Custom-designed haptic training for restoring reaching ability to individuals with poststroke hemiparesis

Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development

Volumn 43, Issue 5, 2006, Pages 643-655

  Patton, James L ^a,b   Kovic, Mark ^a   Mussa Ivaldi, Ferdinando A ^a,b  

^a REHABILITATION INSTITUTE OF CHICAGO   (United States)

^b NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Adaptation; Control; Cortex; Force fields; Haptics; Hemiparesis; Human; Human machine interface; Impairment; Lesion; Motor learning; Rehabilitation; Robots; Stroke; Teaching

Indexed keywords

LEARNING SYSTEMS; MAN MACHINE SYSTEMS; MEDICAL PROBLEMS; PATIENT REHABILITATION; PATIENT TREATMENT;

FORCE FIELDS; LESION; POSTSTROKE HEMIPARESIS;

HAPTIC INTERFACES;

ARM MOVEMENT; ARTICLE; DEMOGRAPHY; FORCE; HUMAN; LEARNING; MACHINE; MOTION; MUSCULOSKELETAL INJURY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; ROBOTICS; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; STROKE; TRAINING;

ADULT; AGED; ARM; CEREBROVASCULAR ACCIDENT; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PARESIS; RECOVERY OF FUNCTION; ROBOTICS;

EID: 33751051076     PISSN: 07487711     EISSN: 07487711     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1682/JRRD.2005.05.0088     Document Type: Article

References (78)

1. Bobath B. Adult hemiplegia: Evaluation and treatment. London (England): Heinemann; 1978. p. 1-160.
2. Voss DR, Ionta MK, Myers BJ. Proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation. Philadelphia (PA): Harper and Row; 1985. p. 1-370.
3. Volpe BT, Krebs HI, Hogan N, Edelsteinn L, Diels CM, Aisen ML. Robot training enhanced motor outcome in patients with stroke maintained over 3 years. Neurology. 1999;53(8):1874-76.
4. Lum PS, Burgar CG , Shor PC, Majmundar M, Van der Loos M. Robot-assisted movement training compared with conventional therapy techniques for the rehabilitation of upper-limb motor function following stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2002;83(7):952-59.
5. Reinkensmeyer DJ, Kahn LE, Averbuch M, McKenna-Cole A, Schmit BD, Rymer WZ. Understanding and treating arm movement impairment after chronic brain injury: Progress with the ARM guide. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2000;37(6):653-62.
6. Kahn LE, Zygman ML, Rymer WZ, Reinkensmeyer DJ. Effect of robot-assisted and unassisted exercise on functional reaching in chronic hemiparesis. In: Proceedings of the 23rd Annual International IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society Conference; 2001 Oct 25-28; Istanbul, Turkey. New York: IEEE; 2001. p. 1344-47.
7. Jack D, Boian R, Merians AS, Tremaine M, Burdea GC, Adamovich SV, Recce M, Poizner H. Virtual reality-enhanced stroke rehabilitation. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2001;9(13):308-18.
8. Schultheis MT, Rizzo AA. The application of virtual reality technology for rehabilitation. Rehabil Psychol. 2001;46(3):1-16.
9. Boian R, Sharma A, Han C, Merians A, Burdea G , Adamovich S, Recce M, Tremaine M, Poizner H. Virtual reality-based post-stroke hand rehabilitation. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2002;85:64-70.
10. Rydmark M, Broeren J, Pascher R. Stroke rehabilitation at home using virtual reality, haptics and telemedicine. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2002;85:434-37.
11. Zhang L, Abreu BC, Seale GS, Masel B, Christiansen CH, Ottenbacher KJ. A virtual reality environment for evaluation of a daily living skill in brain injury rehabilitation: Reliability and validity. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2003;84(8):1118-24.
12. Broeren J, Rydmark M, Sunnerhagen KS. Virtual reality and haptics as a training device for movement rehabilitation after stroke: A single-case study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2004;85(8):1247-50.
13. Deutsch JE, Merians AS, Adamovich S, Poizner H, Burdea GC. Development and application of virtual reality technology to improve hand use and gait of individuals post-stroke. Restor Neurol Neurosci. 2004;22(3-5):371-86.
14. Patton JL, Dawe G , Scharver C, Mussa-Ivaldi FA, Kenyon R. Robotics and virtual reality: A perfect marriage for motor control research and rehabilitation. In: Proceedings of the 26th Annual International IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society Conference; 2004 Sep 1-5; San Francisco, CA. New York: IEEE; 2004. p. 4840-43.
15. Sveistrup H. Motor rehabilitation using virtual reality. J Neuroengineering Rehabil. 2004;1(1):1-10.
16. Patton JL, Rymer WZ, Mussa-Ivaldi FA. Robotic-induced improvement of movements in hemiparetics via an implicit learning technique. In: Society for Neuroscience; 2001 Nov 10-15; San Diego, CA.
17. Patton JL, Mussa-Ivaldi FA, Rymer WZ. Altering movement patterns in healthy and brain-injured subjects via custom designed robotic forces. In: Proceedings of the 23rd Annual International IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society Conference; 2001 Oct 25-28; Istanbul, Turkey. New York: IEEE; 2001. p. 1356-59.
18. Dancause N, Ptito A, Levin MF. Error correction strategies for motor behavior after unilateral brain damage: Short-term motor learning processes. Neuropsychologia. 2002;40(8):1313-23.
19. Patton JL, Mussa-Ivaldi FA. Robot-assisted adaptive training: Custom force fields for teaching movement patterns. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2004;51(4):636-46.
20. Takahashi CD, Reinkensmeyer DJ. Hemiparetic stroke impairs anticipatory control of arm movement. Exp Brain Res. 2003;149(2):131-40.
21. Mussa-Ivaldi FA, Patton JL. Robots can teach people how to move their arm. In: Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation; 2000 Apr 24-28; San Francisco, CA. New York: IEEE; 2000. p. 300-305.
22. Bock O. Load compensation in human goal-directed arm movements. Behav Brain Res. 1990;41(3):167-77.
23. Flash T, Gurevitch F. Arm movement and stiffness adaptation to external loads. In: Proceedings of the 13th Annual International IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society Conference; 1991 Oct 31-Nov 3; Orlando, FL. New York: IEEE; 1991. p. 885-86.
24. Shadmehr R, Mussa-Ivaldi FA. Adaptive representation of dynamics during learning of a motor task. J Neurosci. 1994;14(5 Pt 2):3208-24.
25. Gandolfo F, Mussa-Ivaldi FA, Bizzi E. Motor learning by field approximation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1996;93(9):3843-46.
26. Conditt MA, Gandolfo F, Mussa-Ivaldi FA. The motor system does not learn the dynamics of the arm by rote memorization of past experience. J Neurophysiol. 1997;78(1):554-60.
27. Lackner JR, Dizio P. Rapid adaptation to Coriolis force perturbations of arm trajectories. J Neurophysiol. 1994;72(1):299-313.
28. Held R, Freedman SJ. Plasticity in human sensorimotor control. Science. 1963;142:455-61.
29. Miall RC, Weir DJ, Wolpert DM, Stein JF. Is the cerebellum a Smith Predictor? J Mot Behav. 1993;25(3):203-16.
30. Pine ZM, Krakauer JW, Gordon J, Ghez C. Learning of scaling factors and reference axes for reaching movements. Neuroreport. 1996;7(14):2357-61.
31. Krakauer JW, Ghilardi MF, Ghez C. Independent learning of internal models for kinematic and dynamic control of reaching. Nat Neurosci. 1999;2(11):1026-31.
32. Kawato M, Wolpert D. Internal models for motor control. Novartis Found Symp. 1998;218:291-304; discussion 304-7.
33. Bhushan N, Shadmehr R. Computational nature of human adaptive control during learning of reaching movements in force fields. Biol Cybern. 1999;81(1):39-60.
34. Weiner MJ, Hallett M, Funkenstein HH. Adaptation to lateral displacement of vision in patients with lesions of the central nervous system. Neurology. 1983;33(6):766-72.
35. Cohen LG , Ziemann U, Chen R, Classen J, Hallett M, Gerloff C, Butefisch C. Studies of neuroplasticity with transcranial magnetic stimulation. J Clin Neurophysiol. 1998;15(4):305-24.
36. Rossetti Y, Rode G , Pisella L, Farne A, Li L, Boisson D, Perenin MT. Prism adaptation to a rightward optical deviation rehabilitates left hemispatial neglect. Nature. 1998;395(6698):166-69.
37. Nudo RJ, Friel KM. Cortical plasticity after stroke: Implications for rehabilitation. Rev Neurol (Paris). 1999;155(9):713-17.
38. Patton JL, Stoykov ME, Kovic M, Mussa-Ivaldi FA. Evaluation of robotic training forces that either enhance or reduce error in chronic hemiparetic stroke survivors. Exp Brain Res. 2006;168(3):368-83.
39. Raasch CC, Mussa-Ivaldi FA, Rymer WZ. Motor learning in reaching movements by hemiparetic subjects [abstract]. Soc Neurosci Abstr. 1997;23:2374.
40. Scheidt RA, Reinkensmeyer DJ, Conditt MA, Rymer WZ, Mussa-Ivaldi FA. Persistence of motor adaptation during constrained, multi-joint, arm movements. J Neurophysiol. 2000;84(2):853-62.
41. Flash T, Hogan N. The coordination of arm movements: An experimentally confirmed mathematical model. J Neurosci. 1985;5(7):1688-1703.
42. Krebs HI, Aisen ML, Volpe BT, Hogan N. Quantization of continuous arm movements in humans with brain injury. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1999;96(8):4645-49.
43. Beer RF, Dewald JP, Rymer WZ. Deficits in the coordination of multijoint arm movements in patients with hemiparesis: Evidence for disturbed control of limb dynamics. Exp Brain Res. 2000;131(3):305-19.
44. Scheidt RA, Rymer WZ. Control strategies for the transition from multijoint to single-joint arm movements studied using a simple mechanical constraint. J Neurophysiol. 2000;83(1):1-12.
45. Thoroughman KA, Shadmehr R. Learning of action through adaptive combination of motor primitives. Nature. 2000;407(6805):742-47.
46. Cirstea MC, Ptito A, Levin MF. Arm reaching improvements with short-term practice depend on the severity of the motor deficit in stroke. Exp Brain Res. 2003;152(4):476-88.
47. Levin MF. Interjoint coordination during pointing movements is disrupted in spastic hemiparesis. Brain. 1996;119(Pt 1):281-93.
48. Fisher BE, Winstein CJ, Velicki MR. Deficits in compensatory trajectory adjustments after unilateral sensorimotor stroke. Exp Brain Res. 2000;132(3):328-44. Erratum in: Exp Brain Res. 2000;132(3):417.
49. Reinkensmeyer DJ, Iobbi MG , Kahn LE, Kamper DG , Takahashi CD. Modeling reaching impairment after stroke using a population vector model of movement control that incorporates neural firing-rate variability. Neural Comput. 2003;15(11):2619-42.
50. Schmidt RA. Motor control and learning. Champaign (IL): Human Kinetics Publishers; 1988. p. 352-53.
51. Hollerbach MJ, Flash T. Dynamic interactions between limb segments during planar arm movement. Biol Cybern. 1982;44(1):67-77.
52. Ghahramani Z, Wolpert DM, Jordan MI. Generalization to local remappings of the visuomotor coordinate transformation. J Neurosci. 1996;16(21):7085-96.
53. Schaal S, Atkeson CG. Constructive incremental learning from only local information. Neural Comput. 1998;10(8):2047-84.
54. Mussa-Ivaldi FA. Modular features of motor control and learning. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 1999;9(6):713-17.
55. Schmit BD, Dewald JP, Rymer WZ. Stretch reflex adaptation in elbow flexors during repeated passive movements in unilateral brain-injured patients. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2000;81(3):269-78.
56. Wei Y, Bajaj P, Scheidt RA, Patton JL. Visual error augmentation for enhancing motor learning and rehabilitative relearning. In: Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics; 2005 Jun 28-Jul 1; Chicago, IL. New York: IEEE; 2005. p. 505-10.
57. Rumelhart DE, Hinton GE, Williams RJ. Learning representations by back-propagating errors. Nature. 1986;323:533-36.
58. Lisberger S. The neural basis for the learning of simple motor skills. Science. 1988;242(4879):728-35.
59. Kawato M. Feedback-error-learning neural network for supervised learning. In: Eckmiller R, editor. Advanced neural computers. Amsterdam (the Netherlands): Elsevier; 1990. p. 365-72.
60. Wolpert DM, Ghahramani Z, Jordan MI. An internal model for sensorimotor integration. Science. 1995;269(5232):1880-82.
61. Alleva E, Santucci D. Psychosocial vs. "physical" stress situations in rodents and humans: Role of neurotrophins. Physiol Behav. 2001;73(3):313-20.
62. Emken JL, Reinkensmeyer DJ. Robot-enhanced motor learning: Accelerating internal model formation during locomotion by transient dynamic amplification. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2005;13(1):33-39.
63. Brewer B, Fagan M, Klatzky R, Matsuoka Y. Perceptual limits for a robotic rehabilitation environment using visual feedback distortion. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2005;13(1):1-11.
64. Wei Y, Patton JL, Bajaj P, Scheidt RA. A real-time haptic/graphic demonstration of how error augmentation can enhance learning. In: Proceedings of the 2005 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation; 2005 Apr 18-22; Barcelona, Spain. New York: IEEE; 2005. p. 4406-11.
65. Flanagan JR, Rao AK. Trajectory adaptation to a nonlinear visuomotor transformation: Evidence of motion planning in visually perceived space. J Neurophysiol. 1995;74(5):2174-78.
66. Srinivasan MA, LaMotte RH. Tactual discrimination of softness. J Neurophysiol. 1995;73(1):88-101.
67. Robles-De-La-Torre G , Hayward V. Force can overcome object geometry in the perception of shape through active touch. Nature. 2001;412(6845):445-48.
68. Ernst MO, Banks MS. Humans integrate visual and haptic information in a statistically optimal fashion. Nature. 2002;415(6870):429-33.
69. Sainburg RL, Lateiner JE, Latash ML, Bagesteiro LB. Effects of altering initial position on movement direction and extent. J Neurophysiol. 2003;89(1):401-15.
70. Brewer BR, Klatzky R, Matsuoka Y. Effects of visual feedback distortion for the elderly and the motor-impaired in a robotic rehabilitation environment. In: Proceedings of the 2004 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation; 2004 Apr 26-May 1; New Orleans, LA. New York: IEEE; 2004. p. 2080-85.
71. Kording KP, Wolpert DM. Bayesian integration in sensorimotor learning. Nature. 2004;427(6971):244-47.
72. Winstein CJ, Merians AS, Sullivan KJ. Motor learning after unilateral brain damage. Neuropsychologia. 1999;37(8):975-87.
73. Kording KP, Wolpert DM. The loss function of sensorimotor learning. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004;101(26):9839-42.
74. Miles FA, Eighmy BB. Long-term adaptive changes in primate vestibuloocular reflex. I: Behavioral observations. J Neurophysiol. 1980;43(5):1406-25.
75. Imamizu H, Miyauchi S, Tamada T, Sasaki Y, Takino R, Putz B, Yoshioka T, Kawato M. Human cerebellar activity reflecting an acquired internal model of a new tool. Nature. 2000;403(6766):192-95.
76. Krakauer JW, Pine ZM, Ghilardi MF, Ghez C. Learning of visuomotor transformations for vectorial planning of reaching trajectories. J Neurosci. 2000;20(23):8916-24.
77. Tong C, Wolpert DM, Flanagan JR. Kinematics and dynamics are not represented independently in motor working memory: Evidence from an interference study. J Neurosci. 2000;22(3):1108-13.
78. Fasoli SE, Krebs HI, Ferraro M, Hogan N, Volpe BT. Does shorter rehabilitation limit potential recovery poststroke? Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2004;18(2):88-94.