The future of research synthesis in applied linguistics: Beyond art or science

TESOL Quarterly

Volumn 41, Issue 4, 2007, Pages 805-815

  Norris, John M ^a   Ortega, Lourdes ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HAWAII   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 38949207505     PISSN: 00398322     EISSN: 15457249     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/j.1545-7249.2007.tb00105.x     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Chaudron, C. (1988). Second language classrooms: Research on teaching and learning. New York: Cambridge University Press.
2. Cohen, J. (1994). The earth is round (p <.05). The American Psychologist, 49, 997-1003.
3. Collentine, J., & Freed, B. (Eds.). (2004). Learning context and its effects on second language acquisition [Special issue]. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 26(2).
4. Cooper, H., & Hedges, L. V. (Eds.). (1994). The handbook of research synthesis. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
5. Davis, K. A., & Lazaraton, A. (Eds.). (1995). Qualitative research in ESOL [Special issue]. TESOL Quarterly, 29(3).
6. Dixon-Woods, M., Bonas, S., Booth, A., Jones, D. R., Miller, T., Sutton, A. J., et al. (2006). How can systematic reviews incorporate qualitative research? A critical perspective. Qualitative Research, 6, 27-44.
7. Dörnyei, Z., & Schmidt, R. (Eds.). (2001). Motivation and second language acquisition (Technical Report No. 23). Honolulu, HI: University of Hawai'i, Second Language Teaching and Curriculum Center.
8. DuFon, M. A., & Churchill, E. (Eds.). (2006). Language learners in study abroad contexts. Clevedon, England: Multilingual Matters.
9. Ellis, N. C. (2006). The associative-cognitive CREED. In B. VanPatten & J. Williams (Eds.), Theories in second language acquisition: An introduction (pp. 77-95). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
10. Ferris, D. R. (2004). The "grammar correction" debate in L2 writing: Where are we, and what do we go from here? (And what do we do in the meantime?). Journal of Second Language Writing, 13, 49-62.
11. Foster, P., & Ohta, A. S. (2005). Negotiation for meaning and peer assistance in second language classrooms. Applied Linguistics, 26, 402-430.
12. Glass, G. V. (1976). Primary, secondary, and meta-analysis of research. Educational Researcher, 5(10), 3-8.
13. Glass, G. V. (1999). Meta-analysis at 25. Paper presented at the Office of Special Education Programs Research Project Directors' Conference, U.S. Department of Education. Retrieved March 1, 2007, from http://glass.ed.asu. edu/gene/papers/meta25.html
14. Glass, G. V., McGaw, B., & Smith, M. L. (1981). Meta-analysis in social research. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
15. Goldschneider, J., & DeKeyser, R. M. (2001). Explaining the "natural order of L2 morpheme acquisition" in English: A meta-analysis of multiple determinants. Language Learning, 51, 1-50.
16. Grant, C. A., & Grauer, E. (1999). (Re)viewing a review: A case history of the Review of Educational Research. Review of Educational Research, 69, 384-396.
17. Grissom, R. J., & Kim, J. J. (2005). Effect sizes for research: A broad practical approach. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
18. House, E. R., & Howe, K. R. (1999). Values in evaluation and social research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
19. Hunt, M. (1997). How science takes stock: The story of meta-analysis. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
20. Keck, C. M., Iberri-Shea, G., Tracy-Ventura, N., & Wa-Mbaleka, S. (2006). Investigating the empirical link between task-based interaction and acquisition: A metaanalysis. InJ. M. Norris & L. Ortega (Eds.), Synthesizing research on language learning and teaching (pp. 91-131). Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
21. Klein, R. B. (2004). Beyond significance testing: Reforming data analysis methods in behavioral research. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
22. Krashen, S., Long, M. H., & Scarcella, R. (1979). Accounting for child-adult differences in second language rate and attainment. TESOL Quarterly, 13, 573-582.
23. Lazaraton, A. (2000). Current trends in research methodology and statistics in applied linguistics. TESOL Quarterly, 34, 175-181.
24. Light, R., & Pillemer, D. (1984). Summing up: The science of reviewing research. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
25. Lipsey, M. W., & Wilson, D. B. (2001). Practical meta-analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
26. Loschky, L., & Bley-Vroman, R. (1993). Grammar and task-based methodology. In G.Crookes & S. Gass (Eds.), Tasks and language learning: Integrating theory and practice (pp. 123-167). Philadelphia: Multilingual Matters.
27. Masgoret, A.-M., & Gardner, R. C. (2003). Attitudes, motivation, and second language learning: A meta-analysis of studies conducted by Gardner and associates. Language Learning, 53, 123-163.
28. Muñoz, C. (Ed.). (2006). Age and the rate of foreign language learning. Clevedon, England: Multilingual Matters.
29. Nicholas, H., Lightbown, P. M., & Spada, N. (2001). Recasts as feedback to language learners. Language Learning, 51, 719-758.
30. Norris, J. M., & Ortega, L. (2000). Effectiveness of L2 instruction: A research synthesis and quantitative meta-analysis. Language Learning, 50, 417-528.
31. Norris, J. M., & Ortega, L. (Eds.). (2006a). Synthesizing research on language learning and teaching. Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
32. Norris, J. M., & Ortega, L. (2006b). The value and practice of research synthesis for language learning and teaching. In J. M. Norris & L. Ortega (Eds.), Synthesizing research on language learning and teaching (pp. 3-50). Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
33. Ortega, L. (2003). Syntactic complexity measures and their relationship to L2 proficiency: A research synthesis of college-level L2 writing. Applied Linguistics, 24, 492-518.
34. Ortega, L. (2005). For what and for whom is our research? The ethical as transformative lens in instructed SLA. Modern Language Journal, 89, 427-443.
35. Paterson, B. L., Thorne, S. E., Canam, C., &Jillings, C. (2001). Meta-study of qualitative health research: A practical guide to meta-analysis and meta-synthesis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
36. Patton, M. (1997). Utilization focused evaluation: The new century text (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
37. Rosenthal, R., & DiMatteo, M. R. (2001). Meta-analysis: Recent developments in quantitative methods for literature reviews. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 59-82.
38. Shadish, W. R., Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (2002). Experimental and quasiexperimental designs for generalized causal inference. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
39. Shanahan, T. (2002). Research synthesis: Making sense of the accumulation of knowledge in reading. In M. L. Kamil, P. B. Mosenthal, P. D. Pearson, & R. Barr (Eds.), Methods of literacy research: The methodology chapters from the handbook of reading research, volume III (pp. 133-150). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
40. Smith, M. L., & Glass, G. V. (1977). Meta-analysis of psychotherapy outcome studies. The American Psychologist, 32, 752-760.
41. Tashakkori, A., & Creswell, J. W. (2007). Editorial: The new era of mixed methods. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1, 3-7.
42. Téllez, K., & Waxman, H. C. (2006). A meta-synthesis of qualitative research on effective teaching practices for English language learners. In J. M. Norris & L. Ortega (Eds.), Synthesizing research on language learning and teaching (pp. 245-277). Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
43. Thomas, M. (2006). Research synthesis and historiography: The case of assessment of second language proficiency. InJ. M. Norris & L. Ortega (Eds.), Synthesizing research on language learning and teaching (pp. 279-298). Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
44. Thompson, B. (2006). Foundations of behavioral statistics: An insight-based approach. New York: Guilford.
45. Truscott, J. (1996). The case against grammar correction in L2 writing classes [Review article]. Language Learning, 46, 327-369.
46. Truscott, J. (1998). Noticing in second language acquisition: A critical review. Second Language Research, 14, 103-135.