Utility of multilocus genotypes for taxon assignment in stands of closely related European white oaks from Switzerland

Annals of Botany

Volumn 102, Issue 5, 2008, Pages 855-863

  Gugerli, Felix ^a   Brodbeck, Sabine ^a   Holderegger, Rolf ^a  

^a SWISS FEDERAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE WSL   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Assignment test; Bayesian inference; Multilocus genotype; Nuclear microsatellites; Quercus sp.; Species complex

Indexed keywords

MICROSATELLITE DNA;

BAYESIAN ANALYSIS; CERTIFICATION; COMMON ANCESTRY; DECIDUOUS TREE; FOREST MANAGEMENT; FORESTRY PRODUCTION; GENETIC DIFFERENTIATION; GENETIC MARKER; GENOTYPE; HYBRIDIZATION; LEAF MORPHOLOGY; MOLECULAR ANALYSIS; SPECIES COMPLEX; TAXONOMY;

ARTICLE; CLASSIFICATION; GENETICS; GENOTYPE; GEOGRAPHY; OAK; SWITZERLAND; TREE;

GENOTYPE; GEOGRAPHY; MICROSATELLITE REPEATS; QUERCUS; SWITZERLAND; TREES;

CENTRAL EUROPE; EURASIA; EUROPE; SWITZERLAND;

MERLANGIUS MERLANGUS; QUERCUS; QUERCUS ALBA; QUERCUS PETRAEA; QUERCUS PUBESCENS; QUERCUS ROBUR;

EID: 54249120794     PISSN: 03057364     EISSN: 10958290     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/aob/mcn164     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. Aldrich PR, Parker GR, Michler CH, Romero-Severson J. 2003. Whole-tree silvic identifications and the microsatellite genetic structure of a red oak species complex in an Indiana old-growth forest. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 3: 2228-2237.
2. Anderson EC, Thompson EA. 2002. A model-based method for identifying species hybrids using multilocus genetic data. Genetics 160: 1217-1229.
3. Bacilieri R, Ducousso A, Petit RJ, Kremer A. 1996. Mating system and asymmetric hybridization in a mixed stand of European oaks. Evolution 50: 900-908.
4. Barreneche T, Casasoli M, Russell K, Akkak A, Meddour H, Plomion C, et al. 2004. Comparative mapping between Quercus and Castanea using simple-sequence repeats (SSRs). Theoretical & Applied Genetics 108: 558-566.
5. Bodénès C, Joandet S, Laigret F, Kremer A. 1997a. Detection of genomic regions differentiating two closely related oak species Quercus petraea (Matt.) Liebl. and Quercus robur L. Heredity 78: 433-444.
6. Bodénès C, Labbé T, Pradère S, Kremer A. 1997b. General vs. local differentiation between two closely related white oak species. Molecular Ecology 6: 713-724.
7. Braun-Blanquet J. 1961. Die inneralpine Trockenvegetation. Stuttgart: Gustav Fischer.
8. Brewer S, Cheddadi R, de Beaulieu JL, Reille M, Contributors D. 2002. The spread of deciduous Quercus throughout Europe since the last glacial period. Forest Ecology and Management 156: 27-48.
9. Brodtbeck T, Zemp M, Frei M, Kienzle U, Knecht D. 1997. Flora von Basel und Umgebung 1980-1996 Teil 1. Mitteilungen der Naturforschenden Gesellschaften beider Basel 2: 9-543.
10. Bruschi P, Vendramin GG, Bussotti F, Grossini P. 2000. Morphological and molecular differentiation between Quercus petraea (Matt.) Liebl. and Quercus pubescens Willd. (Fagaceae) in northern and central Italy. Annals of Botany 85: 325-333.
11. Craft KJ, Ashley MV, Koenig WD. 2002. Limited hybridization between Quercus lobata and Quercus douglasii (Fagaceae) in a mixed stand in central coastal California. American Journal of Botany 89: 1792-1798.
12. Deguilloux M-F, Pemonge M-H, Petit RJ. 2004. DNA-based control of oak wood geographic origin in the context of the cooperage industry. Annals of Forest Science 61: 97-104.
13. n microsatellites in the bur oak, Quercus macrocarpa. Theoretical & Applied Genetics 91: 137-141.
14. Dupanloup I, Schneider S, Excoffier L. 2002. A simulated annealing approach to define the genetic structure of populations. Molecular Ecology 11: 2571-2581.
15. Dzialuk A, Chybicki I, Welc M, Sliwinska E, Burczyk J. 2007. Presence of triploids among oak species. Annals of Botany 99: 959-964.
16. Excoffier L, Laval G, Schneider S. 2005. Arlequin ver. 3.0: an integrated software package for population genetics data analysis. Evolutionary Bioinformatics Online 1: 47-50.
17. Falush D, Stephens M, Pritchard JK. 2003. Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data: linked loci and correlated allele frequencies. Genetics 164: 1567-1587.
18. Finkeldey R, Mátyás G. 2003. Genetic variation of oaks (Quercus spp.) in Switzerland. 3. Lack of impact of postglacial recolonization history on nuclear gene loci. Theoretical & Applied Genetics 106: 346-352.
19. Gams H. 1927. Von den Follatères zur Dent des Morcles. Beiträge zur geobotanischen Landesaufnahme 15: 1-760.
20. González-Rodríguez A, Arias DM, Oyama K. 2005. Genetic variation and differentiation of populations within the Quercus affinis-Quercus laurina (Fagaceae) complex analyzed with RAPD markers. Canadian Journal of Botany 83: 155-162.
21. Goudet J. 1995. FSTAT (version 1.2): a computer program to calculate F-statistics. Journal of Heredity 86: 485-486.
22. Gugerli F, Brodbeck S, Holderegger R. 2005. Die unerträgliche Leichtigkeit, eine reine Eiche zu sein. Blattmorphologie und genetischer Fingerabdruck als unterschiedlich einsetzbare Bestimmungshilfen. Informationsblatt Forschungsbereich Landschaft 63: 1-5.
23. Gugerli F, Walser J-C, Dounavi K, Holderegger R, Finkeldey R. 2007. Coincidence of small-scale spatial discontinuities in leaf morphology and nuclear microsatellite variation of Quercus petraea and Q. robur in a mixed forest. Annals of Botany 99: 713-722.
24. Gugerli F, Brodbeck S, Holderegger R. 2008. Insertions-deletions in a microsatellite flanking region may be resolved by variation in stuttering patterns. Plant Molecular Biology Reporter 26: 255-262.
25. Howard DJ, Preszler RW, Williams J, Fenchel S, Boecklen WJ. 1997. How discrete are oak species? Insights from a hybrid zone between Quercus grisea and Quercus gambelii. Evolution 51: 747-755.
26. Ishida TA, Hattori K, Sato H, Kimura MT. 2003. Differentiation and hybridization between Quercus crispula and Q. dentata (Fagaceae): insights from morphological traits, amplified fragment length polymorphism markers, and leafminer composition. American Journal of Botany 90: 769-776.
27. (n) microsatellite loci from Quercus robur. Hereditas 129: 183-186.
28. Kremer A, Savill PS, Steiner KC, eds. 1993. Genetics of oaks. Paris: Elsevier.
29. Kremer A, Dupouey JL, Deans JD, Cottrell J, Csaikl U, Finkeldey R, et al. 2002a. Leaf morphological differentiation between Quercus robur and Quercus petraea is stable across western European mixed oak stands. Annals of Forest Science 59: 777-787.
30. Kremer A, Kleinschmit J, Cottrell J, Cundall EP, Deans JD, Ducousso A, et al. 2002b. Is there a correlation between chloroplastic and nuclear divergence, or what are the roles of history and selection on genetic diversity in European oaks? Forest Ecology and Management 156: 75-87.
31. Lexer C, Kremer A, Petit RJ. 2006. Shared alleles in sympatric oaks: recurrent gene flow is a more parsimonious explanation than ancestral polymorphism. Molecular Ecology 15: 2007-2012.
32. Manel S, Gaggiotti OE, Waples RS. 2005. Assignment methods: matching biological questions with appropriate techniques. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 20: 136-142.
33. Mariette S, Cottrell JE, Csaikl UM, Goikoechea P, König A, Lowe AJ, et al. 2002a. Comparison of levels of genetic diversity detected with AFLP and microsatellite markers within and among mixed Q. petraea (Matt.) Liebl. and Q. robur L. stands. Silvae Genetica 51: 72-79.
34. Mariette S, Le Corre V, Austerlitz F, Kremer A. 2002b. Sampling within the genome for measuring within-population diversity: tradeoffs between markers. Molecular Ecology 11: 1145-1156.
35. Muir G, Schlötterer C. 2005. Evidence for shared ancestral polymorphism rather than recurrent gene flow at microsatellite loci differentiating two hybridizing oaks (Quercus spp.). Molecular Ecology 14: 549-561.
36. Muir G, Schlötterer C. 2006. Moving beyond single-locus studies to characterize hybridization between oaks (Quercus spp.). Molecular Ecology 15: 2301-2304.
37. Muir G, Fleming CC, Schlötterer C. 2000. Species status of hybridizing oaks. Nature 405: 1016.
38. Müller B. 1999. Variation und Hybridisierung von Quercus pubescens. PhD Thesis, ETH Zürich, Zürich.
39. Nixon KC. 1993. Infrageneric classification of Quercus (Fagaceae) and typification of sectional names. Annales des Sciences Forestières 50: 25s-34s.
40. Paetkau D, Waits LP, Clarkson PL, Craighead L, Strobeck C. 1997. An empirical evaluation of genetic distance statistics using microsatellite data from bear (Ursidae) populations. Genetics 147: 1943-1957.
41. Petit RJ, Csaikl UM, Bordács S, Burg K, Coart E, Cottrell J, et al. 2002. Chloroplast DNA variation in European white oaks: phylogeography and patterns of diversity based on data from over 2600 populations. Forest Ecology and Management 156: 5-26.
42. Petit RJ, Bodénès C, Ducousso A, Roussel G, Kremer A. 2003. Hybridization as a mechanism of invasion in oaks. New Phytologist 161: 151-164.
43. Ponton S, Dupouey J-L, Bréda N, Dreyer E. 2002. Comparison of water-use efficiency of seedlings from two sympatric oak species: genotype x environment interactions. Tree Physiology 22: 413-422.
44. Pritchard JK, Stephens M, Donnelly P. 2000. Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data. Genetics 155: 945-959.
45. Rosenberg NA, Burke T, Elo K, Feldman MW, Freidlin PJ, Groenen MAM, et al. 2001. Empirical evaluation of genetic clustering methods using multilocus genotypes from 20 chicken breeds. Genetics 159: 699-713.
46. Rushton BS. 1993. Natural hybridization within the genus Quercus L. Annales des Sciences Forestières 50: 73s-90s.
47. Saintagne C, Bodénès C, Barreneche T, Pot D, Plomion C, Kremer A. 2004. Distribution of genomic regions differentiating oak species assessed by QTL detection. Heredity 92: 20-30.
48. Scotti-Saintagne C, Mariette S, Porth I, Goicoechea PG, Barreneche T, Bodénès C, et al. 2004. Genome scanning for interspecific differentiation between two closely related oak species [Quercus robur L. and Q. petraea (Matt.) Liebl.]. Genetics 168: 1615-1626.
49. Stebbins GL, Matzke EB, Epling C. 1947. Hybridization in a population of Quercus marilandica and Q. ilicifolia. Evolution 1: 79-88.
50. Steinkellner H, Fluch S, Turetschek E, Lexer C, Streiff R, Kremer A, et al. 1997. Identification and characterization of (GA/ CT)n-microsatellite loci from Quercus petraea. Plant Molecular Biology 33: 1093-1096.
51. Tovar-Sánchez E, Oyama K. 2004. Natural hybridization and hybrid zones between Quercus crassifolia and Quercus crassipes (Fagaceae) in Mexico: morphological and molecular evidence. American Journal of Botany 91: 1352-1363.
52. Tutin TG, Burges NA, Chater AO, Edmonds JR, Heywood VH, Moore DM, et al. eds. 1993. Flora Europaea, 2 edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
53. Vähä J-P, Primmer CR. 2006. Efficiency of model-based Bayesian methods for detecting hybrid individuals under different hybridization scenarios and with different numbers of loci. Molecular Ecology 15: 63-72.
54. Waser PM, Strobeck C. 1998. Genetic signatures of interpopulation dispersal. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 13: 43-44.
55. Werner P. 1988. Etude botanique des Follatères (Dorénaz et Fully, Valais). III. Les Fôrets. Bulletin de la Murithienne; société valaisianne des sciences naturelles 106: 101-117.
56. Werth S, Gugerli F, Holderegger R, Wagner HH, Csencsics D, Scheidegger C. 2007. Landscape-level gene flow in Lobaria pulmonaria, an epiphytic lichen. Molecular Ecology 16: 2807-2815.
57. Zanetto A, Roussel G, Kremer A. 1994. Geographic variation of interspecific differentiation between Quercus robur L. and Quercus petraea (Matt.) Liebl. Forest Genetics 1: 111-123.