Genome-wide pleiotropy of osteoporosis-related phenotypes: The Framingham study

Journal of Bone and Mineral Research

Volumn 25, Issue 7, 2010, Pages 1555-1563

  Karasik, David ^a   Hsu, Yi Hsiang ^a   Zhou, Yanhua ^b   Cupples, L Adrienne ^b   Kiel, Douglas P ^a   Demissie, Serkalem ^b  

^a HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

^b BOSTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Bone mineral density; Femoral geometry; Genetic correlations; Genome wide association; Pleiotropy; Quantitative ultrasound; Single nucleotide polymorphisms

Indexed keywords

AGED; ARTICLE; BONE DENSITY; BONE MINERAL; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; ECHOGRAPHY; ENVIRONMENTAL FACTOR; FEMALE; GENETIC ASSOCIATION; GENOTYPE; HEEL; HIP; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; OSTEOPOROSIS; PHENOTYPE; PLEIOTROPY; SINGLE NUCLEOTIDE POLYMORPHISM; SPINE;

ADULT; BONE DENSITY; FEMALE; FEMUR NECK; GENOME, HUMAN; GENOME-WIDE ASSOCIATION STUDY; HIP; HUMANS; OSTEOPOROSIS; PHENOTYPE; POLYMORPHISM, SINGLE NUCLEOTIDE;

EID: 77954717620     PISSN: 08840431     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jbmr.38     Document Type: Article

References (61)

1. Johnell O, Kanis JA. An estimate of the worldwide prevalence and disability associated with osteoporotic fractures. Osteoporos Int. 2006;17:1726-1733. (Pubitemid 44607392)
2. Faulkner KG, Wacker WK, Barden HS, et al. Femur strength index predicts hip fracture independent of bone density and hip axis length. Osteoporos Int. 2006;17:593-599.
3. Gluer CC, Hans D. How to use ultrasound for risk assessment: a need for defining strategies. Osteoporos Int. 1999;9:193-195. (Pubitemid 29182367)
4. Marshall D, Johnell O, Wedel H. Meta-analysis of how well measures of bone mineral density predict occurrence of osteoporotic fractures [see comments]. BMJ. 1996;312:1254-1259. (Pubitemid 26147662)
5. Kanis JA, Johnell O, Oden A, et al. The use of multiple sites for the diagnosis of osteoporosis. Osteoporos Int. 2006;17:527-534.
6. Lu Y, Genant HK, Shepherd J, et al. Classification of osteoporosis based on bone mineral densities. J Bone Miner Res. 2001;16:901-910. (Pubitemid 32332300)
7. Kaptoge S, Beck TJ, Reeve J, et al. Prediction of Incident Hip Fracture Risk by Femur Geometry Variables Measured by Hip Structural Analysis in the Study of Osteoporotic Fractures. J Bone Miner Res. 2008;23:1892-1904.
8. Deng HW, Livshits G, Yakovenko K, et al. Evidence for a major gene for bone mineral density/content in human pedigrees identified via probands with extreme bone mineral density. Ann Hum Genet. 2002;66:61-74.
9. Peacock M, Turner C, Econs M, Foroud T. Genetics of osteoporosis. Endocrine Reviews. 2002;23:303-326.
10. Howard GM, Nguyen TV, Harris M, Kelly PJ, Eisman JA. Genetic and environmental contributions to the association between quantitative ultrasound and bone mineral density measurements: a twin study. J Bone Miner Res. 1998;13:1318-1327. (Pubitemid 28373334)
11. Ralston SH. Genetic control of susceptibility to osteoporosis. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2002;87:2460-2466.
12. Karasik D, Shimabuku NA, Zhou Y, et al. A genome wide linkage scan of metacarpal size and geometry in the Framingham Study. Am J Hum Biol. 2008;20:663-670.
13. Deng HW, Mahaney MC, Williams JT, et al. Relevance of the genes for bone mass variation to susceptibility to osteoporotic fractures and its implications to gene search for complex human diseases. Genet Epidemiol. 2002;22:12-25.
14. Andrew T, Antioniades L, Scurrah KJ, Macgregor AJ, Spector TD. Risk of wrist fracture in women is heritable and is influenced by genes that are largely independent of those influencing BMD. J Bone Miner Res. 2005;20:67-74. (Pubitemid 41716220)
15. Villadsen MM, Bunger MH, Carstens M, Stenkjaer L, Langdahl BL. Methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) C677T polymorphism is associated with osteoporotic vertebral fractures, but is a weak predictor of BMD. Osteoporos Int. 2005;16:411-416. (Pubitemid 40487399)
16. van Meurs JB, Schuit SC, Weel AE, et al. Association of 5′ estrogen receptor alpha gene polymorphisms with bone mineral density, vertebral bone area and fracture risk. Hum Mol Genet. 2003;12: 1745-1754.
17. Styrkarsdottir U, Halldorsson BV, Gretarsdottir S, et al. New sequence variants associated with bone mineral density. Nat Genet. 2009; 41:15-17.
18. Richards JB, Kavvoura FK, Rivadeneira F, et al. For the GEnetic Factors For Osteoporosis (GEFOS) Consortium. Collaborative meta-analysis: Associations of 150 candidate genes with osteoporisis and osteoporotic fracture. Ann Int Med. 2009;151:528-537.
19. Wang X, Kammerer CM, Wheeler VW, Patrick AL, Bunker CH, Zmuda JM. Genetic and environmental determinants of volumetric and areal BMD in multi-generational families of African ancestry: the Tobago Family Health Study. J Bone Miner Res. 2007;22:527-536.
20. Karasik D, Myers RH, Cupples LA, et al. Genome screen for quantitative trait loci contributing to normal variation in bone mineral density: the Framingham Study. J Bone Miner Res. 2002;17:1718-1727.
21. Ioannidis JP, Ng MY, Sham PC, et al. Meta-analysis of genome-wide scans provides evidence for sex- and site-specific regulation of bone mass. J Bone Miner Res. 2007;22:173-183.
22. Karasik D, Cupples LA, Hannan MT, Kiel DP. Genome screen for a combined bone phenotype using principal component analysis: the Framingham study. Bone. 2004;34:547-556.
23. Liu XG, Liu YJ, Liu J, et al. A bivariate whole genome linkage study identified genomic regions influencing both BMD and bone structure. J Bone Miner Res. 2008;23:1806-1814.
24. Helgadottir A, Thorleifsson G, Manolescu A, et al. A common variant on chromosome 9p21 affects the risk of myocardial infarction. Science. 2007;316:1491-1493. (Pubitemid 46906618)
25. Saxena R, Voight BF, Lyssenko V, et al. Genome-wide association analysis identifies loci for type 2 diabetes and triglyceride levels. Science. 2007;316:1331-1336.
26. Scott LJ, Mohlke KL, Bonnycastle LL, et al. A genome-wide association study of type 2 diabetes in Finns detects multiple susceptibility variants. Science. 2007;316:1341-1345.
27. McPherson R, Pertsemlidis A, Kavaslar N, et al. A common allele on chromosome 9 associated with coronary heart disease. Science. 2007;316:1488-1491.
28. Freimer N, Sabatti C. The human phenome project. Nat Genet. 2003;34:15-21.
29. Kiel DP, Demissie S, Dupuis J, Lunetta KL, Murabito JM, Karasik D. Genome-wide association with bone mass and geometry in the Framingham Heart Study. BMC Med Genet. 2007;8 (Suppl 1): S14.
30. Rivadeneira F, Styrkársdóttir U, Estrada K, et al. Twenty bone mineral density loci identified by large-scale meta-analysis of genome-wide association studies. Nature Genetics. 2009;41:1199-1206.
31. Styrkarsdottir U, Halldorsson BV, Gretarsdottir S, et al. Multiple genetic loci for bone mineral density and fractures. N Engl J Med. 2008;358:2355-2365.
32. van Driel MA, Bruggeman J, Vriend G, Brunner HG, Leunissen JA. A text-mining analysis of the human phenome. Eur J Hum Genet. 2006;14:535-542.
33. Drenos F, Talmud PJ, Casas JP, et al. Integrated associations of genotypes with multiple blood biomarkers linked to coronary heart disease risk. Hum Mol Genet. 2009;18:2305-2316.
34. Karasik D, Cupples LA, Hannan MT, Kiel DP. Age, gender, and body mass effects on quantitative trait loci for bone mineral density: the Framingham study. Bone. 2003;33:308-316.
35. Karasik D, Ferrari SL. Contribution of gender-specific genetic factors to osteoporosis risk. Ann Hum Genet. 2008;72:696-714.
36. Hannan MT, Felson DT, Dawson-Hughes B, et al. Risk factors for longitudinal bone loss in elderly men and women: the Framingham Osteoporosis Study. J Bone Miner Res. 2000;15:710-720.
37. Karasik D, Myers R, Cupples L, et al. Genome screen for quantitative trait loci contributing to normal variation in bone mineral density: The Framingham Study. J Bone Miner Res. 2002;17:1718-1727.
38. Demissie S, Dupuis J, Cupples LA, Beck TJ, Kiel DP, Karasik D. Proximal hip geometry is linked to several chromosomal regions: Genome-wide linkage results from the Framingham Osteoporosis Study. Bone. 2007;40:743-750. (Pubitemid 46187216)
39. McLean RR, Hannan MT, Epstein BE, et al. Elderly cohort study subjects unable to return for follow-up have lower bone mass than those who can return. Am J Epidemiol. 2000;151:689-692.
40. Khoo BC, Beck TJ, Qiao QH, et al. In vivo short-term precision of hip structure analysis variables in comparison with bone mineral density using paired dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry scans from multi-center clinical trials. Bone. 2005;37:112-121.
41. Kannel WB, Sorlie P. Some health benefits of physical activity. The Framingham Study. Arch Intern Med. 1979;139:857-861.
42. Blangero J, Williams JT, Almasy L. Robust LOD scores for variance component-based linkage analysis. Genet Epidemiol. 2000;19 (Suppl 1): S8-14.
43. Almasy L, Dyer TD, Blangero J. Bivariate quantitative trait linkage analysis: pleiotropy versus co- incident linkages. Genet Epidemiol. 1997;14:953-958. (Pubitemid 28027515)
44. Williams JT, Van Eerdewegh P, Almasy L, Blangero J. Joint multipoint linkage analysis of multivariate qualitative and quantitative traits. I. Likelihood formulation and simulation results. Am J Hum Genet. 1999;65:1134-1147.
45. Boerwinkle E, Chakraborty R, Sing CF. The use of measured genotype information in the analysis of quantitative phenotypes in man. I. Models and analytical methods. Ann Hum Genet. 1986;50:181-194.
46. Rivadeneira F, Zillikens MC, De Laet CE, et al. Femoral neck BMD is a strong predictor of hip fracture susceptibility in elderly men and women because it detects cortical bone instability: the Rotterdam Study. J Bone Miner Res. 2007;22:1781-1790.
47. Wang Q, Teo JW, Ghasem-Zadeh A, Seeman E. Women and men with hip fractures have a longer femoral neck moment arm and greater impact load in a sideways fall. Osteoporos Int. 2008;20:1151-1156.
48. Wilsman NJ, Farnum CE, Leiferman EM, Fry M, Barreto C. Differential growth by growth plates as a function of multiple parameters of chondrocytic kinetics. J Orthop Res. 1996;14:927-936. (Pubitemid 27044462)
49. Lanske B, Amling M, Neff L, Guiducci J, Baron R, Kronenberg HM. Ablation of the PTHrP gene or the PTH/PTHrP receptor gene leads to distinct abnormalities in bone development. J Clin Invest. 1999; 104:399-407. (Pubitemid 29534324)
50. Lovejoy CO, Meindl RS, Ohman JC, Heiple KG, White TD. The Maka femur and its bearing on the antiquity of human walking: applying contemporary concepts of morphogenesis to the human fossil record. Am J Phys Anthropol. 2002;119:97-133.
51. Karasik D, Kiel DP. Genetics of the musculoskeletal system: a pleiotropic approach. J Bone Miner Res. 2008;23:788-802. (Pubitemid 351768797)
52. Wolf JB, Pomp D, Eisen EJ, Cheverud JM, Leamy LJ. The contribution of epistatic pleiotropy to the genetic architecture of covariation among polygenic traits in mice. Evol Dev. 2006;8:468-476. (Pubitemid 44267807)
53. Maher B. Personal genomes: The case of the missing heritability. Nature. 2008;456:18-21.
54. Schork NJ. Genetics of complex disease: approaches, problems, and solutions. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1997;156:S103-109.
55. Bilder RM, Sabb FW, Cannon TD, et al. Phenomics: The systematic study of phenotypes on a genome-wide scale. Neuroscience. 2009;164:30-42.
56. Li R, Tsaih SW, Shockley K, et al. Structural model analysis of multiple quantitative traits. PLoS Genet. 2006;2:e114.
57. Jones R, Pembrey M, Golding J, Herrick D. The search for genotype/ phenotype associations and the phenome scan. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2005;19:264-275.
58. Moskvina V, Schmidt KM. On multiple-testing correction in genome-wide association studies. Genet Epidemiol. 2008;32:567-573.
59. Lussier YA, Liu Y. Computational approaches to phenotyping: high-throughput phenomics. Proc Am Thorac Soc. 2007;4: 18-25.
60. Allison DB, Thiel B, St Jean P, Elston RC, Infante MC, Schork NJ. Multiple phenotype modeling in gene-mapping studies of quantitative traits: power advantages. Am J Hum Genet. 1998;63:1190-1201.
61. Jung J, Zhong M, Liu L, Fan R. Bivariate combined linkage and association mapping of quantitative trait loci. Genet Epidemiol. 2008;32:396-412.