Scoring a diverse set of high-quality docked conformations: A metascore based on electrostatic and desolvation interactions

Proteins: Structure, Function and Genetics

Volumn 63, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 868-877

  Camacho, Carlos J ^a   Ma, Hui ^a   Champ, P Christoph ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH   (United States)

Author keywords

Binding mechanism; Complex structure; Desolvation; Docking; Free energy; Protein interactions; Recognition; Scoring

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BINDING AFFINITY; COMPLEX FORMATION; ELECTRICITY; MOLECULAR MODEL; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEIN PROTEIN INTERACTION; PROTEIN STRUCTURE; QUALITY CONTROL; SCORING SYSTEM; SOLVATION; TECHNIQUE;

ELECTROSTATICS; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEINS; SOLVENTS;

EID: 33646817694     PISSN: 08873585     EISSN: 10970134     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/prot.20932     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Katchalski-Katzir E, Shariv I, Eisenstein M, Friesem A, Aflalo C, Vakser IA. Molecular surface recognition-determination of geometric fit between proteins and their ligands by correlation techniques. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1992;89:2195-2199.
2. Mendez R, Leplae R, Lensink MF, Wodak SJ. Assessment of CAPRI predictions in rounds 3-5 shows progress in docking procedures. Proteins 2005;60:150-169.
3. Wodak SJ, Janin J. Computer analysis of protein-protein interaction. J Mol Biol 1978;124:323-342.
4. Chothia C. The nature of the accessible and buried surfaces in proteins. J Mol Biol 1976;105:1-14.
5. Chothia C, Janin J. Principles of protein-protein recognition. Nature 1975;256:705-708.
6. Vakser IA, Matar OG, Lam CF. A systematic study of low-resolution recognition in protein-protein complexes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1999;96:8477-8482.
7. Getzoff ED, Tainer JA, Weiner PK, Kollman PA, Richardson JS, Richardson DC. Electrostatic recognition between superoxide and copper, zinc superoxide dismutase. Nature 1983;306:287-290.
8. Mauk MR, Mauk AG, Weber PC, Matthew JB. Electrostatic analysis of the interaction of cytochrome c with native dimethyl ester heme substituted cytochrome 65. Biochemistry 1986;25:7085-7091.
9. Weiner PK, Langridge R, Blaney JM, Schaeffer R, Kollman PA. Electrostatic potential molecular surfaces. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1982;79:709-713.
10. Gilson MK, Honig B. Energetics of charge-charge interactions in proteins. Proteins 1988;3:32-52.
11. Pickersgill RW. A rapid method of calculating charge-charge interaction energies in proteins. Protein Eng 1988;2:247-248.
12. Honig B, Nicholls A. Classical electrostatics in biology and chemistry. Science 1995;268:1144-1149.
13. Eisenberg D, McLachlan AD. Solvation energy in protein folding and binding. Nature 1986;319:199-203.
14. Camacho CJ, Weng Z, Vajda S, DeLisi C. Free energy landscapes of encounter complexes in protein-protein association. Biophys J 1999;76,1166-1178.
15. Camacho CJ, Gatchell DW, Kimura SR, Vajda S. Scoring docked conformations generated by rigid-body protein-protein docking. Proteins 2000;40:525-537.
16. Camacho CJ, Zhang C. FastContact: rapid estimate of contact and binding free energies. Bioinformatics 2005;21:2534-2536.
17. Zhang C, Vasmatzis G, Cornette JL, DeLisi, C. Determination of atomic desolvation energies from the structures of crystallized proteins. J Mol Biol 1997;267:707-726.
18. Camacho CJ, Vajda S. Protein docking along smooth association pathways. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2001;98:10636-10641.
19. Janin J, Henrick K, Moult J, Ten Eyck L, Sternberg MJ, Vajda S, Vakser I, Wodak SJ. CAPRI: a critical assessment of predicted interactions. Proteins 2003;52:2-9.
20. Comeau SR, Gatchell DW, Vajda S, Camacho CJ. ClusPro: an automated docking and discrimination method for the prediction of protein complexes. Bioinformatics 2004;20:45-50.
21. Camacho CJ, Gatchell DW. Successful discrimination of protein interactions. Proteins 2003;52:92-97.
22. Comeau SR, Vajda S, Camacho CJ. Performance of the first protein docking server ClusPro in CAPRI rounds 3-5. Proteins 2005 60:239-244.
23. Camacho CJ (2005) Modeling side chains using molecular dynamics improve recognition of binding region in CAPRI targets. Proteins 60:245-251.
24. Ben-Zeev E, Kowalsman N, Ben-Shimon A, Segal D, Atarot T, Noivirt O, Shay T, Eisenstein M. Docking to single-domain and multiple-domain proteins: old and new challenges. Proteins 2005;60:195-201.
25. Wiehe K, Pierce B, Mintseris J, Tong WW, Anderson R, Chen R, Weng Z. ZDOCK and RDOCK performance in CAPRI rounds 3, 4, and 5. Proteins 2005;60:207-213.
26. Brooks BR, Bruccoleri RE, Olafson BD, States DJ, Swaminathan S, Karplus M. CHARMm: a program for macromolecular energy, minimization, and dynamics calculations. J Comput Chem 1983;4:187-217.
27. Schaeffer F, Matuschek M, Guglielmi G, Miras I, Alzari PM, Beguin P. Duplicated dockerin subdomains of Clostridium thermocellum endoglucanase CelD bind to a cohesin domain of the scaffolding protein CipA with distinct thermodynamic parameters and a negative cooperativity. Biochemistry 2002;39:5013-5021.
28. Carvalho AL, Dias FM, Prates JA, Nagy T, Gilbert HJ, Davies GJ, Ferreira LM, Romao MJ, Fontes CM. Cellulosome assembly revealed by the crystal structure of the cohesin-dockerin complex. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2003;100:13809-13814.
29. Terashi G, Takeda-Shitaka M, Takaya D, Komatsu K, Umeyama H. Searching for protein-protein interaction sites and docking by the methods of molecular dynamics, grid scoring, and the pairwise interaction potential of amino acid residues. Proteins 2005;60:289-295.
30. Inbar Y, Schneidman-Duhovny D, Halperin I, Oron A, Nussinov R, Wolfson HJ. Approaching the CAPRI challenge with an efficient geometry-based docking. Proteins 2005;60:217-223.
31. Smith GR, Fitzjohn PW, Page CS, Bates PA. Incorporation of flexibility into rigid-body docking: applications in rounds 3-5 of CAPRI. Proteins 2005;60:263-268.
32. Schueler-Furman O, Wang C, Baker D. Progress in protein-protein docking: atomic resolution predictions in the CAPRI experiment using RosettaDock with an improved treatment of side-chain flexibility. Proteins 2005;60:187-194.
33. Mustard D, Ritchie DW. Docking essential dynamics eigenstructures. Proteins 2005;60:269-274.
34. Zhang C, Liu S, Zhou Y. Docking prediction using biological information, ZDOCK sampling technique, and clustering guided by the DFIRE statistical energy function. Proteins 2005;60:314-318.
35. Fernández-Recio J, Abagyan R, Totrov M. Improving CAPRI predictions: optimized desolvation for rigid-body docking. Proteins 2005;60:308-313.
36. Carter P, Lesk VI, Islam SA, Sternberg MJE. Protein-protein docking using 3D-Dock in rounds 3, 4, and 5 of CAPRI. Proteins 2005;60:281-288.
37. Zacharias M. ATTRACT: protein-protein docking in CAPRI using a reduced protein model. Proteins 2005;60:252-256.
38. Daily MD, Masica D, Sivasubramanian A, Somarouthu S, Gray JJ. CAPRI rounds 3-5 reveal promising successes and future challenges for RosettaDock. Proteins 2005;60:181-186.
39. van Dijk ADJ, de Vries SJ, Dominguez C, Chen H, Zhou HX, Bonvin AMJJ. Data-driven docking: HADDOCK'S adventures in CAPRI. Proteins 2005;60:232-238.
40. Tress M, de Juan D, Graña O, Gómez MJ, Gómez-Puertas P, González JM, López G, Valencia A. Scoring docking models with evolutionary information. Proteins 2005;60:275-280.
41. Tovchigrechko A, Vakser IA. Development and testing of an automated approach to protein docking. Proteins 2005;60:296-301.
42. Sansen S, De Ranter CJ, Gebruers K, Brijs K, Courtin CM, Delcour JA, Rabijns A. Structural basis for inhibition of Aspergillus niger xylanase by triticum aestivum xylanase inhibitor-I. J Biol Chem 2004;279:36022-36028.