Modeling dose-response at low dose: A systems biology approach for ionization radiation

Dose-Response

Volumn 8, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 456-477

  Zhao, Yuchao ^a   Ricci, Paolo F ^b  

^a BEIJING NORMAL UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b Holy Names University   (United States)

Author keywords

Cell cycle checkpoint; Dose response; Hormesis; Incidence rates; Ionizing radiation; Precautionary policy

Indexed keywords

EID: 78649434952     PISSN: None     EISSN: 15593258     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2203/dose-response.09-054.Zhao     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. Aderem A. 2005. Systems biology: its practice and challenges. Cell 121:511-513.
2. Andersen ME, Dennison JE, Thomas RS and Conolly RB. 2005a. New directions in incidence-dose modeling. Trends Biotechnol 23:122-127
3. Andersen ME, Thomas RS, Gaido KW and Conolly RB. 2005b. Dose-response modeling in reproductive toxicology in the systems biology era. Reprod Toxicol 19:327-37
4. Azzam EI, de Toledo SM, Raaphorst GP and Mitchel RE. 1996. Low-dose ionizing radiation decreases the frequency of neoplastic transformation to a level below the spontaneous rate in C3H 10T1/2 cells. Radiat Res 146:369-373
5. Blais A. and Dynlacht BD. 2005. Constructing transcriptional regulatory networks. Genes Dev 19:1499-511.
6. Bonner WM. 2004. Phenomena leading to cell survival values which deviate from linear-quadratic models. Mutat Res 568:33-39.
7. Calabrese EJ., and Ricci PF. 2010. Hormesis in Environmental Health. In: Encyclopedia of Environmental Health. Elsevier Publishers (In press).
8. Chen KC, Calzone L, Csikasz-Nagy A, Cross FR, Novak B and Tyson JJ. 2004. Integrative analysis of cell cycle control in budding yeast. Mol Biol Cell 15:3841-3862.
9. Cohen SM and Ellwein LB. 1990. Cell proliferation in carcinogenesis. Science 249:1007-1011.
10. Conolly RB, Gaylor DW, Lutz WK. 2005. Population variability in biological adaptive responses to DNA damage and the shapes of carcinogen dose-response curves. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 207(2 Suppl):570-575.
11. Conolly RB, Kimbell JS, Janszen D, Schlosser PM, Kalisak D, Preston J and Miller FJ. 2003. Biologically motivated computational modeling of formaldehyde carcinogenicity in the F344 rat. Toxicol Sci 75:432-447.
12. Conolly RB. and Lutz WK. 2004. Nonmonotonic dose-response relationships: mechanistic basis, kinetic modeling, and implications for risk assessment. Toxicol Sci 77:151-157.
13. Csikasz-Nagy A, Kapuy O, Toth A, Pal C, Jensen LJ, Uhlmann F, Tyson JJ and Novak B. 2009. Cell cycle regulation by feed-forward loops coupling transcription and phosphorylation. Mol Syst Biol. 5:236.
14. Edwards FM. 1986. Dose-response models and methods of risk prediction and causation estimation. Semin Nucl Med 16:118-130.
15. Goldbeter A and Koshland DE Jr. 1981. An amplified sensitivity arising from covalent modification in biological systems. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 78:6840-6844.
16. Goldbeter A and Koshland DE Jr. 1984. Ultrasensitivity in biochemical systems controlled by covalent modification. Interplay between zero-order and multistep effects. J Biol Chem 259:14441-14447.
17. Han Z, Yang L, MacLellan WR, Weiss JN and Qu Z. 2005. Hysteresis and cell cycle transition: How crutial is it? Biophys J 88:1626-1634.
18. Heidenreich WF, Luebeck EG, Hazelton WD, Paretzke HG and Moolgavkar SH. 2002. Multistage models and the incidence of cancer in the cohort of atomic bomb survivors. Radiat Res 158:607-614.
19. Ishikawa T, Zhang SS, Qin X, Takahashi Y, Oda H, Nakatsuru Y and Ide F. 2004. DNA repair and cancer: lessons from mutant mouse models. Cancer Sci 95:112-117.
20. Kapuy O, He E, Lopez-Aviles S, Uhlmann F, Tyson J.J. and Novak B. 2009. System-level feedbacks control cell cycle progression. FEBS Lett. 22, Epub ahead of print.
21. Kitano H. 2002. Computational systems biology. Nature 420:206-210.
22. Kohn KW. 1998. Functional capabilities of molecular network components controlling the mammalian G1/S cell cycle phase transition. Oncogene 168:1065-1075.
23. Li S, Brazhnik P, Sobral B and Tyson J.J. 2009. Temporal controls of the asymmetric cell division cycle in Caulobacter crescentus. PLoS Comput Biol. 58:e1000463.
24. Little MP. 2003. Risks associated with ionizing radiation. Br Med Bull 68:259-275.
25. Little MP, Haylock RG, Muirhead CR. 2002. Modelling lung tumour risk in radon-exposed uranium miners using generalizations of the two-mutation model of Moolgavkar, Venzon and Knudson. Int J Radiat Biol 781:49-68.
26. Mills KD, Ferguson DO and Alt FW 2003. The role of DNA breaks in genomic instability and tumori-genesis. Immunol Rev 194:77-95.
27. Mebust M, Crawford-Brown D, Hofmann W and Schollnberger H. 2002. Testing extrapolation of a biologically based exposure-response model from in vitro to in vivo conditions. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol 351:72-79.
28. Moolgavkar SH. and Knudson AG, Jr. 1981. Mutation and cancer:a model for human carcinogenesis. J Natl Cancer Inst 666:1037-1052.
29. Moolgavkar SH. and Luebeck EG. 2003. Multistage carcinogenesis and the incidence of human cancer. Genes Chromosomes Cancer 384:302-306.
30. Mothersill C. and Seymour C. 2004a. Radiation-induced bystander effects and adaptive responses- the Yin and Yang of low dose radiobiology? Mutat Res 5681:121-128.
31. Mothersill C. and Seymour CB. 2004b. Radiation-induced bystander effects-implications for cancer. Nat Rev Cancer 42:158-164.
32. Novak B, Csikasz-Nagy A, Gyorffy B, Chen K and Tyson JJ. 1998. Mathematical model of the fission yeast cell cycle with checkpoint controls at the G1/S, G2/M and metaphase/anaphase transitions. Biophys Chem 721-2:185-200.
33. Novak B, Tyson JJ, Gyorffy B, Csikasz-Nagy A. 2007. Irreversible cell-cycle transitons are due to systems-level feedback. Nat. Cell. Biol. 9. 724-728.
34. Novak B, Pataki Z, Ciliberto A and Tyson JJ. 2001. Mathematical model of the cell division cycle of fission yeast. Chaos 111:277-286.
35. Ohtaki M. and Niwa O. 2001. A mathematical model of radiation carcinogenesis with induction of genomic instability and cell death. Radiat Res 1565 Pt 2:672-667.
36. Pierce DA. 2003. Mechanistic models for radiation carcinogenesis and the atomic bomb survivor data. Radiat Res 1606:718-723.
37. Preston RJ. 2005. Radiation biology: concepts for radiation protection. Health Phys 886:545-556.
38. Qu Z, MacLellan WR and Weiss JN. 2003a. Dynamics of the cell cycle: checkpoints, sizers, and timers. Biophys J 856:3600-3611.
39. Qu Z, Weiss JN and MacLellan WR. 2003b. Regulation of the mammalian cell cycle: a model of the G1-to-S transition. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 2842:C349-364.
40. Qu Z, Weiss JN, MacLellan WR. 2004. Coordination of cell growth and cell division: a mathematical study. J. Cell Sci 117:4199-4207.
41. Redpath JL and Antoniono RJ. 1998. Induction of an adaptive response against spontaneous neo-plastic transformation in vitro by low-dose gamma radiation. Radiat Res 1495:517-520.
42. Redpath JL, Liang D, Taylor TH, Christie C and Elmore E. 2001. The shape of the dose-response curve for radiation-induced neoplastic transformation in vitro: evidence for an adaptive response against neoplastic transformation at low doses of low-LET radiation. Radiat Res 1566:700-707.
43. Ricci, PF, Straja S, and Cox, LA Jr., 2009, Changing regulatory risk paradigms can be good for our health: Phasic or linear and threshold dose-response models? Env. Int. (submitted)
44. Sachs RK, Chan M, Hlatky L and Hahnfeldt P. 2005. Modeling Intercellular Interactions during Carcinogenesis. Radiat Res 1643:324-331.
45. Slikker W, Xu Z and Wang C. 2005. Application of a systems biology approach to developmental neu-rotoxicology. Reprod Toxicol 193:305-319.
46. Sveiczer A, Tyson JJ and Novak B. 2004. Modelling the fission yeast cell cycle. Brief Funct Genomic Proteomic 24:298-307.
47. Tyson JJ, Chen K and Novak B. 2001. Network dynamics and cell physiology. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2. 908-916.
48. Tyson JJ, Csikasz-Nagy A and Novak B. 2002. The dynamics of cell cycle regulation. Bioessays 2412:1095-1109.
49. Tyson JJ and Novak B. 2001. Regulation of the eukaryotic cell cycle: molecular antagonism, hysteresis, and irreversible transitions. J Theor Biol 2102:249-263.
50. Upton AC. 2002. Carcinogenic effects of low-level ionizing radiation: problems and prospects. In Vivo 166:527-533.
51. Wheldon EG, Lindsay KA and Wheldon TE. 2000. The dose-response relationship for cancer incidence in a two-stage radiation carcinogenesis model incorporating cellular repopulation. Int J Radiat Biol 765:699-710.
52. Yakovlev A and Polig E. 1996. A diversity of responses displayed by a stochastic model of radiation car-cinogenesis allowing for cell death. Math Biosci 1321:1-33.
53. Zamborszky J, Hong CI, Csikasz NA. 2007. Computational analysis of mammalian cell division gated by a circadian clock: quantized cell cycle and cell size control. J Biol Rhythms. 226:542-553.
54. Zhao Y. and Conolly RB. 2010. Computational Modeling of Biochemical Pathways Linking Ionizing Radiation to Cell Cycle Arrest and Apoptosis. Environment Health Perspectives, to be submitted.
55. Zwolak JW, Tyson JJ and Watson LT. 2005. Parameter estimation for a mathematical model of the cell cycle in frog eggs. J Comput Biol 121:48-63.