Molecular signatures-based prediction of enzyme promiscuity

Bioinformatics

Volumn 26, Issue 16, 2010, Pages 2012-2019

  Carbonell, Pablo ^a   Faulon, Jean Loup ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ D EVRY VAL D ESSONNE   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ENZYME; PROTEIN;

ARTICLE; ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; CATALYSIS; CHEMISTRY; ENZYME ACTIVE SITE; METABOLISM; PROTEIN ENGINEERING;

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; CATALYSIS; CATALYTIC DOMAIN; ENZYMES; PROTEIN ENGINEERING; PROTEINS;

EID: 77955353890     PISSN: 13674803     EISSN: 14602059     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btq317     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Altschul,S.F. et al. (1990) Basic local alignment search tool. J. Mol. Biol., 215, 403-410.
2. Anandarajah,K. et al. (2000) Recruitment of a double bond isomerase to serve as a reductive dehalogenase during biodegradation of pentachlorophenol. Biochemistry, 39, 5303-5311.
3. Andrianantoandro,E. et al. (2006) Synthetic biology: new engineering rules for an emerging discipline. Mol. Syst. Biol., 2, msb4100073-E1-msb4100073-E14.
4. Babbitt,P.C. et al. (1996) The enolase superfamily: A general strategy for enzymecatalyzed abstraction of the protons of carboxylic acids. Biochemistry, 35, 16489-16501.
5. Badia,J. et al. (1991) L-lyxose metabolism employs the L-rhamnose pathway in mutant cells of Escherichia coli adapted to grow on L-lyxose. J. Bacteriol., 173, 5144-5150.
6. Bartlett,G.J. et al. (2002) Analysis of catalytic residues in enzyme active sites. J. Mol. Biol., 324, 105-121.
7. Bornscheuer,U.T. and Kazlauskas,R.J. (2004) Catalytic promiscuity in biocatalysis: using old enzymes to form new bonds and follow new pathways. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed, 43, 6032-6040.
8. Carbonell,P. et al. (2009) Energetic determinants of protein binding specificity: insights into protein interaction networks. Proteomics, 9, 1744-1753.
9. Chang,A. et al. (2009) Brenda, amenda and frenda the enzyme information system: new content and tools in 2009. Nucleic Acids Res., 37, gkn820.
10. Chan,K.K. et al. (2008) Structural basis for substrate specificity in phosphate binding (beta/alpha)8-barrels: D-allulose 6-phosphate 3-epimerase from Escherichia coli k-12. Biochemistry, 47, 9608-9617.
11. Copley,S. (2003) Enzymes with extra talents: moonlighting functions and catalytic promiscuity. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol., 7, 265-272.
12. Delano,W.L. (2002) The PyMOL User's Manual. DeLano Scientific, San Carlos.
13. Faulon,J.-L.L. et al. (2004) The signature molecular descriptor. 4. canonizing molecules using extended valence sequences. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci., 44, 427-436.
14. Faulon,J.-L. et al. (2008) Genome scale enzyme metabolite and drug target interaction predictions using the signature molecular descriptor. Bioinformatics, 24, 225-233.
15. Gartner,T. et al. (2003) On graph kernels: Hardness results and efficient alternatives. Lect. Notes Comput. Sci., 2777, 129-143.
16. Glasner,M.E. et al. (2006) Evolution of structure and function in the o-succinylbenzoate synthase/n-acylamino acid racemase family of the enolase superfamily. J .Mol.Biol., 360, 228-250.
17. Gomez,A. et al. (2003) Do current sequence analysis algorithms disclose multifunctional (moonlighting) proteins? Bioinformatics, 19, 895-896.
18. Guyon,I. et al. (2002) Gene selection for cancer classification using support vector machines. Mach. Learn., 46, 389-422.
19. Hegyi,H. and Gerstein,M. (1999) The relationship between protein structure and function: a comprehensive survey with application to the yeast genome. J. Mol. Biol., 288, 147-164.
20. Hult,K. and Berglund,P. (2007) Enzyme promiscuity: mechanism and applications. Trends Biotechnol., 25(5), 231-238.
21. Ishijima,J. et al. (2000) Free energy requirement for domain movement of an enzyme. J. Biol. Chem., 275, 18939-18945.
22. Jurgens,C. et al. (2000) Directed evolution of a (alpha-beta)8-barrel enzyme to catalyze related reactions in two different metabolic pathways. Proc. Natl Acad. USA, 97, 9925-9930.
23. Kabsch,W. and Sander,C. (1983) Dictionary of protein secondary structure: pattern recognition of hydrogen-bonded and geometrical features. Biopolymers, 22, 2577-2637.
24. Kanehisa,M. et al. (2008) KEGG for linking genomes to life and the environment. Nucleic Acids Res., 36, D480-D484.
25. Kazlauskas,R. (2005) Enhancing catalytic promiscuity for biocatalysis. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol., 9, 195-201.
26. Khersonsky,O. et al. (2006) Enzyme promiscuity: evolutionary and mechanistic aspects. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol., 10, 498-508.
27. Kim,P.M. et al. (2008) The role of disorder in interaction networks: a structural analysis. Mol. Syst. Biol., 4, 179.
28. Kuper,J. et al. (2005) Two-fold repeated (betaalpha)4 half-barrels may provide a molecular tool for dual substrate specificity. EMBO Rep., 6, 134-139.
29. Leslie,C. et al. (2003) Mismatch string kernels for SVM protein classification. In Becker,S. et al. (eds), Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 15. Cambridge. Proceedings of the Neural Information Processing (NIPS) 2002, MIT Press, pp. 1441-1448.
30. Linding,R. et al. (2003) Protein disorder prediction: implications for structural proteomics. Structure, 11, 1453-1459.
31. Li,W. and Godzik,A. (2006) Cd-hit: a fast program for clustering and comparing large sets of protein or nucleotide sequences. Bioinformatics, 22, 1658-1659.
32. Macchiarulo,A. et al. (2004) Ligand selectivity and competition between enzymes in silico. Nat. Biotechnol., 22, 1039-1045.
33. Martin,S. et al. (2005) Predicting protein-protein interactions using signature products. Bioinformatics, 21, 218-226.
34. Ma,W. et al. (2005) Specificity of trypsin and chymotrypsin: loop-motion-controlled dynamic correlation as a determinant. Biophys. J., 89, 1183-1193.
35. Murzin,A.G. et al. (1995) SCOP: a structural classification of proteins database for the investigation of sequences and structures. J. Mol. Biol., 247, 536-540.
36. Nobeli,I. et al. (2009) Protein promiscuity and its implications for biotechnology. Nat. Biotechnol., 27, 157-167.
37. O'Brien,P.J. and Herschlag,D. (1999) Catalytic promiscuity and the evolution of new enzymatic activities. Chem. Biol., 6, 91-105.
38. Orengo,C.A. et al. (1997) CATH-a hierarchic classification of protein domain structures. Structure, 5, 1093-1108.
39. Petsko,G.A. (2000) Enzyme evolution: design by necessity. Nature, 403, 606-607.
40. Poelarends,G. et al. (2008) The chemical versatility of the fold: catalytic promiscuity and divergent evolution in the tautomerase superfamily. Cell. Mol. Life Sci., 65, 3606-3618.
41. Porter,C.T. et al. (2004) The catalytic site atlas: a resource of catalytic sites and residues identified in enzymes using structural data. Nucleic Acids Res., 32 (Suppl. 1), D129-D133.
42. Romero,P.A. and Arnold,F.H. (2009) Exploring protein fitness landscapes by directed evolution. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol., 10, 866-876.
43. Rothman,S.C. and Kirsch,J.F. (2003) How does an enzyme evolved in vitro compare to naturally occurring homologs possessing the targeted function? tyrosine aminotransferase from aspartate aminotransferase. J. Mol. Biol., 327, 593-608.
44. Saigo,H. et al. (2004) Protein homology detection using string alignment kernels. Bioinformatics, 20, 1682-1689.
45. Sitbon,E. and Pietrokovski,S. (2007) Occurrence of protein structure elements in conserved sequence regions. BMC Struc. Biol., 7,3.
46. Taglieber,A. et al. (2007) Alternate-site enzyme promiscuity. Angewandte Chemie, 46, 8597-8600.
47. Tyagi,M. et al. (2009) Exploring functional roles of multibinding protein interfaces. Protein Sci., 18, 1674-1683.
48. Vapnik,V.N. (1995) The nature of statistical learning theory. Springer, New York, NY.
49. Wu,B.-N.N. et al. (2009) Structural modification of acyl carrier protein by butyryl group. Protein Sci., 18, 240-246.
50. Yano,T. et al. (1998) Directed evolution of an aspartate aminotransferase with new substrate specificities. Proc. Natl Acad. USA, 95, 5511-5515.
51. Yasutake,Y. et al. (2004) Crystal structure of the pyrococcus horikoshii isopropylmalate isomerase small subunit provides insight into the dual substrate specificity of the enzyme. J. Mol. Biol., 344, 325-333.
52. Yoshikuni,Y. et al. (2006) Designed divergent evolution of enzyme function. Nature, 440, 1078-1082.