The importance of landscape in wine quality perception: An integrated approach using choice-based conjoint analysis and combination-based permutation tests

Food Quality and Preference

Volumn 21, Issue 7, 2010, Pages 827-836

  Tempesta, Tiziano ^a   Giancristofaro, Rosa Arboretti ^a   Corain, Livio ^a   Salmaso, Luigi ^a   Tomasi, Diego ^b   Boatto, Vasco ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PADOVA   (Italy)

^b CRA VIT Centro di Ricerca per la Viticoltura   (Italy)

Author keywords

Choice experiment; Landscape; Multivariate permutation tests; Segmentation; Wine sensory valuation

Indexed keywords

EID: 77956401531     PISSN: 09503293     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodqual.2010.04.007     Document Type: Article

References (67)

1. Barreiro-Hurlé J., Colombo S., Cantos-Villar E. Is there a market for functional wines?. Food Quality and Preference 2008, 19(4):360-371.
2. Basso D., Pesarin F., Salmaso L., Solari A. Permutation tests for stochastic ordering and ANOVA: Theory and applications with R 2009, Springer, Heidelberg.
3. Bello Acebron L., Calvo Dopico D. The importance of intrinsic cues to expected and experienced quality: An empirical application for beef. Food Quality and Preferences 2000, 11:229-238.
4. Blair R.C., Higgins J.J., Karniski W., Kromrey J.D. A study of multivariate permutation tests which may replace hotelling's T2 test in prescribed circumstances. Multivariate Behavioral Research 1994, 29:141-163.
5. Borooah V.K. Logit and probit: Ordered and multinomial models 2001, Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, California, USA.
6. Bourassa S.C. Toward a theory of landscape aesthetics. Landscape and Urban Planning 1988, 15:241-252.
7. Bourassa S.C. A paradigm for landscape aesthetics. Environment and Behaviour 1990, 22:787-812.
8. Bredahl L. Cue utilisation and quality perception with regard to branded beef. Food Quality and Preferences 2004, 15:65-75.
9. Caporale G., Policastro S., Carlucci A., Monteleone E. Bitterness enhancement induced by cut grass odourant (cis-3-hexen-1-ol) in a model olive oil. Food Quality and Preferences 2004, 17:116-125.
10. Carneiro de D.S., Minim V.P.R., Deliza R., Silva C.H.O., Carneiro J.C.S., Leao F.P. Labelling effects on consumer intention to purchase for soybean oil. Food Quality and Preferences 2005, 16(3):275-282.
11. Cohen, S. H. (2003). Maximum difference scaling: Improved measures of importance and preference for segmentation. In Proceedings of the sawtooth software conference, San Antonio, TX.
12. Corain L., Melas V.B., Salmaso L. A discussion on nonlinear models for price decision in rating based product preference models. Communications in Statistics - Simulations and Computation 2009, 38:1178-1201.
13. Corain L., Salmaso L. Multivariate and multistrata nonparametric tests: The NPC method. Journal of Modern Applied Statistical Methods 2004, 3(2):443-461.
14. Daniel T.C. Whither scenic beauty? Visual quality assessment in the 21st century. Landscape and Urban Planning 2001, 54:67-281.
15. Daniel, T. C., & Boster, R. S. (1976). Measuring landscape aesthetics: The scenic beauty estimation method. USDA forest service research paper. RM-167. Fort Collins, CO: Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station.
16. Delwiche J.F. Impact of color on perceived wine flavor. Foods Food Ingredients Journal of Japan 2003, 208(5):349-352.
17. Edgington E.S., Onghena P. Randomization tests 2007, Chapman and Hall, London. 4th ed.
18. Enneking U., Neumann C., Henneberg S. How important intrinsic and extrinsic product attributes affect purchase decision. Food Quality and Preferences 2007, 18:133-138.
19. Finos L., Salmaso L. FDR- and FWE-controlling methods using data-driven weights. Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference 2007, 137:3859-3870.
20. Garber L.L., Hyatt E.M., Starr R.G. The effects of food color on perceived flavour. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice 2000, 8:59-71.
21. Gil J.M., Sanchez M. Consumer preferences for wine attribute: A conjoint approach. British Food Journal 1997, 99(1):3-11.
22. Green P.E., Krieger A.M., Wind Y. Thirty years of conjoint analysis: Reflections and prospects. Interfaces 2001, 31(3):S56-S73.
23. Grunert K. What is in a steak? A cross-cultural study on the quality perception on beef. Food Quality and Preferences 1997, 8(3):157-174.
24. Gustafsson A., Herrmann A., Huber F. Conjoint measurement: Methods and applications 2001, Springer, Berlin.
25. Hagerty M.R. Can segmentation improve predictive accuracy in conjoint analysis?. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 2008, 21(4):353-355.
26. Heath T.B., Chatterjee S. Asymmetric decoy effects on lower-quality versus higher-quality brands: Meta-analytic and experimental evidence. Journal of Consumer Research 1995, 22(3):268-284.
27. Hochberg Y., Tamhane A.C. Multiple comparisons procedures 1987, Wiley, New York.
28. Holleebeek L.D., Jaeger S.R., Roderik J.B., Balemi A. The influence of involvement of purchase intention for new world wine. Food Quality and Preferences 2007, 18:1033-1049.
29. Ittersum K., Candel M.J., Meulenberg M.T. The influence of the image of a product's on product evaluation. Journal of Business Research 2003, 56:215-226.
30. Johansson L., Haglund A., Berglund L., Lea P., Risvik E. Preference for tomatoes, affected by sensory attributes and information about growth conditions. Food Quality and Preferences 1999, 10:289-298.
31. Kaplan R. The analysis of perception via preference: A strategy for studying how the environment is experienced. Landscape Planning 1985, 12:161-176.
32. Kaplan S. Aesthetic, affect and cognition, environmental preferences from an evolutionary perspective. Environment and Behavior 1987, 19:3-32.
33. Kaplan R., Kaplan S. The experience of nature. A psychological perspective 1989, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
34. Kirmani A., Rao A.R. No pain, no gain: A critical review of the literature on signaling, unobservable product quality. Journal of Marketing 2000, 64:66-79.
35. Kole A., Altintzoglou T., Schelvis-Smith R., Luten J. The effects of different types of product information on the consumer product evaluation for fresh cod in real life settings. Food Quality and Preferences 2009, 20:187-194.
36. Lenk P.J., DeSarbo W.S., Green P.E., Young M.R. Hierarchical Bayes conjoint analysis: Recovery of partworth heterogeneity from reduced experimental. Marketing Science 1996, 15(2):173-191.
37. Lockshin L., Jarvis W., d'Hauteville F., Perrouty J. Using simulation for discrete choice experiments to measure consumer sensitivity to brand, region, price and awards in wine choice. Food Quality and Preferences 2006, 17:166-178.
38. Louviere J., Hensher D., Swait J. Conjoint preference elicitation methods in the broader context of random utility theory preference elicitation methods. Conjoint measurement: Methods and applications 2001, Springer, Berlin. A. Gustafsson, A. Herrmann, F. Huber (Eds.).
39. Manly B.F.J. Randomization, bootstrap and Monte Carlo methods in biology 1997, Chapman and Hall, London. 2nd ed.
40. Marcus R., Peritz E., Gabriel K.R. On closed testing procedures with special reference to ordered analysis of variance. Biometrika 1976, 63:655-660.
41. McFadden D. The choice theory approach to marketing research. Marketing Science 1986, 5:275-297.
42. McFadden D. Rationality for economists?. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 1999, 19(1-3):73-105.
43. Montgomery D.C. Design and analysis of experiments 2004, Wiley, New York. 6th ed.
44. Myers J.H. Segmentation and positioning for strategic marketing decisions 1996, American Marketing Association, Chicago.
45. Nelson P. Information and consumer behavior. Journal of Political Economy 1970, 82(4):729-754.
46. NPC Test R10 (2009). Free software for multivariate permutation tests. http://www.gest.unipd.it/~salmaso/NPC_TEST.htm.
47. Odello, L., Ugolini, A., & Violoni, M. (2007). Analisi Sensoriale: I test descrittivi. L'Assaggio, 14 [Brescia].
48. O'Gorman T. A comparison of the F-test, Friedman's test, and several aligned rank tests for the analysis of randomized complete blocks. Journal of Agricultural, Biological, and Environmental Statistics 2001, 6:367-378.
49. Parsons R., Daniel T.C. Good looking: In defense of scenic landscape aesthetics. Landscape and Urban Planning 2002, 60:43-56.
50. Pesarin F., Salmaso L. Permutation tests for complex data: Theory, applications and software 2009, Wiley, Chichester.
51. Pesarin F., Salmaso L. Finite-sample consistency of combination-based permutation tests with application to repeated measures designs. Journal of Nonparametric Statistics 2009, 10.1080/10485250902807407.
52. Piccolo D., D'Elia A. A new approach for modelling consumers' preferences. Food Quality and Preferences 2008, 19:247-259.
53. Poleman A., Mojet J., Lyon D., Sefa-Dedeh S. The influence of information about organic production and fair trade on preferences for and perception of pineapple. Food Quality and Preferences 2008, 19:114-121.
54. Rao A.R., Monroe K.B. The effect of price, brand name, and store name on Buyers' perception of product quality: An integrative review. Journal of Marketing Research 1989, XXVI(August):351-357.
55. Sawtooth (2003). CBC System 2.6.11. http://www.sawtoothsoftware.com.
56. Schnettler B., Vidal R., Silva R., Vallejos L., Sepulveda N. Consumer willingness to pay for beef meat in a developing country: The effect of information regarding country of origin, price and animal handling prior. Food Quality and Preference 2009, 20:156-165.
57. Stamps A.E. Mystery, complexity, legibility and coherence: A meta-analysis. Journal of Environmental Psychology 2004, 24:1-16.
58. Stefani G., Romano D., Cavicchi A. Consumer expectations, liking and willingness to pay for specialty foods: Do sensory characteristics tell the whole story?. Food Quality and Preference 2006, 17:53-62.
59. Stone H., Sidel J.L. Sensory evaluation practices 1993, Academic Press Inc, New York. 2nd ed.
60. Swaffield S.R., Foster R.J. Community perception of landscape values in the South Island high country 2000, Department of Conservation, Wellington.
61. Veale R., Quester P. Consumer sensory evaluation of wine quality: The respective influence of price and country of origin. Journal of Wine Economics 2008, 3(1):10-28.
62. Vranešević T., Stančec R. The effect of the brand on perceived quality of food products. British Food Journal 2003, 105(11):811-825.
63. Wittink D.R., Cattin P. Commercial use of conjoint analysis: An update. Journal of Marketing 1989, 53(3):91-96.
64. Wittink D.R., Vriens M., Burhenne W. Commercial use of conjoint analysis in Europe: Results and critical reflections. International Journal of Marketing Research 1994, 11:41-52.
65. Yeomans M.R., Chambers L., Blumenthal H., Blake A. The role of expectancy in sensory and hedonic evaluation: The case of smoked salmon ice-cream. Food Quality and Preference 2008, 19:565-573.
66. Zampini M., Sanabria D., Phillips N., Spense C. The multisensory perception of flavour. Assessing the influence of color cues on flavour discrimination responses. Food Quality and Preference 2007, 18:975-984.
67. Zube E.H., Sell J.L., Taylor J.G. Landscape perception: Research, application and theory. Landscape Planning 1982, 9:1-33.