SH3 domain-peptide binding energy calculations based on structural ensemble and multiple peptide templates

PLoS ONE

Volumn 5, Issue 9, 2010, Pages 1-8

  Hong, Seungpyo ^a   Chung, Taesu ^a   Kim, Dongsup ^a  

^a Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology (KAIST)   (South Korea)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

PROTEIN SH3; PEPTIDE; PROTEIN;

ACCURACY; AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; ARTICLE; CALCULATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; ENERGY; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS; MOLECULAR RECOGNITION; PEPTIDE MAPPING; PREDICTION; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEIN DOMAIN; PROTEIN STRUCTURE; BINDING SITE; CHEMISTRY; METABOLISM; MOLECULAR GENETICS; SRC HOMOLOGY DOMAIN; THERMODYNAMICS;

AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; BINDING SITES; MOLECULAR SEQUENCE DATA; PEPTIDES; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEINS; SRC HOMOLOGY DOMAINS; THERMODYNAMICS;

EID: 77958588478     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0012654     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Pawson T, Nash P (2003) Assembly of cell regulatory systems through protein interaction domains. Science 300: 445-452.
2. Kuriyan J, Cowburn D (1997) Modular peptide recognition domains in eukaryotic signaling. Annu Rev Biophys Biomol Struct 26: 259-288.
3. Frank R (1992) Spot-Synthesis - an Easy Technique for the Positionally Addressable, Parallel Chemical Synthesis on a Membrane Support. Tetrahedron 48: 9217-9232.
4. Reineke U, Volkmer-Engert R, Schneider-Mergener J (2001) Applications of peptide arrays prepared by the SPOT-technology. Curr Opin Biotechnol 12: 59-64.
5. Landgraf C, Panni S, Montecchi-Palazzi L, Castagnoli L, Schneider-Mergener J, et al. (2004) Protein interaction networks by proteome peptide scanning. PLoS Biol 2: E14.
6. Suenaga A, Hatakeyama M, Ichikawa M, Yu X, Futatsugi N, et al. (2003) Molecular dynamics, free energy, and SPR analyses of the interactions between the SH2 domain of Grb2 and ErbB phosphotyrosyl peptides. Biochemistry 42: 5195-5200.
7. Gerek ZN, Keskin O, Ozkan SB (2009) Identification of specificity and promiscuity of PDZ domain interactions through their dynamic behavior. Proteins 77: 796-811.
8. Brannetti B, Via A, Cestra G, Cesareni G, Helmer-Citterich M (2000) SH3- SPOT: an algorithm to predict preferred ligands to different members of the SH3 gene family. J Mol Biol 298: 313-328.
9. Doytchinova IA, Flower DR (2001) Toward the quantitative prediction of T-cell epitopes: coMFA and coMSIA studies of peptides with affinity for the class I MHC molecule HLA-A*0201. J Med Chem 44: 3572-3581.
10. Hou T, Chen K, McLaughlin WA, Lu B, Wang W (2006) Computational analysis and prediction of the binding motif and protein interacting partners of the Abl SH3 domain. PLoS Comput Biol 2: e1.
11. Hou T, Xu Z, Zhang W, McLaughlin WA, Case DA, et al. (2009) Characterization of domain-peptide interaction interface: a generic structurebased model to decipher the binding specificity of SH3 domains. Mol Cell Proteomics 8: 639-649.
12. Hou TJ, Zhang W, Case DA, Wang W (2008) Characterization of domainpeptide interaction interface: A case study on the amphiphysin-1 SH3 domain. Journal of Molecular Biology 376: 1201-1214.
13. Wunderlich Z, Mirny LA (2009) Using genome-wide measurements for computational prediction of SH2-peptide interactions. Nucleic Acids Res 37: 4629-4641.
14. Reiss DJ, Schwikowski B (2004) Predicting protein-peptide interactions via a network-based motif sampler. Bioinformatics 20(Suppl 1): i274-282.
15. Lehrach WP, Husmeier D, Williams CK (2006) A regularized discriminative model for the prediction of protein-peptide interactions. Bioinformatics 22: 532-540.
16. Hilpert K, Winkler DF, Hancock RE (2007) Peptide arrays on cellulose support: SPOT synthesis, a time and cost efficient method for synthesis of large numbers of peptides in a parallel and addressable fashion. Nat Protoc 2: 1333-1349.
17. Zarrinpar A, Bhattacharyya RP, Lim WA (2003) The structure and function of proline recognition domains. Sci STKE 2003: RE8.
18. Nguyen JT, Turck CW, Cohen FE, Zuckermann RN, Lim WA (1998) Exploiting the basis of proline recognition by SH3 and WW domains: design of N-substituted inhibitors. Science 282: 2088-2092.
19. Fernandez-Ballester G, Beltrao P, Gonzalez JM, Song YH, Wilmanns M, et al. (2009) Structure-based prediction of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae SH3-ligand interactions. J Mol Biol 388: 902-916.
20. Guerois R, Nielsen JE, Serrano L (2002) Predicting changes in the stability of proteins and protein complexes: A study of more than 1000 mutations. Journal of Molecular Biology 320: 369-387.
21. Schymkowitz J, Borg J, Stricher F, Nys R, Rousseau F, et al. (2005) The FoldX web server: an online force field. Nucleic Acids Res 33: W382-388.
22. Crooks GE, Hon G, Chandonia JM, Brenner SE (2004) WebLogo: a sequence logo generator. Genome Res 14: 1188-1190.
23. Benedix A, Becker CM, de Groot BL, Caflisch A, Bockmann RA (2009) Predicting free energy changes using structural ensembles. Nat Methods 6: 3-4.
24. Comeau SR, Kozakov D, Brenke R, Shen Y, Beglov D, et al. (2007) ClusPro: performance in CAPRI rounds 6-11 and the new server. Proteins 69: 781-785.
25. Berman HM, Westbrook J, Feng Z, Gilliland G, Bhat TN, et al. (2000) The Protein Data Bank. Nucleic Acids Research 28: 235-242.
26. Sali A, Blundell TL (1993) Comparative Protein Modeling by Satisfaction of Spatial Restraints. Journal of Molecular Biology 234: 779-815.
27. Berendsen HJC, Vanderspoel D, Vandrunen R (1995) Gromacs - a Message- Passing Parallel Molecular-Dynamics Implementation. Computer Physics Communications 91: 43-56.
28. Sorin EJ, Pande VS (2005) Exploring the helix-coil transition via all-atom equilibrium ensemble simulations. Biophysical Journal 88: 2472-2493.
29. Duan Y, Wu C, Chowdhury S, Lee MC, Xiong GM, et al. (2003) A pointcharge force field for molecular mechanics simulations of proteins based on condensed-phase quantum mechanical calculations. Journal of Computational Chemistry 24: 1999-2012.