Characteristics of native and enzymatically hydrolyzed Zea mays L., Fritillaria ussuriensis Maxim. and Dioscorea opposita Thunb. starches

Food Hydrocolloids

Volumn 25, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 521-528

  Jiang, Qianqian ^a   Gao, Wenyuan ^a   Li, Xia ^a   Zhang, Jingze ^a  

^a TIANJIN UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

Characteristics; Dioscorea opposita Thunb. Starch; Fritillaria ussuriensis Maxim. Starch; Glucoamylase; Hydrolysis; Zea mays L. starch

Indexed keywords

CRACKS; DIFFERENTIAL SCANNING CALORIMETRY; GELATION; GRAIN (AGRICULTURAL PRODUCT); GRANULATION; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; STARCH;

CHARACTERISTIC; DIOSCOREA OPPOSITA THUNB; DIOSCOREA OPPOSITA THUNB.; FRITILLARIA; FRITILLARIA USSURIENSI MAXIM.; GLUCOAMYLASE; SCANNING ELECTRONS; STARCH GRANULES; ZEA MAY L STARCH; ZEA MAYS L;

HYDROLYSIS;

DIOSCOREA; DIOSCOREA ALATA; DIOSCOREA POLYSTACHYA; FRITILLARIA USSURIENSIS; ZEA MAYS;

EID: 77957797425     PISSN: 0268005X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodhyd.2010.08.003     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Association of Official Analytical Chemists (AOAC). (1990). Official methods of the association official analytical chemists.
2. Chang C.W. Isolation and purification of leaf starch components. Plant Physiology 1979, 64:833-836.
3. Cairns P., Bogracheva T.Ya., Ring S.G., Hedley C.L., Morris V.J. Determination of the polymorphic smooth pea starch composition of smooth pea starch. Carbohydrate Polymers 1997, 32:275-282.
4. Cheetham N.W.H., Tao L.P. Variation in crystalline type with amylose content in maize starch granules: an X-ray powder diffraction study. Carbohydrate Polymers 1998, 36:277-284.
5. Du X.F., Jia J.H., Xu S.Y., Zhou Y.B. The morphology and characterization of starch from Pueraria lobata (Willd.) Ohwi. Starch/Stärke 2007, 59:609-613.
6. Fang J.M., Fowler P.A., Tomkinson J., Hill C.A.S. The preparation and characterisation of a series of chemically modified potato starches. Carbohydrate Polymers 2002, 47:245-252.
7. Gérard C., Colonna P., Buléon A., Planchot V. Order in maize mutant starches revealed by mild acid hydrolysis. Carbohydrate Polymers 2002, 48:131-141.
8. Jiang H.X., Jane J.L., Acevedo D., Green A., Shinn G., Schrenker D., et al. Variations in starch physicochemical properties from a generation-means analysis study using amylomaize V and VII parents. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 2010, 58:5633-5639.
9. Jyothi A.N., Moorthy S.N., Rajasekharan K.N. Effect of cross-linking with epichlorohydrinon the properties of cassava (Manihotesculenta Crantz) Starch. Starch/Stärke 2006, 58:292-299.
10. Karim A.A., Norziah M.H. Methods for the study of starch retrogradation. Food Chemistry 2000, 71:9-36.
11. Khatoon S., Sreerama Y.N., Raghavendra D., Bhattacharya S., Bhat K.K. Properties of enzyme modified corn, rice and tapioca starches. Food Research International 2009, 42:1426-1433.
12. Kimura A., Robyt J.F. Reaction of enzymes with starch granules: kinetics and products of the reaction with glucoamylase. Carbohydrate Research 1995, 277:87-107.
13. Kim Y.K., Robyt J.F. Enzyme modification of starch granules: in situ reaction of glucoamylase to give complete retention of d-glucose inside the granule. Carbohydrate Research 1999, 318:129-134.
14. Krueger B.R., Knutson C.A., Inglett G.E., Walker C.E. A differential canning calorimetry study on the effect of annealing on gelatinization behavior of corn starch. Journal of Food Science 1987, 52:715-718.
15. Leloup V.M., Colonna P., Ring S.G. Studies on probe diffusion and accessibility in amylase gels. Macromols 1990, 23:862-866.
16. Li F. Analytical chemistry 2004, People's Medical Publishing House, Beijing, pp. 245-258. 5th ed.
17. Lim W.J., Liang Y.T., Seib P.A., Rao C.S. Isolation of oat starch from oat flour. Cereal chemistry 1992, 69:233-236.
18. Lin J.H., Lii C.Y., Chang Y.H. Change of granular and molecular structures of waxy maize and potato starches after treated in alcohols with or without hydrochloric acid. Carbohydrate Polymers 2005, 59:507-515.
19. Li J.H., Vasanthan T., Rossnagel B., Hoover R. Starch from hull-less barley: II. Thermal, rheological and acid hydrolysis characteristics. Food Chemistry 2001, 74:407-415.
20. Lopez-Rubio A., Clarke J.M., Scherer B., Topping D.L., Gilbert E.P. Structural modifications of granular starch upon acylation with short-chain fatty acids. Food Hydrocolloids 2009, 23:1940-1946.
21. Lu D.L., Wang D.C., Zhao J.R., Lu W.P. Crystalline structure and pasting properties of starch in eight cultivars of spring- and autumn-sown waxy corn. Acta Agronomica Sinica 2009, 35:499-505.
22. Ma Y., Cai C.G., Wang J., Sun D.W. Enzymatic hydrolysis of corn starch for producing fat mimetics. Journal of Food Engineering 2006, 73:297-303.
23. Otey F.H., Doane W.M. Starch chemistry and technology 1984, Vols. 154-155:667-669. Academic Press, New York. R.L. Whistler (Ed.).
24. O'Brien S., Wang Y.J. Susceptibility of annealed starches to hydrolysis by α-amylase and glucoamylase. Carbohydrate Polymers 2008, 72:597-607.
25. Pang J.P., Wang S.J., Yu J.L., Liu H.Y., Yu J.G., Gao W.Y. Comparative studies on morphological and crystalline properties of B-type and C-type starches by acid hydrolysis. Food Chemistry 2007, 105:989-995.
26. Srichuwong S., Isono N., Mishima T., Hisamatsu M. Structure of lintnerized starch is related to X-ray diffraction pattern and susceptibility to acid and enzyme hydrolysis of starch granules. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules 2005, 37:115-121.
27. Sandhu K.S., Singh N., Lim S.T. A comparison of native and acid thinned normal and waxy corn starches: physicochemical, thermal, morphological and pasting properties. LWT 2007, 40:1527-1536.
28. Sang Y.J., Bean S., Seib P.A., Pedersen J., Shi Y.C. Structure and functional properties of sorghum starches differing in amylose content. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 2008, 56:6680-6685.
29. Uthumporn U., Zaidul I.S.M., Karima A.A. Hydrolysis of granular starch at subgelatinization temperature using a mixture of amylolytic enzymes. Food and Bioproducts Processing 2010, 88:47-54.
30. Vasanthan T., Bhatty R.S. Physicochemical properties of small and large granule starches of waxy, regular, and high amylase barleys. Cereal Chemistry 1996, 73:199-207.
31. Wang S.J., Gao W.Y., Chen H.X., Xiao P.G. New starches from Fritillaria species medicinal plants. Carbohydrate Polymers 2005, 61:111-114.
32. Wang S.J., Gao W.Y., Liu H.Y., Chen H.X., Yu J.G., Xiao P.G. Studies on the physicochemical, morphological, thermal and crystalline properties of starches separated from different Dioscorea opposita cultivars. Food Chemistry 2006, 99:38-44.
33. Wang S.J., Liu H.Y., Gao W.Y., Chen H.X., Yu J.G., Xiao P.G. Characterization of new starches separated from different Chinese yam (Dioscorea opposita Thunb) cultivars. Food Chemistry 2006, 99:30-37.
34. Wang S.J., Yu J.L., Gao W.Y., Liu H.Y., Xiao P.G. New starches from traditional Chinese medicine (TCM)-Chinese yam (Dioscorea opposita Thunb.) cultivars. Carbohydrate Research 2006, 341:289-293.
35. Wang S.J., Yu J.L., Gao W.Y., Pang J.P., Yu J.G., Xiao P.G. Comparison of starches separated from three different F. cirrhosa. Journal of Food Engineering 2007, 80:417-422.
36. Wang S.J., Yu J.L., Liu H.Y., Chen W.P. Characterisation and preliminary lipid-lowering evaluation of starch from Chinese yam. Food Chemistry 2008, 108:176-181.
37. Wang S.J., Yu J.L., Yu J.G. Conformation and location of amorphous and semi-crystalline regions in C-type starch granules revealed by SEM, NMR and XRD. Food Chemistry 2008, 110:39-46.
38. Wang S.J., Yu J.L., Yu J.G., Chen H.X., Pang J.P. The effect of acid hydrolysis on morphological and crystalline properties of Rhizoma Dioscorea starch. Food Hydrocolloids 2007, 21:1217-1222.
39. You S., Izydorczyk M.S. Comparison of the physicochemical properties of barley starches after partial α-amylolysis and acid/alcohol hydrolysis. Carbohydrate Polymers 2007, 69:489-502.
40. Zobel H.F. Starch crystal transmissions and their industrial importance. Starch/Stärke 1988, 40:1-7.
41. Zobel H.F. Molecules to granules - a comprehensive starch review. Starch/Stärke 1988, 40:44-50.