and ROBERT K. MERTON, Patterns of evaluation in science: Institutionalization, structure and functions of the referee system, Minerva, 9 (1971) 66-100.