Does advanced endoscopic imaging increase the efficacy of surveillance colonoscopy?

Endoscopy

Volumn 42, Issue 10, 2010, Pages 866-869

  Dekker, E ^a   East, J E ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

^b UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY; CANCER SCREENING; CHROMOENDOSCOPY; CLINICAL EFFECTIVENESS; COLONOSCOPY; COLORECTAL CANCER; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; EDITORIAL; HEREDITARY NONPOLYPOSIS COLORECTAL CANCER; HIGH RISK PATIENT; HUMAN; IMAGE QUALITY; INTESTINE PREPARATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

ADENOMA; COLONIC POLYPS; COLONOSCOPY; COLORECTAL NEOPLASMS; HUMANS; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT;

EID: 77957291638     PISSN: 0013726X     EISSN: 14388812     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1055/s-0030-1255758     Document Type: Editorial

References (31)

1. Winawer S J., Zauber A G., Ho M N. et al. Prevention of colorectal cancer by colonoscopic polypectomy. The National Polyp Study Workgroup. N Engl J Med 1993 329 1977-1981
2. Atkin W S., Edwards R, Kralj-Hans I et al. Once-only flexible sigmoidoscopy screening in prevention of colorectal cancer: a multicentre randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2010 375 1624-1633
3. Baxter N N., Goldwasser M A., Paszat L F. et al. Association of colonoscopy and death from colorectal cancer. Ann Intern Med 2009 150 1-8
4. Brenner H, Hoffmeister M, Arndt V et al. Protection from right- and left-sided colorectal neoplasms after colonoscopy: population-based study. J Natl Cancer Inst 2010 102 89-95
5. van Rijn J C., Reitsma J B., Stoker J et al. Polyp miss rate determined by tandem colonoscopy: a systematic review. Am J Gastroenterol 2006 101 343-350
6. Lai E J., Calderwood A H., Doros G et al. The Boston bowel preparation scale: a valid and reliable instrument for colonoscopy-oriented research. Gastrointest Endosc 2009 69 620-625
7. Barclay R L., Vicari J J., Doughty A S. et al. Colonoscopic withdrawal times and adenoma detection during screening colonoscopy. N Engl J Med 2006 355 2533-2541
8. Kaminski M F., Regula J, Kraszewska E et al. Quality indicators for colonoscopy and the risk of interval cancer. N Engl J Med 2010 362 1795-1803
9. Shaukat A, Oancea C, Bond J H. et al. Variation in detection of adenomas and polyps by colonoscopy and change over time with a performance improvement program. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2009 7 1335-1340
10. East J E., Stavrindis M, Thomas-Gibson S et al. A comparative study of standard vs. high definition colonoscopy for adenoma and hyperplastic polyp detection with optimized withdrawal technique. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2008 28 768-776
11. Pellis M, Fernndez-Esparrach G, Crdenas A et al. Impact of wide-angle, high-definition endoscopy in the diagnosis of colorectal neoplasia: a randomized controlled trial. Gastroenterology 2008 135 1062-1068
12. Burke C A., Choure A G., Sanaka M R., Lopez R. A comparison of high-definition versus conventional colonoscopes for polyp detection. Dig Dis Sci 2010 55 1716-1720
13. Tribonias G, Theodoropoulou A, Konstantinidis K et al. Comparison of standard versus high-definition, wide-angle colonoscopy for polyp detection: a randomized controlled trial. Colorectal Dis 2009 ohne Seitenzahl DOI: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2009.02145.x
14. Buchner A M., Shahid M W., Heckman M G. et al. High-definition colonoscopy detects colorectal polyps at a higher rate than standard white-light colonoscopy. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2010 8 364-370
15. Hoffman A, Sar F, Goetz M et al. High definition colonoscopy combined with i -Scan is superior in the detection of colorectal neoplasias compared with standard video colonoscopy: a prospective randomized controlled trial. Endoscopy 2010 10 827-833
16. Brown S R., Baraza W, Hurlstone P. Chromoscopy versus conventional endoscopy for the detection of polyps in the colon and rectum. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2007 (4) CD006439
17. Kahi C J., Anderson J C., Waxman I et al. High-definition chromocolonoscopy vs. high-definition white light colonoscopy for average-risk colorectal cancer screening. Am J Gastroenterol 2010 105 1301-1307
18. Lecomte T, Cellier C, Meatchi T et al. Chromoendoscopic colonoscopy for detecting preneoplastic lesions in hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer syndrome. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2005 3 897-902
19. Adler A, Pohl H, Papanikolaou I S. et al. A prospective randomised study on narrow-band imaging versus conventional colonoscopy for adenoma detection: does narrow-band imaging induce a learning effect? Gut 2008 57 59-64
20. Rex D K., Helbig C C. High yields of small and flat adenomas with high-definition colonoscopes using either white light or narrow band imaging. Gastroenterology 2007 133 42-47
21. Inoue T, Murano M, Murano N et al. Comparative study of conventional colonoscopy and pan-colonic narrow-band imaging system in the detection of neoplastic colonic polyps: a randomized, controlled trial. J Gastroenterol 2008 43 45-50
22. Adler A, Aschenbeck J, Yenerim T et al. Narrow-band versus white-light high definition television endoscopic imaging for screening colonoscopy: a prospective randomized trial. Gastroenterology 2009 136 410-416
23. Kaltenbach T, Friedland S, Soetikno R. A randomised tandem colonoscopy trial of narrow band imaging versus white light examination to compare neoplasia miss rates. Gut 2008 57 1406-1412
24. Paggi S, Radaelli F, Amato A et al. The impact of narrow band imaging in screening colonoscopy: a randomized controlled trial. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2009 7 1049-1054
25. Pohl J, Lotterer E, Balzer C et al. Computed virtual chromoendoscopy versus standard colonoscopy with targeted indigocarmine chromoscopy: a randomised multicentre trial. Gut 2009 58 73-78
26. Cha J M., Lee J I., Joo K R. et al. A prospective randomized study on computed virtual chromoendoscopy versus conventional colonoscopy for the detection of small colorectal adenomas. Dig Dis Sci 2010 55 2357-2364
27. Aminalai A, Rsch T, Aschenbeck J et al. Live image processing does not increase adenoma detection rate during colonoscopy: a randomized comparison between FICE and conventional imaging (Berlin Colonoscopy Project 5, BECOP-5). Am J Gastroenterol 2010 ohne Seitenangabe DOI: 10.1038/ajg.2010.273-0
28. Chung S J., Kim D, Song J H. et al. Efficacy of computed virtual chromoendoscopy on colorectal cancer screening: a prospective, randomized, back-to-back trial of Fuji Intelligent Color Enhancement versus conventional colonoscopy to compare adenoma miss rates. Gastrointest Endosc 2010 72 136-142
29. Bossuyt P M., Reitsma J B., Bruns D E. et al. Standards for reporting of diagnostic accuracy. Towards complete and accurate reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy: the STARD initiative. BMJ 2003 326 41-44
30. van den Broek F J., Reitsma J B., Curvers W L. et al. Systematic review of narrow-band imaging for the detection and differentiation of neoplastic and nonneoplastic lesions in the colon (with videos). Gastrointest Endosc 2009 69 124-135
31. East J E., Tan E K., Bergman J J. et al. Meta-analysis: narrow band imaging for lesion characterization in the colon, oesophagus, duodenal ampulla and lung. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2008 28 854-867