The use and effectiveness of analogical instruction in diverse secondary content classrooms

Journal of Educational Psychology

Volumn 92, Issue 3, 2000, Pages 426-441

  Bulgren, Janis A ^a   Deshler, Donald D ^b   Schumaker, Jean B ^b   Lenz, B Keith ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS   (United States)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0034416221     PISSN: 00220663     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/0022-0663.92.3.426     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Andrews, A. C. (1987, September-October). The analogy theme in geography. Journal of Geography, 86, 194-197.
2. Ausubel, D. P. (1963). The psychology of meaningful verbal learning. New York: Grune & Stratton.
3. Baer, D. M., Wolf, M. M., & Risley, T. R. (1968). Some current dimensions of applied behavior analysis. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1, 91-97.
4. Bean, T. W., Singer, H., & Cowan, S. (1985, December). Analogical study guides: Improving comprehension in science. Journal of Reading, 29, 246-250.
5. Berliner, D. C. (1987). But do they understand? In V. Richardson-Koehler (Ed.), Educators' handbook: A research perspective (pp. 259-293). New York: Longman.
6. Brown, A. L., Campione, J. C., & Day, J. D. (1981, February). Learning to learn: On training students to learn from texts. Educational Researcher, 10, 14-21.
7. Bulgren, J. A., Deshler, D. D., & Schumaker, J. B. (1993). The Concept Mastery Routine. Lawrence, KS: Edge Enterprises.
8. Bulgren, J. A., & Lenz, B. K. (1996). Strategic instruction in the content areas. In D. D. Deshler, E. S. Ellis, and B. K. Lenz (Eds.), Teaching adolescents with learning disabilities: Strategies and methods (2nd ed., pp. 409-473). Denver, CO: Love Publishing.
9. Bulgren, J. A., Lenz, B. K., Deshler, D. D., & Schumaker, J. B. (1995). The Concept Comparison Routine. Lawrence, KS: Edge Enterprises.
10. Bulgren, J. A., Lenz, B. K., Scanlon, D., & Clark, C. (1995, April). Participatory research: Varied methodologies, issues, and findings in development and implementation of research partnerships involving teachers and researchers. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association Conference, San Francisco.
11. Bulgren, J. A., Schumaker, J. B., & Deshler, D. D. (1988). Effectiveness of a concept teaching routine in enhancing the performance of LD students in secondary-level mainstream classes. Learning Disability Quarterly, 11, 3-17.
12. Bulgren, J. A., Schumaker, J. B., & Deshler, D. D. (1994a). The Concept Anchoring Routine. Lawrence, KS: Edge Enterprises.
13. Bulgren, J. A., Schumaker, J. B., & Deshler, D. D. (1994b). The effects of a recall enhancement routine on the test performance of students with and without learning disabilities. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 9, 2-11.
14. Carnine, D., & Shinn, M. (Eds.). (1994). Diverse learners and prevailing, emerging, and research-based educational approaches and their tools. School Psychology Review, 23, 341-471.
15. Christian, M. C. (1990, Spring/Summer). HERD. NEACT, 9-11.
16. Connell, P. J. (1987). Teaching language rules as solutions to language problems: A baseball analogy. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 18, 194-205.
17. Curtis, R. V. (1988). When is a science analogy like a social studies analogy? A comparison of text analogies across two disciplines. Instructional Science, 17, 169-177.
18. Fullan, M. (1982). The meaning of educational change. New York: Teachers College Press.
19. Gagne, R. M. (1965). The conditions of learning. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
20. Gentner, D. (1983). Structure-mapping: A theoretical framework for analogy. Cognitive Science, 7, 155-170.
21. Gentner, D., & Toupin, C. (1986). Systematicity and surface similarity in the development of analogy. Cognitive Science, 10, 277-300.
22. Gick, M. L., & Holyoak, K. J. (1980). Analogical problem solving. Cognitive Psychology, 12, 306-355.
23. Goldman, S. R., Pellegrino, J. W., Parseghian, P., & Sallis, R. (1982). Developmental and individual differences in verbal analogical reasoning. Child Development, 53, 550-559.
24. Holyoak, K. J. (1984). Analogical thinking and human intelligence. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Advances in the psychology of human intelligence (Vol. 2, pp. 199-230). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
25. Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (1989). Cooperation and competition: Theory and research. Edina, MN: Interaction Book Co.
26. Keane, M. (1987). Cognitive theory of analogy. In J. T. E. Richardson, M. W. Eysenck, & D. W. Piper (Eds.), Student learning: Research in education and cognitive psychology (pp. 67-72). Philadelphia: Open University Press.
27. Lenz, B. K., Alley, G. R., & Schumaker, J. B. (1987). Activating the inactive learner: Advance organizers in the secondary content classroom. Learning Disability Quarterly, 10, 53-68.
28. Lenz, B. K., Bulgren, J. A., & Hudson, P. (1990). Content enhancement: A model for promoting the acquisition of content by individuals with learning disabilities. In T. E. Scruggs & B. L. Y. Wong (Eds.), Intervention research in learning disabilities (pp. 122-165). New York: Springer-Verlag.
29. Lenz, B. K. (with Bulgren, J. A., Schumaker, J. B., Deshler, D. D., & Boudah, D. A.). (1994). The Unit Organizer Routine. Lawrence, KS: Edge Enterprises.
30. Lenz, B. K., Marrs, R. W., Schumaker, J. B., & Deshler, D. D. (1993). The content enhancement series: The Lesson Organizer Routine. Lawrence, KS: Edge Enterprises.
31. Lenz, B. K., Schumaker, J. B., & Deshler, D. D. (1991, March). Planning in the face of academic diversity: Whose questions should we be answering? Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association Conference, Chicago.
32. Markman, E. M. (1985). Comprehension monitoring of developmental and educational issues. In S. F. Chipman, J. W. Segal, & R. Glaser (Eds.), Thinking and learning skills: Research and open questions (Vol. 2, pp. 275-291). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
33. Mayer, R. E. (1987). Educational psychology: A cognitive approach. Boston: Little, Brown.
34. McGonigal, E. (1988). Correlative thinking: Writing analogies about literature. English Journal, 77, 66-67.
35. Palincsar, A. M., & Brown, A. L. (1984). Reciprocal teaching of comprehension-fostering and comprehension-monitoring activities. Cognition and Instruction, 1, 117-175.
36. Pressley, M. (with McCormick, C. B.). (1995). Cognition, teaching, & assessment. New York: HarperCollins.
37. Putnam, M. L., Deshler, D. D., & Schumaker, J. B. (1992). The investigation of setting demands: A missing link in learning strategy instruction. In L. J. Meltzer (Ed.), Strategy assessment and instruction for students with learning disabilities: From theory to practice (pp. 325-351). Austin, TX: Pro-ed.
38. Raphael, T. E., & Gavalek, J. R. (1984). Question-related activities and their relationship to reading comprehension: Some instructional implications. In G. G. Duffy, L. R. Roehler, & L. J. Mason (Eds.), Comprehension instruction: Perspectives and suggestions (pp. 234-250). New York: Longman.
39. Rumelhart, D. E., & Ortony, A. (1977). The representation of knowledge in memory. In R. C. Anderson, R. J. Spiro, & W. E. Montague (Eds.), Schooling and the acquisition of knowledge (pp. 95-135). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
40. Schumaker, J. B., Bulgren, J. A., Deshler, D. D., & Lenz, B. K. (1998). The Recall Enhancement Routine. Lawrence, KS: Edge Enterprises.
41. Schumaker, J. B., Deshler, D. D., & McKnight, P. (1991). Teaching routines for content areas at the secondary level. In G. Stover, M. R. Shinn, & H. M. Walker (Eds.), Interventions for achievement and behavior problems (pp. 473-494). Washington, DC: National Association of School Psychologists.
42. Sheard, C., & Readence, J. E. (1988). An investigation of the inference and mapping processes of the componential theory of analogical reasoning. Journal of Educational Research, 8, 347-353.
43. Skrtic, T. M. (1980). Formal reasoning abilities of learning disabled adolescents (Research Brief No. 7). Lawrence: University of Kansas, Institute for Research in Learning Disabilities.
44. Slavin, R. E. (1996). Research for the future: Research on cooperative learning and achievement: What we know, what we need to know. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 21, 43-69.
45. Sternberg, R. J., & Ketron, J. L. (1982). Selection and implementation of strategies in reasoning by analogy. Journal of Educational Psychology, 74, 399-413.
46. Vosniadou, S., & Ortony, A. (1989). Similarity and analogical reasoning: A synthesis. In S. Vosniadou & A. Ortony (Eds.), Similarity and analogical reasoning (pp. 1-17). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
47. White, C. S., & Alexander, P. A. (1984). Teaching analogical reasoning processes. Reading World, 24, 38-42.
48. Wong, B. Y. L. (1985). Potential means of enhancing content skills acquisition in learning disabled adolescents. Focus on Exceptional Children, 17, 1-8.
49. Wragg, P. H., & Allen, R. F. (1983). Developing creativity in social studies III: Generating analogies. Georgia Social Science Journal, 14, 27-33.