A new methodological approach to bibliographic coupling and its application to the national, regional and institutional level

Scientometrics

Volumn 37, Issue 2, 1996, Pages 195-221

  Glanzel W ^a,c,d   Czerwon, H J ^b,c  

^a MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR THE HISTORY OF SCIENCE   (Germany)

^b BIELEFELD UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^c Res Assoc Sci Commun Info e V   (Germany)

^d INSTITUTE OF EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE   (Hungary)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0009285476     PISSN: 01389130     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/BF02093621     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. H. SMALL, Co-citation in the scientific literature: A new measure of the relationship between two doćuments, Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 24 (1973), 265-269.
2. I. V. MARSHAKOVA, System of connections between documents based on references (as the Science Citation Index), Nauchno-Tekhnicheskaya Informatsiya, Seriya 2, No. 6 (1973), 3-8 (in Russian).
3. M. M. KESSLER, Bibliographic coupling between scientific papers, American Documentation, 14 (1963), 10-25.
4. J. KING, A review of bibliometric and other science indicators and their role in research evaluation, Journal of Information Science, 13 (1987), 261-276.
5. D. HICKS, Limitations of co-citation analysis as a tool for science policy, Social Studies of Science, 17 (1987), 295-316.
6. G. VLADUTZ, J. COOK, "Bibliographic coupling and subject relatedness", In: 1984: Challenges to an Information Society, Proceedings of the 47th ASIS Annual Meeting (compiled by B. Flood, J. Witiak, T. H. Hogan), White Plains: Knowledge Industry Publications, 1984, pp. 204-207.
7. J. T. SHARABCHIEV, Comparative analysis of two methods of cluster analysis of bibliographic references, Nauchno-Tekhnicheskaya Informatsiya, Seriya 2, No. 4 (1988), 25-28 (in Russian).
8. W. GLÄNZEL, H. J. CZERWON, A New Methodological Approach to Bibliographic Coupling and Its Application to Research-Front and Other Core Documents, Proceedings of 5th International Conference on Scientometrics and Informetrics, held in River Forest, Illinois, June 7-10, Learned Information Inc., Medford, 1995, 167-176.
9. S. K. SEN, S. K. GAN, A mathematical extension of the idea of bibliographic coupling and its applications, Annals of Library Science and Documentation, 30 (1983), 78-82.
10. A. SCHUBERT, T. BRAUN, Relative indicators and relational charts for comparative assessment of publication output and citation impact, Scientometrics, 9 (1986), 281-291.
11. A. SCHUBERT, W. GLÄNZEL, T. BRAUN, Against Absolute Methods. Relative Scientometric Indicators and Relational Charts as Evaluation Tools. In: A. van Raan (Ed.), Handbook of Quantitative Studies of Science and Technology. Elsevier Science Publisher B.V., 1988, 137-176
12. W. GLÄNZEL, A. SCHUBERT, Characteristic scores and scales in assessing citation impact, Journal of Information Science, 14 (1988), 123-127.
13. W. GLÄNZEL, A. SCHUBERT, Some facts and figures on highly cited papers in the sciences, 1981-1985, Scientometrics, 25 (1992), 373-380.
14. W. GLÄNZEL, H.-J. CZERWON, What are highly cited publications ? A method applied to German scientific papers, 1980-1989, Research Evaluation, 2 (1992), 135-141.