Labelling effects on consumer intention to purchase for soybean oil

Food Quality and Preference

Volumn 16, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 275-282

  de D S Carneiro, João ^a   Minim, Valéria P R ^a   Deliza, Rosires ^b   Silva, Carlos H O ^a   Carneiro, Joel C S ^a   Leão, Fabiana P ^a  

^a FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF VIÇOSA   (Brazil)

^b EMBRAPA AGROINDÚSTRIA DE ALIMENTOS   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Conjoint analysis; Consumer; Label; Purchase intention; Soybean oil; Transgenic products

Indexed keywords

ALPHA TOCOPHEROL; CHOLESTEROL; SOYBEAN OIL;

ADULT; ARTICLE; CONSUMER; CONTROLLED STUDY; DATA ANALYSIS; DEMOGRAPHY; EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN; FEMALE; FOOD ANALYSIS; FOOD PACKAGING; HEALTH SURVEY; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; INFORMATION; MALE; MARKETING; MOTIVATION; NUTRITION; PURCHASING; QUESTIONNAIRE; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS;

GLYCINE MAX;

EID: 12144264358     PISSN: 09503293     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodqual.2004.05.004     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Allison R.I. Uhl K.P. Influence of beer brand identification on taste perception Journal of Marketing Research 1 1964 36-39
2. Baker G.A. Crosbie P.J. Consumer preferences for food safety attributes: A market segment approach Agribusiness 10 4 1994 319-324
3. Bower J.A. Saadat M.A. Whitten C. Effect of liking, information and consumer characteristics on purchase intention and willingness to pay more for a fat spread with a proven health benefit Food Quality and Preference 14 1 2003 65-74
4. Cardello A.V. Sensory evaluation and consumer food choice Cereal Foods World 40 11 1995 876-878
5. Carneiro, J. D. S., Minim, V. P. R., Dantas, M. I. S., Deliza, R., Coimbra, J. S., Minim, L. A., & Leão, F. P. A. (2002). The role of package attribute features on soybean oil intention to purchase. In XVIII Brazilian Congress of Food Science and Technology (pp. 2371-2374). CBCTA, Porto Alegre, Brazil
6. Casey M.A. Krueger R.A. Focus group interviewing In: MacFie H.J.H. & Thomson D.M.H. (Eds.) Measurement of food preferences 1994 77-97 Blackie Academic & Professional London
7. Chung L.H. Fu J. Conjoint analysis of consumer preferences and evaluations of a processed meat Journal of International Food Agribusiness Marketing 7 1 1995 35-53
8. Costa, M. C. (1999). Non conventional technologies and the impact on consumer behaviour. 119p. Master Thesis, Federal Rural University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro-RJ
9. Costa M.C. Deliza R. Rosenthal A. Hedderley D. Frewer L. Non conventional technologies and impact on consumer behaviour Trends in Food Science and Technology 11 2000 188-193
10. Dantas, M. I. S. (2001). Package effect of minimally processed green leaves (Brassica oleraceal cv. acephala) on consumer intention to purchase. 77p. Master Thesis. Federal University of Viçosa, Viçosa-MG
11. Dantas M.I.S. Minin V.P.R. Deliza R. Translation and validation of the Health Consciousness Scale used in consumer studies to the Portuguese language Boletim da Sociedade Brasileira de Ciência e Tecnologia de Alimentos 37 2 2003 103-105
12. Deliza, R. (1996). The effects of expectation on sensory perception and acceptance. PhD thesis, University of Reading, 198p
13. Deliza R. MacFie H.J.H. Hedderley D. Use of computer-generated images and conjoint analysis to investigate sensory expectations Journal of Sensory Studies 18 6 2003 465-486
14. Deliza R. Rosenthal A. Silva A.L.S. Consumer attitude towards information on non conventional technology Trends in Food Science and Technology 14 1 2003 39-43
15. Flett G.L. Blankstein K.R. Pliner P. Bator C. Impression-management and self-deception components of appraised emotional experience British Journal of Social Psychology 27 1988 67-77
16. Frewer L.J. Howard C. Shepherd R. Public concerns about general and specific applications of genetic engineering: Risk, benefit and ethics Science, Technology and Human Values 22 1 1997 98-124
17. Green P.E. Srinivasan V. Conjoint analysis in consumer research: issues and outlook Journal of Consumer Research 5 1978 103-123
18. Guerrero L. Colomer Y. Guardia M.D. Xicola J. Clotet R. Consumer attitude towards store brands Food Quality and Preference 11 2000 387-395
19. Krueger R.A. Focus group: A practical guide for applied research 1988 Sage Publications Newbury Park
20. Lange C. Issanchou S. Combris P. Expected versus experienced quality: Trade-off with price Food quality and Preference 11 2000 289-297
21. Leary M.R. Kowalsky R.M. Impression management: A literature review and two-component model Psychological Bullectin 107 1 1990 34-47
22. MacFie H.J. Bratchell N. Greenhoff K. Vallis L.V. Designs to balance the effect of order of presentation and first-order carry-over effects in hall tests Journal of Sensory Studies 4 1989 129-148
23. Makens J.C. Effect of brand preference upon consumers' perceived taste of turkey meat Journal of Applied Psychology 49 1965 261-263
24. Malhotra N.K. Multidimensional scaling and conjoint analysis In: Malhotra N.K. (ed.) Marketing Aesearch: an applied orientation 3rd ed. 1998 633-689 Prentice-Hall New Jersey
25. Massarani L. The public opinion about the transgenic História, Ciências e Saúde 7 2 2000
26. Moore W.L. Levels of aggregation in conjoint analysis: An empirical comparison Journal of Marketing Research 18 1980 516-523
27. Mueller W. Who reads the label? American Demographics 13 1 1991 36-41
28. Nayga R.M. Lipinski D. Savur N. Consumers use of nutritional labels while food shopping at home Journal of Consumers Affairs 32 1 1998 106-120
29. NCC. National Consumer Council (2003). Bamboozled, baffled and bombarded - consumers' views on voluntary food labelling (p. 50) NCC: London
30. Oude Ophuis P.A.M. Measuring health orientation and health consciousness as determinants of food choice behavior: Development and implementation of various attitudinal scales In: Avilonits G.J. Papavasiliou N.K. & Kouremenus A.G. (Eds.) Marketing Thought and Practice in the 1990's. EMAC XVIII 1989 1723-1725 Athens School of Economics and Business Athens, Greece
31. Oude Ophuis P.A.M. Van Trijp H.C.M. Perceived quality: A market driven and consumer oriented approach Food Quality and Preference 6 1995 177-183
32. Rowan C. Packaging by design Food engineering International 2000 19-25
33. SAS, Statistical Analysis System, version 8.0 (1999). The SAS Institute, Cary, NC
34. Steenkamp J.-B.E.M. Conjoint measurement in ham quality evaluation Journal of Agricultural Economies 38 3 1987 473-480
35. Stewart D.W. Shamdasani P.N. Focus groups-theory and practice 1990 Sage Publication Inc. Newbury Park, California
36. Stokes R.C. The effects of price, package design, and brand familiarity on perceived quality In: Jacoby J. & Olson J.C. (eds.) Perceived quality 1985 233-246 Lexington Books
37. UNITED - United Soybean Board., (2001). Available: http://www.unitedsoybean.org. Consulted in March 2002
38. Wakeling I.N. MacFie H.J.H. Designing consumer trials balanced for first and higher orders of carry-over effect when only a subset of k samples from t may be tested Food Quality and Preference 6 1995 299-308
39. Wansink B. Park S.B. Sonka S. Morganosky M. How soy labelling influences preference and taste International Food and Agribusiness Management 3 1 2001 85-94