Computational approaches to phenotyping: High-throughput phenomics

Proceedings of the American Thoracic Society

Volumn 4, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 18-25

  Lussier, Yves A ^a   Liu, Yang ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO   (United States)

Author keywords

Computational genomics; Gene disease associations; Phenomics; Phenotype

Indexed keywords

GENE FUNCTION; GENETIC ANALYSIS; GENETIC DATABASE; GENETIC LINKAGE; GENOTYPE; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; INFORMATION SCIENCE; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; NONHUMAN; PHENOTYPE; PROTEOMICS; REVIEW;

COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; DATABASES, GENETIC; GENOMICS; HUMANS; PHENOTYPE;

EID: 33846080223     PISSN: 15463222     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1513/pats.200607-142JG     Document Type: Review

References (83)

1. Yakushiji A, Tateisi Y, Miyao Y, Tsujii J. Event extraction from biomedical papers using a full parser. Pac Symp Biocomput 2001;6:408-419.
2. Kahraman A, Avramov A, Nashev LG, Popov D, Ternes R, Pohlenz HD, Weiss B. Phenomic DB: a multi-species genotype/phenotype database for comparative phenomics. Bioinformatics 2005;21:418-420.
3. Hamosh A, Scott AF, Amberger J, Valle D, McKusick VA. Online Mendelian Inheritance in Man (OMIM). Hum Mutat 2000;15:57-61.
4. Solberg LC, Valdar W, Gauguier D, Nunez G, Taylor A, Burnett S, Arboledas-Hita C, Hernandez-Pliego P, Davidson S, Burns P, et al. A protocol for high-throughput phenotyping, suitable for quantitative trait analysis in mice. Mamm Genome 2006;17:129-146.
5. McConville P, Moody JB, Moffat BA. High-throughput magnetic resonance imaging in mice for phenotyping and therapeutic evaluation. Curr Opin Chem Biol 2005;9:413-420.
6. Johnson JT, Hansen MS, Wu I, Healy LJ, Johnson CR, Jones GM, Capecchi MR, Keller C. Virtual histology of transgenic mouse embryos for high-throughput phenotyping. PLoS Genet 2006;2:e61.
7. Wheeler DB, Bailey SN, Guertin DA, Carpenter AE, Higgins CO, Sabatini DM. RNAi living-cell microarrays for loss-of-function screens in Drosophila melanogaster cells. Nat Methods 2004;1:127-132.
8. Liu T, Lu J, Wang Y, Campbell WA, Huang L, Zhu J, Xia W, Wong ST. Computerized image analysis for quantitative neuronal phenotyping in zebrafish. J Neurosci Methods 2005;153:190-202.
9. Ashburner M, Ball CA, Blake JA, Botstein D, Butler H, Cherry JM, Davis AP, Dolinski K, Dwight SS, Eppig JT, et al. Gene ontology: tool for the unification of biology. The Gene Ontology Consortium. Nat Genet 2000;25:25-29.
10. Rector AL, Rogers J, Roberts A, Wroe C. Scale and context: issues in ontologies to link health- and bio-informatics. Proc AMIA Symp 2002:642-646.
11. Bard J, Rhee SY, Ashburner M. An ontology for cell types. Genome Biol 2005;6:R21.
12. Blake JA, Eppig JT, Bult CJ, Kadin JA, Richardson JE. The Mouse Genome Database (MGD): updates and enhancements. Nucleic Acids Res 2006;34:D562-D567.
13. de la Cruz N, Bromberg S, Pasko D, Shimoyama M, Twigger S, Chen J, Chen CF, Fan C, Foote C, Gopinath GR, et al. The Rat Genome Database (RGD): developments towards a phenome database. Nucleic Acids Res 2005;33:D485-D491.
14. Spackman KA, Campbell KE, Cote RA. SNOMED RT: a reference terminology for health care. Proc AMIA Annu Fall Symp 1997: 640-644.
15. (PaTO), P.A.O., Open Global Ontologies (OBO). Available from: http://obo.sourceforge.net/. For PaTO, see ftp://ftp.geneontology.org/ pub/go/gobo/phenotype.ontology/phenotype.txt (accessed August, 2003).
16. Gibbs RA, Weinstock GM, Metzker ML, Muzny DM, Sodergren EJ, Scherer S, Scott G, Steffen D, Worley KC, Burch PE, et al. Genome sequence of the Brown Norway rat yields insights into mammalian evolution. Nature 2004;428:493-521.
17. Hafner CD, Baclawski K, Futrelle RP, Fridman N, Sampath S. Creating a knowledge base of biological research papers. Proc Int Conf Intell Syst Mol Biol 1994;2:147-155.
18. Bajdik CD, Kuo B, Rusaw S, Jones S, Brooks-Wilson A. CGMIM: automated text-mining of Online Mendelian Inheritance in Man (OMIM) to identify genetically-associated cancers and candidate genes. BMC Bioinformatics 2005;6:78.
19. Perez-Iratxeta C, Bork P, Andrade MA. Association of genes to genetically inherited diseases using data mining. Nat Genet 2002;31:316-319.
20. Raychaudhuri S, Altman RB. A literature-based method for assessing the functional coherence of a gene group. Bioinformatics 2003;19:396-401.
21. Raychaudhuri S, Chang JT, Sutphin PD, Altman RB. Associating genes with gene ontology codes using a maximum entropy analysis of biomedical literature. Genome Res 2002;12:203-214.
22. Friedman C, Hripcsak G, Shagina L, Liu HF. Representing information in patient reports using natural language processing and the extensible markup language. J Am Med Inform Assoc 1999;6:76-87.
23. Friedman C, Knirsch C, Shagina L, Hripcsak G. Automating a severity score guideline for community-acquired pneumonia employing medical language processing of discharge summaries. Proc AMIA Symp 1999:256-260.
24. Hripcsak G, Friedman C, Alderson PO, DuMouchel W, Johnson SB, Clayton PD. Unlocking clinical data from narrative reports: a study of natural language processing. Ann Intern Med 1995;122:681-688.
25. Hripcsak G, Kuperman GJ, Friedman C. Extracting findings from narrative reports: software transferability and sources of physician disagreement. Methods Inf Med 1998;37:1-7.
26. Jain NL, Friedman C. Identification of findings suspicious for breast cancer based on natural language processing of mammogram reports. Proc AMIA Annu Fall Symp 1997:829-833.
27. Knirsch CA, Jain NL, Pablos-Mendez A, Friedman C, Hripcsak G. Respiratory isolation of tuberculosis patients using clinical guidelines and an automated clinical decision support system. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 1998;19:94-100.
28. Friedman C, Kra P, Yu H, Krauthammer M, Rzhetsky A. GENIES: a natural-language processing system for the extraction of molecular pathways from journal articles. Bioinformatics 2001;17:S74-S82.
29. Friedman C, Shagina L, Lussier Y, Hripcsak G. Automated encoding of clinical documents based on natural language processing. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2004;11:392-402.
30. Tulipano PK, Tao Y, Zanzonico P, Kolbert K, Lussier Y, Friedman C. Natural language processing in the molecular imaging domain. AMIA Annu Symp Proc 2005:1143.
31. Zweigenbaum P, Bachimont B, Bouaud J, Charlet J, Boisvieux JF. Issues in the structuring and acquisition of an ontology for medical language understanding. Methods Inf Med 1995;34:15-24.
32. Masseroli M, Kilicoglu H, Lang FM, Rindflesch TC. Argument-predicate distance as a filter for enhancing precision in extracting predications on the genetic etiology of disease. BMC Bioinformatics 2006;7:291.
33. Mamlin BW, Heinze DT, McDonald CJ. Automated extraction and normalization of findings from cancer-related free-text radiology reports. AMIA Annu Symp Proc 2003:420-424.
34. Jensen LJ, Saric J, Bork P. Literature mining for the biologist: from information retrieval to biological discovery. Nat Rev Genet 2006;7:119-129.
35. Lussier YA, Borlawsky T, Rappaport D, Friedman C. PhenoGO: a multi-strategy language processing system assigning phenotypic context to gene ontology annotations. Pac Symp Biocomput 2006: 64-75.
36. Friedman C, Borlawsky T, Shagina L, Xing H, Lussier Y. Bio-ontology and text: bridging the modeling gap. Bioinformatics 2006;22:2421-2429.
37. Cimino JJ, Barnett GO. Automated translation between medical terminologies using semantic definitions. MD Comput 1990;7:104-109.
38. Aronson AR. Effective mapping of biomedical text to the UMLS Metathesaurus: the MetaMap program. Proc AMIA Symp 2001:17-21.
39. Hill DP, Blake JA, Richardson JE, Ringwald M. Extension and integration of the gene ontology (GO): combining GO vocabularies with external vocabularies. Genome Res 2002;12:1982-1991.
40. Bodenreider O, Mitchell JA, McCray AT. Evaluation of the UMLS as a terminology and knowledge resource for biomedical informatics. Proc AMIA Symp 2002:61-65.
41. Cimino JJ, Johnson SB, Peng P, Aguirre A. From ICD9-CM to MeSH using the UMLS: a how-to guide. Proc Annu Symp Comput Appl Med Care 1993:730-734.
42. Zeng Q, Cimino JJ. Mapping medical vocabularies to the Unified Medical Language System. Proc AMIA Annu Fall Symp 1996:105-109.
43. Tuttle MS, Suarez-Munist ON, Olson NE, Sherertz DD, Sperzel WD, Erlbaum MS, Fuller LF, Hole WT, Nelson SJ, Cole WG, et al. Merging terminologies. Medinfo 1995;8:162-166.
44. Tuttle MS, Cole WG, Sheretz DD, Nelson SJ. Navigating to knowledge. Methods Inf Med 1995;34:214-231.
45. Tuttle MS, Sherertz DD, Erlbaum MS, Sperzel WD, Fuller LF, Olson NE, Nelson SJ, Cimino JJ, Chute CG. Adding your terms and relationships to the UMLS Metathesaurus. Proc Annu Symp Comput Appl Med Care 1991:219-223.
46. Masarie FE Jr, Miller RA, Bouhaddou O, Giuse NB, Warner HR. An interlingua for electronic interchange of medical information: using frames to map between clinical vocabularies. Comput Biomed Res 1991;24:379-400.
47. Lussier YA, Shagina L, Friedman C. Automating SNOMED coding using medical language understanding: a feasibility study. Proc AMIA Symp 2001:418-422.
48. McCray AT, Srinivasan S, Browne AC. Lexical methods for managing variation in biomedical terminologies. Proc Annu Symp Comput Appl Med Care 1994:235-239.
49. Rocha RA, Rocha BH, Huff SM. Automated translation between medical vocabularies using a frame-based interlingua. Proc Annu Symp Comput Appl Med Care 1993:690-694.
50. Lussier YA, Li J. Terminological mapping for high throughput comparative biology of phenotypes. Pac Symp Biocomput 2004:202-213.
51. Sarkar IN, Cantor MN, Gelman R, Hartel F, Lussier YA. Linking biomedical language information and knowledge resources: GO and UMLS. Pac Symp Biocomput 2003:439-450.
52. Lindberg DA, Humphreys BL, McCray AT. The Unified Medical Language System. Methods Inf Med 1993;32:281-291.
53. Covitz PA, Hartel F, Schaefer C, De Coronado S, Fragoso G, Sahni H, Gustafson S, Buetow KH. caCORE: a common infrastructure for cancer informatics. Bioinformatics 2003;19:2404-2412.
54. Soldatova LN, King RD. Are the current ontologies in biology good ontologies? Nat Biotechnol 2005;23:1095-1098.
55. Lenffer J, Nicholas FW, Castle K, Rao A, Gregory S, Poidinger M, Mailman MD, Ranganathan S. OMIA (Online Mendelian Inheritance in Animals): an enhanced platform and integration into the Entrez search interface at NCBI. Nucleic Acids Res 2006;34:D599-D601.
56. Biesecker LG. Mapping phenotypes to language: a proposal to organize and standardize the clinical descriptions of malformations. Clin Genet 2005;68:320-326.
57. Korbel JO, Doerks T, Jensen LJ, Perez-Iratxeta C, Kaczanowski S, Hooper SD, Andrade MA, Bork P. Systematic association of genes to phenotypes by genome and literature mining. PLoS Biol 2005;3:e134.
58. Haft DH, Selengut JD, Brinkac LM, Zafar N, White O. Genome Properties: a system for the investigation of prokaryotic genetic content for microbiology, genome annotation and comparative genomics. Bioinformatics 2005;21:293-306.
59. Safran M, Solomon I, Shmueli O, Lapidot M, Shen-Orr S, Adato A, Ben-Dor U, Esterman N, Rosen N, Peter I, et al. GeneCards 2002: towards a complete, object-oriented, human gene compendium. Bioinformatics 2002;18:1542-1543.
60. Rebhan M, Chalifa-Caspi V, Prilusky J, Lancet D. GeneCards: a novel functional genomics compendium with automated data mining and query reformulation support. Bioinformatics 1998;14:656-664.
61. Rebhan M, Chalifa-Caspi V, Prilusky J, Lancet D. GeneCards: integrating information about genes, proteins and diseases. Trends Genet 1997;13:163.
62. Perez-Iratxeta C, Wjst M, Bork P, Andrade MA. G2D: a tool for mining genes associated with disease. BMC Genet 2005;6:45.
63. Lussier YA, Sarkar IN, Cantor M. An integrative model for in-silico clinical-genomics discovery science. Proc AMIA Symp 2002:469-473.
64. Cantor MN, Sarkar IN, Bodenreider O, Lussier YA. GenesTrace: phenomic knowledge discovery via structured terminology. Pac Symp Biocomput 2005:103-114.
65. Butte AJ, Kohane IS. Creation and implications of a phenome-genome network. Nat Biotechnol 2006;24:55-62.
66. National Library of Medicine. Unified Medical Language System® fact sheet. Available from: http://www.nlm.nih.gov/pubs/factsheets/umls. html (accessed March 23, 2006).
67. Wheeler DL, Church DM, Edgar R, Federhen S, Helmberg W, Madden TL, Pontius JU, Schuler GD, Schriml LM, Sequeira E, et al. Database resources of the National Center for Biotechnology Information: update. Nucleic Acids Res 2004;32:D35-D40.
68. Jimenez-Sanchez G, Childs B, Valle D. Human disease genes. Nature 2001;409:853-855.
69. Hamosh A, Scott AF, Amberger JS, Bocchini CA, McKusick VA. Online Mendelian Inheritance in Man (OMIM): a knowledgebase of human genes and genetic disorders. Nucleic Acids Res 2005;33:D514-D517.
70. Aerts S, Lambrechts D, Maity S, Van Loo P, Coessens B, De Smet F, Tranchevent LC, De Moor B, Marynen P, Hassan B, et al. Gene prioritization through genomic data fusion. Nat Biotechnol 2006;24: 537-544.
71. Nicholas FW. Online Mendelian Inheritance in Animals (OMIA): a comparative knowledgebase of genetic disorders and other familial traits in non-laboratory animals. Nucleic Acids Res 2003;31:275-277.
72. Bogue M. Mouse Phenome Project: understanding human biology through mouse genetics and genomics. J Appl Physiol 2003;95:1335-1337.
73. Bogue MA, Grubb SC. The Mouse Phenome Project. Genetica 2004;122: 71-74.
74. Bono H, Kasukawa T, Furuno M, Hayashizaki Y, Okazaki Y. FANTOM DB: database of Functional Annotation of RIKEN Mouse cDNA Clones. Nucleic Acids Res 2002;30:116-118.
75. Dwight SS, Harris MA, Dolinski K, Ball CA, Binkley G, Christie KR, Fisk DG, Issel-Tarver L, Schroeder M, Sherlock G, et al. Saccharomyces Genome Database (SGD) provides secondary gene annotation using the Gene Ontology (GO). Nucleic Acids Res 2002;30:69-72.
76. Mashimo T, Voigt B, Kuramoto T, Serikawa T. Rat Phenome Project: the untapped potential of existing rat strains. J Appl Physiol 2005;98: 371-379.
77. Becker KG, Barnes KC, Bright TJ, Wang SA. The genetic association database. Nat Genet 2004;36:431-432.
78. Cantor MN, Lussier YA. Mining OMIM for insight into complex diseases. Medinfo 2004;11:753-757.
79. Krauthammer M, Kaufmann CA, Gilliam TC, Rzhetsky A. Molecular triangulation: bridging linkage and molecular-network information for identifying candidate genes in Alzheimer's disease. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2004;101:15148-15153.
80. Jenssen TK, Laegreid A, Komorowski J, Hovig E. A literature network of human genes for high-throughput analysis of gene expression. Nat Genet 2001;28:21-28.
81. Tiffin N, Kelso JF, Powell AR, Pan H, Bajic VB, Hide WA. Integration of text- and data-mining using ontologies successfully selects disease gene candidates. Nucleic Acids Res 2005;33:1544-1552.
82. Karkkainen MJ, Haiko P, Sainio K, Partanen J, Taipale J, Petrova TV, Jeltsch M, Jackson DG, Talikka M, Rauvala H, et al. Vascular endothelial growth factor C is required for sprouting of the first lymphatic vessels from embryonic veins. Nat Immunol 2004;5:74-80.
83. Lee V, Camon E, Dimmer E, Barrell D, Apweiler R. Who tangos with GOA?-Use of Gene Ontology Annotation (GOA) for biological interpretation of '-omics' data and for validation of automatic annotation tools. In Silico Biol. 2005;5:5-8.