Population variability in biological adaptive responses to DNA damage and the shapes of carcinogen dose-response curves

Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology

Volumn 207, Issue 2 SUPPL., 2005, Pages 570-575

  Conolly, Rory B ^a   Gaylor, David W ^b   Lutz, Werner K ^c  

^a U S ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY   (United States)

^b Gaylor and Associates LLC   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF WÜRZBURG   (Germany)

Author keywords

Dose response; Low dose linear; Nonmonotonic; Threshold

Indexed keywords

CARCINOGEN;

ACCURACY; ADAPTIVE BEHAVIOR; CELL CYCLE; CONCENTRATION RESPONSE; CONFERENCE PAPER; DNA DAMAGE; DNA REPAIR; ENVIRONMENTAL EXPOSURE; HEALTH HAZARD; HUMAN; IONIZING RADIATION; MATHEMATICAL COMPUTING; MONTE CARLO METHOD; POPULATION; PREDICTION; PUBLIC HEALTH; QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; RISK ASSESSMENT; SIMULATION;

EID: 24644478241     PISSN: 0041008X     EISSN: 10960333     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.taap.2005.04.027     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (13)

1. P.H. Abelson Risk assessments by low-level exposures Science 265 1994 1507
2. V. Beir Health Effects of Exposure to Low Levels of Ionizing Radiation 1990 National Academy Press Washington
3. W.M. Bonner Low-dose radiation: thresholds, bystander effects, and adaptive responses PSAS 100 2003 4973 4975
4. E.J. Calabrese, and L.A. Baldwin Applications of hormesis in toxicology, risk assessment and chemotherapeutics Trends Pharmacol. Sci. 23 2002 331 337
5. R.B. Conolly, and W.K. Lutz Nonmonotonic dose-response relationships: mechanistic basis, kinetic modeling, and implications for risk assessment Toxicol. Sci. 77 2004 151 157
6. T.D. Downs, and R.F. Frankowski Influence of repair processes on dose-response models Drug Metab. Rev. 13 1982 839 852
7. S.J. Elledge Cell cycle checkpoints: preventing an identity crisis Science 274 1996 1664 1671
8. C. Stecca, and G.B. Gerber Adaptive response to DNA-damaging agents: a review of potential mechanisms Biochem. Pharmacol. 55 1998 941 951
9. A.C. Upton National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements Scientific Committee 1-6 The state of the art in the 1990's: NCRP Report No. 136 on the scientific bases for linearity in the dose-response relationship for ionizing radiation Health Phys. 85 2003 15 22
10. US EPA Guidelines for carcinogen risk assessment Fed. Regist. 51 1986 33992 34003
11. US EPA, 1999. Guidelines for carcinogen risk assessment. NCEA-F-0644. Review Draft.
12. US EPA, 2000. Exposure and human health reassessment of 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD) and related compounds. Part II: health assessment for 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD) and related compounds. Chapter 8. Dose-response modeling for 2,3,7,8-TCDD. SAB Review Draft NCEA-I-0835. www.epa.gov/ncea.
13. A. Yacoub, R. McKinstry, D. Hinman, T. Chung, P. Dent, and M.P. Hagan Epidermal growth factor and ionizing radiation up-regulate the DNA repair genes XRCC1 and ERCC1 in DU145 and LNCaP prostate carcinoma through MAPK signaling Radiat. Res. 159 2003 439 452