Performance improvements of imaging-based screening tests

Best Practice and Research: Clinical Gastroenterology

Volumn 24, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 493-507

  Hassan, Cesare ^a   Pickhardt, Perry J ^b,c   Rex, Douglas K ^d  

^a NUOVO REGINA MARGHERITA HOSPITAL   (Italy)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AND PUBLIC HEALTH   (United States)

^c UNIFORMED SERVICES UNIVERSITY OF THE HEALTH SCIENCES   (United States)

^d INDIANA UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

Colon capsule endoscopy; Colonoscopy; Colorectal cancer screening; CT colonography; MR colonography

Indexed keywords

ADENOMA; CANCER DIAGNOSIS; CAPSULE ENDOSCOPY; COLON POLYP; COLONOSCOPY; COLORECTAL CANCER; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC COLONOGRAPHY; COMPUTER ASSISTED RADIOGRAPHY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; ECONOMICS; HISTOPATHOLOGY; HUMAN; INTESTINE PREPARATION; IONIZING RADIATION; MEDICAL TECHNOLOGY; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; RADIATION DOSE; RADIODIAGNOSIS; RECTUM MUCOSA; REVIEW; SCREENING TEST;

EID: 77956593635     PISSN: 15216918     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.bpg.2010.04.003     Document Type: Article

References (59)

1. N. Segnan, C. Senore, and B. Andreoni Comparing attendance and detection rate of colonoscopy with sigmoidoscopy and FIT for colorectal cancer screening Gastroenterology 132 2007 2304 2312
2. A. Graser, P. Stieber, and D. Nagel Comparison of CT colonography, colonoscopy, sigmoidoscopy and faecal occult blood tests for the detection of advanced adenoma in an average risk population Gut 58 2009 241 248
3. L.A. Ries, P.A. Wingo, and D.S. Miller The annual report to the nation on the status of cancer, 1973-1997, with a special section on colorectal cancer Cancer 88 2000 2398 2424
4. J.C. van Rijn, J.B. Reitsma, and J. Stoker Polyp miss rate determined by tandem colonoscopy: a systematic review Am J Gastroenterol 101 2006 343 350
5. J.V. Selby, G.D. Friedman, and C.P. Quesenberry A case-control study of screening sigmoidoscopy and mortality from colorectal cancer N Engl J Med 326 1992 653 657
6. W. Atkin, P. Rogers, and C. Cardwell Wide variation in adenoma detection rates at screening flexible sigmoidoscopy Gastroenterology 126 2004 1247 1256
7. P.J. Pickhardt, P.A. Nugent, and P.A. Mysliwiec Location of adenomas missed by optical colonoscopy Ann Intern Med 141 2004 352 359
8. D. Lieberman, M. Moravec, and J. Holub Polyp size and advanced histology in patients undergoing colonoscopy screening: implications for CT colonography Gastroenterology 135 2008 1100 1105
9. D. Rex, V. Chadalawada, and D.J. Helper Wide angle colonoscopy with a prototype instrument: impact on miss rates and efficiency determined by back-to-back colonoscopies Am J Gastroenterol 98 2003 2000 2005
10. V.P. Deenadayalu, V. Chadalawada, and D.K. Rex 170 degrees wide-angle colonoscope: effect on efficiency and miss rates Am J Gastroenterol 99 2004 2138 2142
11. H. Fatima, D.K. Rex, and R. Rothstein Cecal insertion and withdrawal times with wide-angle versus standard colonoscopes: a randomized controlled trial Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 6 2008 109 114
12. D.K. Rex Update on colonoscopic imaging and projections for the future Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2009 PMID: 20026427
13. A. Horiuchi, Y. Nakayama, and N. Kato Hood-assisted colonoscopy is more effective in detection of colorectal adenomas than narrow-band imaging Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2009 PMID: 19716434
14. A. Horiuchi, and Y. Nakayama Improved colorectal adenoma detection with a transparent retractable extension device Am J Gastroenterol 103 2008 341 345
15. J. Waye, R.I. Heigh, and D.E. Fleischer The Third Eye Retroscope auxiliary system improves detection of adenomas in the colon-a prospective efficacy evaluation Gastrointest Endosc 2009 PMID: 20018280
16. D.K. Rex Maximizing detection of adenomas and cancers during colonoscopy Am J Gastroenterol 101 2006 2866 2877
17. J. Pohl, E. Lotterer, and C. Balzer Computed virtual chromoendoscopy versus standard colonoscopy with targeted indigocarmine chromoscopy: a randomised multicentre trial Gut 58 2009 73 78
18. A. Adler, H. Pohl, and I.S. Papanikolaou A prospective randomised study on narrow-band imaging versus conventional colonoscopy for adenoma detection: does narrow-band imaging induce a learning effect? Gut 57 2008 59 64
19. A. Adler, J. Aschenbeck, and T. Yenerim Narrow-band versus white-light high definition television endoscopic imaging for screening colonoscopy: a prospective randomized trial Gastroenterology 136 2009 410 416 e1; quiz 715
20. T. Kaltenbach, S. Friedland, and R. Soetikno A randomised tandem colonoscopy trial of narrow band imaging versus white light examination to compare neoplasia miss rates Gut 57 2008 1406 1412
21. T. Inoue, M. Murano, and N. Murano Comparative study of conventional colonoscopy and pan-colonic narrow-band imaging system in the detection of neoplastic colonic polyps: a randomized, controlled trial J Gastroenterol 43 2008 45 50
22. S. Paggi, F. Radaelli, and A. Amato The impact of narrow band imaging in screening colonoscopy: a randomized controlled trial Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 7 2009 1049 1054
23. D.K. Rex, and C.C. Helbig High yields of small and flat adenomas with high-definition colonoscopes using either white light or narrow band imaging Gastroenterology 133 2007 42 47
24. M. Pellise, G. Fernandez-Esparrach, and A. Cardenas Impact of wide-angle, high-definition endoscopy in the diagnosis of colorectal neoplasia: a randomized controlled trial Gastroenterology 135 2008 1062 1068
25. D.K. Rex Narrow-band imaging without optical magnification for histologic analysis of colorectal polyps Gastroenterology 136 2009 1174 1181
26. A. Ignjatovic, J. East, and N. Suzuki Optical diagnosis of small colorectal polyps at routine colonoscopy (Detect InSpect ChAracterise Resect and Discard; DISCARD trial): a prospective cohort study Lancet Oncol 10 2009 1171 1178
27. P.B. Cotton, V.L. Durkalski, and B.C. Pineau Computed tomographic colonography (virtual colonoscopy): a multicenter comparison with standard colonoscopy for detection of colorectal neoplasia JAMA 291 2004 1713 1719
28. D.C. Rockey, E. Paulson, and D. Niedzwiecki Analysis of air contrast barium enema, computed tomographic colonography, and colonoscopy: prospective comparison Lancet 365 2005 305 311
29. P.J. Pickhardt, J.R. Choi, and I. Hwang Computed tomographic virtual colonoscopy to screen for colorectal neoplasia in asymptomatic adults N Engl J Med 349 2 2003 191 200
30. C.D. Johnson, M.H. Chen, and A.Y. Toledano Accuracy of CT colonography for detection of large adenomas and cancers N Engl J Med 359 2008 1207 1217
31. D.H. Kim, P.J. Pickhardt, and A.J. Taylor CT colonography versus colonoscopy for the detection of advanced neoplasia N Engl J Med 357 2007 1403 1412
32. Pickhardt PJ, Wise SM, Kim DH. Positive predictive value for polyps detected at screening CT colonography. Eur Radiol; in press.
33. Z.S. Borden, P.J. Pickhardt, and D.H. Kim Bowel preparation for CT colonography: blinded comparison of magnesium citrate and sodium phosphate for catharsis Radiology 254 2010 138 144
34. P.J. Pickhardt, and J.H.R. Choi Electronic cleansing and stool tagging in CT colonography: advantages and pitfalls with primary three-dimensional evaluation Am J Roentgenol 181 2003 799 805
35. P.J. Pickhardt Colonic preparation for computed tomographic colonography: understanding the relative advantages and disadvantages of a noncathartic approach Mayo Clinic Proc 82 2007 659 661
36. M.H. Liedenbaum, A.F. van Rijn, and A.H. de Vries Using CT colonography as a triage technique after a positive faecal occult blood test in colorectal cancer screening Gut 58 2009 1242 1249
37. R.M. Summers, J. Yao, and P.J. Pickhardt Computed tomographic virtual colonoscopy computer-aided polyp detection in a screening population Gastroenterology 129 2005 1832 1844
38. Lawrence EM, Pickhardt PJ, Kim DH, Robbins JB. Computer-aided detection (CAD) of colorectal polyps: standalone performance in a large asymptomatic screening population. Radiology; in press.
39. R.M. Summers, L.R. Handwerker, and P.J. Pickhardt Performance of a previously validated CT colonography computer-aided detection system in a new patient population Am J Roentgenol 191 2008 168 174
40. N. Petrick, M. Haider, and R.M. Summers CT colonography with computer-aided detection as a second reader: observer performance study Radiology 246 2008 148 156
41. S. Halligan, D.G. Altman, and S. Mallett Computed tomographic colonography: assessment of radiologist performance with and without computer-aided detection Gastroenterology 131 2006 1690 1699
42. M.E. Baker, L. Bogoni, and N.A. Obuchowski Computer-aided detection of colorectal polyps: can it improve sensitivity of less-experienced readers? Preliminary findings Radiology 245 2007 140 149
43. M.H. Liedenbaum, H.W. Venema, and J. Stoker Radiation dose in CT colonography-trends in time and differences between daily practice and screening protocols Eur Radiol 18 2008 2222 2230
44. Radiation risk in perspective: position statement of the Health Physics Society. In: Health Physics Society.
45. D.J. Brenner, and M.A. Georgsson Mass screening with CT colonography: should the radiation exposure be of concern? Gastroenterology 129 2005 328 337
46. Garg S, Ahnen DJ. Is computed tomographic colonography being held to a higher standard? Ann Intern Med; 152:178-81.
47. V. Panteris, J. Haringsma, and E.J. Kuipers Colonoscopy perforation rate, mechanisms and outcome: from diagnostic to therapeutic colonoscopy Endoscopy 41 2009 941 951
48. A. Graser, B.J. Wintersperger, and C. Suess Dose reduction and image quality in MDCT colonography using tube current modulation Am J Roentgenol 187 2006 695 701
49. D. Marin, R.C. Nelson, and S.T. Schindera Low-tube-voltage, high-tube-current multidetector abdominal ct: improved image quality and decreased radiation dose with adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction algorithm-initial clinical experience Radiology 254 2010 145 153
50. E. Thornton, M.M. Morrin, and J. Yee Current status of MR colonography Radiographics 30 2010 201 U229
51. E.A. Sadowski, L.K. Bennett, and M.R. Chan Nephrogenic systemic fibrosis: risk factors and incidence estimation Radiology 243 2007 148 157
52. W. Ajaj, T.C. Lauenstein, and G. Pelster MR colonography: how does air compare to water for colonic distention? J Magn Reson Imaging 19 2004 216 221
53. C.A. Kuehle, J. Langhorst, and S.C. Ladd Magnetic resonance colonography without bowel cleansing: a prospective cross sectional study in a screening population Gut 56 2007 1079 1085
54. F.M. Zijta, S. Bipat, and J. Stoker Magnetic resonance (MR) colonography in the detection of colorectal lesions: a systematic review of prospective studies Eur Radiol 2009 PMID: 19936754
55. J. Florie, S. Jensch, and R.A. Nievelstein MR colonography with limited bowel preparation compared with optical colonoscopy in patients at increased risk for colorectal cancer Radiology 243 2007 122 131
56. W.K. Leung, W.W. Lam, and J.C. Wu Magnetic resonance colonography in the detection of colonic neoplasm in high-risk and average-risk individuals Am J Gastroenterol 99 2004 102 108
57. B. Bakir, B. Acunas, and D. Bugra MR colonography after oral administration of polyethylene glycol-electrolyte solution Radiology 251 2009 901 909
58. C. Spada, C. Hassan, and R. Marmo Meta analysis shows colon capsule endoscopy is effective in detecting colorectal polyps Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2010 Mar 6 [Epub ahead of print PMID: 20215066]
59. R. Eliakim, K. Yassin, and Y. Niv Prospective multicenter performance evaluation of the second-generation colon capsule compared with colonoscopy Endoscopy 41 2009 1026 1031