Research synthesis

Language Teaching

Volumn 43, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 461-479

  Norris, John M ^a   Ortega, Lourdes ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HAWAII   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 78649970235     PISSN: 02614448     EISSN: 14753049     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S0261444810000200     Document Type: Review

References (80)

1. Hunt, M. (1997). How science takes stock: The story of meta-analysis. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
2. Language Teaching, Cambridge University Press (ISSN: 0261-4448). URL: http://journals.cambridge.org/lta
3. Glass, G. V. (1976). Primary, secondary and meta-analysis of research. Educational Researcher 5. 10, 3-8.
4. Krashen, S. D. (1977). Some issues relating to the Monitor Model. In H. D. Brown, C. A. Yorio & R. H. Crymes (eds.), On TESOL'77. Teaching and learning English as a second language: Trends in research and practice Washington, DC: TESOL, 144-158.
5. Smith, M. L. & G. V. Glass (1977). Meta-analysis of psychotherapy outcome studies. American Psychologist 32, 752-760.
6. Schmidt, F. L. & J. E. Hunter (1977). Development of a general solution to the problem of validity generalization. Journal of Applied Psychology 62, 529-540.
7. Rosenthal, R. (1978). Combining results of independent studies. Psychological Bulletin 85, 185-193.
8. Carver, R. P. (1978). The case against statistical significance testing. Harvard Educational Review 48, 378-399.
9. Rosenthal, R. (1979). The 'file drawer problem' and tolerance for null results. Psychological Bulletin 86, 638-641.
10. Krashen, S., M. H. Long & R. Scarcella (1979). Accounting for child-adult differences in second language rate and attainment. TESOL Quarterly 13, 573-582.
11. Smith, M. L. (1980). Publication bias and meta-analysis. Evaluation in Education 4, 22-24.
12. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, Cambridge University Press (ISSN: 0267-1905). URL: http://journals.cambridge.org/lta
13. Glass, G. V., B. McGaw & M. L. Smith (1981). Meta-analysis in social research. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
14. Light, R. & D. Pillemer (1984). Summing up: The science of reviewing research. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
15. Slavin, R. E. (1986). Best evidence synthesis: An alternative to meta-analytic and traditional reviews. Educational Researcher 15. 9, 5-11.
16. Ragin, C. C. (1987). The Comparative Method: Moving beyond qualitative and quantitative strategies. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
17. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd edn.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
18. Noblit, G. W. & R. D. Hare (1988). Meta-ethnography: Synthesizing qualitative studies Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
19. Auger, C. P. (1998). Information sources in grey literature. London: Bowker Saur.
20. Lazaraton, A. (1991). Power, effect size, and second language research. A researcher comments. TESOL Quarterly 25, 759-762.
21. Cochrane Collaboration: www.cochrane.org Centre for Reviews and Dissemination (CRD): www.york.ac. uk/inst/crd/index.htm
22. Evidence for Policy and Practice Information and Co-ordinating Centre (EPPI-Centre): eppi.ioe.ac.uk/cms
23. Lipsey, M. W. & D. B. Wilson (1993). The efficacy of psychological, educational, and behavioral treatment: Confirmation from meta-analysis. American Psychologist 48, 1181-1209.
24. Cooper, H. & L. V. Hedges (eds.) (1994). The handbook of research synthesis. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
25. Editor's statement. Language Learning 44. 1, p. 3
26. Thomas, M. (1994). Assessment of L2 proficiency in second language acquisition research. Language Learning 44, 307-336.
27. Thompson, B. (1996). AERA editorial policies regarding statistical significance testing: Three suggested reforms. Educational Researcher 25. 2, 26-30.
28. Harlow, L., S. Mulaik & J. Steiger (eds.) (1997). What if there were no significance tests? Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
29. Sahari, M. (1997). Elaboration as a text-processing strategy: A meta-analytic review. RELC Journal 28, 15-27.
30. Cochrane Qualitative Research Methods Group: www.joannabriggs.edu.au/ cqrmg
31. Review of Educational Research 68.4 and 69.1.
32. Ross, S. (1998). Self-assessment in second language testing: A meta-analysis and analysis of experiential factors. Language Testing 15, 1-20.
33. Wolfe-Quintero, K., S. Inagaki & H.-Y. Kim (1998). Second language development in writing: Measures of fluency, accuracy, and complexity. Honolulu, HI: University of Hawai'i, Second Language Teaching and Curriculum Center.
34. Wilkinson, L. & Task Force on Statistical Inference (1999). Statistical methods in psychology journals: Guidelines and explanations. American Psychologist 54, 594-604.
35. Krashen, S. (1999). Seeking a role for grammar: A review of some recent studies. Foreign Language Annals 32, 245-257.
36. Campbell Collaboration: www.campbellcollaboration.org
37. Comprehensive Meta-Analysis: www.meta-analysis.com
38. Editor's statement. Language Learning 50. 3, xi-xiii.
39. Norris, J. M. & L. Ortega (2000). Effectiveness of L2 instruction: A research synthesis and quantitative meta-analysis. Language Learning 50, 417-528.
40. Lipsey, M. W. & D. B. Wilson (2001). Practical meta-analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
41. Goldschneider, J. & R. M. DeKeyser (2001). Explaining the 'natural order of L2 morpheme acquisition' in English: A meta-analysis of multiple determinants. Language Learning 51, 1-50.
42. What Works Clearinghouse: http://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc
43. Finfgeld, D. L. (2003). Metasynthesis: The state of the art - so far. Qualitative Health Research 13, 893-904.
44. Masgoret, A.-M. & R. C. Gardner (2003). Attitudes, motivation, and second language learning: A meta-analysis of studies conducted by Gardner and associates. Language Learning 53, 123-163.
45. Ortega, L. (2003). Syntactic complexity measures and their relationship to L2 proficiency: A research synthesis of college-level L2 writing. Applied Linguistics 24, 492-518. (Pubitemid 37358238)
46. Zhao, Y. (2003). Recent developments in technology and language learning: A literature review and meta-analysis. CALICO Journal 21, 7-27.
47. Rothstein, H. R., A. J. Sutton & M. Borenstein (eds.) (2005). Publication bias in meta-analysis: Prevention, assessment and adjustments. Chichester: Wiley.
48. Dixon-Woods, M., S. Bonas, A. Booth, D. R. Jones, T. Miller, A. J. Sutton, R. Shaw, J. A. Smith & B. Young (2006). How can systematic reviews incorporate qualitative research? A critical perspective. Qualitative Research 6, 27-44.
49. Petticrew, M. & H. Roberts (2006). Systematic reviews in the social sciences: A practical guide. Oxford: Blackwell.
50. Society for Research Synthesis Methodology: www.srsm.org
51. Dinsmore, T. H. (2006). Principles, parameters, and SLA: A retrospective meta-analytic investigation into adult L2 learners' access to Universal Grammar. In Norris & Ortega (eds.), 53-90.
52. Indefrey, P. (2006). A meta-analysis of hemodynamic studies on first and second language processing: Which suggested differences can we trust and what do they mean? Language Learning 56 Supplement 1, 279-304.
53. Jeon, E. H. & T. Kaya (2006). Effects of L2 instruction on interlanguage pragmatic development: A meta-analysis. In Norris & Ortega (eds.), 165-211.
54. Keck, C. M., G. Iberri-Shea, N. Tracy-Ventura & S. Wa-Mbaleka (2006). Investigating the empirical link between task-based interaction and acquisition: A meta-analysis. In Norris & Ortega (eds.), 91-131.
55. Norris, J. M. & L. Ortega (eds.) (2006). Synthesizing research on language learning and teaching. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
56. Russell, J. & N. Spada (2006). The effectiveness of corrective feedback for the acquisition of L2 grammar: A meta-analysis of the research. In Norris & Ortega (eds.), 133-164.
57. Taylor, A. M. (2006). The effects of CALL versus traditional L1 glosses on L2 reading comprehension. CALICO Journal 23, 309-318.
58. Taylor, A., J. R. Stevens & J. W. Asher (2006). The effects of explicit reading strategy training on L2 reading comprehension: A meta-analysis. In Norris & Ortega (eds.), 213-244.
59. Téllez, K. & H. C. Waxman (2006). A meta-synthesis of qualitative research on effective teaching practices for English Language Learners. In Norris & Ortega (eds.), 245-277.
60. Thomas, M. (2006). Research synthesis and historiography: The case of assessment of second language proficiency. In Norris & Ortega (eds.), 279-298.
61. Krashen, S. (2007). Extensive reading in English as foreign language by adolescents and young adults: A meta-analysis. The International Journal of Foreign Language Teaching 3. 2, 23-29.
62. Mackey, A. & J. M. Goo (2007). Interaction research in SLA: A meta-analysis and research synthesis. In A. Mackey (ed.), Conversational interaction in second language acquisition: A collection of empirical studies. New York: Oxford University Press, 407-452.
63. Norris, J. M. & L. Ortega (2007). The future of research synthesis in applied linguistics: Beyond art or science. TESOL Quarterly 41, 805-815.
64. Truscott, J. (2007). The effect of error correction on learners' ability to write accurately. Journal of Second Language Writing 16, 255-272.
65. APA Publications and Communications Board Working Group on Journal Article Reporting Standards (2008). Reporting standards for research in psychology: Why do we need them? What might they be? American Psychologist 63. 9, 839-851.
66. Abraham, L. B. (2008). Computer-mediated glosses in second language reading comprehension and vocabulary learning: A meta-analysis. Computer Assisted Language Learning 21, 199-226.
67. Lee, S.-K. & H. T. Huang (2008). Visual input enhancement and grammar learning: A meta-analytic review. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 30, 307-331.
68. Wa-Mbaleka, S. (2008). A meta-analysis investigating the effects of reading on second language vocabulary learning. Saarbrücken, Germany: VDM.
69. Cooper, H. M., L. V. Hedges & J. Valentine (eds.), The handbook of research synthesis and meta-analysis (2nd edn.). New York: The Russell Sage Foundation.
70. Suri, H. & D. Clarke (2009). Advancements in research synthesis methods: From a methodologically inclusive perspective. Review of Educational Research 79, 395-430.
71. In'nami, Y. & R. Koizumi (2009). A meta-analysis of multitrait-multimethod studies in language testing research: Focus on language ability and Chapelle's (1998) construct definition and interpretation. Language Testing 26, 219-244.
72. Taylor, A. M. (2009). CALL-based versus paper-based glosses: Is there a difference in reading comprehension? CALICO Journal 27, 147-160.
73. Research Synthesis Methods (doi10.1002/jrsm.0), published by Wiley-Blackwell.
74. In'nami, Y. & R. Koizumi (2010). Database selection guidelines for meta-analysis in applied linguistics. TESOL Quarterly 44, 169-184.
75. Li, S. (2010). The effectiveness of corrective feedback in SLA: A meta-analysis. Language Learning 60, 309-365.
76. Lyster, R. & K. Saito (2010). Oral feedback in classroom SLA: A meta-analysis. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 32, 265-302.
77. Ortega, L. (2010). Research synthesis. In B. Paltridge & A. Phakiti (eds.), Companion to research methods in applied linguistics. London: Continuum, 111-126.
78. Oswald, F. L. & L. Plonsky (2010). Meta-analysis in second language research: Choices and challenges. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 30, 85-110.
79. Spada, N. & Y. Tomita (2010). Interactions between type of instruction and type of language feature: A meta-analysis. Language Learning 60, 263-308.
80. Plonsky, L. (in press). The effectiveness of second language strategy instruction: A meta-analysis. Language Learning.