Knowledge of the Crime Context: Improving the Understanding of Why the Cognitive Interview Works

Memory

Volumn 6, Issue 1, 1998, Pages 103-112

  Campos, Laura ^a   Alonso Quecuty, Maria L ^a  

^a UNIVERSIDAD DE LA LAGUNA   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; COGNITION; CRIME; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTERVIEW; MALE; MEMORY; METHODOLOGY; SPAIN; VIDEORECORDING;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; COGNITION; CRIME; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTERVIEWS; MALE; MEMORY; SPAIN; VIDEOTAPE RECORDING;

EID: 0031602620     PISSN: 09658211     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/741941602     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Bekerian, D.A., & Dennett, J.L. (1993). The cognitive interview: Reviving the issues. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 7(4), 275-298.
2. Bower, G. (1967). A multicomponent theory of memory trace. In K.W. Spence & J.T. Spence (Eds.), The psychology of learning and motivation. Vol I. New York: Academic Press.
3. Bransford, J. D., & Johnson, M.K. (1973.) Considerations of some problems in comprehension. In W. G. Chase (Ed.) Visual information processing. New York: Academic Press.
4. Davies, G., & Alonso-Quecuty, M. (1997). Cultural factors in the recall of a witnessed event. Memory, 5, 601-614.
5. Fisher, R.P., & Geiselman, R.E. (1992). Memory enhancing terchniques for investigative interviewing: The cognitive interview. Springfield ILL.: Charles C. Thomas.
6. Fisher, R.P., Geiselman, R.E., & Amador, M. (1989). Field test of the cognitive interview: Enhancing the recollection of actual victims and witnesses of crime. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74, 722-727.
7. Fisher, R.P., Geiselman, R.E., Raymond, D.S., Jurkevich, L.M., & Warliaftig, M.L. (1987). Enhancing eyewitness memory: Refining the cognitive interview. Journal of Police Science and Administration, 15, 291-297.
8. Flexser, A.J. & Tulving, K. (1978). Retrieval independence in recognition and recall. Psychological Review, 85, 153-172.
9. Geiselman, R.E., Fisher, R.P., Firstenberg, I., Mutton, L.A., Sullivan, S.J., Avetissian, I.V. & Prosk, A.L. (1984). Enhancemcnt of eyewitness memory: An empirical evaluation of the cognitive interview. Journal of Police Science and Administration, 12, 74-79.
10. Geiselman, R.K., Fisher, R.P., MacKinnon, D.P., & Holland, H.L. (1985). tyewitness memory enhancement in the police interview: Cognitive retrieval mnemonics versus hypnosis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 70, 401-412.
11. Geiselman, R.F., Fisher, R.P., Mackinnon, D.P., & Holland, H.L. (1986). Eyewitness memory enhancement in the cognitive interview. American Journal of Psychology, 99, 385-401.
12. Hernández-Fernaud, H., & Alonso-Quecuty, M.L. (1997). The cognitive interview and lie detection: A new magnifying glass for Sherlock Holmes. Applied ami Cognitive Psychology, 11, 55-68.
13. Mantwill, M., Köhnken, G. & Aschermann, E. (1995). Effects of the cognitive interview on the recall of familiar and unfamiliar events. Journal of Applied Psychology, 80(1), 68-78.
14. Memon, A., & Bull, R. (1991). The cognitive interview, its origins, empirical support, evaluation and practical implications. Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology, 1, 291-307.
15. Memon, A., Bull, R., & Smith, M. (1995). Improving the quality of the police interview: Can training in the use cognitive techniques help? Policing and Society, 5, 53-68.
16. Memon, A., Cronin. O., Eaves, R., Bull, R., & Küpper, H. (1992). The cognitive internew and child witnesses. Paper presented at NATO Advanced Study Institute: The child witness in context: cognitive, social and legal perspectives. Lucca, Italy.
17. Memon, A., & Köhnken, G. (1992). Helping witnesses to remember more: The cognitive interview. Expert Evidence: The International Digest of Human Behaviour, Science and Law, 1, 39-48.
18. Memon, A., & Stevenage, S. (1996). Interviewing witnesses: What works and what doesn't? Psycholoquy, 7(6), psye.96.7.06.witness memory, l.memon.
19. Milne, R., & Bull, R. (1995. September). Interviewing children with mild learning difficulty with the cognitive interview. Paper presented at the Division of Criminological and Legal Psychology Annual Conference, Rugby, UK.
20. Milne, R., Bull, R., Köhnken, G., & Memon, A. (1995). The cognitive interview and suggestibility. In G.M. Stephenson & N.K. Clark. (Eds.), Criminal behaviour: Perceptions, attributions and rationality. Division of Criminological and Legal Psychology, Occasional Papers, No. 22, Leicester, UK: British Psychological Society.
21. Minsky, M. (1975). Fame-system theory. In R.C. Schank & B.L. Nashwebber (Ed.), Theoretical issues in natural language processing. Cambridge, MA: Bolt, Beranek & Newman.
22. Schank, R.C. & Abelson, R.P. (1977). Scripts, plans, goals and understanding: An inquiry into human knowledge structures. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.
23. Tulving, E., (1974). Cue-dependent forgetting. American Science, 62, 74-82.
24. Wickens, D. (1970). Encoding categories of words: An empirical approach to meaning. Psychological Review, 77, 1-15.