The use of control groups in artificial grammar learning

Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A: Human Experimental Psychology

Volumn 56 A, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 97-115

  Reber, Rolf ^b   Perruchet, Pierre ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DE BOURGOGNE   (France)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BERN   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CONTROL GROUP; FRANCE; HUMAN; LANGUAGE; LEARNING; PHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; STATISTICS; STUDENT; TEACHING;

ADULT; CONTROL GROUPS; FRANCE; HUMANS; LANGUAGE; LEARNING; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; STUDENTS; TEACHING;

EID: 0038472311     PISSN: 02724987     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/02724980244000297     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Altmann, G.T.M., Dienes, Z., & Goode, A. (1995). On the modality independence of implicitly learned grammatical knowledge. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21, 899-912.
2. Anastasopoulou, T., & Harvey, N. (1999). Assessing sequential knowledge through performance measures: The influence of short-term sequential effects. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 52A, 423-448.
3. Cohen, J., & Cohen, P. (1983). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
4. Dienes, Z., & Altmann, G.T.M. (1997). Transfer of implicit knowledge across domains: How implicit and how abstract? In D.C. Berry (Ed.), How implicit is implicit learning? Debates in psychology (pp. 107-123). New York: Oxford University Press.
5. Dienes, Z., Altmann, G.T.M., Kwan, L., & Goode, A. (1995). Unconscious knowledge of artificial grammars is applied strategically. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21, 1322-1338.
6. Dulany, D.E., Carlson, R.A., & Dewey, G.I. (1984). A case of syntactical learning and judgement: How conscious and how abstract? Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 113, 541-555.
7. Gujarati, D.N. (1995). Basic econometrics (3rd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
8. Johnstone, T., & Shanks, D.R. (1999). Two mechanisms in implicit artificial grammar learning? Comment on Meulemans and Van der Linden (1997). Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 25, 524-531.
9. Meulemans, T., & Van der Linden, M. (1997). Chunk strength and artificial grammar learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 23, 1007-1028.
10. Perruchet, P., & Pacteau, C. (1990). Synthetic grammar learning: Implicit rule abstraction or explicit fragmentary knowledge? Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 119, 264-275.
11. Reber, A.S. (1967). Implicit learning of artificial grammars. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 6, 855-863.
12. Reber, A.S. (1993). Implicit learning and tacit knowledge: An essay on the cognitive unconscious. New York: Oxford University Press.
13. Redington, M., & Chater, N. (1996). Transfer in artificial grammar learning: A reevaluation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 125, 123-138.
14. Rescorla, R.A. (1967). Pavlovian conditioning and its proper control procedures. Psychological Review, 74, 71-80.
15. Schwarz, N. (1994). Judgement in a social context: Biases, shortcomings, and the logic of conversation. In M. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (Vol. 26, pp. 123-162). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
16. Shanks, D.R., Johnstone, T., & Staggs, L. (1997). Abstraction processes in artificial grammar learning. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 50A, 216-252.
17. Wechsler, D. (1981). Manual for the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale (Rev. ed.). San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation.
18. Whittlesea, B.W.A., & Wright, R.L. (1997). Implicit (and explicit) learning: Acting adaptively without knowing the consequences. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 23, 181-200.