Novel modulation factor quantifies the role of water molecules in protein interactions

Proteins: Structure, Function and Bioinformatics

Volumn 78, Issue 15, 2010, Pages 3226-3234

  Bueno, Marta ^a,c   Temiz, Nuri A ^b   Camacho, Carlos J ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH   (United States)

Author keywords

DNA protein interactions; Hydrogen bonds; Protein protein interactions; Solvation prediction; Water interactions

Indexed keywords

WATER;

ARTICLE; CRYSTAL STRUCTURE; HUMAN; HYDROGEN BOND; MOLECULAR INTERACTION; POLARIZATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN DNA INTERACTION; PROTEIN INTERACTION; PROTEIN STRUCTURE; WATER STRUCTURE;

COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; CRYSTALLOGRAPHY, X-RAY; DNA; DNA-BINDING PROTEINS; HYDROGEN BONDING; MODELS, CHEMICAL; MODELS, MOLECULAR; MOLECULAR CONFORMATION; PROTEIN INTERACTION DOMAINS AND MOTIFS; THERMODYNAMICS; TRANSCRIPTION FACTORS; WATER; ZINC FINGERS;

EID: 77957958029     PISSN: 08873585     EISSN: 10970134     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/prot.22805     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. Bueno M, Camacho CJ, Sancho J. SIMPLE estimate of the free energy change due to aliphatic mutations: superior predictions based on first principles. Proteins 2007;68:850-862.
2. Potapov V, Cohen M, Schreiber G. Assessing computational methods for predicting protein stability upon mutation: good on average but not in the details. Protein Eng Des Sel 2009;22:553-560.
3. Sarai A, Kono H. Protein-DNA recognition patterns and predictions. Annu Rev Biophys Biomol Struct 2005;34:379-398.
4. Spyrakis F, Cozzini P, Bertoli C, Marabotti A, Kellogg GE, Mozzarelli A. Energetics of the protein-DNA-water interaction. BMC Struct Biol 2007;7:4.
5. Temiz NA, Camacho CJ. Experimentally based contact energies decode interactions responsible for protein-DNA affinity and the role of molecular waters at the binding interface. Nucleic Acids Res 2009;37:4076-4088.
6. Li Z, Lazaridis T. Water at biomolecular binding interfaces. Phys Chem Chem Phys 2007;9:573-581.
7. Jayaram B, Jain T. The role of water in protein-DNA recognition. Annu Rev Biophys Biomol Struct 2004;33:343-361.
8. Reddy CK, Das A, Jayaram B. Do water molecules mediate protein-DNA recognition? J Mol Biol 2001;314:619-632.
9. Dixit SB, Jayaram B. Role of hydrogen bonds in protein-DNA recognition: a comparison of generalized born and finite difference Poisson-Boltzmann solvation treatments. J Biomol Struct Dyn 1998;16:237-242.
10. Jayaram B, McConnell K, Dixit SB, Das A, Beveridge DL. Freeenergy component analysis of 40 protein-DNA complexes: a consensus view on the thermodynamics of binding at the molecular level. J Comput Chem 2002;23:1-14.
11. Coulocheri SA, Pigis DG, Papavassiliou KA, Papavassiliou AG. Hydrogen bonds in protein-DNA complexes: where geometry meets plasticity. Biochimie 2007;89:1291-1303.
12. Bueno M, Camacho CJ. Acidic groups docked to well defined wetted pockets at the core of the binding interface: a tale of scoring and missing protein interactions in CAPRI. Proteins 2007;69:786-792.
13. Dennis S, Camacho CJ, Vajda S. Continuum electrostatic analysis of preferred solvation sites around proteins in solution. Proteins 2000;38:176-188.
14. Guerois R, Nielsen JE, Serrano L. Predicting changes in the stability of proteins and protein complexes: a study of more than 1000 mutations. J Mol Biol 2002;320:369-387.
15. Capriotti E, Fariselli P, Casadio R. I-Mutant2.0: predicting stability changes upon mutation from the protein sequence or structure. Nucleic Acids Res 2005;33:W306-W310.
16. Dehouck Y, Grosfils A, Folch B, Gilis D, Bogaerts P, Rooman M. Fast and accurate predictions of protein stability changes upon mutations using statistical potentials and neural networks: PoPMu-SiC-2.0. Bioinformatics 2009;25:2537-2543.
17. Kortemme T, Joachimiak LA, Bullock AN, Schuler AD, Stoddard BL, Baker D. Computational redesign of protein-protein interaction specificity. Nat Struct Mol Biol 2004;11:371-379.
18. Pokala N, Handel TM. Energy functions for protein design: adjustment with protein-protein complex affinities, models for the unfolded state, and negative design of solubility and specificity. J Mol Biol 2005;347:203-227.
19. Szczepek M, Brondani V, Buchel J, Serrano L, Segal DJ, Cathomen T. Structure-based redesign of the dimerization interface reduces the toxicity of zinc-finger nucleases. Nat Biotechnol 2007;25:786-793.
20. Pan Y, Daggett V. Direct comparison of experimental and calculated folding free energies for hydrophobic deletion mutants of chymotrypsin inhibitor 2: free energy perturbation calculations using transition and denatured states from molecular dynamics simulations of unfolding. Biochemistry 2001;40:2723-2731.
21. Jaramillo A, Wodak SJ. Computational protein design is a challenge for implicit solvation models. Biophys J 2005;88:156-171.
22. Papoian GA, Ulander J, Wolynes PG. Role of water mediated interactions in protein-protein recognition landscapes. J Am Chem Soc 2003;125:9170-9178.
23. Reichmann D, Phillip Y, Carmi A, Schreiber G. On the contribution of water-mediated interactions to protein-complex stability. Biochemistry 2008;47:1051-1060.
24. Hubbard SJ, Gross KH, Argos P. Intramolecular cavities in globular proteins. Protein Eng 1994;7:613-626.
25. Williams MA, Goodfellow JM, Thornton JM. Buried waters and internal cavities in monomeric proteins. Protein Sci 1994;3:1224-1235.
26. Yu B, Blaber M, Gronenborn AM, Clore GM, Caspar DL. Disordered water within a hydrophobic protein cavity visualized by x-ray crystallography. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1999;96:103-108.
27. Matthews BW, Liu L. A review about nothing: are apolar cavities in proteins really empty? Protein Sci 2009;18:494-502.
28. Buckle AM, Cramer P, Fersht AR. Structural and energetic responses to cavity-creating mutations in hydrophobic cores: observation of a buried water molecule and the hydrophilic nature of such hydrophobic cavities. Biochemistry 1996;35:4298-4305.
29. Bueno M, Campos LA, Estrada J, Sancho J. Energetics of aliphatic deletions in protein cores. Protein Sci 2006;15:1858-1872.
30. Collins MD, Quillin ML, Hummer G, Matthews BW, Gruner SM. Structural rigidity of a large cavity-containing protein revealed by high-pressure crystallography. J Mol Biol 2007;367:752-763.
31. Eriksson AE, Baase WA, Wozniak JA, Matthews BW. A cavity-containing mutant of T4 lysozyme is stabilized by buried benzene. Nature 1992;355:371-373.
32. Lee J, Lee K, Shin S. Theoretical studies of the response of a protein structure to cavity-creating mutations. Biophys J 2000;78:1665-1671.
33. Liu L, Baase WA, Michael MM, Matthews BW. Use of stabilizing mutations to engineer a charged group within a ligand-binding hydrophobic cavity in T4 lysozyme. Biochemistry 2009;48:8842-8851.
34. Mizuno T, Hasegawa C, Tanabe Y, Hamajima K, Muto T, Nishi Y, Oda M, Kobayashi Y, Tanaka T. Organic ligand binding by a hydrophobic cavity in a designed tetrameric coiled-coil protein. Chemistry 2009;15:1491-1498.
35. Adamek DH, Guerrero L, Blaber M, Caspar DL. Structural and energetic consequences of mutations in a solvated hydrophobic cavity. J Mol Biol 2005;346:307-318.
36. Burling FT, Weis WI, Flaherty KM, Brunger AT. Direct observation of protein solvation and discrete disorder with experimental crystallographic phases. Science 1996;271:72-77.
37. Liu L, Quillin ML, Matthews BW. Use of experimental crystallographic phases to examine the hydration of polar and nonpolar cavities in T4 lysozyme. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2008;105:14406-14411.
38. Sonavane S, Chakrabarti P. Cavities and atomic packing in protein structures and interfaces. PLoS Comput Biol 2008;4:e1000188.
39. Sonavane S, Chakrabarti P. Cavities in protein-DNA and protein-RNA interfaces. Nucleic Acids Res 2009;37:4613-4620.
40. Takano K, Yamagata Y, Yutani K. Buried water molecules contribute to the conformational stability of a protein. Protein Eng 2003;16:5-9.
41. Janin J, Bahadur RP, Chakrabarti P. Protein-protein interaction and quaternary structure. Q Rev Biophys 2008;41:133-180.
42. Temiz NA, Trapp A, Prokopyev OA, Camacho CJ. Optimization of minimum set of protein-DNA interactions: a quasi exact solution with minimum over-fitting. Bioinformatics 2010;26:319-325.
43. Leulliot N, Chaillet M, Durand D, Ulryck N, Blondeau K, van TH. Structure of the yeast tRNA m7G methylation complex. Structure 2008;16:52-61.
44. Micheelsen PO, Vevodova J, De ML, Ostergaard PR, Friis EP, Wilson K, Skjot M. Structural and mutational analyses of the interaction between the barley alpha-amylase/subtilisin inhibitor and the subtilisin savinase reveal a novel mode of inhibition. J Mol Biol 2008;380:681-690.
45. Isabet T, Montagnac G, Regazzoni K, Raynal B, El KF, England P, Franco M, Chavrier P, Houdusse A, Menetrey J. The structural basis of Arf effector specificity: the crystal structure of ARF6 in a complex with JIP4. EMBO J 2009;28:2835-2845.
46. Bao R, Zhou CZ, Jiang C, Lin SX, Chi CW, Chen Y. The ternary structure of the double-headed arrowhead protease inhibitor API-A complexed with two trypsins reveals a novel reactive site conformation. J Biol Chem 2009;284:26676-26684.
47. Tong Y, Chugha P, Hota PK, Alviani RS, Li M, Tempel W, Shen L, Park HW, Buck M. Binding of Rac1, Rnd1, and RhoD to a novel Rho GTPase interaction motif destabilizes dimerization of the plexin-B1 effector domain J Biol Chem 2007;282:37215-37224.
48. Tong Y, Hota PK, Hamaneh MB, Buck M. Insights into oncogenic mutations of plexin-B1 based on the solution structure of the Rho GTPase binding domain. Structure 2008;16:246-258.
49. Krachler AM, Sharma A, Kleanthous C. Self-association of TPR domains: lessons learned from a designed, consensus-based TPR oligomer. Proteins 2010;78:2131-2143.
50. Elrod-Erickson M, Benson TE, Pabo CO. High-resolution structures of variant Zif268-DNA complexes: implications for understanding zinc finger-DNA recognition. Structure 1998;6:451-464.
51. Elrod-Erickson M, Rould MA, Nekludova L, Pabo CO. Zif268 protein-DNA complex refined at 1.6Å: a model system for understanding zinc finger-DNA interactions. Structure 1996;4:1171-1180.
52. Liu J, Stormo GD. Quantitative analysis of EGR proteins binding to DNA: assessing additivity in both the binding site and the protein. BMC Bioinformat 2005;6:176.
53. Brandsdal BO, Aqvist J, Smalas AO. Computational analysis of binding of P1 variants to trypsin. Protein Sci 2001;10:1584-1595.
54. Camacho CJ, Ma H, Champ PC. Scoring a diverse set of high-quality docked conformations: a metascore based on electrostatic and desolvation interactions. Proteins 2006;63:868-877.
55. Champ PC, Camacho CJ. FastContact: a free energy scoring tool for protein-protein complex structures. Nucleic Acids Res 2007; 35:W556-W560.