Contextual cocitation: Augmenting cocitation analysis and its applications

Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology

Volumn 61, Issue 6, 2010, Pages 1130-1143

  Callahan, Alison ^a   Hockema, Stephen ^a   Eysenbach, Gunther ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

^b TORONTO GENERAL HOSPITAL   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COCITATION; FUTURE APPLICATIONS; MULTIPLE DISCIPLINES; NOVEL METHODS;

TECHNICAL WRITING;

EID: 77953004202     PISSN: 15322882     EISSN: 15322890     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/asi.21313     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Bavelas, J.B. (1978). The social psychology of citations. Canadian Psychological Review, 19(2), 158-163.
2. Bornmann, L., & Daniel, H.-D. (2008). Selecting manuscripts for a highimpact journal thorugh peer review: A citation analysis of communications that were accepted by Angewandte Chemie International Edition, or rejected but published elsewhere. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 59(11), 1841-1852.
3. Brooks, TA. (1986). Evidence of complex citer motivations. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 37(1), 34-36.
4. Chan, K.C., & Liano, K. (2009). Threshold citation analysis of influential articles, journals, institutions and researchers in accounting. Accounting and Finance, 49(1), 59-74.
5. Davis, P.M. (2009). Reward or persuasion? The battle to define the meaning of a citation. Learned Publishing, 22(1), 5-11.
6. Elkiss, A., Shen, S., Fader, A., Erkan, G., States, D., & Radev, D. (2008). Blind men and elephants: What do citation summaries tell us about a research article? Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 59(1), 51-62.
7. Eysenbach, G. (2008, June). Preserving the scholarly record with WebCite (www.webcitation.org): An archiving system for long-term digital preservation of cited Webpages. Paper presented at the 2008 Conference on Electronic Publishing (ELRUB 2008), Toronto, Canada. Retrieved February 25, 2010, from http://ocs.library.utoronto.ca/index.php/Elpub/ 2008/paper/view/705
8. Feeley, T.H. (2008). Abibliometric analysis of communication journals from 2002 to 2005. Human Communication Research, 34, 505-520.
9. Garfield, E. (1955). Citation indexes for science: A new dimension in documentatin through association of ideas. Science, 122(3159), 108-111.
10. Garfield, E. (1977). Can citation indexing be automated? In E. Garfield (Ed.), Essays of an Information Scientist. Philadelphia: ISI Press.
11. Gilbert, G.N. (1977). Referencing as persuasion. Social Studies of Science, 7(1), 113-122.
12. Giles, C.L., Bollacker, K.D., & Lawrence, S. (1998). CiteSeer: An automatic citation indexing system. In E. Witten, R. Akscyn, & F.M. Shipman III (Ed.), Digital Libraries 98: The Third ACM Conference on Digital Libraries (pp. 89-98). New York: ACM Press.
13. Gipp, B., & Beel, J. (2009). Citation Proximity Analysis (CPA)-A new approach for identifying related work, based on co-citation analysis. In B. Larsen & J. Leta (Eds.), Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Scientometrics and Informetrics (ISSI'09), July 2009, (pp. 571-575). Leuvuen, Belgium.: International Society for Scientometrics and Informetrics.
14. Griffith, B.C., Small, H.G., Stonehill, J.A., & Dey, S. (1974). The structure of scientific literatures II: Toward a macro- and .microstructure for science. Science Studies, 4(4), 339-365.
15. Herlach, G. (1978). Can retrieval of information from citation indexes be simplified? Multiple mention of a reference as a characteristic of the link between cited and citing article. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 29, 308-310.
16. Kaplan, N. (1965). The norms of citation behavior: Prolegomena to the footnote. American Documentation, 16(3), 179-184.
17. Kessler, M.M. (1963a). Bibliographic coupling between scientific documents. American Documentation, 14, 10-25.
18. Kessler, M.M. (1963b). Bibliographic coupling extended in time: Ten case histories. Information Strorage and Retrieval, 1, 169-187.
19. Kessler, M.M. (1965). Comparison of the results of bibliographic coupling and analytic subject indexing. American Documentation, 16(3), 223-233.
20. Kim, H.J. (2000). Motivations for hyperlinking in scholarly electronic articles: A qualitative study. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 51(10), 887-899.
21. Lawrence, S., Giles, CL., & Bollacker, K. (1999). Digital libraries and autonomous citation indexing. IEE Computer, 32(6), 67-71.
22. Leydesdorff, L. (1987). Various methods for the mapping of science. Scientometrics, 11(5-6), 295-324.
23. MacRoberts, M.H., & MacRoberts B.R. (1984). The negational reference: Or the art of dissembling. Social Studies of Science, 14, 91-94.
24. Marion, L.S. (2002). A tri-citation analysis exploring the citation image of Kurt Lewin. Proceedings of the ASIST Annual Meeting, 39, 3-13.
25. Martyn, J. (1964). Bibliographic coupling. Journal of Documentation, 20, 236.
26. McCain, K.W. (2009). Using tricitation to dissect the citation image: Conrad Hal Waddington and the rise of evolutionary developmental biology. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 60(7), 1301-1319.
27. McCain, K.W., & Salvucc, L.J. (2006). How influential is Brooks' Law? A longitudinal citation context analysis of Frederick Brooks' The Mythical Man Month. Journal of Information Science, 32, 277-295.
28. Moravcsik, M.J., & Murugesan, P. (1975). Some results on the function and quality of citations. Social Studies of Science, 5(1), 86-92.
29. Nakov, P.I., Schwartz, A.S., & Hearst, M.A. (2004, July). In Gitanees: Citation sentences for semantic analysis of bioscience text. Paper presented at the SIGIR 2004 Workshop on Search and Discovery in Bioinformatics, Sheffield, UK.
30. Nanba, H., & Okumura, M. (1999, August). In towards multi-paper summarization using reference information. Paper presented at the 16th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Stockholm, Sweden.
31. Nanba, H., & Okumura, M. (2005, September). In A. Rauber, S. Christodoulakis, A.M. Tjoa (Eds.), Automatic detection of survey articles. Paper presented at the Research and Advanced Technology for Digital Libraries; Ninth European Conference (ECDL 2005). Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 3652 (pp. 391-491). Berlin, Germany: Springer.
32. Nerur, S.P., Rasheed, A.A., & Natarajan, V. (2008). The intellectual structure of the strategic management field: An author co-citation analysis. Strategic Management Journal, 29, 319-336.
33. Ritchie, A., Teufel, S., & Robertson, S. (2006). How to find better index terms through, citations. In Proceedings of the Joint Conference of International Committee on Computational Linguistics and the Association for Computational Linguistics (COLING/ACL 2006), "Can computational linguistics improve information retrieval?" Workshop (pp. 25-32). Stroudsburg, PA: ACL.
34. Schneider, J.W., & Borlund, P. (2007). Matrix comparison, part 1 : Motivation and important issues for measuring the resemblance between proximity measures or ordination results. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58(11), 1586-1595.
35. Small, H. (1973). Co-citation in the scientific literature: A new measure of the relationship between two documents. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 24(4), 265-269.
36. Small, H. (1974). Multiple citation patterns in scientific literature: The circle and hill models. Information Storage and Retrieval, 10, 393-402.
37. Small, H. (1978). Cited documents as concept symbols. Social Studies of Science, 8, 327-340.
38. Small, H. (1979). Co-citation context analysis: The relationship between bibliometric structure and knowledge. In Tally R.D. and R.R. Deultgen (Eds.), Proceedings of the ASIS Annual Meeting. (Vol. 16, pp. 270-275). Medford, NJ: Information Today.
39. Small, H. (1982). Citation context analysis. Progress in Communication Sciences, 3, 287-310.
40. Small, H. (1986). The synthesis of specialty narratives from, co-citation clusters. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 37, 97-110.
41. Small, H., & Griffith B.C. (1974). The structure of scientific literatures I: Identifying and graphing specialties. Science Studies, 4(1), 17-40.
42. Sullivan, D., White, D.H., & Barboni, E.J. (1977). Co-citation analyses of science: An evaluation. Social Studies of Science, 7(2), 223-240.
43. Tagliacozzo, R. (1967). Citations and citation indexes: A. review Methods of Information in Medicine, 6, 136-142.
44. Teufel, S. (2001, June). Task-based evaluation of summary quality: describing relationships between scientific papers. Paper presented at the 2001 NAACL Workshop on Automatic Summarization, Pittsburgh, PA. Retrieved February 24, 2010, from, http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/~sht25/ papers/naac101.pdf
45. Tuominen, K., Talja, S., & Savolainen, R. (2002). In R. Fidel, H. Bruce, P. Ingwersen, & P. Vakkari (Eds.), Discourse, cognition and reality: Towards a social constructionist metatheory for library and information science. In Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Conceptions of Library and Information Science (CoLIS4) (pp. 271-283). Greenwood Village, CO: Libraries Unlimited.
46. White, H.D., & Griffith, B.C. (1981). Author cocitation: A literature measure of intellectual structure. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 32(3), 163-171.
47. White, M.D., & Wang, P. (1997). A qualitative study of citing behavior: Contributions, criteria and metalevel documentation concerns. The Library Quarterly, 67(2), 122-154.
48. Zhao, D., & Strotmann, A. (2008). Evolution of research activities and intellectual influences in information science 1996-2005: Introducing author bibliographic coupling analysis. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 59(13), 2070-2086.