Effects of divided attention and speeded responding on implicit and explicit retrieval of artificial grammar knowledge

Memory and Cognition

Volumn 31, Issue 5, 2003, Pages 703-714

  Helman, Shaun ^a   Berry, Dianne C ^b  

^a CARDIFF METROPOLITAN UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF READING   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ATTENTION; CONTROLLED STUDY; EXPERIMENTAL MODEL; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; INFORMATION PROCESSING; INFORMATION RETRIEVAL; LEARNING; LITERATURE; MALE; NERVE CELL NETWORK; NORMAL HUMAN; TASK PERFORMANCE; WORD RECOGNITION; WORKING MEMORY;

EID: 0042662630     PISSN: 0090502X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/BF03196109     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. BADDELEY, A., LEWIS, V., ELDRIDGE, M., & THOMSON, N. (1984). Attention and retrieval from long term memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 113, 518-540.
2. BERRY, D. C., BANBURY, S., & HENRY, L. (1997). Transfer across form and modality in implicit and explicit memory. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 50A, 1-24.
3. BORNSTEIN, R. F. (1989). Exposure and affect: Overview and metaanalysis of research, 1968-1987. Psychological Bulletin, 106, 265-289.
4. BORNSTEIN, R. F., & D'AGOSTINO, P. R. (1992). Stimulus recognition and the mere exposure effect. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 63, 545-552.
5. BUTLER, L. T., & BERRY, D. C. (2001). Implicit memory: Intention and awareness revisited. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 5, 192-197.
6. CLEEREMANS, A., DESTREBECQZ, A., & BOYER, M. (1998). Implicit learning: News from the front. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 2, 406-416.
7. CRAIK, F. I. M., GOVONI, R., NAVEH-BENJAMIN, M., & ANDERSON, N. D. (1996). The effects of divided attention on encoding and retrieval processes in human memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 125, 159-180.
8. DIENES, Z., & ALTMANN, G. T. M. (1997). Transfer of implicit knowledge across domains: How implicit and how abstract? In D. C. Berry (Ed.), How implicit is implicit learning? (pp. 107-123). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
9. DIENES, Z., ALTMANN, G. T. M., KWAN, L., & GOODE, A. (1995). Unconscious knowledge of artificial grammars is applied strategically. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 21, 1322-1338.
10. DIENES, Z., & BERRY, D. [C.] (1997). Implicit learning: Below the subjective threshold. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 4, 3-23.
11. DIENES, Z., BROADBENT, D. E., & BERRY, D. C. (1991). Implicit and explicit knowledge bases in artificial grammar learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 17, 875-887.
12. DULANY, D. E., CARLSON, R. A., & DEWEY, G. I. (1984). A case of syntactical learning and judgement: How conscious and how abstract? Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 113, 541-551.
13. GOMEZ, R. L., GERKEN, L., & SCHVANEVELDT, R. W. (2000). The basis of transfer in artificial grammar learning. Memory & Cognition, 28, 253-263.
14. GORDON, P. C., & HOLYOAK, K. J. (1983). Implicit learning and the generalization of the mere exposure effect. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 45, 492-500.
15. GRAF, P., & SCHACTER, D. L. (1985). Implicit and explicit memory for new associations in normal and amnesic subjects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 11, 501-518.
16. HELMAN, S. (2000). The knowledge and processing underlying the structural mere exposure effect. Unpublished PhD thesis, University of Reading.
17. HIGHAM, P. A., VOKEY, J. R., & PRITCHARD, J. L. (2000). Beyond dissociation logic: Evidence for controlled and automatic influences in artificial grammar learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 129, 457-470.
18. JACOBY, L. L. (1991). A process dissociation framework: Separating automatic from intentional uses of memory. Journal of Memory & Language, 30, 513-541.
19. JACOBY, L. L., & DALLAS, M. (1981). On the relationship between autobiographical memory and perceptual learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 110, 306-340.
20. JACOBY, L. L., WOLOSHYN, V., & KELLEY, C. (1989). Becoming famous without being recognized: Unconscious influences of memory produced by dividing attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 118, 115-125.
21. KINDER, A., & ASSMANN, A. (2000). Learning artificial grammars: No evidence for the acquisition of rules. Memory & Cognition, 28, 1321-1332.
22. KUNST-WILSON, W. R., & ZAJONC, R. B. (1980). Affective discrimination of stimuli that cannot be recognized. Science, 207(1), 557-558.
23. MANZA, L., & BORNSTEIN, R. F. (1995). Affective discrimination and the implicit learning process. Consciousness & Cognition, 4, 399-409.
24. MANZA, L., HALLMAN, C., McCoy, A., SHUMWAY, E., RUCZHAK, M., LAEPPLE, K., & DANGLER, R. (1999, April). Structural mere exposure: The influence of instructional set and stimulus complexity on implicit learning. Paper presented at the Meeting of the Eastern Psychological Association, Providence, RI.
25. MANZA, L., ZIZAK, D., & REBER, A. S. (1998). Artificial grammar learning and the mere exposure effect. In M. A. Stadler & P. A. Frensch (Eds.), Handbook of implicit learning (pp. 201-222). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
26. MATHEWS, R. C., BUSS, R. R., STANLEY, W. B., BLANCHARD-FIELDS, F., CHO, J. R., & DRUHAN, B. (1989). The role of implicit and explicit processes in learning from examples: A synergistic effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 15, 1083-1100.
27. MERIKLE, P. M., & REINGOLD, E. M. (1991). Comparing direct (explicit) and indirect (implicit) measures to study unconscious memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 17, 224-233.
28. MEULEMANS, T., & VAN DER LINDEN, M. (1997). Associative chunk strength in artificial grammar learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 23, 1007-1028.
29. MULLIGAN, N. W. (1997). Attention and implicit memory tests: The effects of varying attentional load on conceptual priming. Memory & Cognition, 25, 11-17.
30. NAVEH-BENJAMIN, M., CRAIK, F. I. M., GAVRILESCU, D., & ANDERSON, N. D. (2000). Asymmetry between encoding and retrieval processes: Evidence from divided attention and a calibration analysis. Memory & Cognition, 28, 965-976.
31. NEWELL, B. R., & BRIGHT, J. E. H. (2001). The relationship between the structural mere exposure effect and the implicit learning process. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 54A, 1087-1104.
32. PARKIN, A. J., & RUSSO, R. (1990). Implicit and explicit memory and the automatic/effortful distinction. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 2, 71-80.
33. PERRUCHET, P., & PACTEAU, C. (1990). Synthetic grammar learning: Implicit rule abstraction or explicit fragmentary knowledge. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 119, 264-275.
34. POTHOS, E. M., & BAILEY, T. M. (2000). The role of similarity in artificial grammar learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 26, 847-862.
35. REBER, A. S. (1967). Implicit learning of artificial grammars. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 6, 855-863.
36. REBER, A. S., ALLEN, R., & REGAN, S. (1985). Syntactical learning and judgement, still unconscious and still abstract: Comment on Dulany, Carlson and Dewey. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 114, 17-24.
37. REINGOLD, E. M., & TOTH, J. P. (1996). Process dissociations versus task dissociations: A controversy in progress. In G. Underwood (Ed.), Implicit cognition (pp. 159-202). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
38. ROEDIGER, H. L., III, & McDERMOTT, K. B. (1993). Implicit memory in normal human subjects. In F. Boller & J. Grafman (Eds.), Handbook of neuropsychology (Vol. 8, pp. 63-130). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
39. SCHACTER, D. L., BOWERS, J., & BOOKER, J. (1989). Intention, awareness and implicit memory: The retrieval intentionality criterion. In S. Lewandowsky, J. C. Dunn, & K. Kirsner (Eds.), Implicit memory: Theoretical issues (pp. 47-65). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
40. SHANKS, D. R., & ST. JOHN, M. F. (1994). Characteristics of dissociable human learning systems. Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 17, 367-447.
41. TOWSE, J. N., & NEIL, D. (1998). Analyzing human random generation behavior: A review of methods used and a computer program for describing performance. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 30, 583-591.
42. TURNER, C. W., & FISCHLER, I. S. (1993). Speeded tests of implicit knowledge. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 19, 1165-1177.
43. WHITTLESEA, B. W. A., & PRICE, J. R. (2001). Implicit/explicit memory versus analytic/nonanalytic processing: Rethinking the mere exposure effect. Memory & Cognition, 29, 234-246.
44. WHITTLESEA, B. W. A., & WRIGHT, R. L. (1997). Implicit (and explicit) learning: Acting adaptively without knowing the consequences. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 23, 181-200.
45. ZAJONC, R. B. (1968). Attitudinal effects of mere exposure. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 9(2, Pt. 2), 1-27.