Manual skill generalization enhanced by negative viscosity

Journal of Neurophysiology

Volumn 104, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 2008-2019

  Huang, Felix C ^a,b   Patton, James L ^a,b,c   Mussa Ivaldi, Ferdinando A ^a,b  

^a REHABILITATION INSTITUTE OF CHICAGO   (United States)

^b NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCELERATION; ADAPTATION; ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; DEVICE; EXPLORATORY BEHAVIOR; FORCE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; IMPEDANCE; LEARNING; MAN MACHINE INTERACTION; MOTOR PERFORMANCE; NEGATIVE VISCOSITY; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; ROBOTICS; SENSORIMOTOR FUNCTION; SKILL; TASK PERFORMANCE; TRAINING; VELOCITY; VOLUNTARY MOVEMENT;

HAND; HUMANS; MOTOR SKILLS; MOVEMENT; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; ROBOTICS; VISCOSITY;

EID: 77957827738     PISSN: 00223077     EISSN: 15221598     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1152/jn.00433.2009     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. Aguirre-Ollinger G, Colgate JE, Peshkin MA, Goswami A. IEEE 10th International Conference on Active-Impedance Control of a Lower-Limb Assistive Exoskeleton. Rehabilitation Robotics, Noordwijk, Netherlands, 2007.
2. Bays PM, Flanagan JR, Wolpert DM. Interference between velocity-dependent and position-dependent force-fields indicates that tasks depending on different kinematic parameters compete for motor working memory. Exp Brain Res 163: 400-405, 2005.
3. Brashers-Krug T, Shadmehr R, Bizzi E. Consolidation in human motor memory. Nature 382: 252-255, 1996.
4. Burdet E, Osu R, Franklin DW, Milner TE, Kawato M. The central nervous system stabilizes unstable dynamics by learning optimal impedance. Nature 414: 446-449, 2001. (Pubitemid 34173725)
5. Conditt MA, Mussa-Ivaldi FA. Central representation of time during motor learning. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 96: 11625-11630, 1999.
6. Davidson PR, Wolpert DM. Internal models underlying grasp can be additively combined. Exp Brain Res 155: 334-340, 2004.
7. Emken JL, Benitez R, Beinkensmeyer DJ. Human-robot cooperative movement training: learning a novel sensory motor transformation during walking with robotic assistance-as-needed. J Neuroeng Rehabil 4: 8, 2007.
8. Emken JL, Reinkensmeyer DJ. Robot-enhanced motor learning: accelerating internal model formation during locomotion by transient dynamic amplification. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng 13: 33-39, 2005.
9. Flanagan JR, Lolley S. The inertial anisotropy of the arm is accurately predicted during movement planning. J Neurosci 21: 1361-1369, 2001.
10. Franklin DW, Liaw G, Milner TE, Osu R, Burdet E, Kawato M. Endpoint stiffness of the arm is directionally tuned to instability in the environment. J Neurosci 27: 7705-7716, 2007. (Pubitemid 47093815)
11. Gandolfo F, Mussa-Ivaldi FA, Bizzi E. Motor learning by field approximation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 93: 3843-3846, 1996.
12. Gentili R, Cahouet V, Ballay Y, Papaxanthis C. Inertial properties of the arm are accurately predicted during motor imagery. Behav Brain Res 155: 231-239, 2004.
13. Ghahramani Z, Wolpert DM. Modular decomposition in visuomotor learning. Nature 386: 392-395, 1997.
14. Giuffrida CG, Shea JB, Fairbrother JT. Differential transfer benefits of increased practice for constant, blocked, and serial practice schedules. J Mot Behav 34: 353-365, 2002.
15. Held R, Rekosh J. Motor-sensory feedback and the geometry of visual space. Science 141: 722-723, 1963.
16. Hinder MR, Walk L. The interference effects of non-rotated versus counter-rotated trials in visuomotor adaptation. Exp Brain Res 180: 629-640, 2007.
17. Hogan N. Impedance control - an approach to manipulation. I. Theory. II. Implementation. III. Applications. ASME Trans J Dynam Syst Measurement Control B 107: 1-24, 1985.
18. Housman SJ, Scott KM, Reinkensmeyer DJ. A randomized controlled trial of gravity-supported, computer-enhanced arm exercise for individuals with severe hemiparesis. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 23: 505-514, 2009.
19. Huang FC, Gillespie RB, Kuo AD. Human adaptation to interaction forces in visuo-motor coordination. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng 14: 390-397, 2006.
20. Huang FC, Gillespie RB, Kuo AD. Visual and haptic feedback contribute to tuning and online control during object manipulation. J Mot Behav 39: 179-193, 2007.
21. Imamizu H, Higuchi S, Toda A, Kawato M. Reorganization of brain activity for multiple internal models after short but intensive training. Cortex 43: 338-349, 2007.
22. Johnson MJ, Van der Loos HF, Burgar CG, Shor P, Leifer LJ. Experimental results using force-feedback cueing in robot-assisted stroke therapy. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng 13: 335-348, 2005.
23. Kahn LE, Zygman ML, Rymer WZ, Reinkensmeyer DJ. Robot-assisted reaching exercise promotes arm movement recovery in chronic hemiparetic stroke: a randomized controlled pilot study. J Neuroeng Rehabil 3: 12, 2006.
24. Karniel A, Mussa-Ivaldi FA. Sequence, time, or state representation: how does the motor control system adapt to variable environments? Biol Cybern 89: 10-21, 2003.
25. Kawato M. Internal models for motor control and trajectory planning. Curr Opin Neurobiol 9: 718-727, 1999.
26. Kazerooni H. The human power amplifier technology at the University of California, Berkeley. Robot Auton Syst 19: 179-187, 1996. (Pubitemid 126414919)
27. Krakauer JW, Ghilardi MF, Ghez C. Independent learning of internal models for kinematic and dynamic control of reaching. Nat Neurosci 2: 1026-1031, 1999.
28. Krakauer JW, Mazzoni P, Ghazizadeh A, Ravindran R, Shadmehr R. Generalization of motor learning depends on the history of prior action. PLoS Biol 4: 1798-1808, 2006.
29. Krebs HI, Palazzolo J, Dipietro L, Ferraro M, Krol J, Rannekleiv K, Volpe BT, Hogan N. Rehabilitation robotics: performance-based progressive robot-assisted therapy. Auton Robots 15: 7-20, 2003.
30. Kreifeldt JG, Chuang MC. Moment of inertia: psychophysical study of an overlooked sensation. Science 206: 588-590, 1979.
31. Krouchev NI, Kalaska JF. Context-dependent anticipation of different task dynamics: rapid recall of appropriate motor skills using visual cues. J Neurophysiol 89: 1165-1175, 2003.
32. Ljung L. System Identification: Theory for the User. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1999.
33. Mah CD, Mussa-Ivaldi FA. Evidence for a specific internal representation of motion-force relationships during object manipulation. Biol Cybern 88: 60-72, 2003.
34. Matsuoka Y, Brewer BR, Klatzky RL. Using visual feedback distortion to alter coordinated pinching patterns for robotic rehabilitation. J Neuroeng Rehabil 4: 17, 2007.
35. McIntyre, J, Lipshits M, Zaoui M, Berthoz A, Gurfinkel V. Internal reference frames for representation and storage of visual information: the role of gravity. Acta Astronaut 49: 111-121, 2001.
36. Milner TE. Adaptation to destabilizing dynamics by means of muscle cocontraction. Exp Brain Res 143: 406-416, 2002.
37. Milner TE. Accuracy of internal dynamics models in limb movements depends on stability. Exp Brain Res 159: 172-184, 2004.
38. Milner TE, Cloutier C. Compensation for mechanically unstable loading in voluntary wrist movement. Exp Brain Res 94: 522-532, 1993.
39. Milner TE, Cloutier C. Damping of the wrist joint during voluntary movement. Exp Brain Res 122: 309-317, 1998.
40. Patton JL, Kovic M, Mussa-Ivaldi FA. Custom-designed haptic training for restoring reaching ability to individuals with poststroke hemiparesis. J Rehabil Res Dev 43: 643-656, 2006. (Pubitemid 44759901)
41. Patton JL, Mussa-Ivaldi FA. Robot-assisted adaptive training: custom force fields for teaching movement patterns. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 51: 636-646, 2004.
42. Piccoli B, Kulkarni J. Pumping a swing by standing and squatting: do children pump time optimally? IEEE Control Syst Magazine 25: 48-56, 2005.
43. Sabes PN, Jordan ML, Wolpert DM. The role of inertial sensitivity in motor planning. J Neurosci 18: 5948-5957, 1998.
44. Salimi I, Hollender I, Frazier W, Gordon AM. Specificity of internal representations underlying grasping. J Neurophysiol 84: 2390-2397, 2000.
45. Sanchez RJ, Liu J, Rao S, Shah P, Smith R, Rahman T, Cramer SC, Bobrow JE, Reinkensmeyer DJ. Automating arm movement training following severe stroke: functional exercises with quantitative feedback in a gravity-reduced environment. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng 14: 378-389, 2006.
46. Schaal S, Atkeson CG, Sternad D. One-handed juggling: a dynamical approach to a rhythmic movement task. J Mot Behav 28: 165-183, 1996.
47. Shadmehr R, Mussa-Ivaldi FA. Adaptive representation of dynamics during learning of a motor task. J Neurosci 14: 3208-3224, 1994 (Pubitemid 24139004)
48. Shea CH, Lai Q, Wright DL, Immink M, Black C. Consistent and variable practice conditions: effects on relative and absolute timing. J Mot Behav 33: 139-152, 2001.
49. Shoenfelt EL, Snyder LA, Maue AE, McDowell CP, Woolard CD. Comparison of constant and variable practice conditions on free-throw shooting. Percept Mot Skills 94: 1113-1123, 2002.
50. Solomon HY, Turvey MT, Burton G. Perceiving extents of rods by wielding: haptic diagonalization and decomposition of the inertia tensor. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 15: 58-68, 1989.
51. Sveistrup H. Motor rehabilitation using virtual reality. J Neuroeng Rehabil 1: 10, 2004.
52. Takahashi CD, Scheidt RA, Reinkensmeyer DJ. Impedance control and internal model formation when reaching in a randomly varying dynamical environment. J Neurophysiol 86: 1047-1051, 2001.
53. Todorov E, Shadmehr R, Bizzi E. Augmented feedback presented in a virtual environment accelerates learning of a difficult motor task. J Mot Behav 29: 147-158, 1997.
54. Tong C, Wolpert DM, Flanagan JR. Kinematics and dynamics are not represented independently in motor working memory: evidence from an interference study. J Neurosci 22: 1108-1113, 2002. (Pubitemid 34141790)
55. Wei Y, Bajaj P, Scheidt R, Patton J. Visual error augmentation for enhancing motor learning and rehabilitative relearning. ICORR 2005 9th International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics.
56. Wei Y, Patton JL. Force field training to facilitate learning visual distortions: a "sensory crossover" experiment. Proceedings of the 12th International Symposium on Haptic Interfaces for Virtual Environment and Teleoperator Systems, Chicago, IL, 2004.