Measuring perceived quality of speech and video in multimedia conferencing applications

Proceedings of the 6th ACM International Conference on Multimedia, MULTIMEDIA 1998

Volumn , Issue , 1998, Pages 55-60

  Watson, Anne ^a   Sasse, M Angela ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Speech quality; Subjective measurement; Video quality

Indexed keywords

MULTIMEDIA SERVICES;

MULTIMEDIA CONFERENCING; REAL TIME MULTIMEDIA SERVICE; SERVICES AND APPLICATIONS; SPEECH QUALITY; SUBJECTIVE MEASUREMENTS; SUBJECTIVE QUALITY ASSESSMENTS; TESTING METHODOLOGY; VIDEO QUALITY;

QUALITY OF SERVICE;

EID: 84857003805     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/290747.290755     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (19)

1. Zhang, L., Daring, S., Estrin, D., Shenker, S. and Zappala, D. RSVP: A new resource ReSerVation Protocol, IEEE Network Magazine, 1993, 7(5), 8-18.
2. Jayant, N.S. High-quality coding of telephone speech and wideband audio. IEEE Communications Magazine, Jan. 1990, 10-20.
3. Podolsky, M, Romer, C and McCanne, S. Simulation of EEC-based error control for packet audio on the Internet Proc. INFOCOM "98.
4. Watson, A. and Sasse, MA. Multimedia conferencing via multicast determining the quality of service required by the end user. Proc. AVSPN '97.
5. ITU-T P.S00 Methods for subjective determination of transmission quality.
6. ITU-R BT-500-7 Methodology for the subjective assessment of the quality of television pictures.
7. Watson, A. and Sasse, MA Evaluating audio and video quality in low-cost multimedia conferencing systems, Interacting with Computers, 1996, 8 (3), 255-275.
8. Aldridge, R., Davidoff, J., Ghanbari, M., Hands, D. and Pearson, D. Measurement of scene-dependent quality variations in digitally coded television pictures. IEE Proc.-Vis. Image Signal Process, 1995, 142(3), 149-154.
9. ITU-T P.920 Interactive test methods for audiovisual communications.
10. Jones, B.L. & McManus, PR. Graphic scaling of qualitative terms. SMFIE Journal, November 1986, 1166-1171.
11. Narita, N. Graphic scaling and validity of Japanese descriptive terms used in subjective-evaluation tests. SMFIE Journal, July 1993, 616-622.
12. Viitanen, MT., Gleiss, N. and Goldstein, M On the use of evaluative category scales in telecommunications. Proc. Human Factors in Telecommunications '95.
13. Teumssen, K. The validity of CCIR quality indicators along a graphical scale. SMPTE Journal, March 1996, 144-149.
14. Preminger, J.E. and Van Tasell, D.J. Quantifying the relationship between speech quality and speech intelligibility. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 1995, 38, 714-725.
15. Gili Manzanaro, J., Janez Escalada, L., Hernandez Lioreda, M, Szymanski, M. Subjective image quality assessment and prediction in digital video communications. COST 212 HUHS Report, 1991.
16. de Ridder, H and Hamberg, R. Continuous assessment of image quality SMPTE Journal, February 1997, 123-128.
17. Seferidis, V., Ghanbari, M and Pearson, DE. Forgiveness effect in subjective assessment of packet video. Electronics Letters, 1992, 28(1), 2013-2014.
18. Wilson, R, Wakeman, L and Smith, W. Quality of service parameters for commercial application of videotelephony. Proc. Human Factors in Telecommunications '93.
19. Schulzrinne, H., Casner, S. and Frederick, R. RTP: A transport protocol for real-time applications. IETF Audio/Video Transport Working Group, Januaiy 1996, RFC 1889.