Effects of the failure free Reading Program on Students with Severe Reading Disabilities

Journal of Learning Disabilities

Volumn 31, Issue 3, 1998, Pages 307-312

  Rankhorn, Barney ^a,b   England, Grace ^b,c   Collins, Sara M ^e   Lockavitch, Joseph F ^e   Algozzine, Bob ^d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT TYLER   (United States)

^b Klein Independent School   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF ST THOMAS   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT CHARLOTTE   (United States)

^e University of Texas at Tyler ^*

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CHILD; COMPARATIVE STUDY; FEMALE; HOSPITALIZATION; HUMAN; LEARNING DISORDER; MALE; READING; REHABILITATION; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

BIBLIOTHERAPY; CHILD; FEMALE; HUMANS; LEARNING DISORDERS; MALE; READING; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 0032068046     PISSN: 14690047     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/002221949803100311     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Center, Y., Wheldall, K., Freeman, L., Outhred, L., & McNaught, M. (1995). An evaluation of Reading Recovery, Reading Research Quarterly, 30, 240-263.
2. Clay, M. M. (1985). The early detection of reading difficulties (3rd ed.). Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
3. Frankenberger, W., & Fronzaglio, J. (1991). A review of states' criteria and procedures for identifying children with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 24, 495-500.
4. Freeman, T. J., & McLaughlin, T. F. (1984). Effects of a taped-words treatment procedure on learning disabled students' sight-word oral reading. Learning Disability Quarterly, 7, 49-54.
5. Hiebert, E. H. (1994). Reading Recovery in the United States: What difference does it make to an age cohort? Educational Researcher, 23(9), 15-25.
6. Kirk, S. A., & Elkins, J. (1975). Characteristics of children enrolled in Child Service Demonstration Centers. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 8, 630-637.
7. Kuder, S. (1990). Effectiveness of the DISTAR reading program for children with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 23, 69-71.
8. Lerner, J. (1993). Learning disabilities: Theories, diagnosis, and teaching strategies. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
9. Lockavitch, J. (1994). failure free Reading Program. Concord, NC: JFL Enterprises.
10. Lockavitch, J. (1995). Don't close the book on your not-yet reader. Concord, NC: JFL Enterprises.
11. Lovitt, T. C., & DeMeir, D. M (1984). An evaluation of the Slingerland method with LD youngsters. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 17, 267-272.
12. Lyon, R. (1985). Education validation studies of learning disabilities subtypes. In B. Rourke (Ed.), Learning disabilities in children: Advances in subtype analysis. New York: Guilford Press.
13. O'Connor, R. E., Jenkins, J. R., Cole, K. N., & Mills, P. E. (1993). Two approaches to reading instruction with children with disabilities: Does program make a difference? Exceptional Children, 59, 312-323.
14. O'Shea, L. J., & Valcante, G. (1986). A comparison over time of relative discrepancy scores of low achievers. Exceptional Children, 53, 253-259.
15. Perkins, V. L. (1988). Feedback effects on oral reading errors of children with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 21, 244-248.
16. Polloway, E. A., Epstein, M. H., Polloway, C. H., Patton, J. R., & Ball D. W. (1986). Corrective reading program: An analysis of effectiveness with learning disabled and mentally retarded students. Remedial and Special Education, 7(4), 41-47.
17. Rose, T. L. (1986). Effects of illustrations on reading comprehension of learning disabled students. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 19, 542-544.
18. Rose, T. L., & Beattie, J. R. (1986). Relative effects of teacher-directed and taped previewing on oral reading. Learning Disability Quarterly, 9, 193-199.
19. Rose, T. L., McEntire, E., & Dowdy, C. (1982). Effects of two error-correction procedures on oral reading. Learning Disability Quarterly, 7, 100-105.
20. Rose, T. L., & Sherry, L. (1984). Relative effects of two previewing procedures on LD adolescents' oral reading performance. Learning Disability Quarterly, 7, 39-44.
21. Rosenberg, M. S. (1986). Error-correction during oral reading: A comparison of three techniques. Learning Disability Quarterly, 9, 182-192.
22. Sachs, A. (1983). The effects of three prereading activities on learning disabled students' reading comprehension. Learning Disability Quarterly, 6, 248-251.
23. Sachs, A. (1984). The effects of previewing activities on oral reading miscues. Remedial and Special Education, 5(3), 45-49.
24. Salend, S. J., & Nowak, M. R. (1988). Effects of peer-previewing on LD students' oral reading skills. Learning Disability Quarterly, 10, 47-53.
25. Sleeter, C. (1986). Learning disabilities: The social construction of a special education category. Exceptional Children, 53, 46-54.
26. Smith, N. B. (1965). American reading instruction. Newark, DE: International Reading Association. (Original work published 1934)
27. Thorpe, H. W., Chiang, B., & Darch, C. B. (1981). Individual and group feedback systems for improving oral reading accuracy in learning disabled and regular class children. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 14, 332-334.
28. Tindal, J., Algozzine, B., & Ysseldyke, J. E. (1996). Effective strategies for improving reading performance. Manuscript in preparation.
29. van Bon, W., Boksebeld, L., Font Freide, T., & van den Hurk, A. (1991). A comparison of three methods of reading-while-listening. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 24, 471-483.
30. Wasik, B. A., & Slavin, R. E. (1983). Preventing early reading failure with one-to-one tutoring: A review of five programs. Reading Research Quarterly, 28, 179-200.
31. Weinstein, G., & Cooke, N. L. (1992). The effects of two repeated reading interventions on generalization of fluency. Learning Disability Quarterly, 15, 21-28.
32. Wood, K. D., & Algozzine, B. (1995). Teaching reading to high-risk learners: A unified perspective. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
33. Ysseldyke, J. E., & Algozzine, B. (1995). Special education: A practical approach for teachers (3rd ed.). Boston: Houghton Mifflin.