360 degree assessment (multisource feedback) of UK trainee doctors: Field testing of team assessment of behaviours (TAB)

Medical Teacher

Volumn 29, Issue 2-3, 2007, Pages 171-176

  Whitehouse, Andrew ^a   Hassell, Andrew ^a   Bullock, Alison ^b   Wood, Laurence ^a   Wall, David ^a  

^a West Midlands Deanery ^*  (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BIRMINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BEHAVIOR DISORDER; CLINICAL ASSESSMENT TOOL; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEEDBACK SYSTEM; HUMAN; HUMAN RELATION; INTERVIEW; MEDICAL STUDENT; PROFESSIONAL COMPETENCE; QUESTIONNAIRE; RATING SCALE; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR; TEAM ASSESSMENT OF BEHAVIOR; UNITED KINGDOM; VOLUNTEER;

FEEDBACK, PSYCHOLOGICAL; GREAT BRITAIN; HUMANS; INTERNSHIP AND RESIDENCY; INTERPERSONAL RELATIONS; PROFESSIONAL COMPETENCE;

EID: 34547978320     PISSN: 0142159X     EISSN: 1466187X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/01421590701302951     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Altmaier, EM, Johnson, SR, Tarico, VS and Laube, D. (1988) An empirical specification of residency performance dimensions. Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 72, pp. 126-130.
2. Brennan, RL (2001) Generalizability theory., Springer, New York
3. Davidge, AM and Hull, AL (1990) A system for the evaluation of medical students' clinical competence. J. Med. Edu., 55, pp. 65-67.
4. Dawson-Saunders, B. and Paiva, REA (1986) The validity of clerkship performance evaluations. Med. Edu., 20, pp. 240-245.
5. Dielman, TE, Hull, AL and Davis, WK (1980) Psychometric properties of clinical performance ratings. Evaluation and the Health Professions, 3, pp. 103-117.
6. Evans, R., Elwyn, G. and Edwards, A. (2004) Review of instruments for peer assessment of physicians. Brit. Med. J., 328, pp. 1240-1243.
7. Fletcher, C., Baldry, C. and Cunningham-Snell, N. (1998) The psychometric properties of 360 degree feedback: An empirical study and a cautionary tale. Int. J. Selection and Assessment, 6, pp. 19-34.
8. General Medical Council (2001) Good Medical Practice, General Medical Council, London
9. Linn, BS (1975) Performance self assessment. Brit. J. Med. Edu., 9, pp. 98-101.
10. Maxim, BR and Dielman, TE. (1987) 1987. Dimensionality, internal consistency and interrrater reliability of clinical performance ratings. Med. Edu., 21, pp. 130-137.
11. Modernising Medical Careers Foundation Curriculum (2005) Curriculum for the Foundation Years in Postgraduate Education and Training
12. Mohanna, K., Wall, D. and Chambers, R. (2004) Teaching Made Easy: A Manual for Health Professionals, Radcliffe Medical Press, Abingdon
13. Norcini, JJ, Blank, LL, Duffy, FD and Fortna, GS (2003) The miniCEX: A method for assessing clinical skills. Annals of Internal Med., 138, pp. 476-481.
14. Ramsey, PG, Wenrich, MD, Carline, JD and Larson, EB (1993) Use of peer ratings to evaluate physician performance. J. Amer. Med. Assoc., 269, pp. 1655-1660.
15. Ramsey, PG, Carline, JD, Blank, LL and Wenrich, MJ (1996) Feasibility of hospital-based use of peer ratings to evaluate the performances of practising physicians. Acad. Med., 71, pp. 364-370.
16. Risucci, DA, Tortolania, AJ and Ward, RJ (1989) Ratings of surgical residents by self, supervisors and peers. Surgery Gynaecology and Obstetrics, 169, pp. 519-526.
17. Shavelson, RJ and Webb, NM (1991) Generalizability theory-A primer, Sage Publications, London
18. Whitehouse, AB, Wall, DW and Walzman, M. (2002) Pilot Study of 360° Assessment of personal skills to inform record of in-training assessments for senior house officers. Hosp. Med., 63, pp. 172-175.
19. Whitehouse, AB, Hassell, A., Wood, L., Wall, D., Walzman, M. and Campbell, I. (2005) Development and reliability testing of TAB, a new form for 360° assessment of senior house officers' professional behaviour, as specified by the General Medical Council. Med. Teac., 27, pp. 252-258.