MR colonography after oral administration of polyethylene glycol-electrolyte solution

Radiology

Volumn 251, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 901-909

  Bakir, Baris ^a   Acunas, Bulent ^a   Bugra, Dursun ^a   Yamaner, Sumer ^a   Asoǧlu, Oktar ^a   Salmaslioǧlu, Artur ^a   Balik, Emre ^a  

^a ISTANBUL UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

GOLYTELY;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; COLON POLYP; COLONOSCOPY; COLORECTAL TUMOR; FEMALE; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGE QUALITY; INTESTINE DISTENSION; INTESTINE WALL; MAGNETIC RESONANCE COLONOGRAPHY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE; OCCULT BLOOD TEST; PATIENT ATTITUDE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RECTUM HEMORRHAGE;

ADMINISTRATION, ORAL; ADULT; AGED; COLONIC DISEASES; COLONOSCOPY; CONTRAST MEDIA; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; MEGLUMINE; MIDDLE AGED; ORGANOMETALLIC COMPOUNDS; POLYETHYLENE GLYCOLS; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SURFACE-ACTIVE AGENTS;

EID: 67049137072     PISSN: 00338419     EISSN: 15271315     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2513081061     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Jemal A, Murray T, Ward E, et al. Cancer statistics, 2005. CA Cancer J Clin 2005;55:10-30.
2. Winawer S, Fletcher R, Rex D, et al. Colorectal cancer screening and surveillance: clinical guidelines and rationale-update based on new evidence. Gastroenterology 2003;124:544-560. (Pubitemid 36169269)
3. Sosna J, Morrin MM, Kruskal JB, Lavin PT, Rosen MP, Raptopoulos V. CT colonography of colorectal polyps: a metaanalysis. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2003;181:1593-1598. (Pubitemid 37466537)
4. Halligan S, Altman DG, Taylor SA, et al. CT colonography in the detection of colorectal polyps and cancer: systematic review, meta-analysis, and proposed minimum data set for study level reporting. Radiology 2005;237:893-904. (Pubitemid 41636379)
5. Lauenstein TC. MR colonography: current status. Eur Radiol 2006;16:1519-1526. (Pubitemid 43871824)
6. Ajaj W, Lauenstein TC, Schneemann H, et al. Magnetic resonance colonography without bowel cleansing using oral and rectal stool softeners (fecal cracking): a feasibility study. Eur Radiol 2005;15:2079-2087. (Pubitemid 41403505)
7. Pickhardt PJ, Choi JR, Hwang I, et al. Computed tomographic virtual colonoscopy to screen for colorectal neoplasia in asymptomatic adults. N Engl J Med 2003;349:2191-2200. (Pubitemid 37485135)
8. van Gelder RE, Nio CY, Florie J, et al. Computed tomographic colonography compared with colonoscopy in patients at increased risk for colorectal cancer. Gastroenterology 2004;127:41-48. (Pubitemid 38962272)
9. 1990 Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. Ann ICRP 1991;21:1-201.
10. Brenner DJ, Georgsson MA. Mass screening with CT colonography: should the radiation exposure be of concern? Gastroenterology 2005;129:328-337.
11. Luboldt W, Bauerfeind P, Wildermuth S, Marincek B, Fried M, Debatin JF. Colonic masses: detection with MR colonography. Radiology 2000;216:383-388. (Pubitemid 30599854)
12. Ajaj W, Pelster G, Treichel U, et al. Dark lumen magnetic resonance colonography: comparison with conventional colonoscopy for the detection of colorectal pathology. Gut 2003;52:1738-1743. (Pubitemid 37510395)
13. Hartmann D, Bassler B, Schilling D, et al. Colorectal polyps: detection with dark-lumen MR colonography versus conventional colonoscopy. Radiology 2006;238:143-149. (Pubitemid 43010590)
14. Pappalardo G, Polettini E, Frattaroli FM, et al. Magnetic resonance colonography versus conventional colonoscopy for the detection of colonic endoluminal lesions. Gastroenterology 2000;119:300-304. (Pubitemid 30621979)
15. Saar B, Heverhagen JT, Obst T, et al. Magnetic resonance colonography and virtual magnetic resonance colonoscopy with the 1.0 T system: a feasibility study. Invest Radiol 2000;35:521-526. (Pubitemid 30672806)
16. Luboldt W, Bauerfeind P, Wildermuth S, Debatin JF. Contrast optimization for assessment of the colonic wall and lumen in MR colonography. J Magn Reson Imaging 1999;9:745-750. (Pubitemid 29211172)
17. Luboldt W, Frohlich JM, Schneider N, Weishaupt D, Landolt F, Debatin JF. MR colonography: optimized enema composition. Radiology 1999;212:265-269. (Pubitemid 29302546)
18. Lauenstein T, Holtmann G, Schoenfelder D, Bosk S, Ruehm SG, Debatin JF. MR colonography without colonic cleansing: a new strategy to improve patient acceptance. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2001;177:823-827. (Pubitemid 32881658)
19. Morrin MM, Hochman MG, Farrell RJ, Marquesuzaa H, Rosenberg S, Edelman RR. MR colonography using colonic distension with air as the contrast material: work in progress. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2001;176:144-146. (Pubitemid 32012874)
20. 2 enema - pilot study. Radiology 2001;219:558-562.
21. 3He as an endoluminal contrast agent: demonstration of feasibility. Magn Reson Med 2000;44:813-816.
22. Ell C, Fischbach W, Keller R, et al. A randomized, blinded, prospective trial to compare the safety and efficacy of three bowel-cleansing solutions for colonoscopy. Endoscopy 2003;35:300-304. (Pubitemid 36388809)
23. Ernstoff JJ, Howard DA, Marshall JB, Jumshyd A, McCullough AJ. A randomized blinded clinical trial of a rapid colonic lavage solution (Golytely) compared with standard preparation for colonoscopy and barium enema. Gastroenterology 1983;84:1512-1516.
24. Tomlinson TL, DiPalma JA, Mangano FA. Comparison of a new colon lavage solution (Golytely-RSS) with a standard preparation for air-contrast barium enema. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1988;151:947-950. (Pubitemid 18251573)
25. Taylor SA, Halligan S, Goh V, et al. Optimizing colonic distention for multi-detector row CT colonography: effect of hyoscine butylbromide and rectal balloon catheter. Radiology 2003;229:99-108. (Pubitemid 37152111)
26. Zalis ME, Barish MA, Choi JR, et al. CT colonography reporting and data system: a consensus proposal. Radiology 2005;236:3-9. (Pubitemid 40853289)
27. Lam WW, Leung WK, Wu JK, So NM, Sung JJ. Screening of colonic tumors by air-inflated magnetic resonance (MR) colonography. J Magn Reson Imaging 2004;19:447-452. (Pubitemid 38437152)
28. So NM, Lam WW, Mann D, Leung KL, Metreweli C. Feasibility study of using air as a contrast medium in MR colonography. Clin Radiol 2003;58:555-559. (Pubitemid 36806107)
29. Ajaj W, Lauenstein TC, Pelster G, Goehde SC, Debatin JF, Ruehm SG. MR colonography: how does air compare to water for colonic distension? J Magn Reson Imaging 2004;19:216-221.
30. Rodriguez Gomez S, Pagés Llinas M, Castells Garangou A, et al. Dark-lumen MR colonography with fecal tagging: a comparison of water enema and air methods of colonic distension for detecting colonic neoplasms. Eur Radiol 2008;18:1396-1405.
31. Winawer SJ, Fletcher RH, Miller L, et al. Colorectal cancer screening: clinical guidelines and rationale. Gastroenterology 1997;112:594-642. (Pubitemid 27078848)
32. Florie J, Birnie E, van Gelder RE, et al. MR colonography with limited bowel preparation: patient acceptance compared with that of full-preparation colonoscopy. Radiology 2007;245:150-159. (Pubitemid 47417798)
33. Ajaj W, Ruehm SG, Gerken G, et al. Strengths and weaknesses of dark-lumen MR colonography: clinical relevance of polyps smaller than 5 mm in diameter at the moment of their detection. J Magn Reson Imaging 2006;24:1088-1094. (Pubitemid 44658247)
34. Lauenstein TC, Goehde SC, Ruehm SG, Holtmann G, Debatin JF. MR colonography with barium-based fecal tagging: initial clinical experience. Radiology 2002;223:248-254. (Pubitemid 34258216)
35. Kuehle CA, Langhorst J, Ladd SC, et al. Magnetic resonance colonography without bowel cleansing: a prospective cross sectional study in a screening population. Gut 2007;56:1079-1085. (Pubitemid 47123237)