Perceptual or motor learning in SRT tasks with complex sequence structures

Psychological Research

Volumn 70, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 88-102

  Deroost, Natacha ^a   Soetens, Eric ^a  

^a VRIJE UNIVERSITEIT BRUSSEL   (Belgium)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; FEMALE; HUMAN; LEARNING; MALE; MOTOR PERFORMANCE; PERCEPTION; REACTION TIME;

ADULT; FEMALE; HUMANS; LEARNING; MALE; MOTOR SKILLS; PERCEPTION; REACTION TIME;

EID: 33646725520     PISSN: 03400727     EISSN: 14302772     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00426-004-0196-3     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Bischoff-Grethe, A., Goedert, K. M., Willingham, D. B., & Grafton, S. T. (2004). Neural substrates of response-based sequence learning using fMRI. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 16, 127-138.
2. Cleeremans, A., & McClelland, J. L. (1991). Learning the structure of event sequences. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 120, 235-253.
3. Cock, J. J., Berry, D. C., & Buchner, A. (2002). Negative priming and sequence learning. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 14, 24-48.
4. Cohen, A., Ivry, R. I., & Keele, S. W. (1990). Attention and structure in sequence learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 16, 17-30.
5. Frensch, P. A., & Miner, C. (1994). Effects of presentation rate and individual differences in short-term memory capacity on an indirect measure of serial learning. Memory & Cognition, 22, 95-110.
6. Frensch, P. A., Buchner, A., & Lin, J. (1994). Implicit learning of unique and ambiguous serial transitions in the presence and absence of a distractor task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 20, 567-584.
7. Frensch, P. A., Lin, J., & Buchner, A. (1998). Learning versus behavioral expression of the learned: The effects of a secondary tone-counting task on implicit learning in the serial reaction time task. Psychological Research, 61, 83-98.
8. Goschke, T. (1998). Implicit learning of perceptual and motor sequences: Evidence for independent learning systems. In M. A. Stadler & P. A. Frensch (Eds.). Handbook of implicit learning (pp. 401-444). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
9. Grafton, S. T., Hazeltine, E., & Ivry, R. (1995). Functional anatomy of sequence learning in normal humans. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 7, 497-510.
10. Heuer, H., Schmidtke, V., & Kleinsorge, T. (2001). Implicit learning of sequences of tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 27, 967-983.
11. Hommel, B. (1998). Event files: Evidence for automatic integration of stimulus-response episodes. Visual Cognition, 5, 183-216.
12. Howard, J. H., Mutter, S. A., & Howard D. V. (1992). Serial pattern learning by event observation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 18, 1029-1039.
13. Keele, S. W., Jennings, P., Jones, S., Caulton, D., & Cohen, A. (1995). On the modularity of sequence representation. Journal of Motor Behavior, 27, 17-30.
14. Kelly, S. W., & Burton, M. A. (2001). Learning complex sequences: No role for observation? Psychological Research, 65, 15-23.
15. Koch, I. (2001). Automatic and intentional activation of task sets. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 27, 1474-1486.
16. Koch, I., & Hoffmann, J. (2000). The role of stimulus-based and response-based spatial information in sequence learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory & Cognition, 26, 863-882.
17. Mayr, U. (1996). Spatial attention and implicit sequence learning: Evidence for independent learning of spatial and nonspatial sequences. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 22, 350-364.
18. Nattkemper, D. & Prinz, W. (1997). Stimulus and response anticipation in a serial reaction task. Psychological Research, 60, 98-112.
19. Nissen, M. J., & Bullemer, P. (1987). Attentional requirements of learning: evidence from performance measures. Cognitive Psychology, 19, 1-32.
20. Notebaert, W., & Soetens, E. (2003). The influence of irrelevant stimulus changes on stimulus and response repetition effects. Acta Psychologica, 112, 143-156.
21. Reed, J., & Johnson, P. (1994). Assessing implicit learning with indirect tests: Determining what is learned about sequence structure. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 20, 585-594.
22. Remillard, G. (2003). Pure perceptual-based sequence learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 29, 518-597.
23. Rüsseler, J., & Rösler, F. (2000). Implicit and explicit learning of event sequences: evidence for distinct coding of perceptual and motor responses. Acta Psychologica, 104, 45-67.
24. Rüsseler, J., Münte, T. F., & Rösler, F. (2002). Influence of stimulus distance in implicit learning of spatial and nonspatial event sequences. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 95, 973-987.
25. Schmidtke, V., & Heuer, H. (1997). Task integration as factor in secondary-task effects on sequence learning. Psychological Research, 60, 53-71.
26. Schneider, W. (1996). MEL Professional. Pittsburgh, PA: Psychology Software Tools.
27. Schneider, W., Eschman, A., & Zuccolotto, A. (2002). E-prime, Version 1.1. Pittsburgh, PA: Psychology Software Tools.
28. Shanks, D. R., & St. John, M. F. (1994). Characteristics of dissociable human learning systems. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 17, 367-447.
29. Shin, J. C., & Ivry, R. B. (2002). Concurrent learning of temporal and spatial sequences. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory & Cognition, 28, 445-457.
30. Soetens, E., Melis, A., & Notebaert, W. (2004). Sequential effects and sequence learning. Psychological Research, 10.1007/s00426-003-0163-4.
31. Stadler, M. A., & Frensch, P. A. (1998). Handbook of implicit learning. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
32. Stadler, M. A., & Neely, C. B. (1997). Effects of sequence length and structure on implicit serial learning. Psychological Research, 60, 14-23.
33. Willingham, D. B. (1999). Implicit motor sequence learning is not purely perceptual. Memory and Cognition, 27, 561-572.
34. Willingham, D. B., Nissen, M., & Bullemer, P. (1989). On the development of procedural knowledge. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 15, 1047-1060.
35. Willingham, D. B., Wells, L. A., Farrell, J. M., & Stemwedel, M. E. (2000). Implicit motor sequence learning is represented in response locations. Memory and Cognition, 28, 366-375.
36. Ziessler, M. (1994). The impact of motor responses on serial pattern learning. Psychological Research, 57, 30-41.
37. Ziessler, M. (1998). Response-effect learning as a major component of implicit serial learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 24, 962-978.
38. Ziessler, M., & Nattkemper, P. (2001). Learning of event sequences is based on response-effect learning: Further evidence from a serial reaction time task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 27, 595-613.