The cognitive interview: A meta-analytic review and study space analysis of the past 25 years

Psychology, Public Policy, and Law

Volumn 16, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 340-372

  Memon, Amina ^a   Meissner, Christian A ^b   Fraser, Joanne ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT EL PASO   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF PORTSMOUTH   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Cognitive interview; Eyewitness memory; Meta analysis; Review

Indexed keywords

EID: 78549284279     PISSN: 10768971     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/a0020518     Document Type: Article

References (124)

1. Achieving Best Evidence 2001, Retrieved October 1, 2009, from http://www.homeoffice.gov.uk/documents/achieving-best-evidence/.
2. Akehurst L., Milne R., Köhnken G. The effects of children's age and delay on recall in a cognitive or structured interview. Psychology, Crime, & Law 2003, 9:97-107. doi: 10.1080/1068316021000057686.
3. Allwood C.M., Ask K., Granhag P.A. The cognitive interview: Effects on the realism in witnesses' confidence in their free recall. Psychology, Crime, & Law 2005, 11:183-198. doi: 10.1080/10683160512331329943.
4. Anderson R.C., Pichert J.W. Recall of previously unrecalled information following a shift in perspective. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior 1978, 17:1-12. doi: 10.1016/S0022-5371(78)90485-1.
5. Aschermann E., Mantwill M., Köhnken G. An independent replication of the effectiveness of the cognitive interview. Applied Cognitive Psychology 1991, 5:489-495. doi: 10.1002/acp.2350050604.
6. Brock P., Fisher R.P., Cutler B.L. Examining the cognitive interview in a double-test paradigm. Psychology, Crime, & Law 1999, 5:29-45. doi: 10.1080/10683169908414992.
7. Brown C., Geiselman R.E. Eyewitness testimony of mentally retarded: Effect of cognitive interview. Journal of Police & Criminological Psychology 1992, 6:14-21. doi: 10.1007/BF02806593.
8. Campos L., Alonso-Quecuty M. The cognitive interview: Much more than simply " try again" Psychology, Crime, & Law 1999, 5:47-59. doi: 10.1080/10683169908414993.
9. Campos L., Alonso-Quecuty M.L. Knowledge of the crime context: Improving the understanding of why the cognitive interview works. Memory 1998, 6:103-112. doi: 10.1080/741941602.
10. Centofanti A.T., Reece J. The cognitive interview and its effect on misleading post event information. Psychology, Crime, & Law 2006, 12:683-699. doi: 10.1080/10683160600558394.
11. Chapman A.J., Perry D.J. Applying the cognitive interview procedure to child and adult eyewitnesses of road accidents. Applied Psychology: An International Review 1995, 44:283-294. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-0597.1995.tb01081.x.
12. Christianson S.-Å. Emotional stress and eyewitness memory: A critical review. Psychological Bulletin 1992, 112:284-309. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.112.2.284.
13. Christianson S.-Å., Lindholm T. The fate of traumatic memories in childhood and adulthood. Development & Psychopathology 1998, 10:761-780. doi: 10.1017/S0954579498001850.
14. Clarke C., Milne R. National evaluation of the PEACE investigative interviewing course 2005, Home Office, London.
15. Clifford B.R., George R. A field evaluation of training in three methods of witness and victim investigative interviewing. Psychology, Crime, & Law 1996, 2:231-248. doi: 10.1080/10683169608409780.
16. Craik F.I.M. Memory changes in normal aging. Current Directions in Psychological Science 1994, 5:155-158. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8721.1994.tb00166.x.
17. Craik F.I.M., Byrd M., Swanson J.M. Patterns of memory loss in three elderly samples. Psychology & Aging 1987, 2:79-86. doi: 10.1037/0882-7974.2.1.79.
18. Dando, C., Wilcock, R., Behnkle, C., & Milne, R. (in press). Modifying the Cognitive Interview: Countenancing forensic application by enhancing practicability. Psychology, Crime, & Law.
19. Dando C., Wilcock R., Milne R. Victims and witnesses of crime: Police officers' perceptions of interviewing practices. Legal & Criminological Psychology 2008, 13:59-70. doi: 10.1348/135532506X162498.
20. Dando C., Wilcock R., Milne R., Henry L. An adapted cognitive interview procedure for frontline police investigators. Applied Cognitive Psychology 2009, 23:698-716. doi: 10.1002/acp.1501.
21. Dando C., Wilcock R., Milne R. The cognitive interview: The efficacy of a modified mental reinstatement of context procedure for frontline police investigators. Applied Cognitive Psychology 2009, 23:138-147. doi: 10.1002/acp.1451.
22. Dando C., Wilcock R., Milne R. Novice police officers application of the Cognitive Interview procedure. Psychology, Crime, & Law 2009, 15:679-696. doi: 10.1080/10683160802203963.
23. Dando C.J., Milne R. The Cognitive Interview. Applied criminal psychology: A guide to forensic behavioral sciences 2009, 147-168. Charles C Thomas, Springfield. R.N. Kocsis (Ed.).
24. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals. (1993). 509 US 579.
25. Davis M.R., McMahon M., Greenwood K.M. The efficacy of mnemonic components of the cognitive interview: Towards a shortened variant for time-critical investigations. Applied Cognitive Psychology 2005, 19:75-93. doi: 10.1002/acp.1048.
26. Deffenbacher K.A., Bornstein B.H., McGorty K., Penrod S.D. Forgetting the once-seen face: Estimating the strength of an eyewitness's memory representation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied 2008, 14:139-150. doi: 10.1037/1076-898X.14.2.139.
27. Deffenbacher K.A., Bornstein B.H., Penrod S.D., McGorty E.K. A meta-analytic review of the effects of high stress on eyewitness memory. Law & Human Behavior 2004, 28:687-706. doi: 10.1007/s10979-004-0565-x.
28. Dietze P.M., Thomson D.M. Mental reinstatement of context: A technique for interviewing child witnesses. Applied Cognitive Psychology 1993, 7:97-108. doi: 10.1002/acp.2350070203.
29. Dornburg C.C., McDaniel M.A. The cognitive interview enhances long-term free recall of older adults. Psychology & Aging 2006, 21:196-200. doi: 10.1037/0882-7974.21.1.196.
30. Dysart J.E., Lindsay R.C.L. The effects of delay on eyewitness identification accuracy: Should we be concerned?. The handbook of eyewitness psychology, Vol II: Memory for people 2007, 361-376. Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ. R.C.L. Lindsay (Ed.).
31. Easterbrook J.A. The effect of emotion on cue utilization and the organization of behavior. Psychological Review 1959, 66:183-201. doi: 10.1037/h0047707.
32. Eyewitness Evidence: A guide for Law Enforcement. (1999). U.S. Department of Justice Office of Justice Programs. Retrieved February 1, 2010, from http://www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles1/nij/178240.pdf.
33. Finger K., Pedzek K. The effect of the cognitive interview on face identification accuracy: Release from verbal overshadowing. Journal of Applied Psychology 1999, 84:340-348. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.84.3.340.
34. Fisher R., Brewer N., Mitchell G. The relation between consistency and accuracy of witness testimony: Legal versus cognitive explanations. Handbook of psychology of investigative interviewing: Current developments and future directions 2009, 121-136. John Wiley, Chichester, UK. T. Williamson, R. Bull, T. Valentine (Eds.).
35. Fisher R.P. Interviewing victims and witnesses of crime. Psychology, Public Policy, & Law 1995, 1:732-764. doi: 10.1037/1076-8971.1.4.732.
36. Fisher R.P. Interviewing cooperative witnesses. Legal and Criminological Psychology 2010, 15:25-38. doi: 10.1348/135532509X441891.
37. Fisher R.P., Falkner K.L., Trevisan M., McCauley M.R. Adapting the Cognitive Interview to enhance long-term (35-years) recall of psychical activities. Journal of Applied Psychology 2000, 85:180-189. doi: 10.1037//0021-9010.85.2.180.
38. Fisher R.P., Geiselman R.E. Memory enhancing techniques for investigative interviewing: The Cognitive Interview 1992, Charles C. Thomas, Springfield, IL.
39. Fisher R.P., Geiselman R.E., Amador M. Field test of the cognitive interview: Enhancing the recollection of actual victims and interviewees of crime. Journal of Applied Psychology 1989, 74:722-727. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.74.5.722.
40. Fisher R.P., Geiselman R.E., Raymond D.S., Jurkevich L.M., Warhaftig M.L. Enhancing enhanced eyewitness memory: Refining the cognitive interview. Journal of Police Science & Administration 1987, 15:291-297.
41. Fisher R.P., Quigley K.L. Applying cognitive theory in public health investigations: Enhancing food recall with the cognitive interview. Questions about questions: Inquiries into the cognitive bases of surveys 1992, 154-169. Russell Sage Foundation, New York. J.M. Tanur (Ed.).
42. Fisher R.P., Schreiber N. Interviewing protocols to improve eyewitness memory. The handbook for eyewitness psychology, Vol. I: Memory for events 2007, 53-80. Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ. M. Toglia (Ed.).
43. Flin R., O'Connor P., Crichton M. Safety at the sharp end: A guide to non-technical skills 2008, Ashgate, Aldershot.
44. Gabbert F., Hope L., Fisher R.P. Protecting eyewitness evidence: Examining the efficacy of a self-administered interview tool. Law & Human Behavior 2009, 33:298-307. doi: 10.1007/s10979-008-9146-8.
45. Gabbert, F., Hope, L., & Jamieson, K. (2010). In the field: Trials of self-administered interview recall tool with witnesses to serious crime. Paper presented at the American Psychology Law Society Meeting, Vancouver.
46. Geiselman R.E., Fisher R.P., Cohen G., Holland H., Surtes L. Eyewitness responses to leading and misleading questions under the cognitive interview. Journal of Police Science & Administration 1986, 14:31-39.
47. Geiselman R.E., Fisher R.P., Firstenberg I., Hutton L.A., Sullivan S.J., Avetissian I.V., Prosk A.L. Enhancement of eyewitness memory: An empirical evaluation of the cognitive interview. Journal of Police Science & Administration 1984, 12:74-80.
48. Geiselman R.E., Fisher R.P., MacKinnon D.P., Holland H.L. Eyewitness memory enhancement in the police interview: Cognitive retrieval mnemonics versus hypnosis. Journal of Applied Psychology 1985, 70:401-412. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.70.2.401.
49. Geiselman R.E., Fisher R.P., MacKinnon D.P., Holland H.L. Enhancement of eyewitness memory with the cognitive interview. American Journal of Psychology 1986, 99:385-401. doi: 10.1080/09658210601092670.
50. Geiselman R.E., Padilla J. Cognitive interviewing with child witnesses. Journal of Police Science & Administration 1988, 16:236-242.
51. Geiselman R.E., Taras L., Schaap R., Woodruf N. Recall of constituent elements from multiple episodes of the Cognitive Interview. Journal of Police & Criminal Psychology 1994, 10:1-7.
52. Ginet M., Verkampt F. The cognitive interview: Is its benefit affected by the level of witness emotion?. Memory 2007, 15:450-464. doi: 10.1080/09658210601092670.
53. Goodman G.S., Quas J. Repeated interviews and children's memory: It's more than just how many. Current Directions in Psychological Science 2008, 17:386-390. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8721.2008.00611.x.
54. Goodman G.S., Taub E.P., Jones D.P.H., England P., Port L.K., Rudy L., Prado L. Testifying in criminal court: Emotional effects on child sexual assault victims. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development 1992, 57(Serial No. 229):5. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-5834.1992.tb00324.x.
55. Granhag P.A., Jonsson A., Allwood M. The cognitive interview and its effect on witness' confidence. Psychology, Crime, & Law 2004, 10:37-52. doi: 10.1080/1068316021000030577.
56. Gwyer P., Clifford B.R. The effects of the cognitive interview on recall, identification, confidence and the confidence/accuracy relationship. Applied Cognitive Psychology 1997, 11:121-145. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1099-0720(199704)11:2<121::AID- ACP443>3.0.CO;2-L.
57. Hayes B.K., Delamothe K. Cognitive interviewing procedures and suggestibility. Journal of Applied Psychology 1997, 82:562-577. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.82.4.562.
58. Hedges L.V., Olkin I. Statistical methods for meta-analysis 1985, Academic Press, Orlando, FL.
59. Hernandez-Fernaud E., Alonso-Quecuty M. The cognitive interview and lie detection: A new magnifying glass for Sherlock Holmes?. Applied Cognitive Psychology 1997, 11:55-68. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1099-0720(199702)11:1<55::AID-ACP423>3.0.CO;2-G.
60. Hershkowitz I., Orbach Y., Lamb M.E., Sternberg K.J., Horowitz D. The effects of mental context reinstatement on children's accounts of sexual abuse. Applied Cognitive Psychology 2001, 15:235-248. doi: 10.1002/acp.699.
61. Holliday R. Reducing misinformation effects in children with cognitive interviews: Dissociating recollection and familiarity. Child Development 2003, 74:728-751. doi: 10.1111/1467-8624.00565.
62. Holliday R. The effect of a prior cognitive interview on children's acceptance of misinformation. Applied Cognitive Psychology 2003, 17:443-457. doi: 10.1002/acp.879.
63. Holliday R., Albon A.J. Minimizing misinformation effects in young children with cognitive interview mnemonics. Applied Cognitive Psychology 2004, 18:263-281. doi: 10.1002/acp.973/.
64. Holliday, R., Ferguson, J., Milne, R., Bull, R. H. C., & Memon, A. (March, 2009). Isolating the effect of the Cognitive Interview instructions on witness testimony. Poster presentation at the American Psychology Law Society Conference, San Antonio, TX.
65. Memorandum of good practice on video recorded interviews with child witnesses for criminal proceedings 1992, Home Office & Department of Health, HMSO, London.
66. Hulse L., Memon A. Fatal impact? The effects of emotional arousal and weapon presence on police officers' memories for a simulated crime. Legal & Criminological Psychology 2006, 11:313-325. doi: 10.1348/135532505X58062.
67. Hulse L.M., Allan K., Memon A., Read J.D. Emotional arousal and memory: A test of the post stimulus processing hypothesis. American Journal of Psychology 2007, 120:73-90.
68. Johnson B., Mullen B., Salas E. A comparison of the three major meta-analytic approaches. Journal of Applied Psychology 1995, 80:94-106. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.80.1.94.
69. Köhnken G., Milne R., Memon A., Bull R. A meta-analysis on the effects of the Cognitive Interview. Special Issue of Psychology, Crime, & Law 1999, 5:3-27. doi: 10.1080/10683169908414991.
70. Köhnken G., Schimossek E., Aschermann E., Hofer E. The cognitive interview and the assessment of the credibility of adults' statements. Journal of Applied Psychology 1995, 80:671-684. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.80.6.671.
71. Köhnken G., Thuerer C., Zoberbier D. The cognitive interview: Are the interviewers' memories enhanced, too?. Applied Cognitive Psychology 1994, 8:13-24. doi: 10.1002/acp.2350080103.
72. Köhnken G. Interviewing adults. Handbook of psychology in legal contexts 1995, 215-233. Wiley, Chichester. R. Bull, D. Carson (Eds.).
73. Kebbell M., Milne R. Police officers' perception of eyewitness factors in forensic investigations. Journal of Social Psychology 1998, 138:323-330. doi: 10.1080/00224549809600384.
74. Kebbell M., Milne R., Wagstaff G. The Cognitive Interview: A survey of its forensic effectiveness. Psychology, Crime, & Law 1999, 5:101-115. doi: 10.1080/10683169908414996.
75. Kebbell M.R., Wagstaff G.F. An investigation into the influence of hypnosis on the confidence and accuracy of eyewitness recall. Contemporary Hypnosis 1997, 14:157-166. doi: 10.1002/ch.97.
76. Koriat A., Goldsmith M. Monitoring and control processes in the strategic regulation of memory accuracy. Psychological Review 1996, 103:490-517. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.103.3.490.
77. Koriat A., Goldsmith M., Halamish V. Control processes in voluntary remembering. Cognitive psychology of memory. Learning and memory: A comprehensive reference 2008, 307-324. Elsevier, Oxford. J. Byrne, H.L. Roediger (Eds.).
78. Lachs M., Bachman R., Williams C., Kossac A., Bove B., O'Leary J. Older adults as crime victims, perpetrators, witnesses, and complainants: A population-based study of police interactions. Journal of Elder Abuse & Neglect 2005, 16:25-40. doi: 10.1300/J084v16n04_02.
79. Lamb M.E., Hershkowitz I., Orbach Y., Esplin P.W. Tell me what happened: Structured investigative interviews of child victims and witnesses 2008, Wiley, Chichester, UK.
80. Lane S.M., Meissner C.A. A " middle road" approach to bridging the basic-applied divide in eyewitness identification research. Applied Cognitive Psychology 2008, 22:779-787. doi: 10.1002/acp.1482.
81. La Rooy D., Lamb M.E., Pipe M.E. Repeated Interviewing: A critical evaluation of the risks and potential benefits. The evaluation of child sexual abuse allegations: A comprehensive guide to assessment and testimony 2009, 327-361. Wiley, Chichester. K. Kuehnle, M. Connell (Eds.).
82. La Rooy D., Pipe M.E., Murray J.E. Reminiscence and hypermnesia in children's eyewitness memory. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 2005, 90:235-254. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2004.11.002.
83. Larsson A.S., Granhag P.A., Spjut E. Children's recall and the cognitive interview: Do the positive effects hold over time?. Applied Cognitive Psychology 2003, 17:203-214. doi: 10.1002/acp.863.
84. Malpass R.S., Tredoux C.G., Schreiber Compo N., McQuiston-Surrett D.E., MacLin O.H., Zimmerman L.A., Topp L.D. Study space analysis for policy development. Applied Cognitive Psychology 2008, 22:789-801. doi: 10.1002/acp.1483.
85. Mantwill M., Köhnken G., Ascherman E. Effects of the cognitive interview on the recall of familiar and unfamiliar events. Journal of Applied Psychology 1995, 80:68-78. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.80.1.68.
86. McCauley M.R., Fisher R.P. Facilitating children's eyewitness recall with the revised cognitive interview. Journal of Applied Psychology 1995, 80:510-516. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.80.4.510.
87. McMahon M. The effect of the enhanced cognitive interview on recall and confidence in elderly adults. Psychiatry, Psychology, & Law 2000, 7:9-32. doi: 10.1080/13218710009524968.
88. Mello E.W., Fisher R.P. Enhancing older adult eyewitness memory with the cognitive interview. Applied Cognitive Psychology 1996, 10:403-417. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1099-0720(199610)10:5<403::AID-ACP395>3.0.CO;2-X.
89. Memon A. The Cognitive Interview. A handbook of communication skills 2006, Routledge, London. 3rd ed. O. Hargie (Ed.).
90. Memon A., Bull R., Smith M. Improving the quality of the police interview: Can training in the use of the cognitive techniques help?. Policing & Society 1995, 5:53-68.
91. Memon A., Cronin O., Eaves R., Bull R. An empirical test of the mnemonic components of the Cognitive Interview. Psychology and law: Advances in research 1996, 135-145. De Gruyter, Berlin. G.M. Davies (Ed.).
92. Memon A., Milne R., Holley A., Bull R., Köhnken G. Towards understanding the effects of interviewer training in evaluating the cognitive interview. Applied Cognitive Psychology 1994, 8:641-659. doi: 10.1002/acp.2350080704.
93. Memon A., Holley A., Wark L., Bull R., Köhnken G. Reducing suggestibility in child witness interviews. Applied Cognitive Psychology 1996, 10:503-518. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1099-0720(199612)10:6<503::AID-ACP416>3.0.CO;2-R.
94. Memon A., Wark L., Bull R., Köhnken G. Isolating the effects of the cognitive interview techniques. British Journal of Psychology 1997, 88:179-198.
95. Memon A., Wark L., Holley A., Bull R., Köhnken G. Eyewitness performance in cognitive and structured interviews. Memory 1997, 5:639-656. doi: 10.1080/741941481.
96. Memon A., Yarmey D. Earwitness recall and identification: Comparison of the Cognitive Interview and Structured Interview. Perceptual & Motor Skills 1999, 88:797-807. doi: 10.2466/PMS.88.3.797-807.
97. Memon A., Zaragoza M., Clifford B., Kidd L. Inoculation or antidote? The effects of cognitive interview timing on false memory for forcibly fabricated events. Law & Human Behavior 2010, 34:105-117. doi: 10.1007/s10979-008-9172-6.
98. Milne R., Bull R. Interviewing children with mild learning disability with a cognitive interview. Investigative and forensic decision making: issues in criminological psychology (No. 26) 1996, British Psychological Society, Leicester. N.K. Clark, G.M. Stephenson (Eds.).
99. Milne R., Bull R. Back to basics: A componential analysis of the original cognitive interview mnemonics with three age groups. Applied Cognitive Psychology 2002, 16:743-753. doi: 10.1002/acp.825.
100. Milne R., Bull R. Does the cognitive interview help children to resist the effects of suggestive questioning?. Legal & Criminological Psychology 2003, 8:21-38. doi: 10.1002/acp.825.
101. Milne R., Bull R., Köhnken G., Memon A. The cognitive interview and suggestibility. Criminal behavior: Perceptions, attributions and rationality, issues in criminological and legal psychology 1995, 21-27. British Psychological Society, Leicester, No. 22. N. Clark, G.M. Stephenson (Eds.).
102. Milne R., Clare I.C.H., Bull R. Using the cognitive interview with adults with mild learning disabilities. Psychology, Crime, & Law 1999, 5:81-99. doi: 10.1080/10683169908414995.
103. Morgan C.A., Hazlett G., Doran A., Garrett S., Hoyt G., Thomas P., Baranoski M., Southwick S.M. Accuracy of eyewitness memory for persons encountered during exposure to highly intense stress. International Journal of Law & Psychiatry 2004, 27:265-279. doi: 10.1016/j.ijlp.2004.03.004.
104. National Investigative Interviewing Strategy 2009, Retrieved October 1, 2009, from http://www.npia.police.uk/en/docs/National_Investigative_Interviewing_Strategy_09.pdf.
105. Neisser U. What are the important questions?. Practical Aspects of Memory 1978, 3-24. Academic Press, London. M. Grunerberg, R.N. Sykes (Eds.).
106. Priestley G., Roberts S., Pipe M.E. Returning to the scene: Reminders and context reinstatement enhances children's recall. Developmental Psychology 1999, 35:1006-1019. doi: 10.1037/0012-1649.35.4.1006.
107. Py J., Magali G., Desperies C., Cathey C. Cognitive encoding and cognitive interviewing in eyewitness testimony. Swiss Journal of Psychology 1997, 56:33-41.
108. Roberts W.T., Higham P.A. Selecting accurate statements from the cognitive interview using confidence ratings. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied 2002, 8:33-43. doi: 10.1037//1076-898X.8.1.33.
109. Saywitz K.J., Geiselman R.E., Bornstein G.K. Effects of the cognitive interview and practice on children's recall performance. Journal of Applied Psychology 1992, 77:744-756. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.77.5.744.
110. Schreiber, N., & Fisher, R. P. (2006, March). Evaluating police training in Cognitive Interview techniques: Possibilities and difficulties. Paper presented at the American Psychology and Law Society Conference, St. Petersburg, FL.
111. Searcy J.H., Bartlett J.C., Memon A., Swanson K. Aging and lineup performance at long retention intervals: Effects of metamemory and context reinstatement. Journal of Applied Psychology 2001, 86:207-214. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.86.2.207.
112. Scoboria A., Mazzoni G., Kirsch I. " Don't know" responding to answerable and unanswerable questions during misleading and hypnotic interviews. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied 2008, 14:255-265. doi: 10.1037/1076-898X.14.3.255.
113. Scoboria, A., Trang, H., Shapero, D., & Frey, M. (2009). The effects of metacognitive monitoring and clarifying 'don't know' statements upon memory accuracy. Manuscript under review.
114. Smith S.M. Environmental context-dependent memory. Memory in context: Context in memory 1988, 13-34. Wiley, New York. G.M. Davies, D.M. Thomson (Eds.).
115. Stein L.M., Memon A. Testing the efficacy of the cognitive interview in a developing country. Applied Cognitive Psychology 2006, 20:597-605. doi: 10.1002/acp.1211.
116. Sternberg K.J., Lamb M.E., Esplin P.W., Orbach Y., Hershkowitz I. Using a structured protocol to improve the quality of investigative interviews. Memory and suggestibility in the forensic interview 2002, 409-436. Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ. M.L. Eisen (Ed.).
117. Tulving E. Elements of episodic memory 1983, Oxford University Press, New York.
118. Tulving E., Thomson D.M. Encoding specificity and retrieval processes in episodic memory. Psychological Review 1973, 80:352-373. doi: 10.1037/h0020071.
119. Turtle J., Read J.D., Lindsay D.S., Brimacombe C.A.E. Towards a more informative psychological science of eyewitness evidence. Applied Cognitive Psychology 2008, 22:769-778. doi: 10.1002/acp.1481.
120. Valentine T., Mesout J. Eyewitness identification under stress in the London Dungeon. Applied Cognitive Psychology 2009, 23:151-161. doi: 10.1002/acp.1463.
121. Wells G.L., Memon A., Penrod S.D. Eyewitness evidence: Improving its probative value. Psychological Science in the Public Interest 2006, 7:45-75. doi: 10.1111/j.1529-1006.2006.00027.x.
122. Wright A.M., Holliday R.E. Police officers' perceptions of older eyewitnesses. Legal & Criminological Psychology 2005, 10:211-223. doi: 10.1348/135532505X37001.
123. Wright A.M., Holliday R.E. Enhancing the recall of young, young-old and old-old adults with cognitive interviews. Applied Cognitive Psychology 2007, 21:19-43. doi: 10.1002/acp.1260.
124. Yuille J.C., Hunter R., Joffe R., Zaparniuk J. Interviewing children in sexual abuse cases. Child victims, child witnesses: Understanding and improving children's testimony 1993, 95-115. Guilford Press, New York. G.S. Goodman, B.L. Bottoms (Eds.).