Do unto others as they do unto you: Reciprocity and social identification as determinants of ingroup favoritism

Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin

Volumn 31, Issue 6, 2005, Pages 831-845

  Stroebe, Katherine ^a   Lodewijkx, Hein F M ^b   Spears, Russell ^c  

^a LEIDEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^b UTRECHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^c CARDIFF UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Group identification; Interdependence; Intergroup discrimination; Minimal group paradigm; Reciprocity; Social identity theory

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ALGORITHM; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; FEMALE; GROUP PROCESS; HUMAN; MALE; PERCEPTIVE DISCRIMINATION; PSYCHOLOGICAL THEORY; QUESTIONNAIRE; REWARD; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR;

ADULT; ALGORITHMS; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; DISCRIMINATION (PSYCHOLOGY); FEMALE; GROUP PROCESSES; HUMANS; MALE; PSYCHOLOGICAL THEORY; QUESTIONNAIRES; REWARD; SOCIAL IDENTIFICATION;

EID: 18844444281     PISSN: 01461672     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0146167204271659     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Bourhis, R. Y., Sachdev, I., & Gagnon, A. (1994). Intergroup research with Tajfel matrices: Methodological notes. In M. P. Zanna, & J. M. Olson (Eds.), The psychology of prejudice: The Ontario symposium (Vol. 7., pp. 209-232). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
2. Bourhis, R. Y., Turner, J. C., & Gagnon, A. (1997). Interdependence, social identity and discrimination. In R. Spears, P. J. Oakes, N. Ellemers, & S. A. Haslam (Eds.), The social psychology of stereotyping and group life (pp. 273-295). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
3. Brown, R. J. (2000). Group processes (2nd ed.). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
4. Campbell, J. D., Trapnell, P. D., Heine, S. J., Katz, I. M., Lavallee, L. F., & Lehman, D. R. (1996). Self-concept clarity: Measurement, personality correlates, and cultural boundaries. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 141-156.
5. Diehl, M. (1988). Social identity and minimal groups: The effects of interpersonal and intergroup attitudinal similarity on intergroup discrimination. British Journal of Social Psychology, 27, 289-300.
6. Gaertner, L., & Insko C. A. (2000). Intergroup discrimination in the minimal group paradigm: Categorization, reciprocation or fear? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 77-94.
7. Gagnon, A., & Bourhis, R. Y. (1996). Discrimination in the minimal group paradigm: Social identity or self-interest? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22, 1289-1301.
8. Hodson, G., Dovidio, J., & Esses, V. M. (2003). Ingroup identification as a moderator of positive-negative asymmetry in social discrimination. European Journal of Social Psychology, 33, 215-233.
9. Jetten, J., Spears, R., & Manstead, A. (1996). Intergroup norms and intergroup discrimination: Distinctive self-categorization and social identity effects. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 1222-1233.
10. Jetten, J., Spears, R., & Manstead, A. (1997). Strength of identification and intergroup differentiation: The influence of group norms. European Journal of Social Psychology, 27, 603-609.
11. Kenny, D. A. (2003). Mediation analysis. Retrieved March 28, 2003, from http://users.rcn.com/dakenny/mediate.htm
12. Leonardelli, G. J. (1999). The motivational underpinnings of social discrimination: A test of the self-esteem hypothesis. Unpublished master's thesis, Ohio State University, Columbus.
13. Leonardelli, G. J., & Brewer, M. B. (2001). Minority and majority dis-crimination: When and why. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 37, 468-485.
14. LeVine, R. A., & Campbell, D. T. (1972). Ethnocentrism: Theories of conflict, ethnic attitudes and group behavior. New York: Wiley.
15. Lodewijkx, H. F. M., Rabbie, J. M., & Syroit, J. E. M. M. (1999). Don't bite the hand that feeds you: Mediation of minimal group discrimination by reciprocal expectations. Representative Research in Social Psychology, 23, 28-42.
16. Luhtanen, R., & Crocker, J. (1992). A collective self-esteem scale: Self-evaluation of one's social identity. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 18, 302-318.
17. Mael, F. A., & Tetrick, L. E. (1992). Identifying organizational identification. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 52, 813-824.
18. Messick, D. M., & Mackie, D. M. (1989). Intergroup relations. Annual Review of Psychology, 40, 45-81.
19. Rabbie, J. M., Schot, J. C., & Visser, L. (1989). Social identity theory: A conceptual and empirical critique from the perspective of a behavioral interaction model. European Journal of Social Psychology, 19, 171-202.
20. Scheepers, D., Branscombe, N. R., Spears, R., & Doosje, B. (2002). The emergence and effects of deviants in low and high status groups. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 38, 611-617.
21. Scheepers, D., Spears, R., Doosje, B., & Manstead, A. S. R. (2002). Integrating identity and instrumental approaches to intergroup differentiation: Different contexts, different motives. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 1455-1467.
22. Sherif, M. (1966). Group conflict and co-operation: Their social psychology. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
23. Tajfel, H. (1978). Social categorization, social identity and social comparison. In H. Tajfel (Ed.), Differentiation between social groups: Studies in the social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 61-76). London: Academic Press.
24. Tajfel, H., Billig, M. G., Bundy, H. P. & Flament, C. I. (1971). Social categorization and intergroup behavior. European Journal of Social Psychology, 1, 149-178.
25. Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1986). The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In S. Worchel & W. G. Austin (Eds.), Thesocialpsychology of intergroup relations (pp. 7-24). Chicago: Nelson-Hall.
26. Yamagishi, T., Jin, N., & Kiyonari, T. (1999). Bounded generalized reciprocity: Ingroup boasting and ingroup favoritism. Advances in Group Processes, 16, 161-197.