Metabolomics by numbers: Acquiring and understanding global metabolite data

Trends in Biotechnology

Volumn 22, Issue 5, 2004, Pages 245-252

  Goodacre, Royston ^a   Vaidyanathan, Seetharaman ^a   Dunn, Warwick B ^a   Harrigan, George G ^b   Kell, Douglas B ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER   (United Kingdom)

^b PFIZER INC   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIOMARKERS; DATA REDUCTION; DISEASES; DRUG THERAPY; GENES; METABOLISM; METABOLITES;

METABOLOMICS; TRANSCRIPTOMICS;

BIOTECHNOLOGY;

DRUG DEVELOPMENT; METABOLISM;

ACCURACY; ALGORITHM; AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; BIOLOGY; BIOTECHNOLOGY; CHROMATOGRAPHY; DISEASE MARKER; EXPERIMENT; EXTRACTION; GEL CHROMATOGRAPHY; GENE; GENE EXPRESSION; GENE SEQUENCE; GENETIC ANALYSIS; GENOTYPE; HUMAN; INFRARED SPECTROSCOPY; MASS SPECTROMETRY; MEASUREMENT; METABOLISM; METABOLITE; MOLECULAR BIOLOGY; MOLECULAR WEIGHT; NONHUMAN; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE; PHENOTYPE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEOMICS; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; REVIEW; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS; VALIDATION PROCESS;

COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; DATABASES, FACTUAL; GENOME; INTERNET; METABOLISM; SOFTWARE;

EID: 1942470073     PISSN: 01677799     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tibtech.2004.03.007     Document Type: Review

References (88)

1. Fleischmann R.D., et al. Whole-genome random sequencing and assembly of Haemophilus influenzae Rd. Science. 269:1995;496-512.
2. Anderson S., et al. Sequence and organization of the human mitochondrial genome. Nature. 290:1981;457-465.
3. Blattner F.R., et al. The complete genome sequence of Escherichia coli K-12. Science. 277:1997;1453-1474.
4. Venter J.C., et al. The sequence of the human genome. Science. 291:2001;1304-1351.
5. The International Human Genome Mapping Consortium (2001) A physical map of the human genome. Nature 409, 934-941.
6. Fiehn O. Metabolomics - the link between genotypes and phenotypes. Plant Mol. Biol. 48:2002;155-171.
7. Oliver S.G., et al. Systematic functional analysis of the yeast genome. Trends Biotechnol. 16:1998;373-378.
8. Beecher C.W.W. The human metabolome. Harrigan G.G., Goodacre R. Metabolic Profiling: its Role in Biomarker Discovery and Gene Function Analysis. 2003;311-319 Kluwer Academic Publishers.
9. Fell D.A. Understanding the Control of Metabolism. 1996;Portland Press.
10. Kell D.B., Mendes P. Snapshots of systems: metabolic control analysis and biotechnology in the post-genomic era. Cornish-Bowden A., Cárdenas M.L. Technological and Medical Implications of Metabolic Control Analysis. 2000;3-25 Kluwer Academic Publishers.
11. Raamsdonk L.M., et al. A functional genomics strategy that uses metabolome data to reveal the phenotype of silent mutations. Nat. Biotechnol. 19:2001;45-50.
12. Urbanczyk-Wochniak E., et al. Parallel analysis of transcript and metabolic profiles: a new approach in systems biology. EMBO Rep. 4:2003;989-993.
13. ter Kuile B.H., Westerhoff H.V. Transcriptome meets metabolome: hierarchical and metabolic regulation of the glycolytic pathway. FEBS Lett. 500:2001;169-171.
14. Wilson I.D., Nicholson J.K. Topics in xenobiochemistry: do metabolic pathways exist for xenobiotics? The micro-metabolism hypothesis. Xenobiotica. 33:2003;887-901.
15. Sanders G.H.W., Manz A. Chip-based microsystems for genomic and proteomic analysis. Trends Anal. Chem. 19:2000;364-378.
16. Mann M., et al. Analysis of proteins and proteomes by mass spectrometry. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 70:2001;437-473.
17. Kell D.B., Oliver S.G. Here is the evidence, now what is the hypothesis? The complementary roles of inductive and hypothesis-driven science in the post-genomic era. BioEssays. 26:2004;99-105.
18. Lindon J.C., et al. So what's the deal with metabonomics? Metabonomics measures the fingerprint of biochemical perturbations caused by disease, drugs, and toxins. Anal. Chem. 75:2003;384A-391A.
19. Nicholson J.K., Wilson I.D. Understanding 'global' systems biology: metabonomics and the continuum of metabolism. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 2:2003;668-676.
20. 1H-NMR-based metabonomics. Nat. Med. 8:2002;1439-1444.
21. Tolstikov V.V., Fiehn O. Analysis of highly polar compounds of plant origin: combination of hydrophilic interaction chromatography and electrospray ion trap mass spectrometry. Anal. Biochem. 301:2002;298-307.
22. Shellie R., et al. Concepts and preliminary observations on the triple dimensional analysis of complex volatile samples by using GC×GC-TOF MS. Anal. Chem. 73:2001;1336-1344.
23. Weckwerth, W. et al. (2001) Metabolomic characterization of transgenic potato plants using GC/TOF and LC/MS analysis reveals silent metabolic phenotypes. In Proceedings of the 49th ASMS Conference on Mass Spectrometry American Society of Mass Spectrometry, Chicago.
24. Duran A.L., et al. Metabolomics spectral formatting, alignment and conversion tools (MSFACTs). Bioinformatics. 19:2003;2283-2293.
25. van Mispelaar V.G., et al. Quantitative analysis of target components by comprehensive two-dimensional gas chromatography. J. Chromatogr. A. 1019:2003;15-29.
26. Ivanova P.T., et al. Electrospray ionization mass spectrometry analysis of changes in phospholipids in RBL-2H3 mastocytoma cells during degranulation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 98:2001;7152-7157.
27. Allen J., et al. High-throughput classification of yeast mutants for functional genomics via metabolic footprinting. Nat. Biotechnol. 21:2003;692-696.
28. Aharoni A., et al. Nontargeted metabolome analysis by use of Fourier transform ion cyclotron mass spectrometry. OMICS. 6:2002;217-234.
29. Rashed M.S. Clinical applications of tandem mass spectrometry: ten years of diagnosis and screening for inherited metabolic diseases. J. Chromatogr. B. 758:2001;27-48.
30. Petrich W. Mid-infrared and Raman spectroscopy for medical diagnostics. Appl. Spectrosc. Rev. 36:2001;181-237.
31. Alm E., Arkin A.P. Biological networks. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 13:2003;193-202.
32. Brenner S.E. Errors in genome annotation. Trends Genet. 15:1999;132-133.
33. Goodacre R., Kell D.B. Correction of mass spectral drift using artificial neural networks. Anal. Chem. 68:1996;271-280.
34. Brazma A., et al. Minimum information about a microarray experiment (MIAME) - toward standards for microarray data. Nat. Genet. 29:2001;365-371.
35. Taylor C.F., et al. A systematic approach to modeling, capturing, and disseminating proteomics experimental data. Nat. Biotechnol. 21:2003;247-254.
36. Hardy F., Fuell H. Databases, data modelling and schemas. Harrigan G.G., Goodacre R. Metabolic Profiling: Its Role in Biomarker Discovery and Gene Function Analysis. 2003;Kluwer Academic Publishers.
37. Barabási A.-L., Oltvai Z.N. Network biology: understanding the cell's functional organization. Nat. Rev. Genet. 5:2004;101-113.
38. Kell, D.B. Metabolomics and systems biology: making sense of the soup. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. (in press).
39. Leggewie G., et al. Overexpression of the sucrose transporter SoSUT1 in potato results in alterations in leaf carbon partitioning but has little impact on tuber morphology. Planta. 217:2003;158-167.
40. Westerhoff H.V., Kell D.B. Matrix method for determining the steps most rate-limiting to metabolic fluxes in biotechnological processes. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 30:1987;101-107.
41. Snoep J.L., et al. Protein burden in Zymomonas mobilis - negative flux and growth-control due to overproduction of glycolytic enzymes. Microbiology. 141:1995;2329-2337.
42. Jeong H., et al. The large-scale organization of metabolic networks. Nature. 407:2000;651-654.
43. Wagner A., Fell D.A. The small world inside large metabolic networks. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B. 268:2001;1803-1810.
44. Weckwerth W., Fiehn O. Can we discover novel pathways using metabolomic analysis? Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 13:2002;156-160.
45. Steuer R., et al. Observing and interpreting correlations in metabolomic networks. Bioinformatics. 19:2003;1019-1026.
46. Kholodenko B.N., et al. Untangling the wires: a strategy to trace functional interactions in signaling and gene networks. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 99:2002;12841-12846.
47. Jing Li X., et al. Databases and visualization for metabolomics. Harrigan G.G., Goodacre R. Metabolic Profiling: Its Role in Biomarker Discovery and Gene Function Analysis. 2003;Kluwer Academic Publishers.
48. Hastie T., et al. The Elements of Statistical Learning: Data Mining, Inference and Prediction. 2001;Springer-Verlag.
49. Altshuler D., et al. Guilt by association. Nat. Genet. 26:2000;135-137.
50. Kell D.B., King R.D. On the optimization of classes for the assignment of unidentified reading frames in functional genomics programmes: the need for machine learning. Trends Biotechnol. 18:2000;93-98.
51. White H. Artificial Neural Networks: Approximation and Learning Theory. 1992;Blackwell.
52. Tickle A.B., et al. The truth will come to light: directions and challenges in extracting the knowledge embedded within trained artificial neural networks. IEEE Trans. Neural Netw. 9:1998;1057-1068.
53. Seasholtz M.B., Kowalski B. The parsimony principle applied to multivariate calibration. Anal. Chim. Acta. 277:1993;165-177.
54. Maddox J.S. Towards more measurement in biology. Nature. 368:1994;95.
55. Kell D.B. Genotype:phenotype mapping: genes as computer programs. Trends Genet. 18:2002;555-559.
56. Oldroyd, D. (1986) The Arch of Knowledge: an Introduction to the History of the Philosophy and Methodology of Science, Methuen.
57. Flach P.A., Kakas A.C. Induction and Abduction: Essays on their Relation and Integration. 2000;Kluwer Academic Publishers.
58. Brent R. Genomic biology. Cell. 100:2000;169-183.
59. Koza J.R., et al. Genetic Programming: Routine Human-Competitive Machine Intelligence. 2003;Kluwer Academic Publishers.
60. Breiman L., et al. Classification and Regression Trees. 1984;Wadsworth Inc.
61. Muggleton S. Inductive logic programming: issues, results and the challenge of learning language in logic. Artif. Intell. 114:1999;283-296.
62. Kell D.B. Metabolomics and machine learning: explanatory analysis of complex metabolome data using genetic programming to produce simple, robust rules. Mol. Biol. Rep. 29:2002;237-241.
63. von Bertalanffy L. General System Theory. 1969;George Braziller.
64. Kitano H. Systems biology: a brief overview. Science. 295:2002;1662-1664.
65. Weckwerth W. Metabolomics in systems biology. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 54:2003;669-689.
66. Hucka M., et al. The systems biology markup language (SBML): a medium for representation and exchange of biochemical network models. Bioinformatics. 19:2003;524-531.
67. Kell D.B., Westerhoff H.V. Metabolic control theory - its role in microbiology and biotechnology. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 39:1986;305-320.
68. Sweetlove L.J., et al. Predictive metabolic engineering: a goal for systems biology. Plant Physiol. 132:2003;420-425.
69. Kacser H. On parts and wholes in metabolism. Welch G.R., Clegg J.S. The Organization of Cell Metabolism. 1986;327-337 Plenum Press.
70. Fiehn O. Combining genomics, metabolome analysis, and biochemical modelling to understand metabolic networks. Comp. Funct. Genomics. 2:2001;155-168.
71. Harrigan, G.G. and Goodacre, R. (2003) Metabolic Profiling: Its Role in Biomarker Discovery and Gene Function Analysis, pp. 335, Kluwer Academic Publishers.
72. Nicholson J.K., et al. 'Metabonomics': understanding the metabolic responses of living systems to pathophysiological stimuli via multivariate statistical analysis of biological NMR spectroscopic data. Xenobiotica. 29:1999;1181-1189.
73. Mendes P. Emerging bioinformatics for the metabolome. Brief. Bioinform. 3:2002;134-145.
74. Kanehisa M., et al. The KEGG databases at GenomeNet. Nucleic Acids Res. 30:2002;42-46.
75. Famili I., et al. Saccharomyces cerevisiae phenotypes can be predicted by using constraint-based analysis of a genome-scale reconstructed metabolic network. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 100:2003;13134-13139.
76. Förster J., et al. Genome-scale reconstruction of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae metabolic network. Genome Res. 13:2003;244-253.
77. Ellis D.I., Goodacre R. Rapid and quantitative detection of the microbial spoilage of muscle foods: current status and future trends. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 12:2002;413-423.
78. Manly, B.F.J. (1994) Multivariate Statistical Methods: A Primer, Chapman & Hall.
79. Martens, H. and Næs, T. (1989) Multivariate Calibration, John Wiley.
80. Rumelhart, D.E. et al. (1986) Learning internal representations by error propagation. In Parallel Distributed Processing (Volume 1, Foundations) (Rumelhart, D.E. and McClelland, J. eds), MIT Press, Cambridge MA.
81. Broomhead D.S., Lowe D. Multivariable function interpolation and adaptive networks. Complex Syst. 2:1988;321-355.
82. Harrington P.B. Fuzzy rule-building expert systems: minimal neural networks. J. Chemometrics. 5:1991;467-486.
83. Quinlan, J.R. (1993) C4.5: Programs for Machine Learning, Morgan Kaufmann.
84. Bäck, T. et al. (1997) Handbook of Evolutionary Computation, IOP Publishing/Oxford University Press.
85. Reeves, C.R. (2002) Genetic Algorithms - Principles and Perspectives: a Guide to GA Theory, Kluwer Academic Publishers.
86. Kell D.B., et al. Genomic computing. Explanatory analysis of plant expression profiling data using machine learning. Plant Physiol. 126:2001;943-951.
87. King R.D., et al. Functional genomic hypothesis generation and experimentation by a robot scientist. Nature. 427:2004;247-252.
88. Vaidyanathan S., et al. Explanatory optimisation of protein mass spectrometry via genetic search. Anal. Chem. 75:2003;6679-6686.