The Effects of Adjunct Questions and Feedback on Improving the Reading Comprehension Skills of Learning-Disabled Adolescents

Contemporary Educational Psychology

Volumn 26, Issue 1, 2001, Pages 25-43

  Peverly, Stephen T ^a   Wood, Rhea ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0038213419     PISSN: 0361476X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1006/ceps.1999.1025     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Adams M. J. Beginning to read: Learning and thinking about print. 1990;MIT Press, Cambridge.
2. Andre T. Does answering higher level questions while reading facilitate productive learning? Review of Educational Research. 49:1979;280-318.
3. Andre T., Thieman A. Level of adjunct question, type of feedback, and learning concepts by reading. Contemporary Educational Psychology. 13:1988;296-307.
4. Armbruster B., Ostertag J. Questions in elementary and science and social studies textbooks. Britton B. K., Woodward A., Binkley M. Learning from textbooks: Theory and practice. 1993;69-94 Erlbaum, Hillsdale.
5. Bangert-Downs R. L., Kulik C. L. C., Kulik J. A., Morgan M. T. The instructional effect of feedback in test-like events. Review of Educational Research. 61:1991;213-237.
6. Britton B. K., Gulgoz S., Glynn S. Impact of good and poor writing on learners; Research and theory. Britton B. K., Woodward A., Binkley M. Learning from textbooks: Theory and practice. 1993;1-46 Erlbaum, Hillsdale.
7. Chmielewski T. L., Dansereau D. F. Enhancing the recall of text: Knowledge mapping training promotes implicit transfer. Journal of Educational Psychology. 90:1998;407-413.
8. Dempster F. N. A case study in the failure to apply psychological research. American Psychologist. 43:1988;627-634.
9. Dempster F. N., Ferris R. The spacing effect: Research and practice. Journal of Research and Development in Education. 23:1990;97-101.
10. Dole J. A., Duffy G. C., Roehler L. R., Pearson P. D. Moving from the old to the new: Research on reading comprehension instruction. Review of Educational Research. 61:1991;239-264.
11. Frase L. T. Learning from prose material. Journal of Educational Psychology. 58:1967;266-272.
12. Fry E. B. A readability formula that saves time. Journal of Reading. 11:1968;513-516.
13. Haenggi D., Perfetti C. A. Individual differences in processing text. Journal of Educational Psychology. 84:1992;182-192.
14. Hamaker C. The effects of adjunct questions on prose learning. Review of Educational Research. 56:1986;212-242.
15. Hamilton R. J. A framework for the evaluation of adjunct questions and objectives. Review of Educational Research. 55:1985;47-85.
16. Hamilton R. J. Role of Concept definition, teaching examples, and practice on concept learning from prose. Contemporary Educational Psychology. 14:1989;357-365.
17. Hamilton R. J. Application adjunct post-questions and conceptual problem solving. Contemporary Educational Psychology. 17:1992;89-97.
18. Holliday W. G., Benson G. Enhancing learning using questions, adjunct to science charts. Journal of Research in Science Teaching. 28:1991;523-535.
19. Holliday W. G., McGuire B. How can comprehension adjunct questions focus students' attention and enhance concept learning of a computer-animated science lesson? Journal of Research in Science Teaching. 29:1992;3-15.
20. Hudgins B. B., Dorman J., Harris M. Some effects of adjunct questions on intermediate grade children with differing reading comprehension abilities. Journal of Educational Research. 72:1979;259-265.
21. Kintsch W. Comprehension: A paradigm for cognition. 1998;Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge.
22. MacGinitie W. H., MacGinitie R. K. Gates-MacGinitie Reading Tests. 1989;Riverside, Chicago.
23. Perfetti C. A. Reading ability. 1985;Oxford Univ. Press, New York.
24. Pressley M., Ghatala E. S. Delusions about performance on multiple choice comprehension test items. Reading Research Quarterly. 23:1988;454-465.
25. Raphael T. E. Teaching learners about sources of information for answering comprehension questions. Journal of Reading. 27:1984;303-311.
26. Rickards J. P. Adjunct post questions in text: A critical review of methods and processes. Review of Educational Research. 49:1979;181-196.
27. Rickards J. P., DiVesta F. Type and frequency of questions in processing textual material. Journal of Educational Psychology. 66:1974;354-362.
28. Rickards J. P., Hatcher W. C. Interspersed meaningful learning questions as semantic cues for poor comprehenders. Reading Research Quarterly. 13:1978;438-552.
29. Rosenshine B. Advances in research on instruction. The Journal of Educational Research. 88:1995;262-268.
30. Rosenshine B., Meister C. Reciprocal teaching: A review of the research. Review of Educational Research. 64:1994;479-530.
31. Rosenshine B., Meister C., Chapman S. Teaching students to generate questions: A review of the Intervention Studies. Review of Educational Research. 66:1996;181-221.
32. Rothkopf E. Z. Learning from written instruction materials: An exploration of the control of inspection behavior by test-like events. American Educational Research Journal. 3:1966;241-249.
33. Rothkopf E. Z. The concept of mathemagenic activities. Review of Educational Research. 40:1970;325-336.
34. Rothkopf E. Z. Control of mathemagenic activities. Jonassen D. H. Handbook of research for educational communications and technology. 1996;879-896 Simon & Schuster/Macmillian, New York.
35. Spear-Swerling L., Sternberg R. J. Off track: When poor readers become "learning disabled." 1996;Westview Press, Boulder.
36. Torgesen J. K. Cross-age consistency in phonological processing. Brady S. A., Shankweiler D. P. Phonological processes in literacy: A tribute to Isabelle Y. Liberman. 1991;187-193 Erlbaum, Hillsdale.
37. Watts G. H., Anderson R. C. Effects of three types of inserted question on learning from prose. Journal of Educational Psychology. 62:1971;387-394.
38. Williams J. P., Taylor M. B., deCani J. S. Constructing macrostructure for expository text. Journal of Educational Psychology. 76:1984;1065-1075.