Exploring species limits in two closely related Chinese oaks

PLoS ONE

Volumn 5, Issue 11, 2010, Pages

  Zeng, Yan Fei ^a,b   Liao, Wan Jin ^b   Petit, Rémy J ^c,d   Zhang, Da Yong ^b  

^a RESEARCH INSTITUTE OF FORESTRY   (China)

^b BEIJING NORMAL UNIVERSITY   (China)

^c UMR 1202 BIOGECO   (France)

^d UNIVERSITÉ DE BORDEAUX   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AMPLIFIED FRAGMENT LENGTH POLYMORPHISM; ARTICLE; BAYES THEOREM; CHINA; CLUSTER ANALYSIS; CONTROLLED STUDY; GENE LOCUS; GENETIC DISTANCE; GENETIC MARKER; GENETIC VARIABILITY; GEOGRAPHY; INTROGRESSION; NONHUMAN; OAK; PLANT GENE; PLANT GENETICS; POPULATION GENETICS; PRINCIPAL COORDINATE ANALYSIS; QUERCUS LIAOTUNGENSIS; QUERCUS MONGOLICA; SIMPLE SEQUENCE REPEAT; SIMULATION; TAXONOMY; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; CLASSIFICATION; GENETICS; GENOTYPE; GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT AND AGING; PHYLOGENY; SPECIES DIFFERENCE;

QUERCUS; QUERCUS WUTAISHANICA;

MICROSATELLITE DNA; PLANT DNA;

AMPLIFIED FRAGMENT LENGTH POLYMORPHISM ANALYSIS; BAYES THEOREM; CHINA; CLUSTER ANALYSIS; DNA, PLANT; GENETIC VARIATION; GENOTYPE; GEOGRAPHY; MICROSATELLITE REPEATS; MODELS, GENETIC; PHYLOGENY; QUERCUS; SPECIES SPECIFICITY;

EID: 78649795003     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0015529     Document Type: Article

References (88)

1. Harrison RG (1993) Hybrids and hybrid zones: historical perspective. In: Harrison RG, ed. Hybrid zones and the evolutionary process. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. pp 3-12.
2. Barton NH, Hewitt GM (1985) Analysis of hybrid zones. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 16:113-148.
3. Jiggins CD, Mallet J (2000) Biomodal hybrid zones and speciation. Trends Ecol Evol 15: 250-255.
4. Coyne JA, Orr HA (2004) Speciation. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates, Inc. 545 p.
5. Rieseberg LH, Wood TE, Baack EJ (2006) The nature of plant species. Nature 440: 524-527.
6. Aldridge G, Campbell DR (2009) Genetic and morphological patterns show variation in frequency of hybrids between Ipomopsis (Polemoniaceae) zones of sympatry. Heredity 102: 257-265.
7. Harrison RG (1990) Hybrid zones: Windows on evolutionary process. Oxford Surveys in Evolutionary Biology 7: 69-128.
8. Burger WC (1975) The species concept in Quercus. Taxon 24: 45-50.
9. Van Valen L (1976) Ecological species, multispecies, and oaks. Taxon 25:233-239.
10. Grant V (1981) Plant speciation. New York: Columbia University Press. 563 p.
11. Jensen RJ, Hokanson SC, Isebrands JG, Hancock JF (1993) Morphometric variation in oaks of the Apostle Islands in Wisconsin: evidence of hybridization between Quercus rubra and Q. ellipsoidalis (Fagaceae). Am J Bot 80: 1358-1366.
12. Rushton BS (1993) Natural hybridization within the genus Quercus L. Ann Sci For 50: 73s-90s.
13. Benson L, Phillips EA, Wilder PA (1967) Evolutionary sorting of characters in a hybrid swarm. I: Direction of slope. Am J Bot 54: 1017-1026.
14. Whittemore AT, Schaal BA (1991) Interspecific gene flow in sympatric oaks. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 88: 2540-2544.
15. Dumolin-Lapegue S, Kremer A, Petit RJ (1999) Are chloroplast and mitochondrial DNA variation species independent in oaks? Evolution 53:1406-1413.
16. Petit RJ, Csaikl UM, Bordács S, Burg K, Coart E, et al. (2002) Chloroplast DNA variation in European white oaks: phylogeography and patterns of diversity based on data from over 2600 populations. Forest Ecol Manag 156: 5-26.
17. Bodénes C, Joandet S, Laigret F, Kremer A (1997) Detection of genomic regions differentiating two closely related oak species Quercus petraea (Matt.) Liebl. And Quercus robur L. Heredity 78: 433-444.
18. Bruschi P, Vendramin GG, Bussotti F, Grossoni P (2000) Morphological and molecular differentiation between Quercus petraea (Matt.) Liebl. and Quercus pubescens Willd. (Fagaceae) in Northern and Central Italy. Ann Bot 85: 325-333.
19. Muir G, Fleming CC, Schlötterer C (2001) Three divergent rDNA clusters predate the species divergence in Quercus petraea (Matt.) Liebl. and Quercus robur L. Mol Biol Evol 18: 112-119.
20. González-Rodríguez A, Arias DM, Valencia S, Oyama K (2004) Morphological and RAPD analysis of hybridization between Quercus affinis and Q. laurina (Fagaceae), two Mexican red oaks. Am J Bot 91: 401-409.
21. Howard DJ, Preszler RW, Williams J, Fenchel S, Boecklen WJ (1997) How discrete are oak species? Insights from a hybrid zone between Quercus grisea and Quercus gambelii. Evolution 51: 747-755.
22. Zanetto A, Roussel G, Kremer A (1994) Geographic variation of inter-specific differentiation between Quercus robur L. and Quercus petraea (Matt.) Liebl. Forest Genet 1: 111-123.
23. Bodénes C, Labbé T, Pradere S, Kremer A (1997) General vs. local differentiation between two closely related white oak species. Mol Ecol 6: 713-724.
24. Muir G, Fleming CC, Schlötterer C (2000) Species status of hybridizing oaks. Nature 405: 1016-1016.
25. Craft KJ, Ashley MV, Koenig WD (2002) Limited hybridization between Quercus lobata and Quercus douglasii (Fagaceae) in a mixed stand in central coastal California. Am J Bot 89: 1792-1798.
26. Ishida TA, Hattori K, Sato H, Kimura MT (2003) Differentiation and hybridization between Quercus crispula and Q. dentata (Fagaceae): insights from morphological traits, amplified fragment length polymorphism markers, and leafminer composition. Am J Bot 90: 769-776.
27. Valbuena-Carabaña M, González-Martínez SC, Sork VL, Collada C, Soto A, et al. (2005) Gene flow and hybridisation in a mixed oak forest (Quercus pyrenaica Willd. and Quercus petraea (Matts.) Liebl.) in central Spain. Heredity 95: 457-465.
28. Dodd RS, Afzal-Rafii Z (2004) Selection and dispersal in a multispecies oak hybrid zone. Evolution 58: 261-269.
29. Gugerli F, Brodbeck S, Holderegger R (2008) Utility of multilocus genotypes for taxon assignment in stands of closely related European white oaks from Switzerland. Ann Bot 102: 855-863.
30. Muir G, Schlötterer C (2005) Evidence for shared ancestral polymorphism rather than recurrent gene flow at microsatellite loci differentiating two hybridizing oaks (Quercus spp.). Mol Ecol 14: 549-561.
31. Gardiner AS (1970) Pedunculate and sessile oak (Quercus robur L. and Quercus petraea (Mattuschka) Liebl.): A review of the hybrid controversy. Forestry 43: 151-160.
32. Curtu AL, Gailing O, Finkeldey R (2009) Patterns of contemporary hybridization inferred from paternity analysis in a four-oak-species forest. BMC Evol Biol 9: 284.
33. Jensen J, Larsen A, Nielsen LR, Cottrell J (2009) Hybridization between Quercus robur and Q. petraea in a mixed oak stand in Denmark. Ann For Sci 66: 706-717.
34. Lepais O, Petit RJ, Guichoux E, Lavabre JE, Alberto F, et al. (2009) Species relative abundance and direction of introgression in oaks. Mol Ecol 18: 2228-2242.
35. Salvini D, Bruschi P, Fineschi S, Grossoni P, Kjaer ED, et al. (2009) Natural hybridisation between Quercus petraea (Matt.) Liebl. and Quercus pubescens Willd. within an Italian stand as revealed by microsatellite fingerprinting. Plant Biology 11: 758-765.
36. Peñaloza-Ramírez JM, González-Rodríguez A, Mendoza-Cuenca L, Caron H, Kremer A, et al. (2010) Interspecific gene flow in a multispecies oak hybrid zone in the Sierra Tarahumara of Mexico. Ann Bot 105: 389-399.
37. Streiff R, Ducousso A, Lexer C, Steinkellner H, Gloessl J, et al. (1999) Pollen dispersal inferred from paternity analysis in a mixed oak stand of Quercus robur L. and Q. petraea (Matt.) Liebl. Mol Ecol 8: 831-841.
38. Zhang YT (2000) Fagaceae. In: Fu LK, Chen TQ, Lang KY, Hong T, Lin Q, eds. Higher Plants of China. Qingdao: Qingdao Publishing House. pp 177-254.
39. Wang HX, Hu ZA, Zhong M, Yun R, Qian YQ (1997) Genetic Diversity of Liaodong Oak Populations. In: Hu ZA, Zhang YP, eds. Genetic Diversity of Animals and Plants in China. Hangzhou: Zhejiang Science and Technology Press. pp 155-159.
40. Chen HY, Huang CJ (1998) Quercus. Flora Reipublicae Popularis Sinicae. Beijing: Science Press. pp 213-332.
41. Huang CJ, Zhang YT, Bartholomew B (1999) Fagaceae. In: Flora of China Editorial Committee, editor. Flora of China. Beijing: Science Press and St. Louis: Missouri Botanical Garden Press. pp 314-402.
42. Beljaev EA (2004) A new oak species for the flora of Russia Quercus wutaishanica (Fagaceae) from Primorskiy territory. Bot Zh 89: 1665-1672.
43. Yun R, Wang HX, Hu ZA, Zhong M, Wei W, et al. (1998) Genetic differentiation of Quercus mongolica and Q. liaotungensis based on morphological observation, isozyme and DNA analysis. Acta Bot Sin 40: 1040-1046.
44. Dow BD, Ashley MV, Howe HF (1995) Characterization of highly variable (GA/CT)n microsatellites in the bur oak, Quercus macrocarpa. Theor Appl Genet 91: 137-141.
45. Dow BD, Ashley MV (1996) Microsatellite analysis of seed dispersal and parentage of saplings in bur oak, Quercus macrocarpa. Mol Ecol 5: 615-627.
46. Steinkellner H, Fluch S, Turetschek E, Lexer C, Streiff R, et al. (1997) Identification and characterization of (GA/CT)n - microsatellite loci from Quercus petraea. Plant Mol Biol 33: 1093-1096.
47. Kampfer S, Lexer C, Glössl J, Steinkellner H (1998) Characterization of (GA)n microsatellite loci from Quercus robur. Hereditas 129: 183-186.
48. Aldrich PR, Michler CH, Sun WL, Romero-Severson J (2002) Microsatellite markers for northern red oak (Fagaceae: Quercus rubra). Mol Ecol Notes 2: 472-474.
49. Mishima K, Watanabe A, Isoda K, Ubukata M, Takata K (2006) Isolation and characterization of microsatellite loci from Quercus mongolica var. crispula. Mol Ecol Notes 6: 695-697.
50. Vos P, Hogers R, Bleeker M, Reijans M, van de Lee T, et al. (1995) AFLP: a new technique for DNA fingerpringting. Nucleic Acids Res 23: 4407-4414.
51. Goudet J (2001) FSTAT, a program to estimate and test gene diverisities and fixation indices. Version 2.9.3 ed.
52. Rousset F (2008) GENEPOP '007: a complete re-implementation of the GENEPOP software for Windows and Linux. Mol Ecol Resour 8: 103-106.
53. Vekemans X, Beauwens T, Lemaire M, Roldan-Ruiz I (2002) Data from amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP) markers show indication of size homoplasy and of a relationship between degree of homoplasy and fragment size. Mol Ecol 11: 139-151.
54. Zhivotovsky LA (1999) Estimating population structure in diploids with multilocus dominant DNA markers. Mol Ecol 8: 907-913.
55. Lynch M, Milligan BG (1994) Analysis of population genetic structure with RAPD markers. Mol Ecol 3: 91-99.
56. Weir BS, Cockerham CC (1984) Estimating F-Statistics for the analysis of population structure. Evolution 38: 1358-1370.
57. Peakall R, Smouse PE, Huff DR (1995) Evolutionary implications of allozyme and RADP variation in diploid populations of dioecious buffalograss (Buchloe dactyloides). Mol Ecol 4: 135-147.
58. Peakall R, Smouse PE (2006) GENALEX 6: genetic analysis in Excel. Population genetic software for teaching and research. Mol Ecol Notes 6: 288-295.
59. Nei M (1972) Genetic distance between populations. Am Nat 106: 283-292.
60. Nei M (1987) Molecular evolutionary genetics. New York: Columbia University Press. 512 p.
61. Felsenstein J (2004) PHYLIP (Phylogeny Inference Package). version 3.6. ed. Seattle, Washington: Department of Genome Sciences, University of Washington.
62. Pritchard JK, Stephens M, Donnelly P (2000) Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data. Genetics 155: 945-959.
63. Falush D, Stephens M, Pritchard JK (2003) Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data: linked loci and correlated allele frequencies. Genetics 164: 1567-1587.
64. Falush D, Stephens M, Pritchard JK (2007) Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data: dominant markers and null alleles. Mol Ecol Notes 7: 574-578.
65. Evanno G, Regnaut S, Goudet J (2005) Detecting the number of clusters of individuals using the software STRUCTURE: a simulation study. Mol Ecol 14: 2611-2620.
66. Rosenberg NA (2004) DISTRUCT: a program for the graphical display of population structure. Mol Ecol Notes 4: 137-138.
67. Vähä JP, Primmer CR (2006) Efficiency of model-based Bayesian methods for detecting hybrid individuals under different hybridization scenarios and with different numbers of loci. Mol Ecol 15: 63-72.
68. Beaumont MA, Nichols RA (1996) Evaluating loci for use in the genetic analysis of population structure. Proc R Soc Lond B 263: 1619-1626.
69. Beaumont MA, Balding DJ (2004) Identifying adaptive genetic divergence among populations from genome scans. Mol Ecol 13: 969-980.
70. Tomlinson PT, Jensen RJ, Hancock JF (2000) Do whole tree silvic characters indicate hybridization in red oak (Quercus section Lobatae)? Am Midl Nat 143: 154-168.
71. Coart E, Lamote V, De Loose M, Van Bockstaele E, Lootens P, et al. (2002) AFLP markers demonstrate local genetic differentiation between two indigenous oak species [Quercus robur L. and Quercus petraea (Matt.) Liebl.] in Flemish populations. Theor Appl Genet 105: 431-439.
72. Duminil J, Caron H, Scotti I, Cazal S, Petit RJ (2006) Blind population genetics survey of tropical rainforest trees. Mol Ecol 15: 3505-3513.
73. Zeng YF (2008) The species status, phylogeography and population genetic structure of Quercus liaotungensis and Quercus mongolica. Beijing: Beijing Normal University. 127 p.
74. Kremer A, Dupouey JL, Deans JD, Cottrell J, Csaikl U, et al. (2002) Leaf morphological differentiation between Quercus robur and Quercus petraea is stable across western European mixed oak stands. Ann For Sci 59: 777-787.
75. Mariette S, Cottrell J, Csaikl UM, Goikoechea P, König A, et al. (2002) Comparison of levels of genetic diversity detected with AFLP and microsatellite markers within and among mixed Q. petraea (Matt.) Liebl. and Q. robur L. stands. Silvae Genet 51: 72-79.
76. Scotti-Saintagne C, Mariette S, Porth I, Goicoechea PG, Barreneche T, et al. (2004) Genome scanning for interspecific differentiation between two closely related oak species [Quercus robur L. and Q. petraea (Matt.) Liebl.]. Genetics 168: 1615-1626.
77. Goodman SN (1999) Toward evidence-based medical statistics. 2: The Bayes factor. Ann Intern Med 130: 1005-1013.
78. Harrison RG, Bogdanowicz SM (1997) Patterns of variation and linkage disequilibium in a field cricket hybrid zone. Evolution 51: 493-505.
79. Williams JH, Boecklen WJ, Howard DJ (2001) Reproductive processes in two oak (Quercus) contact zones with different levels of hybridization. Heredity 87: 680-690.
80. Muller CH (1952) Ecological control of hybridization in Quercus: a factor in the mechanism of evolution. Evolution 6: 147-161.
81. Alberto F, Niort J, Derory J, Lepais O, Vitalis R, et al. (2010) Population differentiation of sessile oak at the altitudinal front of migration in the French Pyrenees. Mol Ecol 19: 2626-2639.
82. Burgarella C, Lorenzo Z, Jabbour-Zahab R, Lumaret R, Guichoux E, et al. (2009) Detection of hybrids in nature: application to oaks (Quercus suber and Q. ilex). Heredity 102: 442-452.
83. Nason JD, Ellstrand NC, Arnold ML (1992) Patterns of hybridization and introgression in populations of oaks, manzanitas, and irises. Am J Bot 79: 101-111.
84. Silliman FE, Leisner RS (1958) An analysis of a colony of hybrid oaks. Am J Bot 45: 730-736.
85. Rieseberg LH, Kim S-C, Randell RA, Whitney KD, Gross BL, et al. (2007) Hybridization and the colonization of novel habitats by annual sunflowers. Genetica 129: 149-165.
86. Currat M, Ruedi M, Petit RJ, Excoffier L (2008) The hidden side of invasions: massive introgression by local genes. Evolution 62: 1908-1920.
87. Howard DJ (1993) Reinforcement: origin, dynamics and fate of an evolutionary hypothesis. In: Harrison RG, ed. Hybrid zones and the evolutionary process. Oxford: Oxford University Press. pp 46-69.
88. Petit RJ, Bodénes C, Ducousso A, Roussel G, Kremer A (2004) Hybridization as a mechanism of invasion in oaks. New Phytol 161: 151-164.