In silico predication of nuclear hormone receptors for organic pollutants by homology modeling and molecular docking

Toxicology Letters

Volumn 191, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 69-73

  Wu, Bing ^a   Zhang, Yan ^a   Kong, Jie ^a   Zhang, Xuxiang ^a   Cheng, Shupei ^a  

^a NANJING UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

Homology modeling; Molecular docking; Nuclear hormone receptors; Organic pollutants

Indexed keywords

2,2',4,4',5,5' HEXACHLOROBIPHENYL; 3,3',4,4',5 PENTACHLOROBIPHENYL; ANDROSTANE RECEPTOR; AROMATIC HYDROCARBON RECEPTOR; BENZO[A]PYRENE; HORMONE RECEPTOR; ORGANIC COMPOUND; POLYBROMINATED DIPHENYL ETHER; POLYCHLORINATED DIBENZOFURAN; PREGNANE X RECEPTOR; PYRENE; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; ARTICLE; BINDING AFFINITY; CRYSTAL STRUCTURE; GEOMETRY; HUMAN; LIGAND BINDING; MOLECULAR DOCKING; MOLECULAR MODEL; NONHUMAN; POLLUTANT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN DOMAIN; RAT; SEQUENCE ALIGNMENT; SEQUENCE HOMOLOGY; STEREOCHEMISTRY;

ANIMALS; BENZOFURANS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; CRYSTALLIZATION; ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTANTS; HORMONES; MODELS, MOLECULAR; MOLECULAR CONFORMATION; POLYBROMINATED BIPHENYLS; POLYCHLORINATED BIPHENYLS; RATS; RECEPTORS, ARYL HYDROCARBON; RECEPTORS, CYTOPLASMIC AND NUCLEAR; RECEPTORS, STEROID;

ANIMALIA; RATTUS; RUMEX;

EID: 70449519407     PISSN: 03784274     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.toxlet.2009.08.005     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Andrysik Z., Vondracek J., Machala M., Krcmar P., Svihalkova-Sindlerova L., Kranz A., Weiss C., Faust D., Kozubik A., and Dietrich C. The aryl hydrocarbon receptor-dependent deregulation of cell cycle control induced by polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in rat liver epithelial cells. Mutat. Res., Fundam. Mol. Mech. Mutagen. 615 (2007) 87-97
2. Baroukiabi R., Coumoul X., and Fernandez-Salgueroc P.M. The aryl hydrocarbon receptor, more than a xenobiotic-interacting protein. FEBS Lett. 581 (2007) 3608-3615
3. Bemis J.C., Nazarenko D.A., and Gasiewicz T.A. Coplanar polychlorinated biphenyls activate the aryl hydrocarbon receptor in developing tissues of two TCDD-responsive lacZ mouse lines. Toxicol. Sci. 87 (2005) 529-536
4. Giesy J.P., and Kannan K. Dioxin-like and non-dioxin-like toxic effects of polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs): implications for risk assessment. Crit. Rev. Toxicol. 28 (1998) 511-569
5. Goodsell, D.S., 2005. Representing structural information with RasMol. Curr Protoc Bioinformatics Chapter 5, Unit 5.4.
6. Guex N., and Peitsch M.C. SWISS-MODEL and the Swiss-PdbViewer: an environment for comparative protein modeling. Electrophoresis 18 (1997) 2714-2723
7. Hahn M.E. The aryl hydrocarbon receptor: a comparative perspective. Comp. Biochem. Physiol., Part C: Toxicol. Pharmacol. 121 (1998) 23-53
8. Holt P.A., Chaires J.B., and Trent J.O. Molecular docking of intercalators and groove-binders to nucleic acids using Autodock and Surflex. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 48 (2008) 1602-1615
9. Jacobs M.N., Dickins M., and Lewis D.F.V. Homology modelling of the nuclear receptors: human oestrogen receptor beta (hER beta), the human pregnane X receptor (PXR), the Ah receptor (AhR) and the constitutive androstane receptor (CAR) ligand binding domains from the human oestrogen receptor alpha (hER alpha) crystal structure, and the human peroxisome proliferator activated receptor alpha (PPAR alpha) ligand binding domain from the human PPAR gamma crystal structure. J. Steroid Biochem. Mol. Biol. 84 (2003) 117-132
10. Jain A.N. Surflex-Dock 2.1: Robust performance from ligand energetic modeling, ring flexibility, and knowledge-based search. J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des. 21 (2007) 281-306
11. Janosek J., Hilscherova K., Blaha L., and Holoubek I. Environmental xenobiotics and nuclear receptors-interactions, effects and in vitro assessment. Toxicol. In Vitro 20 (2006) 18-37
12. Kakizaki S., Yamazaki Y., Takizawa D., and Negishi M. New insights on the xenobiotic-sensing nuclear receptors in liver diseases-CAR and PXR. Curr. Drug Metab. 9 (2008) 614-621
13. Kellenberger E., Rodrigo J., Muller P., and Rognan D. Comparative evaluation of eight docking tools for docking and virtual screening accuracy. Proteins: Struct., Funct., Bioinf. 57 (2004) 225-242
14. Laskowski R.A., Macarthur M.W., Moss D.S., and Thornton J.M. Procheck-a program to check the stereochemical quality of protein structures. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 26 (1993) 283-291
15. Li W.H., Tang Y., Liu H., Cheng J.G., Zhu W.L., and Jiang H.L. Probing ligand binding modes of human cytochrome P450 2J2 by homology modeling, molecular dynamics simulation, and flexible molecular docking. Proteins: Struct., Funct., Bioinf. 71 (2008) 938-949
16. Lutfullah G., Amin F., Khan Z., Azhar N., Azim M.K., Noor S., and Shoukat K. Homology modeling of hemagglutinin/protease [HA/P (vibriolysin)] from Vibrio cholerae: sequence comparision, residue interactions and molecular mechanism. Protein J. 27 (2008) 105-114
17. McAlister D.R., Fern M.J., and Allen R.L. Rapid aryl hydrocarbon receptor based polymerase chain reaction screening assay for polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins and furans in soil and sediment. Talanta 74 (2008) 992-997
18. Naspinski C., Gu X.S., Zhou G.D., Mertens-Talcott S.U., Donnelly K.C., and Tian Y.A. Pregnane X receptor protects HepG2 cells from BaP-induced DNA damage. Toxicol. Sci. 104 (2008) 67-73
19. Pandini A., Denison M.S., Song Y.J., Soshilov A.A., and Bonati L. Structural and functional characterization of the aryl hydrocarbon receptor ligand binding domain by homology modeling and mutational analysis. Biochemistry (Mosc.) 46 (2007) 696-708
20. Patel R.D., Hollingshead B.D., Omiecinski C.J., and Perdew G.H. Aryl-hydrocarbon receptor activation regulates constitutive androstane receptor levels in murine and human liver. Hepatology 46 (2007) 209-218
21. Sali A., and Blundell T.L. Comparative protein modeling by satisfaction of spatial restraints. J. Mol. Biol. 234 (1993) 779-815
22. Sanders J.M., Burka L.T., Smith C.S., Black W., James R., and Cunningham M.L. Differential expression of CYP1A, 2B, and 3A genes in the F344 rat following exposure to a polybrominated diphenyl ether mixture or individual components. Toxicol. Sci. 88 (2005) 127-133
23. Savouret J.F., Berdeaux A., and Casper R.F. The aryl hydrocarbon receptor and its xenobiotic ligands: a fundamental trigger for cardiovascular diseases. Nutr. Metab. Cardiovasc. Dis. 13 (2003) 104-113
24. Shan L., Vincent J., Brunzelle J.S., Dussault I., Lin M., Ianculescu I., Sherman M.A., Forman B.M., and Fernandez E.J. Structure of the murine constitutive androstane receptor complexed to androstenol: a molecular basis for inverse agonism. Mol. Cell 16 (2004) 907-917
25. Staskal D.F., Diliberto J.J., DeVito M.J., and Birnbaum L.S. Inhibition of human and rat CYP1A2 by TCDD and dioxin-like chemicals. Toxicol. Sci. 84 (2005) 225-231
26. Tirona R.G., Leake B.F., Podust L.M., and Kim R.B. Identification of amino acids in rat pregnane X receptor that determine species-specific activation. Mol. Pharmacol. 65 (2004) 36-44
27. Van Brussel H., Wyns J., Valckenaers P., Bongaerts L., and Peeters P. Reference architecture for holonic manufacturing systems: PROSA. Comput. Ind. 37 (1998) 255-274
28. Van der Spoel D., Lindahl E., Hess B., Groenhof G., Mark A.E., and Berendsen H.J.C. GROMACS: fast, flexible, and free. J. Comput. Chem. 26 (2005) 1701-1718
29. Waxman D.J. P450 gene induction by structurally diverse xenochemicals: central role of nuclear receptors CAR, PXR, and PPAR. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 369 (1999) 11-23
30. Windshugel B., Jyrkkarinne J., Vanamo J., Poso A., Honkakoski P., and Sippl W. Comparison of homology models and X-ray structures of the nuclear receptor CAR: assessing the structural basis of constitutive activity. J. Mol. Graphics Modell. 25 (2007) 644-657
31. Yang W., Mu Y., Giesy J.P., Zhang A., and Yu H. Anti-androgen activity of polybrominated diphenyl ethers determined by comparative molecular similarity indices and molecular docking. Chemosphere 75 (2009) 1159-1164