Anonymous peer assessment of medication management reviews

American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education

Volumn 74, Issue 5, 2010, Pages 1-8

  Basheti, Iman A ^a,b   Ryan, Greg ^b   Woulfe, Jim ^b   Bartimote Aufflick, Kathryn ^b  

^a APPLIED SCIENCE PRIVATE UNIVERSITY   (Jordan)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SYDNEY   (Australia)

Author keywords

Assessment; Medication therapy management; Peer assessment

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; EDUCATION; EVALUATION; HUMAN; MEDICATION THERAPY MANAGEMENT; METHODOLOGY; PEER GROUP;

EDUCATION, PHARMACY; EDUCATIONAL MEASUREMENT; HUMANS; MEDICATION THERAPY MANAGEMENT; PEER GROUP;

EID: 77954670358     PISSN: 00029459     EISSN: 15536467     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5688/aj740577     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Boud D. Enhancing learning through self assessment. London: Kogan Page; 1995.
2. Fry H, Ketteridge S, Marshall S. A handbook for teaching and learning in higher education: enhancing academic practice. London: Kogan Page; 1999.
3. James R, McInnis C, Devlin M, University of Melbourne. Australian Universities Teaching Committee. Assessing learning in Australian universities: ideas, strategies and resources for quality in student assessment. Melbourne, Canberra: Centre for the Study of Higher Education; 2002. http://www.cshe.unimelb.edu.au/assessinglearning/docs/AssessingLearning.pdf. AccessedMay 24, 2010.
4. Boud D, Cohen R, Sampson J. Peer learning and assessment. Asses Eval Higher Educ. 1999;24(4):413-426.
5. Falchikov N. Peer feedback marking: developing peer assessment. Innovat Educ Teach Int. 1995;32(2):175-187.
6. Dochy F, Segers M, Sluijsmans D. The use of self-, peer and coassessment in higher education: a review. Stud Higher Educ. 1999;24(3):331-350.
7. Topping KJ, Smith EF, Swanson I, Elliot A. Formative peer assessment of academic writing between postgraduate students. Asses Eval Higher Educ. 2000;25(2):149-166.
8. Brown S, Dove P. Self and peer assessment. Standing Conference on Educational Development, Birmingham, UK; 1991.
9. Zlatic TD. Abilities-based assessment within pharmacy education: preparing students for practice of pharmaceutical care. J Pharm Teach. 2000;7(3):5-27.
10. Topping K. Peer assessment between students in colleges and universities. Rev Educ Res. 1998;68(3):249-276.
11. Fry H, Ketteridge S, Marshall S, eds. A Handbook for Teaching and Learning in Higher Education: Enhancing Academic Practice. 2nd ed. London; Sterling, VA: Kogan Page; 2003.
12. van den Berg I, Admiraal W, Pilot A. Peer assessment in university teaching: evaluating seven course designs. Asses Eval Higher Educ. 2006;31(1):19-36.
13. Van Lehn KA, Chi MTH, Baggett W, Murray RC. Progress report: towards a theory of learning during tutoring. Pittsburgh, PA: Learning Research and Development Center, University of Pittsburgh; 1995.
14. Sluijsmans D, Dochy F, Moerkerke G. Creating a learning environment by using self-, peer- and co-assessment. Learning Environments Res. 1998;1(3):293-319.
15. Cho K, Schunn CD, Wilson RW. Validity and reliability of scaffolded peer assessment of writing from instructor and student perspectives. J Educ Psychol. 2006;98(4):891-901.
16. Medication Management Reviews. Australian Government. Department of Health and Aging; 2008. http://www.quitnow.info.au/internet/main/publishing.nsf/Content/medication_management_reviews.htm Accessed May 24, 2010.
17. Malcolmson C, Shaw J. The use of self- and peer-contribution assessments within a final year pharmaceutics assignment. Pharm Educ. 2005;5(3):169-174.
18. Austin Z, Gregory PAM. Evaluating the accuracy of pharmacy students' self-assessment skills. Am J Pharm Educ. 2007;71(5):Article 89.
19. Banga AK. Assessment of group projects beyond cooperative group effort. J Pharm Teach. 2005;11(2):115-123.
20. Steensels C, Leemans L, Buelens H, Laga E, Lecoutere A, Laekeman G, et al. Peer assessment: a valuable tool to differentiate between student contributions to group work? Pharm Educ. 2006;6(2):111-118.
21. Marriott JL. Use and evaluation of "virtual" patients for assessment of clinical pharmacy undergraduates. Pharm Educ. 2007;7(4):341-349.
22. Shah R. Improving undergraduate communication and clinical skills: personal reflections of a real world experience. Pharm Educ. 2004;4(1):1-6.
23. Falchikov N, Goldfinch J. Student peer assessment in higher education: a meta-analysis comparing peer and teacher marks. Rev Educ Res. 2000;70(3):287-322.
24. Miller PJ. The effect of scoring criteria specificity on peer and self-assessment. Asses Eval Higher Educ. 2003;28(4):383-394.
25. Davies P. Peer assessment: judging the quality of students' work by comments rather than marks. Innovat Educ Teach Int. 2006;43(1):69-82.
26. About the Unit of Study Evaluation System. Institute for Teaching and Learning, The University of Sydney. Available from: http://www.itl.usyd.edu.au/use/ Accessed May 24, 2010.
27. Orsmond P, Merry S, Reiling K. The importance of marking criteria in the use of peer assessment. Asses Eval Higher Educ. 1996;21(3):239-250.
28. Cheng W, Warren M. Having second thoughts: student perceptions before and after a peer assessment exercise. Stud Higher Educ. 1997;22(2):233-240.
29. Hanrahan SJ, Isaacs G. Assessing self- and peer-assessment: the students' views. Higher Educ Res Dev. 2001;20(1):53-70.