Computational studies of interactions between endocrine disrupting chemicals and androgen receptor of different vertebrate species

Chemosphere

Volumn 80, Issue 5, 2010, Pages 535-541

  Wu, Bing ^a   Ford, Timothy ^b   Gu, Ji Dong ^c   Zhang, Xu Xiang ^a   Li, Ai Min ^a   Cheng, Shu Pei ^a  

^a NANJING UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NEW ENGLAND   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF HONG KONG   (Hong Kong)

Author keywords

Androgen receptor; Endocrine disrupting chemicals; Homology modeling; Molecular docking

Indexed keywords

BINDING ENERGY; CHEMICALS; CLUSTER ANALYSIS; FISH; HYDROGEN BONDS; LIGANDS; MOLECULAR MODELING;

ANDROGEN RECEPTORS; BUTYL BENZYL PHTHALATE; COMPUTATIONAL STUDIES; ENDOCRINE DISRUPTING CHEMICALS; HOMOLOGY MODELING; LIGAND BINDING DOMAIN; MOLECULAR DOCKING; PHYLOGENETIC ANALYSIS;

ENDOCRINE DISRUPTERS;

1,1 DICHLORO 2,2 BIS(4 CHLOROPHENYL)ETHYLENE; 2,2',4,4',5,5' HEXABROMODIPHENYL ETHER; 4,4' ISOPROPYLIDENEDIPHENOL; ANDROGEN RECEPTOR; DIPHENYL ETHER DERIVATIVE; LINURON; NONYLPHENOL; PHTHALIC ACID BENZYL BUTYL ESTER; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ANDROGEN; CLUSTER ANALYSIS; ENDOCRINE DISRUPTOR; HOMOLOGY; HORMONE; LIGAND; PHYLOGENETICS; TROPHIC LEVEL; VERTEBRATE;

AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; AMPHIBIA; ARTICLE; BINDING AFFINITY; BIRD; CHEMICAL INTERACTION; CLUSTER ANALYSIS; COMPUTER MODEL; COMPUTER PREDICTION; CONTROLLED STUDY; ENDOCRINE DISEASE; FISH; LIGAND BINDING; MATHEMATICAL COMPUTING; MOLECULAR DOCKING; PHYLOGENY; RECEPTOR BINDING; SEQUENCE HOMOLOGY; SPECIES DIFFERENCE;

AMPHIBIA; AVES; CHONDRICHTHYES; OSTEICHTHYES; RUMEX; VERTEBRATA;

EID: 77953812306     PISSN: 00456535     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2010.04.043     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Bohl C.E., Wu Z.R., Miller D.D., Bell C.E., Dalton J.T. Crystal structure of the T877A human androgen receptor ligand-binding domain complexed to cyproterone acetate provides insight for ligand-induced conformational changes and structure-based drug design. J. Biol. Chem. 2007, 282:13648-13655.
2. Cantin L., Faucher F., Couture J.F., de Jesus-Tran K.P., Legrand P., Ciobanu L.C., Frechette Y., Labrecque R., Singh S.M., Labrie F., Breton R. Structural characterization of the human androgen receptor ligand-binding domain complexed with EM5744, a rationally designed steroidal ligand bearing a bulky chain directed toward helix 12. J. Biol. Chem. 2007, 282:30910-30919.
3. Chenna R., Sugawara H., Koike T., Lopez R., Gibson T.J., Higgins D.G., Thompson J.D. Multiple sequence alignment with the Clustal series of programs. Nucleic Acids Res. 2003, 31:3497-3500.
4. Cui J.Z., Shen X.Y., Yan Z.W., Zhao H.B., Nagahama Y. Homology-modeled ligand-binding domains of medaka estrogen receptors and androgen receptors: a model system for the study of reproduction. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2009, 380:115-121.
5. De Jesus-Tran K.P., Cote P.L., Cantin L., Blanchet J., Labrie F., Breton R. Comparison of crystal structures of human androgen receptor ligand-binding domain complexed with various agonists reveals molecular determinants responsible for binding affinity. Protein Sci. 2006, 15:987-999.
6. Dehm S.M., Tindall D.J. Androgen receptor structural and functional elements: role and regulation in prostate cancer. Mol. Endocrinol. 2007, 21:2855-2863.
7. Fiser A.S., Sali A. MODELLER: generation and refinement of homology-based protein structure models. Macromol. Crystallogr., Part D 2003, 374:461.
8. Gao W.Q., Bohl C.E., Dalton J.T. Chemistry and structural biology of androgen receptor. Chem. Rev. 2005, 105:3352-3370.
9. Goodsell, D.S., 2005. Representing structural information with RasMol. Curr. Protoc. Bioinformatics, Unit 5.4 (Chapter 5).
10. Guex N., Peitsch M.C. SWISS-MODEL and the Swiss-PdbViewer: an environment for comparative protein modeling. Electrophoresis 1997, 18:2714-2723.
11. Holt P.A., Chaires J.B., Trent J.O. Molecular docking of intercalators and groove-binders to nucleic acids using Autodock and Surflex. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2008, 48:1602-1615.
12. Jorgensen A., Andersen O., Bjerregaard P., Rasmussen L.J. Identification and characterisation of an androgen receptor from zebrafish Danio rerio. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. C 2007, 146:561-568.
13. Kruger T., Long M., Bonefeld-Jorgensen E.C. Plastic components affect the activation of the aryl hydrocarbon and the androgen receptor. Toxicology 2008, 246:112-123.
14. Laskowski R.A., Macarthur M.W., Moss D.S., Thornton J.M. Procheck - a program to check the stereochemical quality of protein structures. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 1993, 26:283-291.
15. Li W.H., Tang Y., Liu H., Cheng J.G., Zhu W.L., Jiang H.L. Probing ligand binding modes of human cytochrome P450 2J2 by homology modeling, molecular dynamics simulation, and flexible molecular docking. Proteins 2008, 71:938-949.
16. Lindahl E., Hess B., van der Spoel D. GROMACS 3.0: a package for molecular simulation and trajectory analysis. J. Mol. Model. 2001, 7:306-317.
17. Lutfullah G., Amin F., Khan Z., Azhar N., Azim M.K., Noor S., Shoukat K. Homology modeling of hemagglutinin/protease [HA/P (vibriolysin)] from Vibrio cholerae: sequence comparison, residue interactions and molecular mechanism. Protein J. 2008, 27:105-114.
18. Marhefka C.A., Moore B.M., Bishop T.C., Kirkovsky L., Mukherjee A., Dalton J.T., Miller D.D. Homology modeling using multiple molecular dynamics simulations and docking studies of the human androgen receptor ligand binding domain bound to testosterone and nonsteroidal ligands. J. Med. Chem. 2001, 44:1729-1740.
19. Pandini A., Denison M.S., Song Y.J., Soshilov A.A., Bonati L. Structural and functional characterization of the aryl hydrocarbon receptor ligand binding domain by homology modeling and mutational analysis. Biochemistry (Mosc.) 2007, 46:696-708.
20. Sali A., Potterton L., Yuan F., Vanvlijmen H., Karplus M. Evaluation of comparative protein modeling by MODELER. Proteins 1995, 23:318-326.
21. Soderholm A.A., Lehtovuori P.T., Nyronen T.H. Three-dimensional structure-activity relationships of nonsteroidal ligands in complex with androgen receptor ligand-binding domain. J. Med. Chem. 2005, 48:917-925.
22. Soderholm A.A., Viiliainen J., Lehtovuori P.T., Eskelinen H., Roell D., Baniahmad A., Nyronen T.H. Computationally identified novel diphenyl- and phenylpyridine androgen receptor antagonist structures. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2008, 48:1882-1890.
23. Tamura H., Ishimoto Y., Fujikawa T., Aoyama H., Yoshikawa H., Akamatsu M. Structural basis for androgen receptor agonists and antagonists: interaction of SPEED 98-listed chemicals and related compounds with the androgen receptor based on an in vitro reporter gene assay and 3D-QSAR. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2006, 14:7160-7174.
24. Tamura K., Dudley J., Nei M., Kumar S. MEGA4: Molecular evolutionary genetics analysis (MEGA) software version 4.0. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2007, 24:1596-1599.
25. Van Brussel H., Wyns J., Valckenaers P., Bongaerts L., Peeters P. Reference architecture for holonic manufacturing systems: PROSA. Comput. Ind. 1998, 37:255-274.
26. Wells K., Van Der Kraak G. Differential binding of endogenous steroids and chemicals to androgen receptors in rainbow trout and goldfish. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 2000, 19:2059-2065.
27. Wilson V.S., Cardon M.C., Gray L.E., Hartig P.C. Competitive binding comparison of endocrine-disrupting compounds to recombinant androgen receptor from fathead minnow, rainbow trout, and human. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 2007, 26:1793-1802.
28. Wu B., Zhang Y., Kong J., Zhang X., Cheng S. In silico predication of nuclear hormone receptors for organic pollutants by homology modeling and molecular docking. Toxicol. Lett. 2009, 191:69-73.