Do special education interventions improve learning of secondary content? a meta-analysis

Remedial and Special Education

Volumn 31, Issue 6, 2010, Pages 437-449

  Scruggs, Thomas E ^a   Mastropieri, Margo A ^a   Berkeley, Sheri ^b   Graetz, Janet E ^c  

^a GEORGE MASON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA   (United States)

^c OAKLAND UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

content area learning; intervention research; meta analysis

Indexed keywords

EID: 78149370366     PISSN: 07419325     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0741932508327465     Document Type: Article

References (95)

1. Adams, V.M. (1992). Comparing paper-based and electronic outlining as a study strategy for mainstreamed students with learning disabilities. Dissertation Abstracts International, 53(03), 699A. (AAT No. 9222542).
2. Anderman, E.M. (1998). The middle school experience: Effects on the math and science achievement of adolescents with LD. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 31, 128-138.
3. Armbruster, B.B., & Anderson, T.H. (1988). On selecting considerate content area textbooks. Remedial and Special Education, 9, 47-52.
4. Bakken, J.P., Mastropieri, M.A., & Scruggs, T.E. (1997). Reading comprehension of expository science material and students with learning disabilities: A comparison of strategies. Journal of Special Education, 31, 300-324.
5. Bean, R.M., Zigmond, N., & Hartman, D.K. (1994). Adapted use of social studies textbooks in elementary classrooms: Views of classroom teachers. Remedial and Special Education, 15, 216-226.
6. Benedetti, D.M. (1984). The effectiveness of an instructional adaptation on the acquisition of science information by middle school learning disabled students. Dissertation Abstracts International, 44(11), 3346A. (AAT No. 8404884).
7. Bergerud, D., Lovitt, T.C., & Horton, S. (1988). The effectiveness of textbook adaptations in life science for high school students with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 21, 70-76.
8. Boon, R., Burke, M., Fore, C., & Spencer, V. (2006). The impact of cognitive organizers and technology-based practices on student success in secondary social studies classrooms. Journal of Special Education Technology, 21, 5-15.
9. Boon, R., Fore, C., Ayres, K., & Spencer, V. (2005). The effects of cognitive organizers to facilitate content-area learning for students with mild disabilities: A pilot study. Journal of Instructional Psychology, 32, 101-117.
10. Bos, C.S., & Anders, P.L. (1990). Effects of interactive vocabulary instruction on the vocabulary learning and reading comprehension of junior-high learning disabled students. Learning Disability Quarterly, 13, 31-42.
11. Bos, C.S., Anders, P.L., Filip, D., & Jaffe, L. (1989). The effects of an interactive instruction strategy for enhancing reading comprehension and content area learning for students with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 22, 384-390.
12. Boyle, J.R. (1996). The effects of a cognitive mapping strategy on the literal and inferential comprehension of students with mild disabilities. Learning Disability Quarterly, 19, 86-98.
13. Boyle, J.R., & Weishaar, M. (2001). The effects of strategic note taking on the recall and comprehension of lecture information for high school students with learning disabilities. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 16, 133-141.
14. Brigham, F.J., Scruggs, T.E., & Mastropieri, M.A. (1995). Elaborative maps for enhanced learning of historical information: Uniting spatial, verbal and imaginal information. Journal of Special Education, 28, 440-460.
15. Bryant, D.P., Vaughn, S., Linan-Thompson, S., Ugel, N., Hamff, A., & Hougen, M. (2000). Reading outcomes for students with and without reading disabilities in general education middle school content area classes. Learning Disability Quarterly, 23, 238-252.
16. Bulgren, J.A., Deshler, D.D., Schumaker, J.B., & Lenz, K.B. (2000). The use and effectiveness of analogical instruction in diverse secondary classrooms. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92, 426-441.
17. Bulgren, J.A., Lenz, K.B., Schumaker, J.B., Deshler, D.D., & Marquis, J. (2002). The use and effectiveness of a comparison routine in diverse secondary classrooms. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94, 356-371.
18. Bulgren, J.A., Schumaker, J.B., & Deshler, D.D. (1988). Effectiveness of a concept teaching routine in enhancing the performance of LD students in secondary-level mainstream classes. Learning Disability Quarterly, 11, 3-17.
19. Bulgren, J.A., Schumaker, J.B., & Deshler, D.D. (1994). The effects of a recall enhancement routine on the test performance of secondary students with and without learning disabilities. Learning Disabilities Research, 9, 2-11.
20. Carroll, L. (1995). Alice's adventures in wonderland. London: Anness. (Original work published 1865).
21. Cawley, J.F., Hayden, S., Cade, E., & Baker-Krooczynski, S. (2002). Including students with disabilities into the general education science classroom. Exceptional Children, 68, 423-435.
22. Cooper, H. (1998). Synthesizing research: A guide for literature reviews (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
23. Council for Exceptional Children. (2002). No Child Left Behind has major implications for special education. CEC Today, 9(4), 4.
24. Darch, C., & Eaves, R.C. (1986). Visual displays to increase comprehension of high school learning-disabled students. Journal of Special Education, 20, 309-318.
25. Darch, C., & Gersten, R. (1986). Direction-setting activities in reading comprehension: A comparison of two approaches. Learning Disability Quarterly, 9, 235-243.
26. Deluca, C.B. (1997). The effects of thematic-based, hands-on teaching versus a textbook approach for students with disabilities. Dissertation Abstracts International, 59(01), 132A. (AAT No. 9822130).
27. DiCecco, A.M., & Gleason, M.M. (2002). Using graphic organizers to attain relational knowledge from expository text. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 35, 306-320.
28. Doyle, C.S. (1999). The use of graphic organizers to improve comprehension of learning disabled students in social studies. Unpublished master's thesis, Kean University, Union.
29. Fontana, J., Mastropieri, M.A., & Scruggs, T.E. (2007). Mnemonic strategy instruction in inclusive secondary social studies classes. Remedial and Special Education, 28, 345-355.
30. Forness, S.R. (2001). Special education and related services: What have we learned from meta-analysis? Exceptionality, 9, 185-197.
31. Frase-Blunt, M. (2000). High-stakes testing a mixed blessing for special students. CEC Today, 7(2), 1, 5, 7, 15.
32. Fulk, B.J.M., Mastropieri, M.A., & Scruggs, T.E. (1992). Mnemonic generalization training with learning disabled adolescents. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 7, 2-10.
33. Groves, F.H. (1995). Science vocabulary load of selected secondary science textbooks. School Science and Mathematics, 95, 231-235.
34. Hedges, L., & Olkin, I. (1985). Statistical methods for meta-analysis. New York: Academic Press.
35. Higgins, K., Boon, R., & Lovitt, T.C. (1996). Hypertext support for remedial students and students with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 29, 402-413.
36. Hollingsworth, M., & Woodward, J. (1993). Integrated learning: Explicit strategies and their roles in problem-solving instruction for students with learning disabilities. Exceptional Children, 59, 444-455.
37. Horton, S.V., & Lovitt, T.C. (1989). Using study guides with three classifications of secondary students. Journal of Special Education, 22, 447-462.
38. Horton, S.V., Lovitt, T.C., & Bergerud, D. (1990). The effectiveness of graphic organizers for three classifications of secondary students in content area classes. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 23, 12-29.
39. Horton, S.V., Lovitt, T.C., Givens, A., & Nelson, R. (1989). Teaching social studies to high schools students with academic handicaps in a mainstreamed setting: Effects of a computerized study guide. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 22, 102-107.
40. Horton, S.V., Lovitt, T.C., & Slocum, T. (1988). Teaching geography to high school students with academic deficits: Effects of a computerized map tutorial. Learning Disability Quarterly, 11, 371-379.
41. Hudson, P. (1996). Using a learning set to increase test performance of students with learning disabilities in social studies classes. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 11, 78-85.
42. Hudson, P. (1997). Using teacher guided practice to help students with learning disabilities acquire and retain social studies content. Learning Disability Quarterly, 20, 23-32.
43. Jitendra, A.K., Hoppes, M.K., & Xin, Y.P. (2000). Enhancing main idea comprehension for students with learning problems: The role of a summarization strategy and self-monitoring instruction. Journal of Special Education, 34, 127-139.
44. Kim, A., Vaughn, S., Klingneer, J.K., Woodruff, A.L., Reutebuch, C.K., & Kouzekanani, K. (2006). Improving the reading comprehension of middle school students with disabilities through collaborative strategic reading. Remedial and Special Education, 27, 235-249.
45. Kinder, D., Bursuck, W.D., & Epstein, M.H. (1992). An evaluation of history textbooks. Journal of Special Education, 25, 472-291.
46. King-Sears, M.E., Mercer, C.D., & Sindelar, P.T. (1992). Toward independence with keyword mnemonic: A strategy for science vocabulary instruction. Remedial and Special Education, 13, 22-33.
47. Leshowitz, B., Jenkens, K., Heaton, S., & Bough, T.L. (1993). Fostering critical thinking skills in students with learning disabilities: An instructional program. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 26, 483-490.
48. Linn, M.C. (1972). An experiential science curriculum for the visually impaired. Exceptional Children, 39, 37-43.
49. Lovitt, T., Rudsit, J., Jenkins, J., Pious, C., & Benedetti, D. (1986). Adapting science materials for regular and learning disabled seventh graders. Remedial and Special Education, 7, 31-39.
50. MacArthur, C.A., Ferretti, R.P., & Okolo, C.M. (2002). On defending controversial viewpoints: Debates of sixth graders about the desirability of early 20th-century American immigration. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 17, 160-172.
51. MacArthur, C.A., & Haynes, J.B. (1995). Student assistant for learning from text (SALT): A hypermedia reading aid. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 28, 150-159.
52. Madigan, K.A. (1993). Teaching history facts to learning and behaviorally disordered youngsters: A comparison of two instructional approaches. Dissertation Abstracts International, 54(12), 4407A. (AAT No. 9411872).
53. Malmquist, S.K. (1998). The effects of study skills on the United States history achievement of secondary-aged students with mild disabilities. Dissertation Abstracts International, 58(08), 3086A. (AAT No. 9807502).
54. Malone, L., & Mastropieri, M.A. (1992). Reading comprehension instruction: Summarization and self-monitoring training for students with learning disabilities. Exceptional Children, 58, 270-279.
55. Mastropieri, M.A., & Scruggs, T.E. (1988). Increasing content area learning of learning disabled students: Research implementation. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 4, 17-25.
56. Mastropieri, M.A., Scruggs, T.E., Bakken, J.P., & Brigham, F.J. (1992). A complex mnemonic strategy for teaching states and their capitals: Comparing forward and backward associations. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 7, 96-103.
57. Mastropieri, M.A., Scruggs, T.E., & Graetz, J.S. (2005). Cognition and learning in inclusive high school chemistry classes. In T. E. Scruggs & M. A. Mastropieri (Eds.), Advances in learning and behavioral disabilities: Vol. 18. Cognition and learning in diverse settings (pp. 107-118). New York: Elsevier.
58. Mastropieri, M.A., Scruggs, T.E., Hamilton, S.L., Wolfe, S., Whedon, C., & Canevaro, A. (1996). Promoting thinking skills of students with learning disabilities: Effects on recall and comprehension of expository prose. Exceptionality, 6, 1-11.
59. Mastropieri, M.A., Scruggs, T.E., & Levin, J.R. (1985). Mnemonic strategy instruction with learning disabled adolescents. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 18, 94-100.
60. Mastropieri, M.A., Scruggs, T.E., Levin, J.R., Gaffney, J., & McLoone, B. (1985). Mnemonic vocabulary instruction for learning disabled students. Learning Disability Quarterly, 8, 57-63.
61. Mastropieri, M.A., Scruggs, T.E., McLoone, B., & Levin, J.R. (1985). Facilitating learning disabled students acquisition of science classifications. Learning Disability Quarterly, 8, 299-309.
62. Mastropieri, M.A., Scruggs, T.E., Mohler, L.J., Beranek, M.L., Spencer, V., Boon, R.T.,et al.(2001). Can middle school students with serious reading difficulties help each other and learn anything? Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 16, 18-27.
63. Mastropieri, M.A., Scruggs, T.E., Norland, J., Berkeley, S., McDuffie, K., Tornquist, E.H.,et al.(2006). Differentiated curriculum enhancement in inclusive middle school science: Effects on classroom and high-stakes tests. Journal of Special Education, 30, 130-137.
64. Mastropieri, M.A., Scruggs, T.E., Spencer, V., & Fontana, J. (2003). Promoting success in high school world history: Peer tutoring versus guided notes. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 18, 52-65.
65. Mastropieri, M.A., Scruggs, T.E., & Whedon, C. (1997). Using mnemonic strategies to teach information about U.S. presidents: A classroom investigation. Learning Disability Quarterly, 20, 13-20.
66. McCarthy, C.B. (2005). Effects of thematic-based, hands-on science teaching versus a textbook approach for students with disabilities. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42, 245-263.
67. McCleery, J.A., & Tindal, G.A. (1999). Teaching the scientific method to at-risk students and students with learning disabilities through concept anchoring and explicit instruction. Remedial and Special Education, 20, 7-18.
68. McLoone, B.B., Scruggs, T.E., Mastropieri, M.A., & Zucker, S. (1988). Memory strategy instruction and training with learning disabled adolescents. Learning Disabilities Research, 2, 45-53.
69. National Center for Education Statistics. (2005). NAEP science assessment data, 2000. Retrieved November 1, 2005, from http://www.nces.ed.gov/.
70. Okolo, C.M., & Ferretti, R.P. (1996). Knowledge acquisition of technology supported projects in the social studies for students with learning disabilities. Journal of Special Education Technology, 13, 91-102.
71. Parloff, M.B. (1984). Psychotherapy research and its incredible credibility crisis. Clinical Psychology Review, 4, 95-109.
72. Rosenberg, M.S., Adams, D.C., & Gurevitch, J. (2000). MetaWin: Statistical software for meta-analysis. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer.
73. Rosenshine, B. (1986). Synthesis of research on explicit teaching. Educational Leadership, 43, 60-69.
74. Rosenshine, B. (1987). Explicit teaching. In D. C. Berliner & B. V. Rosenshine (Eds.), Talks to teachers: A festschrift for N.L. Gage (pp. 75-92). New York: Random House.
75. Rosenthal, R. (1991). Meta-analytic procedures for social research. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
76. Rosenzweig, S. (1936). Some implicit common factors in diverse methods of psychotherapy. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 6, 412-415.
77. Scruggs, T.E., & Mastropieri, M.A. (1989a). Mnemonic instruction of LD students: A field based investigation. Learning Disability Quarterly, 12, 119-125.
78. Scruggs, T.E., & Mastropieri, M.A. (1989b). Reconstructive elaborations: A model for content area learning. American Educational Research Journal, 26, 311-327.
79. Scruggs, T.E., & Mastropieri, M.A. (1992). Classroom applications of mnemonic instruction: Acquisition, maintenance, and generalization. Exceptional Children, 58, 219-229.
80. Scruggs, T.E., & Mastropieri, M.A. (2000). The effectiveness of mnemonic instruction for students with learning and behavior problems: An update and research synthesis. Journal of Behavioral Education, 10, 163-173.
81. Scruggs, T.E., Mastropieri, M.A., Bakken, J.P., & Brigham, F.J. (1993). Reading versus doing: The relative effects of textbook-based and inquiry-oriented approaches to science learning in special education classrooms. Journal of Special Education, 27, 1-15.
82. Scruggs, T.E., Mastropieri, M.A., Brigham, F.J., & Sullivan, S.G. (1992). Effects of mnemonic reconstructions on the spatial learning of adolescents with learning disabilities. Learning Disability Quarterly, 15, 154-162.
83. Scruggs, T.E., Mastropieri, M.A., Levin, J.R., & Gaffney, J.S. (1985). Facilitating the acquisition of science facts in learning disabled students. American Educational Research Journal, 22, 575-586.
84. Scruggs, T.E., Mastropieri, M.A., & McDuffie, K.A. (2007). Co-teaching in inclusive classrooms: A meta-synthesis of qualitative research. Exceptional Children, 73, 392-416.
85. Scruggs, T.E., Mastropieri, M.A., McLoone, B.B., Levin, J.R., & Morrison, C.R. (1987). Mnemonic facilitation of learning disabled students' memory for expository prose. Journal of Educational Psychology, 79, 27-34.
86. Scruggs, T.E., Mastropieri, M.A., Sullivan, G.W., & Hesser, L.S. (1993). Improving reasoning and recall: The differential effects of elaborative interrogation and mnemonic elaboration. Learning Disability Quarterly, 16, 233-240.
87. Spencer, V.G., Scruggs, T.E., & Mastropieri, M.A. (2003). Content area learning and students with emotional or behavior disorders: Comparison of strategies. Behavioral Disorders, 28, 77-93.
88. Swanson, H.L., & Hoskyn, M. (2000). Intervention research for students with learning disabilities: A comprehensive meta-analysis of group design studies. In T. E. Scruggs & M. A. Mastropieri (Eds.), Advances in learning and behavioral disabilities: Vol. 14. Educational interventions (pp. 1-153). Oxford, UK: Elsevier.
89. Terrill, M.C., Scruggs, T.E., & Mastropieri, M.A. (2004). SAT vocabulary instruction for high school students with learning disabilities. Intervention in School and Clinic, 39, 288-294.
90. Thompson, B. (2006). Research synthesis: Effect sizes. In J. Green, G. Camilli, & P. B. Elmore (Eds.), Complementary methods for research in education (pp. 583-603). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
91. U.S. Department of Education. (2005). Twenty-fifth annual report to Congress on the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act. Washington, DC: Author.
92. Virginia State Department of Education. (2006). Virginia school report card: Standards of Learning (SOL) assessment results. Richmond, VA: Author. Retrieved March 3, 2007, from http://www.pen.k12.va.us/VDOE/src/SOLassessments.shtml.
93. Wilder, A.A., & Williams, J.P. (2001). Students with severe learning disabilities can learn higher order comprehension skills. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93, 268-278.
94. Williams, J., Brown, L., Silverstein, A., & Decant, J. (1994). An instructional program of narrative themes for adolescents with learning disabilities. Learning Disability Quarterly, 17, 205-221.
95. Woodward, J., Carnine, D., & Gersten, R. (1988). Teacher problem solving through computer simulations. American Educational Research Journal, 25, 7-28.