Energetic determinants of protein binding specificity: Insights into protein interaction networks

Proteomics

Volumn 9, Issue 7, 2009, Pages 1744-1753

  Carbonell, Pablo ^a   Nussinov, Ruth ^b,c   Del Sol, Antonio ^a  

^a FUJIREBIO INC   (Japan)

^b SAIC FREDERICK INC   (United States)

^c TEL AVIV UNIVERSITY   (Israel)

Author keywords

Affinity; Protein hubs; Protein networks; Protein protein interactions; Specificity

Indexed keywords

CALCIUM CALMODULIN DEPENDENT PROTEIN KINASE; CYTOCHROME B; PROTEIN CDC42; UBIQUITIN;

ARTICLE; BINDING AFFINITY; BINDING SITE; CONTROLLED STUDY; ENERGY TRANSFER; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEIN MOTIF; PROTEIN PROTEIN INTERACTION; PROTEIN STRUCTURE; THERMODYNAMICS;

CALCIUM-CALMODULIN-DEPENDENT PROTEIN KINASES; COMPUTER SIMULATION; CYTOCHROMES B; FUNGAL PROTEINS; GTP PHOSPHOHYDROLASES; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEIN INTERACTION DOMAINS AND MOTIFS; PROTEIN INTERACTION MAPPING; PROTEINS; SUBSTRATE SPECIFICITY; THERMODYNAMICS; UBIQUITIN; YEASTS;

EID: 65349187039     PISSN: 16159853     EISSN: 16159861     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/pmic.200800425     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. He, X., Zhang, J., Why do hubs tend to be essential in protein networks? PLoS Genet. 2006, 2, e88.
2. Beckett, D., Multilevel regulation of protein-protein interactions in biological circuitry. Phys Biol. 2005, 2, S67-S73.
3. Kuriyan, J., Eisenberg, D., The origin of protein interactions and allostery in colocalization. Nature 2007, 450, 983-990.
4. Han, J. D., Bertin, N., Hao, T., Goldberg, D. S. et al., Evidence for dynamically organized modularity in the yeast proteinprotein interaction network. Nature 2004, 430, 88-93.
5. Kim, P. M., Lu, L. J., Xia, Y, Gerstein, M. B., Relating threedimensional structures to protein networks provides evolutionary insights. Science 2006, 314, 1938-1941.
6. Beltrao, P., Kiel, C., Serrano, L, Structures in systems biology. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 2007, 17, 378-384.
7. Kiel, C., Beltrao, P., Serrano, L, Analyzing protein interaction networks using structural information. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 2008, 77, 415-441.
8. Humphris, E. L, Kortemme, T., Design of multi-specificity in protein interfaces. PLoS Comput. Biol. 2007, 38, e164.
9. Li, S. S., Specificity and versatility of SH3 and other prolinerecognition domains: Structural basis and implications for cellular signal transduction. Biochem. J. 2005, 390, 641-653.
10. Li, W., Keeble, A. H., Giffard, C., James, R. et al., Highly discriminating protein-protein interaction specificities in the context of a conserved binding energy hotspot. J. Mol. Biol. 2004, 337, 743-759.
11. Reichmann, D., Rahat, O., Cohen, M., Neuvirth, H., Schreiber, G., The molecular architecture of protein-protein binding sites. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 2007, 17, 67-76.
12. Keskin, O., Nussinov, R., Favorable scaffolds: Proteins with different sequence, structure and function may associate in similar ways. Protein Eng. Des. Sel. 2005, 18, 11-24.
13. Jones, S., Thornton, J. M., Prediction of protein-protein interaction sites using patch analysis. J. Mol. Biol. 1997, 272, 133-143.
14. Shulman-Peleg, A., Nussinov, R., Wolfson, H. J., Recognition of functional sites in protein structures. J. Mol Biol. 2004, 339, 607-633.
15. DeLano, W. L, Ultsch, M. H., de Vos, A. M., Wells, J. A., Convergent solutions to binding at a protein-protein interface. Science 2000, 287, 1279-1283.
16. Keskin, O., Ma, B., Nussinov, R., Hot regions in protein-protein interactions: The organization and contribution of structurally conserved hot spot residues. J. Mol. Biol. 2005, 345, 1281-1294.
17. Keskin, O., Gursoy, A., Ma, B., Nussinov, R., Principles of protein-protein interactions: What arethe preferred ways for proteins to interact? Chem. Rev. 2008, 108, 1225-1244.
18. Reichmann, D., Cohen, M., Abramovich, R., Dym, O. et al., Binding hot spots in the TEM1-BLIP interface in light of its modular architecture. J. Mol. Biol. 2007, 365, 663-679.
19. Ma, B., Elkayam, T, Wolfson, H., Nussinov, R., Protein-protein interactions: Structurally conserved residues distinguish between binding sites and exposed protein surfaces. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 2003, 100, 5772-5777.
20. Keeble, A. H., Kirkpatrick, N., Shimizu, S., Kleanthous, C., Calorimetric dissection of colicin DNase-immunity protein complex specificity. Biochemistry 2006, 45, 3243-3254.
21. Pal,G., Kouadio,J.L.,Artis, D. R., Kossiakoff, A. A., Sidhu, S. S., Comprehensive and quantitative mapping of energy landscapes for protein-protein interactions by rapid combinatorial scanning. J. Biol. Chem. 2006, 281, 22378-22385.
22. Fernandez-Ballester, G., Blanes-Mira, C., Serrano, L., The tryptophan switch: Changing ligand-binding specificity from type I to type II in SH3 domains. J. Mol. Biol. 2004, 335, 619-629.
23. Kraich, M., Klein, M., Patino, E., Harrer, H. et al., A modular interface of IL-4 allows for scalable affinity without affecting specificity for the IL-4 receptor. BMC Biol. 2006, 4, 13.
24. Moza, B., Buonpane, R. A., Zhu, P., Herfst, C. A. et al., Longrange cooperative binding effects in a T cell receptor variable domain. Proc. Natl.Acad. Sci. 2006, 103, 9867-9872.
25. Reichmann, D., Rahat, O., Albeck, S., Meged, R. et al., The modular architecture of protein-protein binding interfaces. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 2005, 102, 57-62.
26. Bolon, D. N., Grant, R. A., Baker, T. A., Sauer, R. T., Specificity versus stability in computational protein design. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 2005, 102, 12724-12729.
27. Giildener, U., Miinsterkotter, M., Oesterheld, M., Pagel, P. et al., MPact: The MIPS protein interaction resource on yeast. Nucleic Acids Res. 2006, 34 (Database issue), D436-D441.
28. del Sol, A., Carbonell, P., The modular organization of domain structures: Insights into protein-protein binding. PLoS Comput. Biol. 2007, 3, e239.
29. Xenarios, I., Salwiński, Ł., Duan, X. J., Higney, P. et al., DIP, the database of interacting proteins: A research tool for studying cellular networks of protein interactions. Nucleic Acids Res. 2002, 30, 303-305.
30. Teyra, J., Paszkowski-Rogacz, M., Anders, G., Pisabarro, M. T, SCOWLP classification: Structural comparison and analysis of protein binding regions. BMC Bioinformatics 2008, 9, 9.
31. Schymkowitz, J., Borg, J., Stricher, F., Nys, R. et al., The FoldX web server: An online force field. Nucleic Acids Res. 2005, 33 (Web Server issue), W382-W388.
32. Tokuriki, N., Stricher, F., Schymkowitz, J., Serrano, L. et al., The stability effects of protein mutations appear to be universally distributed. J. Mol. Biol. 2007, 369, 1318-1332.
33. Carter, P., Liu, J., Rost, B., PEP: Predictions for entire proteomes. Nucleic Acids Res. 2003, 31, 410-413.
34. Girvan, M., Newman, M. E., Community structure in social and biological networks. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 2002, 99, 7821-7826.
35. Olmea, O., Straus, C. E., Ortiz, A. R., MAMMOTH (matching molecular models obtained from theory): An automated method for model comparison. Protein Sci. 2002, 11, 2606- 2621.
36. Janin, J., Henrick, K., Moult, J., Eyck, L. T. et al., CAPRI: A Critical Assessment of PRedicted Interactions. Proteins 2003, 52, 2-9.
37. Cohen, J., Cohen, P., West, S. G., Aiken, L. S., Applied Multiple Regression/Correlation Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences, Lawrence Erlbaum Assoc., Hillsdale, NJ 2002.
38. Linding, R., Jensen, L. J., Diella, F., Bork, P. et al., Protein disorder prediction: Implications for structural proteomics. Structure 2003, 11, 1453-1459.
39. Nooren, I. M., Thornton, J. M., Diversity of protein-protein interactions. EMBO J. 2003, 22, 3486-3492.
40. Zarrinpar, A., Park, S. H., Lim, W. A., Optimization of specificity in a cellular protein interaction network by negative selection. Nature 2003, 426, 676-680.
41. Aragues, R., Sali, A., Bonet, J., Marti-Renom, M. A.,Oliva, B., Characterization of protein hubs by inferring interacting motifs from protein interactions. PLoS Comput. Biol. 2007, 3, 1761-1771.
42. Keskin, O., Nussinov, R., Similar binding sites and different partners: Implications to shared proteins in cellular pathways. Structure 2007, 15, 341-354.
43. del Sol, A., Araúzo-Bravo, M. J., Amoros, D., Nussinov, R., Modular architecture of protein structures and allosteric communications: Potential implications for signaling proteins and regulatory linkages. Genome Biol. 2007, 8, R92.
44. Dyson, H. J., Wright, P. E., Intrinsically unstructured proteins and their functions. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2005, 6, 197-208.
45. Hicke, L., Schubert, H. L., Hill, C. P., Ubiquitin-binding domains. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2005, 6, 610-621.
46. Sloper-Mould, K. E., Jemc, J. C., Pickart, C. M., Hicke, L., Distinct functional surface regions on ubiquitin. J. Biol. Chem. 2001, 276, 30483-30489.
47. Swanson, K. A., Kang, R. S., Stamenova, S. D., Hicke, L., Radhakrishnan, I., Solution structure of Vps27 UIM-ubiquitin complex important for endosomal sorting and receptor downregulation. EMBO J. 2003, 22, 4597-4606.
48. Schauber, C., Chen, L., Tongaonkar, P., Vega, I. et al., Rad23 links DNA repair to the ubiquitin/proteasome pathway. Nature 1998, 391, 715-718.
49. Shih, S. C., Sloper-Mould, K. E., Hicke, L., Monoubiquitin carries a novel internalization signal that is appended to activated receptors. EMBO J. 2000, 19, 187-198.
50. Su, L. F., Knoblauch, R., Garabedian, M. J., Rho GTPases as modulators of the estrogen receptor transcriptional response. J. Biol. Chem. 2001, 276, 3231-3237.
51. Roumanie, O., Weinachter, C., Larrieu, I., Crouzet, M., Doignon, F., Functional characterization of the Bag7, Lrg1 and Rgd2 RhoGAP proteins from Saccharomyces cerevisiae. FEBS Lett. 2001, 506, 149-156.
52. Dransart, E., Morin, A., Cherfils, J., Olofsson, B., Uncoupling of inhibitory and shuttling functions of rho GDP dissociation inhibitors. J. Biol. Chem. 2005, 280, 4674-4683.
53. Cole, K. C., McLaughlin, H. W., Johnson, D. I., Use of bimolecular fluorescence complementation to study in vivo interactions between Cdc42p and Rdi1p of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Eukaryot. Cell. 2007, 6, 378-387.
54. Dovas, A., Couchman, J. R., RhoGDI: Multiple functions in the regulation of Rho family GTPase activities. Biochem. J. 2005, 390, 1-9.
55. Fisher, N., Castleden, C. K., Bourges, I., Brasseur, G. et al., Human disease-related mutations in cytochrome b studied in yeast. J. Biol. Chem. 2004, 279, 12951-12958.
56. Fisher, N., Bourges, I., Hill, P., Brasseur, G., Meunier, B., Disruption of the interaction between the Rieske iron-sulfur protein and cytochrome b in the yeast bc1 complex owing to a human disease-associated mutation within cytochrome b. Eur. J. Biochem. 2004, 271, 1292-1298.