Limited hybridization between Quercus lobata and Quercus douglasii (Fagaceae) in a mixed stand in central coastal California

American Journal of Botany

Volumn 89, Issue 11, 2002, Pages 1792-1798

  Craft, Kathleen J ^a   Ashley, Mary V ^a   Koenig, Walter D ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Bayesian clustering; California oaks; Fagaceae; Hybridization; Microsatellites; Quercus douglasii; Quercus lobata

Indexed keywords

BAYESIAN ANALYSIS; GENETIC STRUCTURE; HYBRIDIZATION; TREE;

CALIFORNIA; UNITED STATES;

EMBRYOPHYTA; FAGACEAE; LOBATA; QUERCUS; QUERCUS DOUGLASII; QUERCUS LOBATA;

EID: 0036860522     PISSN: 00029122     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3732/ajb.89.11.1792     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Aldrich, P. R., and J. L. Hamrick. 1998. Reproductive dominance of pasture trees in a fragmented tropical forest mosaic. Science 281: 103-105.
2. Bacilieri, R., A. Ducousson, R. J. Petit, and A. Kremer. 1996. Mating system and asymetric hybridization in a mixed stand of European oaks. Evolution 50: 900-908.
3. Balloux, F., and N. Lugon-Moulin. 2002. The estimation of population differentiation with microsatellite markers. Molecalar Ecology 11: 155-165.
4. Barton, N. H., and M. Slatkin. 1986. A Quasi-equilibrium theory of the distribution of rare alleles in a subdivided population. Heredity 56: 409-415.
5. Belahbib, N., M.-H. Pemonge, A. Ouassou, H. Sbay, A. Kremer, and R. J. Petit. 2001. Frequent cytoplasmic exchanges between oak species that are not closely related: Quercus ruber and Q. ilex in Morocco. Molecular Ecology 10: 2003-2012.
6. Bruschi, P., G. G. Vendramin, F. Bussontti, and P. Grossoni. 2000. Morphological and molecular differentiation between Quercus petraea (Matt.) Liebl. and Qaercus pubescens Willd. (Fagaceae) in northern and central Italy. Annals of Botany 85: 325-333.
7. Burger, W. C. 1975. The species concept in Quercas. Taxon 24: 45-50.
8. Burns, R. M., and B. H. Honkala. 1990. Silvics of North America, vol. 2. Hardwoods. Agricultural Handbook 654, Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Washington D.C., USA.
9. Chakraborty, R., M. De Andrade, S. P. Daiger, and B. Budowle. 1992. Apparent heterozygote deficiencies observed in DNA typing data and their implications in forensic applications. Annals of Human Genetics 56: 45-57.
10. Chase, M. R., C. Moller, R. Kesseli, and K. S. Bawa. 1996. Distant gene flow in tropical trees. Nature 383: 398-399.
11. Darwin, C. 1859. On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection. John Murray, London, UK.
12. Dow, B. D., and M. V. Ashley. 1996. Microsatellite analysis of seed dispersal and parentage of saplings in bur oak, Quercus macrocarpa. Molecular Ecology 5: 120-132.
13. Dow, B. D., and M. V. Ashley. 1998. High levels of gene flow in bur oak revealed by paternity analysis using microsatellites. Journal of Heredity 89: 62-70.
14. n microsatellites in the bur oak. Quercus marcrocarpa. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 91: 137-141.
15. Dumolin-Lapegue, S., A. Kremer, and R. J. Petit. 1999. Are chloroplast and mitochondrial DNA variation species independent in oaks? Evolution 53: 1406-1413.
16. Dumolin-Lapegue, S., M.-H. Pemonge, and R. J. Petit. 1998. Association between chloroplast and mitochondrial lineages in oaks. Molecular Biology and Evolution 15: 1321-1331.
17. Ferris, C., R. P. Oliver, A. J. Davy, and G. M. Hewitt. 1993. Native oak chloroplasts reveal an ancient divide across Europe. Molecular Ecology 2: 337-344.
18. Friar, E. A., D. L. Boose, T. LaDoux, E. H. Roalson, AND R. H. Robichaux. 2001. Population structure in the endangered Mauna Loa silversword, Argyroxiphium kauense (Asteraceae), and its bearing on reintroduction. Molecular Ecology 10: 1657-1663.
19. Gaggiotti, O. E., O. Lange, K. Rassman, and C. Gliddon. 1999. A comparison of two indirect methods for extimating average levels of gene flow using microsatellite data. Molecular Ecology 8: 1513-1520.
20. Griffin, J. R., and W. B. Critchfield. 1972. The Distribution of Forest Trees in California. Pacific Southwest Forest and Range Experiment Station, Berkeley, California, USA.
21. Hedrick, P. W. 1999. Highly variable loci and their interpretation in evolution and conservation. Evolution 53: 313-318.
22. Holstein, G. 1984. California riparian forests: Deciduous islands in an evergreen sea. In R. E. Warner and K. M. Hendrix [eds.], California Riparian Systems: Ecology, Conservation, and Productive Management: Proceedings of a Conference, 2-22. University of California Press, Berkeley, California, USA.
23. Howard, D. J., R. W. Preszler, J. Williams, S. Fenchel, and W. J. Boecklen. 1997. How discrete are oak species? Insights from a hybrid zone between Quercus grisea and Quercus gambelii. Evolution 51: 747-755.
24. Keim, P., K. N. Paige, T. G. Whitham, and K. G. Lark. 1989. Genetic analysis of an interspecific hybrid swarm of populus: Occurrence of unidirectional introgression. Genetics 123: 557-565.
25. Koenig, W. D., J. M. H. Knops, W. J. Carmen, M. T. Stanback, and R. L. Mumme. 1996. Acorn production by oaks in central coastal California: Influence of weather at three levels. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 26: 1677-1683.
26. Koenig, W. D., R. L. Mumme, W. J. Carmen, and M. T. Stanback. 1994. Acorn production by oaks in central coastal California: Variation within and among years. Ecology 75: 99-109.
27. Lewis, P. O., and D. Zaykin. 2001. Genetic Data Analysis: Computer Program for the Analysis of Allelic Data. http://lewis.eeb.uconn.edu/lewishome/software.htm.
28. Little, E. L., Jr. 1979. Checklist of United States trees (native and naturalized). Agricultural Handbook 541, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Washington D.C., USA.
29. Manos, P. S., J. J. Doyle, and K. C. Nixon. 1999. Phylogeny, biogeography, and processes of molecular differentiation in Quercus subgenus Quercus (Fagaceae). Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 12: 333-349.
30. Manos, P. S., and D. E. Fairbrothers. 1987. Allozyme variation in populations of six Northeastern American Red Oaks (Fagaceae: Qaercus subg. Erythrobalanus). Systematic Botany 12: 365-373.
31. Michalakis, Y., and L. Excoffier. 1996. A generic estimation of population subdivision using distances between alleles with special reference to microsatellite loci. Genetics 142: 1061-1064.
32. Muir, G., C. C. Fleming, and C. Schlötterer. 2000. Species status of hybridizing oaks. Nature 405: 1016.
33. Muir, G., C. C. Fleming, and C. Schlötterer. 2001. Three divergent rDNA clusters predate the species divergence in Quercus petraea (Matt.) Liebl. and Quercus robur L. Molecular Biology and Evolution 18: 112-119.
34. Munz, P. A. 1973. A California Flora and Supplement. University of California Press, Berkeley, California, USA.
35. Nason, J. D., N. C. Ellstrand, and M. L. Arnold. 1992. Patterns of hybridization and introgression in populations of oaks, manzanitas, and irises. American Journal of Botany 79: 101-111.
36. Nixon, K. C. 1993. Infrageneric classification of Quercus (Fagaceae) and typification of sectional names. Annales des Sciences Forestieres Supplement I (Paris) 50: 25s-34s.
37. Petit, R., A. Kremer, and D. Wagner. 1993. Geographic structure of chloroplast DNA polymorphisms in European oaks. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 87: 122-128.
38. Pritchard, J. K., M. Stephens, and P. Donnelly. 2000. Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data. Genetics 155: 945-959.
39. Randi, M., Pierpaoli, M. Beaumont, and B. Ragni. 2001. Genetic identification of wild and domestic cats (Felix silvestris) and their hybrids using Bayesian clustering methods. Molecular Biology and Evolution 18: 1670-1693.
40. Raymond, M., and F. Rousset. 1995. Genepop (version 1.2): Population genetics software for exact tests and ecumenicism. Journal of Heredity 86: 248-249.
41. Reusch, T. B. H., W. T. Stam, and J. L. Olsen. 2000. A microsatellitebased estimation of clonal diversity and population subdivision in Zostera marina, a marine flowering plant. Molecular Ecology 9: 127-140.
42. Rieseberg, L. H. 1995. The role of hybridization in evolution: Old wine in new skins. American Journal of Botany 82: 944-953.
43. Rieseberg, L. H., and D. E. Soltis. 1991. Phylogenetic consequences of cytoplasmic gene flow in plants. Evolutionary Trends in Plants 5: 65-84.
44. Rousset, F. 1996. Equilibrium values of measures of population subdivision for stepwise mutation processes. Genetics 142: 1357-1362.
45. Slatkin, M. 1985. Rare alleles as indicators of gene flow. Evolution 39: 53-65.
46. Slatkin, M. 1995. A measure of population subdivision based on microsatellite allele frequencies. Genetics 130: 457-462.
47. Standiford, R. B. 2002. California oak woodlands. In W. J. McShea and W. M. Healy [eds.], Oak Forest Ecosystems, 280-303. Johns Hopkins Press, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
48. n-microsatellite loci from Quercus petraea. Plant Molecular Biology 33: 1093-1096.
49. Streiff, R., A. Ducousso, C. Lexer, H. Steinkellner, J. Gloessl, and A. Kremer. 1999. Pollen dispersal inferred from paternity analysis in a mixed oak stand of Quercus robur L. and Q. pelraea (Matt.) Liebl. Molecular Ecology 8: 831-841.
50. Van Valen, L. 1976. Ecological species, multispecies, and oaks. Taxon 25: 233-239.
51. Weir, B., and C. Cockerham. 1984. Estimating F-statistics for the analysis of population structure. Evolution 38: 1358-1370.
52. Whittemore, A. T., and B. A. Schaal. 1991. Interspecific gene flow in sympatric oaks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 88: 2240-2544.
53. Zanetto, A., G. Roussel, and A. Kremer. 1994. Geographic variation of interspecific differentiation between Quercus robur L. and Quercus petraea (Matt.) Liebl. Forest Genetics 2: 111-123.