Computational systems biology

Nature

Volumn 420, Issue 6912, 2002, Pages 206-210

  Kitano, Hiroaki ^a  

^a SONY COMPUTER SCIENCE LABORATORIES INC   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CALCULATIONS; ROBUSTNESS (CONTROL SYSTEMS); SYSTEMS SCIENCE;

SYSTEMS BIOLOGY;

MEDICINE;

BIOLOGY; SYSTEMS ANALYSIS;

BIOLOGY; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DRUG ABSORPTION; DRUG DISTRIBUTION; DRUG EXCRETION; DRUG METABOLISM; DRUG RESEARCH; GENETIC POLYMORPHISM; MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; SYSTEM ANALYSIS; THEORY;

ANIMALS; CELLS; COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DRUG EVALUATION, PRECLINICAL; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION; HUMANS; MEDICINE; MOLECULAR BIOLOGY; SYSTEMS THEORY;

EID: 0037079054     PISSN: 00280836     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/nature01254     Document Type: Review

References (71)

1. Baldi, P. & Brunak, S. Bioinformatics: The Machine Learning Approach 2nd Edn. (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 2001).
2. Onami, S., Kyoda, K., Morohashi, M. & Kitano, H. in Foundations of Systems Biology (ed. Kitano, H.) 59-75 (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 2001).
3. Ideker, T. E., Thorsson, V. & Karp, R. M. in Pac. Symp. Biocomput. (eds Altman, R. B., Dunker, A. K., Hunter, L., Lauderdale, K. & Klein, T. E.) 305-316 (World Scientific, Singapore, 2000).
4. Ideker, T. et al. Discovering regulatory and signalling circuits in molecular interaction networks. Bioinformatics 18(Suppl. 1), S233-S240 (2002).
5. Ideker, T. et al. Integrated genomic and proteomic analyses of a systematically perturbed metabolic network. Science 292, 929-934 (2001).
6. Borisuk, M. T. & Tyson, J. J. Bifurcation analysis of a model of mitotic control in frog eggs. J. Theor. Biol. 195, 69-85 (1998).
7. Chen, K. C. et al. Kinetic analysis of a molecular model of the budding yeast cell cycle. Mol. Biol. Cell 11, 369-391 (2000).
8. Edwards, J. S., Ibarra, R. U. & Palsson, B. O. In silico predictions of Escherichia coli metabolic capabilities are consistent with experimental data. Nature Biotechnol. 19, 125-130 (2001).
9. Fell, D. Understanding the Control of Metabolism (Portland, London, 1997).
10. Morohashi, M. et al. Robustness as a measure of plausibility in models of biochemical networks. J. Theor. Biol. 216, 19-30 (2002).
11. Kitano, H. Standards for modeling. Nature Biotechnol. 20, 337 (2002).
12. Hucka, M. et al. in in Pac. Symp. Biocomput. (eds Altman, R. B., Dunker, A. K., Hunter, L. & Klein, T. E.) 450-461 (World Scientific, Singapore, 2002).
13. Kanehisa, M. & Goto, S. KEGG: Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes. Nucleic Acids Res. 28, 27-30 (2000).
14. Alliance for Cellular Signaling 〈http://www.AfCS.org/〉 (2002).
15. Signal Transduction Knowledge Environment 〈http://www.stke.org/〉 (2002).
16. Wiener, N. Cybernetics: Or Control and Communication in the Animal and the Machine (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1948).
17. Bertalanffy, L. v. General System Theory (Braziller, New York, 1968).
18. Kitano, H. Systems biology: A brief overview. Science 295, 1662-1664 (2002).
19. Kitano, H. in Foundations of Systems Biology (ed. Kitano, H.) 1-36 (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 2001).
20. Alon, U. et al. Robustness in bacterial chemotaxis. Nature 397, 168-171 (1999).
21. Yi, T. M. et al. Robust perfect adaptation in bacterial chemotaxis through integral feedback control. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 97, 4649-4653 (2000).
22. Barkai, N. & Leibler, S. Robustness in simple biochemical networks. Nature 387, 913-917 (1997).
23. Weng, G., Bhalla, U. S. & Iyengar, R. Complexity in biological signaling systems. Science 284, 92-96 (1999).
24. Levine, K., Tinkelenberg, A. & Cross, F. in Progress in Cell Cycle Research (eds Meijer, L., Guidet, S. & Lim Tung, H. Y.) 101-114 (Plenum, New York, 1995).
25. Chang, D. E., Smalley, D. J. & Conway, T. Gene expression profiling of Escherichia coli growth transitions: An expanded stringent response model. Mol. Microbiol. 45, 289-306 (2002).
26. Little, J. W., Shepley, D. P. & Wert, D. W. Robustness of a gene regulatory circuit. EMBO J. 18, 4299-4307 (1999).
27. Gonze, D., Halloy, J. & Goldbeter, A. Robustness of circadian rhythms with respect to molecular noise. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 99, 673-678 (2002).
28. von Dassow, G. et al. The segment polarity network is a robust developmental module. Nature 406, 188-192 (2000).
29. Eldar, A. et al. Robustness of the BMP morphogen gradient in Drosophila embryonic patterning. Nature 419, 304-308 (2002).
30. Carlson, J. M. & Doyle, J. Highly optimized tolerance: A mechanism for power laws in designed systems. Phys. Rev. E60, 1412-1427 (1999).
31. Carlson, J. M. & Doyle, J. Complexity and robustness. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 99, 2538-2545 (2002).
32. Jeong, H. et al. The large-scale organization of metabolic networks. Nature 407, 651-654 (2000).
33. Jeong, H. et al. Lethality and centrality in protein networks. Nature 411, 41-42 (2001).
34. Albert, R., Jeong, H. & Barabasi, A. L. Error and attack tolerance of complex networks. Nature 406, 378-382 (2000).
35. Podani, J. et al. Comparable system-level organization of Archaea and Eukaryotes. Nature Genet. 29, 54-56 (2001).
36. Vogelstein, B., Lane, D. & Levine, A. J. Surfing the p53 network. Nature 408, 307-310 (2000).
37. Adamic, L. A., Lukose, R. M., Puniyani, A. R. & Huberman, B. A. Search in power-law networks. Phys. Rev. E64, 046135-1-046135-8 (2001).
38. Higgins, J. The theory of oscillating reactions. Ind. Eng. Chem. 59, 18-62 (1967).
39. Berridge, M. J. & Rapp, P. E. A comparative survey of the function, mechanism and control of cellular oscillators. J. Fxp. Biol. 81, 217-279 (1979).
40. Goldbeter, A. Biochemical Oscillations and Cellular Rhythms (Cambirdge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 1996).
41. Tyson, J. J. in Computatoinal Cell Biology (eds Fall, C. P., Marland, E. S., Wagner, J. M. & Tyson, J. J.) 230-260 (Springer, New York, 2002).
42. Jordan, J. D., Landau, E. M. & Iyengar, R. Signaling networks: The origins of cellular multitasking. Cell 103, 193-200 (2000).
43. Bhalla, U. S. & Iyengar, R. Emergent properties of networks of biological signaling pathways. Science 283, 381-387 (1999).
44. Hartwell, L. H. et al. From molecular to modular cell biology. Nature 402, C47-C52 (1999).
45. Csete, M. E. & Doyle, J. C. Reverse engineering of biological complexity. Science 295, 1664-1669 (2002).
46. Edelman, G. M. & Gally, J. A. Degeneracy and complexity in biological systems. Proc Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 98, 13763-13768 (2001).
47. Shen-Orr, S. S. et al. Network motifs in the transcriptional regulation network of Escherichia coli. Nature Genet. 31, 64-68 (2002).
48. Cascante, M. et al. Metabolic control analysis in drug discovery and disease. Nature Biotechnol. 20, 243-249 (2002).
49. Bailey, J. E. Lessons from metabolic engineering for functional genomics and drug discovery. Nature Biotechnol. 17, 616-618 (1999).
50. Bailey, J. E. Reflections on the scope and the future of metabolic engineering and its connections to functional genomics and drug discovery. Metab. Eng, 3, 111-114 (2001).
51. Lipinski, C. A. et al. Experimental and computational approaches to estimate solubility and permeability in drug discovery and development settings. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 46, 3-26 (2001).
52. Butina, D., Segall, M. D. & Frankcombe, K. Predicting ADME properties in silico: Methods and models. Drug Discov. Today 7, S83-S88 (2002).
53. Ekins, S. & Rose, J. In silico ADME/Tox: The state of the art. J. Mol. Graph. Model. 20, 305-309 (2002).
54. Selick, H. E., Beresford, A. P. & Tarbit, M. H. The emerging importance of predictive ADME simulation in drug discovery. Drug Discov. Today 7, 109-116 (2002).
55. Li, A. P. & Segall, M. Early ADME/Tox studies and in silico screening. Drug Discov. Today 7, 25-27 (2002).
56. Ekins, S. et al. Progress in predicting human ADME parameters in silico. J. Phamacol. Toxicol. Methods 44, 251-272 (2000).
57. Ueda, H. R., Hagiwara, M. & Kitano, H. Robust oscillations within the interlocked feedback model of Drosophila circadian rhythm. J. Theor. Biol. 210, 401-406 (2001).
58. Leloup, J. C., Gonze, D. & Goldbeter, A. Limit cycle models for circadian rhythms based on transcriptional regulation in Drosophila and Neurospora. J. Biol. Rhythms 14, 433-448 (1999).
59. Schoeberl, B. et al. Computational modeling of the dynamics of the MAP kinase cascade activated by surface and internalized EGF receptors. Nature Biotechnol. 20, 370-375 (2002).
60. Tyson, J. J. & Novak, B. Regulation of the eukaryotic cell cycle: Molecular antagonism, hysteresis, and irreversible transitions. J. Theor. Biol. 210, 249-263 (2001).
61. Novak, B. et al. Mathematical model of the fission yeast cell cycle with checkpoint controls at the G1/S, G2/M and metaphase/anaphase transitions. Biophys. Chem. 72, 185-200 (1998).
62. Ni, T. C. & Savageau, M. A. Model assessment and refinement using strategies from biochemical systems theory: Application to metabolism in human red blood cells. J. Theor. Biol. 179, 329-368 (1996).
63. Ni, T. C. & Savageau, M. A. Application of biochemical systems theory to metabolism in human red blood cells. Signal propagation and accuracy of representation. J. Biol. Chem. 271, 7927-7941 (1996).
64. Jamshidi, N. et al. Dynamic simulation of the human red blood cell metabolic network. Bioinformatics 17, 286-287 (2001).
65. Edwards, J. S. & Palsson, B. O. Robustness analysis of the Escherichia coli metabolic network. Biotechnol. Prog. 16, 927-939 (2000).
66. Bassingthwaighte, J. B. Strategies for the physiome project. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 28, 1043-1058 (2000).
67. Rudy, Y. From genome to physiome: Integrative models of cardiac excitation. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 28, 945-950 (2000).
68. Noble, D. Modeling the heart - From genes to cells to the whole organ. Science 295, 1678-1682 (2002).
69. Guet, C. C. et al. Combinatorial synthesis of genetic networks. Science 296, 1466-1470 (2002).
70. Gardner, T. S., Cantor, C. R. & Collins, J. J. Construction of a genetic toggle switch in Escherichia coli. Nature 403, 339-342 (2000).
71. Elowitz, M. B. & Leibler, S. A synthetic oscillatory network of transcriptional regulators. Nature 403, 335-338 (2000).