Examining the cognitive interview in a double-test paradigm

Psychology, Crime and Law

Volumn 5, Issue 1-2, 1999, Pages 29-45

  Brock, Petra ^a   Fisher, Ronald P ^a   Cutler, Brian L ^a  

^a FLORIDA INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0033268276     PISSN: 1068316X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10683169908414992     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Bailey, F. L. and Rothblatt, H. B. (1971). Successful Techniques for Criminal Trials. Rochester: The Lawyers Co-op. Publ. Co. and Bancroft-Whitney Co.
2. Bekerian, D. A. and Dennett, J. L. (1993). The cognitive interview: Reviving the issues. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 7, 275-298.
3. Berman, G. L. and Cutler, B. L. (1996). Effects of inconsistencies in eyewitness testimony on mock-juror decision making. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81, 170-177.
4. Chapman, A. J. and Perry, D. J. (1995). Applying the cognitive interview procedure to child and adult eyewitnesses of road accidents. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 44, 283-294.
5. Fisher, R. P. (1996a). Misconceptions in design and analysis of research with the cognitive interview. PSYCOLOQUY 7(6), witness-memory. 12 fisher.
6. Fisher, R. P. (1996b). Implications of output-bound measures for laboratory and field research in memory. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 19, 197.
7. Fisher, R. P. (in press). Probing knowledge. In D. Gopher and A. Koriat (Eds.) Attention and Performance: XVII.
8. Fisher, R. P. and Chandler, C. C. (1991). Independence between recalling interevent relations and specific events. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 17, 722-733.
9. Fisher, R. P. and Cutler, B. L. (1995). Relation between consistency and accuracy of eyewitness testimony. In G. M. Davies, S. Lloyd-Bostock, M. McMurran and C. Wilson (Eds.) Psychology and Law: Advances in Research, (pp. 21-28) Berlin: De Gruyter.
10. Fisher, R. P., Falkner, K., Trevisan, M., McCauley, M. and Mello, M. (1997). Adapting the cognitive interview for long-term (35 years) recall of physical activities. Paper presented at meeting of the Society for Applied Research in Memory and Cognition. Toronto.
11. Fisher, R. P. and Geiselman, R. E. (1992). Memory-enhancing Techniques for Investigative Interviewing: The Cognitive Interview. Springfield, IL: C. C. Thomas.
12. Fisher, R. P., Geiselman, R. E. and Amador, M. (1989). Field test of the cognitive interview: Enhancing the recollection of actual victims and witnesses of crime. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74, 722-727.
13. Fisher, R. P. and McCauley, M. L. (1995). Information retrieval: Interviewing witnesses. In N. Brewer and C. Wilson (Eds.) Psychology and Policing, Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
14. Fisher, R. P., Mello, E. and McCauley, M. L. (1999). Are jurors' perceptions of eyewitness credibility affected by the cognitive interview? Psychology, Crime & Law, 5, 167-176.
15. Fisher, R. P. and Quigley, K. L. (1992). Improving the accuracy of food consumption histories in foodborne outbreak investigations. In J. Tanur (Ed.) Questions About Survey Questions: Inquiries into the Cognitive Bases of Surveys. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
16. Geiselman, R. E., Fisher, R. P., MacKinnon, D. P. and Holland, H. L. (1985). Eyewitness memory enhancement in the police interview: Cognitive retrieval mnemonics versus hypnosis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 70, 401-412.
17. Geiselman, R. E., Fisher, R. P., MacKinnon, D. P. and Holland, H. L. (1986). Enhancement of eyewitness memory with the cognitive interview. American Journal of Psychology, 99, 385-401.
18. Glissan, J. L. (1991). Cross-Examination: Practice and Procedure. Sydney: Butterworths.
19. Kintsch, W. (1970). Learning, Memory and Conceptual Processes. New York: Wiley.
20. Kohnken, G., Milne, R., Memon, A. and Bull, R. (March, 1994). Recall in cognitive interviews and standard deviations: A meta-analysis. Paper presented at the Conference of the American Psychology-Law Society, Santa Fe.
21. Koriat, A. and Goldsmith, M. (1994). Memory in naturalistic and laboratory contexts: Distinguishing the accuracy-oriented and quantity-oriented approaches to memory assessment. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 123, 297-316.
22. Koriat, A. and Goldsmith, M. (1996). Monitoring and control processes in the strategic regulation of memory accuracy. Psychological Review, 103, 490-517.
23. McCauley, M. R. and Fisher, R. P. (1995). Facilitating children's recall with the revised cognitive interview. Journal of Applied Psychology, 80, 510-516.
24. McCormack, P. D. (1972). Recognition memory: How complex a retrieval system? Canadian Journal of Psychology, 26, 18-41.
25. Memon, A. and Kohnken, G. (1992). Helping witnesses to remember more: The cognitive interview. Expert Evidence, 1, 39-48.
26. Memon, A. and Stevenage, V. S. (1996). Interviewing witnesses: What works and what doesn't? PSYCOLOQUY, 7(6) witness-memory.1.memon.
27. Memon, A., Wark, L., Holley, A., Bull, R. and Kohnken, G. (1997). Isolating the effects of the cognitive interview techniques. British Journal of Psychology, 88, 179-197.
28. Payne, D. G. (1987). Hypermnesia and reminiscence in recall: A historical and empirical review. Psychological Bulletin, 101, 5-27.
29. Scrivner, E. and Safer, M. A. (1988). Eyewitnesses show hypermnesia for details about a violent event. Journal of Applied Psychology, 73, 371-377.
30. Schwartz, B. L., Fisher, R. P. and Hebert, K. S. (1998). The relation of output order and commission errors in free recall and eyewitness accounts. Memory, 6, 257-275.
31. Smith, S. (1988). Environmental context-dependent memory. In G. M. Davies and D. M. Thomson (Eds.) Memory in Context: Context in Memory (pp. 13-34). Chichester, U.K., John Wiley & Sons.
32. Tulving, E. (1983). Elements of Episodic Memory. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
33. Turtle, J. W. and Yuille, J. C. (1994). Lost but not forgotten details: Repeated eyewitness recall leads to reminiscence but not hypermnesia. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79, 260-271.